Hearth Record

Victory Home Health, LLC

A home health agency in Tishomingo, Oklahoma 73460

750 East Main St., Tishomingo, Oklahoma 73460. (580) 371-2002.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 6, 2023: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 6, 2023: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 226 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure weights were obtained as ordered for two (Patient #2 and 6) of 11 patients. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 08/07/23 to 10/05/23 showed orders to obtain weights every skilled nurse visit and documented a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for one week and one visit per week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical records showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/11/23 documented no weight. A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/31/23 documented no weight. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/07/23 documented no weight. Patient #6 A review of the plan of care dated 08/23/23 to 10/21/23 showed orders to obtain weights every skilled nurse visit and documented a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for one week and one visit per week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical records showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/30/23 documented no weight. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/29/23 documented no weight. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/13/23 documented no weight. On 12/06/23 at 12:50 pm., Staff C stated weights were not obtained as ordered for Patient #2 and 6.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level.

  • Coordination Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 379 words

    “Coordination of Care CFR(s): 484.60(d) Standard: Coordination of care. The HHA must: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure coordination of care for the management of pain for one (Patient #2) of 11 patients. A review of the plan of care dated 08/07/23 to 10/05/23 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease and documented a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for one week and one visit per week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical records showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/11/23 documented a pain level of 10 our of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/18/23 documented a pain level of 10 out of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/25/23 documented a pain level of 10 out of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/31/23 documented a pain level of 8 out of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/21/23 documented a pain level of 10 out of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/29/23 documented a pain level of 10 out of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. A skilled nurse assessment dated 10/05/23 documented a pain level of 10 out of 10 (on the classic pain scale) and the physician was notified. There was no documented follow up to the reported pain level. On 12/06/23 at 1:10 pm., Staff C stated there was no follow up regarding physician notification of the elevated pain level and the patient pain was not managed.”

    Rule G0600. Standard-level.

  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 227 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed to ensure the accuracy of the primary diagnosis documented on skilled nurse assessments for one (Patient #2) of 11 patients. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 08/07/23 to 10/05/23 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with chronic kidney disease and documented a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for one week and one visit per week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/30/23 documented a primary diagnosis of spinal stenosis. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/07/23 documented a primary diagnosis of spinal stenosis. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/15/23 documented a primary diagnosis of spinal stenosis. A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/29/23 documented a primary diagnosis of spinal stenosis. A skilled nurse assessment dated 10/13/23 documented a primary diagnosis of spinal stenosis. On 12/06/23 at 12:50 pm, Staff C stated the primary diagnosis documented on the skilled nurse assessments for Patient #2 was incorrect.”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level.

  • Coordinate Patient Care

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Coordinate patient care CFR(s): 484.105(c)(2) Coordinating patient care, This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure coordination of care was provided for one (Patient #6) of 11 patients. Patients #6 A review of the plan of care dated 08/23/23 to 10/21/23 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart with chronic kidney disease and documented orders for a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for one week and one visit per week for eight weeks. A skilled nurse missed visit note dated 09/29/23 documented the reason for the missed visits was due to the patient being in the hospital related to chronic kidney disease. On 12/05/23 at 2:20 pm., assisted living staff A stated they had attempted to contact he agency regarding fluid coming from the patient ankles and the agency failed to return their call, so the patient was sent to the emergency room. On 12/06/23 at 1:10 pm., Staff C stated she was unaware of the incident.”

    Rule G0962. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 6, 2023Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 3, 1997.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Kimberly Cripps (corporate officer, 100%); Kimberly Cripps (corporate director, 100%); Kimberly Cripps (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Misty Shackelford (corporate director, 80%); Misty Shackelford (managing employee (on the payroll), 80%); Kimberly Cripps (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Jill Parham (owns 5% or more directly, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (153 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, worse.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate73.22% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.22% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate6.71% (worse than the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73460, where this agency’s office is, 16 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.25 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.