Brookestone Home Health Care
A home health agency in Elkhorn, Nebraska 68022
600 Brookestone Meadows Plz Ste100, Elkhorn, Nebraska 68022. (402) 932-9406.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 2.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 12, 2025: a recertification inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 12, 2025: recertification inspection6 deficiencies
-
Ep Training Program
The inspectors’ words, 1,036 words
“EP Training Program CFR(s): 484.102(d)(1) §403.748(d)(1), §416.54(d)(1), §418.113(d)(1), §441.184(d)(1), §460.84(d)(1), §482.15(d)(1), §483.73(d)(1), §483.475(d)(1), §484.102(d)(1), §485.68(d)(1), §485.542(d)(1), §485.625(d)(1), §485.727(d)(1), §485.920(d)(1), §486.360(d)(1), §491.12(d)(1). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospitals at §482.15, ICF/IIDs at §483.475, HHAs at §484.102, REHs at §485.542, “Organizations” under §485.727, OPOs at §486.360, RHC/FQHCs at §491.12:] (1) Training program. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the [facility] must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For Hospices at §418.113(d):] (1) Training. The hospice must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (iii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iv) Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others. (v) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (vi) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the hospice must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For PRTFs at §441.184(d):] (1) Training program. The PRTF must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) After initial training, provide emergency preparedness training every 2 years. (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (iv) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the PRTF must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (1) The PACE organization must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing on-site services under arrangement, contractors, participants, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures, including informing participants of what to do, where to go, and whom to contact in case of an emergency. (iv) Maintain documentation of all training. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the PACE must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (1) Training Program. The LTC facility must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected role. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually. (iii) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. *[For CORFs at §485.68(d):](1) Training. The CORF must do all of the following: (i) Provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of the training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. All new personnel must be oriented and assigned specific responsibilities regarding the CORF’s emergency plan within 2 weeks of their first workday. The training program must include instruction in the location and use of alarm systems and signals and firefighting equipment. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the CORF must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For CAHs at §485.625(d):] (1) Training program. The CAH must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures, including prompt reporting and extinguishing of fires, protection, and where necessary, evacuation of patients, personnel, and guests, fire prevention, and cooperation with firefighting and disaster authorities, to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of the training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the CAH must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For CMHCs at §485.920(d):] (1) Training. The CMHC must provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles, and maintain documentation of the training. The CMHC must demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. Thereafter, the CMHC must provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, Emergency Preparedness (EP) Plan review, and staff interview, the agency failed to provide EP training at least every 2 years for 2023, 2024, and 2025 and failed to follow their policy and procedure to include EP training to all staff at least annually. The agency employs 42 staff. Findings are: A. Review of policy and procedure titled Emergency Preparedness Plan, reviewed 6/16/25, revealed: 1. Emergency preparedness training will be provided to all agency staff at least annually after initial training completed upon hire; documentation on EP training will be maintained; and staff knowledge of emergency procedures will be demonstrated. 2. The agency policy and procedure failed to state how the agency staff would be trained, and competency tested, on emergency preparedness; and failed to state where training, and competency testing, documentation was to be maintained. B. Review of Emergency Preparedness records binder revealed no documentation of staff training, or staff competency testing, of the the agency’s EP Plan for the years 2023, 2024, and 2025. C. During a staff interview on 8/6/25, the QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) coordinator confirmed the agency failed to provide EP training annually for 2023, 2024, and 2025, as required by agency policy and procedures.”
-
Rn Performs Assessment
The inspectors’ words, 357 words
“RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure an initial assessment was completed within 48 hours of referral for 2 of 12 patient records sampled (Patients 3 and 4), requiring an initial assessment. Total sample size 17. Total census 202. Findings are: A. Review of agency policy and procedure titled Admission Criteria, reviewed 6/6/24, revealed: 1. Service was to be initiated within 48 hours of referral, discharge from hospital, or the physician’s ordered start of care (SOC) date. If care was not initiated within the timeframe listed, staff were to have contacted the physician. 2. This policy and procedure failed to include direction for staff to document the reason for the delay or change in SOC date in the patient’s clinical record. B. Review Patient 3’s clinical record revealed: 1. Patient was discharged from the hospital on 6/27/25. 2. Patient’s hospital discharge summary dated 6/27/25 had orders for the Home Health Agency (HHA) to initiate care. 3. The patient Plan of Care (POC) showed agency services were initiated on 6/30/25. C. Review Patient 4’s clinical record revealed: 1. Patient referral was faxed to the agency on 7/17/25. 2. The Patient’s Physician Order Report documented ok to discharge home 7/18/25 with Home Health Care (HHC) to follow. 3. The patient Plan of Care (POC) showed agency services were initiated on 7/21/25. D. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed the agency failed to ensure an initial assessment was completed within 48 hours of referral, patient’s discharge to home, or physician’s ordered SOC date for Patients 3 and 4, requiring an initial assessment.”
