Cornerstone Home Health, Inc.
A home health agency in Bethany, Oklahoma 73008
8370 NW 39th Expressway, Bethany, Oklahoma 73008. (405) 354-5454.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- Not rated quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 29, 2023: a recertification inspection.
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 29, 2023: recertification inspection7 deficiencies
-
Make Complaints To The Hha
The inspectors’ words, 130 words
“Make complaints to the HHA CFR(s): 484.50(c)(3) Make complaints to the HHA regarding treatment or care that is (or fails to be) furnished, and the lack of respect for property and/or person by anyone who is furnishing services on behalf of the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure administrative policy information related to agency grievance procedures were included in patient rights admission information for all patients. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no agency policy/processes indentifying the agency’s grievance procedures included in patient rights admission information for patients. On 11/29/23 at 11:30 a.m., Staff B stated the patient information booklets did not contain agency administrative policy/process information related to agency grievance procedures for the patients.”
-
State Toll Free Hh Telephone Hotline
The inspectors’ words, 135 words
“State toll free HH telephone hotline CFR(s): 484.50(c)(9) Be advised of the state toll free home health telephone hot line, its contact information, its hours of operation, and that its purpose is to receive complaints or questions about local HHAs. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure OSDH complaint hotline contact information was included as a part of the agency’s grievance and complaint procedures in the patient admission information packets for all patients. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no OSDH complaint hotline contact information included in patient rights admission information packets. On 11/29/23 at 11:30 a.m., Staff B stated the agency’s administrative grievance policies/processes and the OSDH complaint hotline contact information were not included in patient admission booklets for the agency.”
-
Rn Performs Assessment
The inspectors’ words, 223 words
“RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure initial patient assessment occurred within 48 hours of referral and showed no coordination between the agency and physician for one (Patient #1) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of a plan of care dated 10/20/23 to 12/18/23 showed a primary diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type II. Documentation showed a referral date of 10/17/23 and an initial assessment/start of care date of 10/20/23. Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal for initial assessment/start of care and no coordination of care communications with the physician related to delay in initial assessment/start of care for agency services. On 11/29/23 at 10:50 a.m., Staff B stated the clinical record showed no documentation of delay of care /initial assessment for agency services or coordination of care communications with the physician for patient #1.”
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 450 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure individualized patient POC included: 1. Identification of wound sites and wound care interventions for two (Patient #2 and #3) of eight and; 2. Skilled nursing intervention goals for one (Patient #4) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #2 A review of the POC dated 09/22/23 to 11/20/23 showed orders for SN for wound care management assessment and instruction. POC documentation showed no identified wound sites or ordered wound care interventions. Documentation showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 10:55 a.m., Staff C stated POC for patient #2 did not identify the wound care sites or wound care interventions. Patient #3 A review of the POC dated 10/06/23 to 12/04/23 showed orders for SN for wound care management assessment each visit. POC documentation showed no identified wound sites or ordered wound care interventions. Documentation showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 11:10 a.m., Staff C stated POC for patient #3 did not identify the wound care sites or wound care interventions. Patient #4 A review of the POC dated 10/06/23 to 12/04/23 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for three weeks, zero time a week for two weeks, one time a week for one week, zero time a week for one week, then one time a week for three weeks to assess and instruct disease management processes. POC documentation showed no skilled nursing intervention goals. Documentation showed no SN visits were conducted between 10/08/23 and 11/25/23. Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of care, physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 11:10 a.m., Staff C stated POC for patient #4 did not include skilled nursing intervention goals.”
-
Only As Ordered By A Physician
The inspectors’ words, 158 words
“Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to ensure an OT evaluation with implementation of a subsequent treatment plan was ordered for one (Patient #3) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 10/06/23 to 12/04/23 showed no ordered OT evaluation. Documentation showed an OT evaluation with subsequent OT treatment plan implementation on 11/02/23. Documentation of the OT evaluation and OT visits were not available for review in the clinical record. Documentation showed no orders for OT evaluation and treatment and no physician notification of the OT evaluation and approval of the treatment plan. On 11/29/23 at 11:10 a.m., Staff C stated a physician’s order for OT evaluation and treatment should have been obtained prior to the implementation of OT services.”
