Hearth Record

Entrust Home Health

A home health agency in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118

5104 N Francis, Suite 100, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118. (405) 778-6270.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 15, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an individualized patient POC for one (Pt #5) of 17 patients. Findings: Pt #5 A review of the plan of care dated 12/13/24 to 02/10/25 documented a principal diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease. The POC showed orders for skilled nurse/therapist to assess patient/caregiver’s knowledge of disease processes with emphasis on musculoskeletal system and integumentary systems. The POC showed no orders for skilled nurse/therapist to assess patient/caregiver’s knowledge of disease processes with emphasis on the primary diagnosis and many secondary diagnoses of the cardiovascular and genitourinary systems. On 01/15/25 at 11:35 am, Staff D stated the POC for Pt #5 was not patient specific.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Other Pertinent Instructions

    The inspectors’ words, 239 words

    “Other pertinent instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(4) Any other pertinent instruction related to the patient’s care and treatments that the HHA will provide, specific to the patient’s care needs. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to ensure a caregiver was trained on the patient’s wound care as ordered by the physician for one (Pt’s #4) of 17. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the EMR showed a POC dated 12/13/24 to 02/10/25 with a physician ordered SN frequency of once a week for one week and three times a week for three weeks. The POC documented orders for SN to instruct patient/caregiver on wound care as follows to left heel: cleanse with sterile water and pat dry. Apply gauze impregnated with Medi honey to wound bed and cover with a hydrocolloid dressing then secure with transparent film. Change three times a week and prn and cover with a hydrocolloid dressing then secure with transparent film. The EMR showed missed visits 12/25/24 and 01/01/25 documenting: Patient’s husband able to assist. A review of SN visits notes prior to these missed visits didn’t document the patient’s husband was educated on wound care and could competently show a return demonstration of the ordered wound care. On 01/15/25 at 11:30 a.m., Staff D stated SN documentation didn’t show that the spouse was instructed and able to provide competent return demonstration of the wound care.”

    Rule G0620. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 15, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 7, 2001.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Physician’s Choice Health Care LLC owns an unstated share directly since May 21, 2007.
  • Physician’s Choice Health Care LLC runs it.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Channing King (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Terri King (owns 5% or more directly); Terri King (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Physician’s Choice Health Care LLCOwns 5% or more directlyMay 21, 2007
Physician’s Choice Health Care LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)May 21, 2007

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (333 surveys completed): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.84% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate5.49% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.17% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 46 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73118, where this agency’s office is, 43 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.