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 374 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure the Patient Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) was individualized for 1 of 17 patient records reviewed (Patient 5). Total census 202. Findings are: A. Review of policy and procedure titled Plan of Care/Physicians Orders, reviewed 6/6/24, revealed an individualized POC was to be developed for each patient admitted for agency services. B. Review of Patient 5’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification periods of 4/30/25 through 6/28/25 and 6/29/25 through 8/27/25, revealed: 1. Patient diagnoses include bilateral above the knee amputee and hemiplegia of right side following a cerebral infarction (stroke). 2. All transfers are to be completed using a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device used to transfer individuals with limited mobility from one place to another). 3. Patient has a power wheelchair for mobility. 4. The Skilled Nurse (SN) interventions include: educate patient on wearing proper footwear; change positions slowly when ambulating; and needs aid of supportive devices such as crutches, canes and walkers. SN to instruct patient on all aspects of diabetic management to include foot assessments. C. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator, confirmed the agency failed to ensure the POC was individualized for Patient 5.”
-
Only As Ordered By A Physician
The inspectors’ words, 669 words
“Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure that physician’s orders for wound care were followed for 2 of 5 patient records reviewed (Patient 5 and 10), with wound care orders. Total sample size 17. Total census 202. Findings are: A. Review of agency policy and procedure titled Plan of Care/Physician Orders, reviewed 6/6/24, revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) will serve as physician’s orders for patient care. 2. All staff providing services will be in compliance with the orders as documented on the POC. B. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 4/30/25 through 6/28/25 included orders for: a. Skilled nurse (SN) to visit 2 times per week for 1 week then 1 visit per week for 3 weeks then 1 visit per week for 5 weeks for wound care assessment. b. SN was to complete patient wound care, and educate caregiver, to include cleanse skin daily and apply a thin layer of triad hydrophilic cream (used to maintain a moist wound healing environment) to left hip wound covered with an abd pad (thick dressing used to collect wound drainage) daily. c. SN was to assess/evaluate wound(s) at each dressing change and as needed. d. SN was to assess for skin breakdown as needed. 2. Registered Nurse (RN) SN Visit Note, dated 5/2/25, revealed the RN/SN failed to document wound care assessment of the left hip wound. 3. Skilled Nurse Visit Notes, dated 5/9/25, 5/13/25, 5/20/25, 5/28/25, 6/3/25, 6/13/25, and 6/18/25, did not include documentation that wound care was completed. 4. VSL Vetter Home Health Care: Case Conference and 60-day Summary form, faxed to the patient’s physician on 6/23/25, documented the need for ongoing wound care and SN wound assessment. 5. The POC for the certification period of 6/29/25 through 8/27/25 included orders for: a. SN to visit 1 time per week for 9 weeks for patient assessment. b. This POC did not include orders for wound care assessment or wound care treatment. 6. SN Visit Notes, dated 7/2/25, 7/8/25, 7/16/25, 7/22/25 and 7/30/25, continued to document the presence of a left hip wound. C. Review of Patient 10’s clinical record revealed: 1. The POC, for the certification period of 6/10/25 through 8/8/25, included orders for: a. SN to visit 1 time per week for 9 weeks for weekly wound care and assessments. b. SN to perform/instruct caregiver to perform wound care to left fifth toe incision: cleanse with saline; apply silver alginate cut to fit wound bed; cover with gauze and gentle tape. 2. SN Visit Note, dated 6/17/25, the SN documented under Goals, the alginate (as ordered) was not needed without an explanation of why the alginate was no longer needed. SN documented the wound was cleansed with saline and a dry gauze dressing was then applied to the wound. There was no documentation in the SN notes to indicate the physician was notified to change the orders. 3. SN Visit Note, dated 6/24/25, the SN documented under Wounds Addressed on this Visit, wound 1, that the wound was cleansed with saline, pat dry and covered with a band-aid. 4. SN Visit Note, dated 7/3/25, the SN documented under Wounds Addressed on this Visit, wound 1, that the wound was cleansed with soap and water and applied a dry gauze dressing to the wound. 5. SN Visit Note, dated 7/22/25, the SN documented under Wounds Addressed on this Visit, wound 1, that the wound was cleansed with saline and a large band-aid was applied. D. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 2:00 PM, the QAPI (Quality Assurance/Process Improvement)/Back up Administrator confirmed the agency failed to follow the physician orders for wound care for Patient 5 and 10.”
