Hearth Record

Vitalcaring Group

A home health agency in Temple, Texas 76502

1616 Azalea Drive Ste 101, Temple, Texas 76502. (254) 751-1600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 22, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 22, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 363 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, within 30 days of completing the assessment of the patient for 36 of 1659 assessments processed for the time reviewed of 06/01/2024 to 12/31/2024. This failure resulted in quality data used to continuously improve the effectiveness of home healthcare failing to be reported to CMS in the required time frame. The findings included: The HHA Error Summary Report, retrieved from the iQIES website for the time of 06/01/2024 to 12/31/2024 was reviewed. Review of the HHA Error Summary Report for the time-period 06/01/2024 to 12/31/2024 identified Error #-3330. The description for Error #-3330 read in part, “Record Submitted Late: The submission date is more than 30 days after M0090 (Item M0090 specifies the date the actual assessment was completed) on this new record.” The documentation further identified the number of assessments with the error was 36 assessments and the percentage of assessments with this error was 2.17% of the total of 1659 assessments completed by the Agency. A joint interview was conducted with the Alternate Administrator and the Regional Director on 4/14/2025 at 4:00 p.m. The HHA Error Summary Report was reviewed with the Alternate Administrator. The Alternate Administrator stated the Agency was not aware of the late submissions of OASIS assessments, however she acknowledged the late submission. The Regional Director also stated that the issue was with the delayed Face to Face dates and completion from providers. During a record review of an Agency policy titled, “OASIS Data Transmission,” dated for revision 12/2024, read in part, “…. The organization will encode and electronically transmit completed OASIS data to the national internet Quality Improvement Evaluation System (iQIES) for each applicable patient within thirty (30) days of completing the assessment of the patient. “”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Coordinate Care Delivery

    The inspectors’ words, 637 words

    “Coordinate care delivery CFR(s): 484.60(d)(4) Coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs, and involve the patient, representative (if any), and caregiver(s), as appropriate, in the coordination of care activities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to coordinate care delivery to ensure patient needs were met in that: Patient #3’s needs were not addressed when Patient #3’s family member notified the Agency of a change in status related to complications involving his indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to facilitate urination). This failure had the potential to place Patient #3 at risk of hospitalization. Review of the clinical record of Patient #3 revealed a start of care date of 5/10/2022 for a primary diagnosis of Encounter for fitting and Adjustment of Urinary Device related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (lower urinary tract symptoms and retention of urine) (care of a catheter inserted inside the male genitals because the client has difficulty passing urine). Further review of the clinical record of Patient #3 revealed an order, dated 4/29/2024, which revealed the following Physician Orders: “skilled nursing visits once weekly, then once every two weeks, with two additional visits as need for catheter care.” Review of the Client #3’s clinical record revealed that the family member of Patient #3 called into the agency on 6/6/2024 and informed the agency that “the foley cath” (urinary indwelling catheter) is not working properly as not urine coming through and would like a nurse to come check it. If a nurse is not available, requesting a call back so that he can take [Patient #3] to urgent care…” Review of the clinical record of Patient #3 for the time-period reviewed revealed that the record did not include documentation that a PRN (as needed) visit was completed between 6/6/2024 to 6/8/2024 Review of the clinical record of Patient #3 revealed nursing visit note from RN E,” dated 6/8/2024, revealed, “[family member] called reporting Foley catheter is out…noted no foley in place upon arrival. [Family member] had supplies on hand…Foley cath placed without difficulty.” During an interview with the Administrative Assistant, on 4/22/2025 at 3:00 p.m., The Administrative Assistant revealed that when she received the call from Patient #3’s family member on 6/6/2024, she informed the Branch Manager verbally at the time of the call. She further revealed that she doesn’t know what the Branch Manager did after the phone call, but it was standard procedure to inform the Branch Manager when a call was received for a visit request. During an interview with the previous Administrator/Alternate Nursing Supervisor on 4/16/2025 at 3:00 p.m., the previous Administrator/Alternate Nursing Supervisor was asked regarding the phone call incident on 6/6/2024, stated she doesn’t recall the incident regarding Patient #3’s foley catheter. During the exit conference on 4/22/2025 at approximately 5:00 PM, the President stated she didn’t know this incident occurred but understands the importance of visiting a patient as soon as possible with issues from a Foley catheter as it is considered an emergency in home care. Review of the Agency’s policy and procedure manual revealed a policy titled “Care/Service Coordination,” dated 12/2024, which read in part, “Timely and ongoing communication is the responsibility of each member of the [care team] and will be appropriate to the needs and abilities of the patient and relevant to the care and service provided. The clinician will be responsible for facilitating communications about changes in the patient’s status among assigned employees…J. Coordination of care delivery to meet the patients’ needs and involve the patient…in the coordination of care activities…11. All organization employees involved in patient care…will have access to the plan of care and other relevant patient information to ensure coordination and continuity. All employees will be knowledgeable regarding patient needs, goals of care and services.””