-
Provide Services In The Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 743 words
“Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. SN conducted assessments of patients pain every visit and report to the physician pain level greater than 6 for one (Patient #1) of eight patients; 2. PT conducted evaluation and implemented treatment plan for one (Patient #1) of eight patients; 3. SN visits were conducted for four (Patients #2, 3, 4 and 5) of eight patient. Findings: Patient #1 A review of a plan of care dated 10/20/23 to 12/18/23 showed a primary diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type II. Documentation showed a pain reporting parameter of greater than 6 and orders for a PT evaluation with implementation of subsequent treatment plan. Documentation showed during SN visit conducted on 10/20/23 a patient reported a pain level of eight. Documentation showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. Documentation showed no PT evaluation with implementation of subsequent treatment plan was conducted. Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of PT evaluation, no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 10:50 a.m., Staff C stated the SN should have reported then patient’s reported pain level of 8 and the PT evaluation should have been conducted and/or any patient/caregiver refusal of the PT evaluation should have been documented with notification to the physician for a change in orders. Patient #2 A review of a POC dated 09/22/23 to 11/20/23, showed orders for a SN visit frequency of zero week one, one week one, zero week two, one week one, zero week one, one week one, then one time a week for two weeks. Documentation showed during the week 10/22/23 to 10/28/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted or documented) and week 11/05/23 to 11/11/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted or documented). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of the SN visits, no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 10:55 a.m., Staff C stated the SN should have conducted and documented the SN visit as ordered in the POC. Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 10/06/23 to 12/04/23, showed orders for a SN visit frequency of one week one, zero week one, one week one, then one time a week for six weeks. Documentation showed during the week 11/05/23 to 11/11/23 no SN visit was conducted (two visits ordered, no visit conducted or documented); 11/12/23 to 11/18/23 SN visit conducted by MD on 11/17/23 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted) and week 11/19/23 to 11/25/23 no SN visit was conducted (two visit ordered, no visit conducted or documented). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of the SN visits, no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 11:10 a.m., Staff C stated the SN should have conducted and documented the SN visit as ordered in the POC. Patient #4 A review of a POC dated 10/06/23 to 12/04/23, showed orders for a SN visit frequency of one week three, zero week two, one week one, zero week one, then one time a week for three weeks. Documentation showed during the week 10/08/23 to 10/14/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visits ordered, no visit conducted or documented); 10/15/23 to 10/21/23 no SN visit conducted (one visits ordered, one visit conducted); week 11/05/23 to 11/11/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted or documented) and week 11/19/23 to 11/25/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted or documented). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of the SN visits, no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 11:15 a.m., Staff C stated the SN should have conducted and documented the SN visit as ordered in the POC. Patient #5 A review of a POC dated 05/27/23 to 07/25/23, showed orders for a SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed during the week 07/16/23 to 07/22/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visits ordered, no visit conducted or documented). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of the SN visits, no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 11/29/23 at 11:20 a.m., Staff C stated the SN should have conducted and documented the SN visit as ordered in the POC.”
-
Preparing Clinical Notes
The inspectors’ words, 136 words
“Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure SN visit notes were started, completed and authenticated for one (Patients #1) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #1 A plan of care dated 10/20/23 to 12/18/23 documented a principal diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type II. Documentation showed a SN visit frequency of two times a week for one week, then one times a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed SN visits notes on 11/24/23 were not started (blank), completed and authenticated by the SN. On 11/29/23 at 10:50 a.m., Staff B stated visit notes are to be accepted by the staff at the start of the visit and completed and signed by staff within one day of the visit.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2023 | Recertification inspection | 7 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 25, 2007.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
- Doesn’t offer medical social services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Hearl Callison (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Balinda Callison (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Balinda Callison (owns 5% or more through other companies); Balinda Callison (holds 5% or more of the mortgage); Balinda Callison (holds 5% or more security interest); Balinda Callison (corporate officer); Balinda Callison (corporate director); Balinda Callison (managing employee (on the payroll)); Balinda Callison (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 68.28% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Cornerstone Home Health, Inc. This home health agency | Not given |
| United Home Health Care Inc. | Not given |
| SSM Health at Home Home Health - Oklahoma | 3 |
| Mercy Home Health | 4 |
| Integris Home Care Oklahoma City | 2.5 |
| Choice Homecare of Oklahoma | 4 |
| Enhabit Home Health of Central Oklahoma | 2.5 |
| Angels Care Home Health of Oklahoma | 4 |
| A Path of Care Home Health III, Inc. | 4 |
| Carter Healthcare of Central Oklahoma, LLC | 4 |
| Excell Home Care | 4 |
| Golden Age Home Health | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.