-
Revised Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 425 words
“Revised plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(c)(2) A revised plan of care must reflect current information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment, and contain information concerning the patient’s progress toward the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and patient in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure progress towards goals, identified by agency and the patient, were included in the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for 5 of 5 patient records reviewed (Patient 5, 9, 10, 11, and 12) requiring updated/revised plans of care. Total sample size 17. Total census 202. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Physician Progress Reports/60-day Summary, reviewed 6/6/24, revealed: 1. The written POC was to be updated at least every 60 days. 2. Written progress/summary reports sent to the patient’s physician no less than once every 60 days will contain information such as met/unmet goals and plan to address unmet goals. B. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Plan of Care/Physician Orders, reviewed 6/6/24, revealed the POC was to be reviewed for effectiveness (patient outcomes/response). C. Review of clinical records revealed: 1. Patient 5’s revised/updated POC for the certification periods 4/30/25 through 6/28/25 and 6/29/25 through 8/27/25 failed to include information concerning the patient’s progress toward the goals identified by the agency and the patient. 2. Patient 9’s revised/updated POC for the certification periods 5/16/25 through 7/14/25 and 7/15/25 through 9/12/25 failed to include information concerning the patient’s progress toward the goals identified by the agency and the patient. 3. Patient 10’s revised/updated POC for the certification periods 4/11/2025 through 6/9/25and 6/10/25 through 8/8/25 failed to include information concerning the patient’s progress toward the goals identified by the agency and the patient. 4. Patient 11’s revised/updated POC for the certification periods 5/28/25 through 7/26/25 and 7/27/25 through 9/24/25 failed to include information concerning the patient’s progress toward the goals identified by the agency and the patient. 5. Patient 12’s revised/updated POC for the certification periods 5/19/25 through 7/17/25 and 7/18/25 through 9/15/25 failed to include information concerning the patient’s progress toward the goals identified by the agency and the patient. D. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 2:00 PM, the QAPI (Quality Assurance/Process Improvement) Director confirmed the agency was not including information concerning the patient’s progress toward the goals, identified by the agency and the patient on revised/updated patient POCs for Patient 5, 9, 10, 11, and 12.”
-
In Accordance With Current Clinical Practice
The inspectors’ words, 388 words
“In accordance with current clinical practice CFR(s): 484.105(f)(2) All HHA services must be provided in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines and accepted professional standards of practice. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure weekly wound measurements were completed, as described in the agency policy and procedure, for 1 of 5 patient records reviewed (Patient 5) who had wounds. Total sample size 17. Total census 202. Findings are: A. Review of agency policy and procedure titled Skin and Wound Care - Assessment: Wound Section: 25.02 reviewed 6/6/24, revealed: 1. The patient Home Health Certification Plan of Care (POC) must be modified as the wound changes. 2. The Skilled Nurse was to reassess and measure wounds at least weekly and document in patient’s clinical record the wound dimensions (length, width, depth, and tunneling). 3. The Skilled Nurse was to consult with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP) about wound care orders. B. Review of agency policy and procedure titled Plan of Care/Physician Orders reviewed 6/6/24, revealed: 1. Physician orders are needed to provide any services requiring prescribed treatment(s). 2. The agency was to notify the physician, prior to any changes in the patient’s orders. 3. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) will serve as physician’s orders for patient care. 4. The staff member may only administer treatments as ordered by the physician. C. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record revealed: 1. Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for certification period 4/30/25 through 6/28/25 included orders for triad hydrophilic cream to left hip wound covered with an abd pad (thick dressing used to collect wound drainage) daily. 2. POC for recertification period 6/29/25 through 8/27/25 did not include orders for wound care. 3. Skilled Nurse (SN) Visit Notes for 5/9/25, 5/13/25, 5/20/25, 5/28/25, 6/3/25, 6/13/25, and 6/18/25 did not contain measurements of the left hip wound. 4. SN Visit Notes for 7/2/25, 7/8/25, 7/16/25, 7/22/25 and 7/30/25, continued to contain documentation by the SN that the left hip wound was present, but no measurements were documented. D. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator confirmed that the agency failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedure to assess, measure and document Patient 5’s wounds weekly.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 10, 2018.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Vetter Senior Living owns 100% directly since Mar 30, 2017.
- 6 owners or officers are people: Glenn A Vanekeren (corporate officer); Jack D Vetter (corporate officer, 0%); Heath Boddy (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Brian W Stuhr (corporate officer, 0%); Tamara Sears (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Eldora D Vetter (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vetter Senior Living | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Mar 30, 2017 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (295 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 2.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 92.24% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 9.07% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.83% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 24 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 68022, where this agency’s office is, 19 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Brookestone Home Health Care This home health agency | 2.5 |
| Amedisys Home Health of the Midlands | 4.5 |
| Methodist Fremont Health Home Care | 2.5 |
| Chi Health at Home - Omaha | 4 |
| St Joseph Villa Homecare & Hospice | 2 |
| Centerwell Home Health | 4.5 |
| Good Samaritan Society - Omaha Metro Home Care | 3.5 |
| Elite Professionals Home Care Company | 3.5 |
| Prime Home Care | 4.5 |
| Home Nursing With Heart | 3.5 |
| Physicians Choice Home Health Care | 3.5 |
| Ify’s Home Health Care | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.