    Rule G0608. Element-level.

  • Assure Implementation Of Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 750 words

    “Assure implementation of plan of care CFR(s): 484.105(c)(5) Assuring the development, implementation, and updates of the individualized plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the clinical manager failed to ensure the plan of care was implemented for 1 of 18 patients (Patient #11) whose records were reviewed, in that; after a Patient #11 was discharged home from the hospital, and there were no nursing visits done for 33 days. This failure had the potential to place Patient #11 at risk of rehospitalization or serious illness. Review of the clinical record of Patient #11 revealed a start of care date of 6/21/2023 for a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (disease of the lungs). Further review of the clinical record of Patient #11 revealed a plan of care, dated 4/16/2024 which revealed the following Physician Orders: “SN: 1w9 Once a week for 9 weeks… to identify and evaluate co-morbid conditions including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and other conditions that present themselves during the course of this episode to identify changes and intervention to minimize complications…” Review of the clinical record of Patient #11 for the time-period of 4/16/2024 to 6/14/2024 revealed that Patient #11 was hospitalized on 5/2/24 with the diagnosis of Pneumonia (infection of the lungs). Patient was discharged from the hospital 5/9/24 and a skilled nursing visit was made on 5/10/2024 for a resumption of care. Further review of the record of Patient #11 revealed that between 5/11/2024 to 6/14/2024, no nursing visits were made as ordered on the plan of care. Review of case conference documentation on 6/12/2024 by the previous Administrator/ Alternate Nursing Supervisor revealed, “Spoke with patient today regarding her ROC visit a few weeks ago and no visits after the ROC visit completed. Patient stated that she has been fine and didn’t feel like she really needed a nurse, which was why she did not call to inquire about nursing visits. However, she stated that the last few days she hasn’t been feeling as well and would like for the nurse to come assess her and continue HHS (Home Health Services) if warranted. Explained that patient’s EOE (end of event) was this Friday, 6/14/2024, so nurse would need to come tomorrow or Friday. Patient requested recert (recertification) visit on Friday, 6/14/2024, as she has an appt tomorrow. Discussed with scheduler and will put recert (recertification) visit on 6/14/2024.” Review of a client coordination note report dated 6/14/24 by Supervising Nurse revealed, “No return call from message left yesterday. Called patient to try to schedule visit for today. The family member of Patient #11 answered the call, reported patient passed away at home yesterday Thursday 6/13/2024 about 1PM.” During an interview with the previous Administrator/ Alternate Nursing Supervisor on 4/16/2025 at 3:00 p.m., the previous Administrator/Alternate Nursing Supervisor was asked about the phone call on 6/12/2024. She stated she doesn’t recall the incident regarding missed visits for Patient #11. During the exit conference on 4/22/2025 at approximately 5:00 PM, the President stated the incident occurred from a computer error precipitated by RN E, but understands the importance of ongoing visits of a patient that was hospitalized with issues of post hospitalization pneumonia. She also stated that measures have been put in place to prevent this incident from recurring. Review of the Agency’s policy and procedure manual revealed a policy titled “Ongoing Assessments,” dated 12/2024, which read in part, “The scope and intensity of ongoing assessments will be determined by the patient’s diagnoses, condition, desire for care, response to previous care, and the care setting…1. During each home visit, the appropriate clinician will re-evaluate the patient according to the problems identified during the initial visit and thereafter the comprehensive assessment…C. Factors that alleviate or exacerbate physical symptoms…” Review of the Agency’s policy and procedure manual revealed a policy titled “Home Health Plan of Care Process,” dated 12/2024, which read in part, “…2. All clinicians will consider the conclusion of initial and ongoing assessment in their care planning, including but not limited to: A. Individualized patient needs and …problems related to care, functional status and family/caregiver support system B: Changes in patient’s condition…J. Specific services and treatment to be provided…S. A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors...14. Services to be provided will be based on the prioritized needs of the patient… Each patient will be monitored for … response to care…””

    Rule G0968. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 22, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 22, 1981.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • At Home Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 5, 2020.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Mishalene Nash (corporate officer); Mishalene Nash (managing employee (on the payroll)); Chris Walker (corporate officer); Janice Riggins (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Tvg Np Homecare Sponsorco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 30, 2021
Homecare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Topco, Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 31, 2021
Homecare Holdings Texas, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Topco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 30, 2021
At Home Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 5, 2020
Vistria Fund III (Ft) LPOwns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition Subco II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Nautic Partners Ix, LPOwns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition Subco I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Vistria Fund III LPOwns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021
Nautic Partners Ix-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companiesJul 30, 2021

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (275 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.58% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.20% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.52% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76502, where this agency’s office is, 29 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.