Hearth Record

Good Samaritan Society - Omaha Metro Home Care

A home health agency in Omaha, Nebraska 68137

12875 Deauville Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68137. (402) 399-1700.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 11, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 11, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 827 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to include complete Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT or wound vac) (a type of wound therapy, that uses negative pressure suction to help heal wounds) orders on the initial Plan of Care and/or failed to verify complete wound vac care orders, to include on the initial Plan of Care, for 3 of 5 patient records reviewed for patients who had wound vacs (Patient 2, 3, 4). The total sample size was 6. The census was 57. Findings are: A .Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled, Wound Care, Home Health, Hospice and Assisted Living – Enterprise, date reviewed/revised 7/30/24, revealed: 1. Wound care was to be provided according to the provider’s order and should include: a. Dressing type to be used. b. Packing type to be used. c. Cleansing solution to be used. B. Review of the agency’s Skills procedure for Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (Home Health Care) – CE/NCPD, developed in cooperation with LeadingAge, date unavailable, revealed: 1. Practitioner’s orders were to be verified to include the cleansing of the wound and the periwound (skin surrounding the wound) and the specific type of dressing. 2. Staff were to ensure the pressure and mode settings were set as prescribed. C. Review of Patient 2’s clinical records revealed: 1. The Transition Orders and Information for the Continuation of Patient Care, received to the agency from Nebraska Medicine, on 7/23/24, included orders: a. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. b. Topical skin prep to the periwound. c. Granufoam (black foam) to the wound. d. Continuous suction at 125 mmHg (measurement of negative pressure level). 2. The initial Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 7/24/24 through 9/21/24, included orders for Skilled Nursing (SN) to provide wound vac dressing change 3 x weekly and PRN (as needed). a. The initial POC wound vac orders failed to include: 1. The cleansing of the wound and periwound. 2. The type of foam to be used on the wound. 3. The type of suction for the wound vac (intermittent or continuous) 4. The negative pressure measurement of the suction. D. Review of Patient 3’s clinical record revealed: 1. Review of Lab Order Summary from CHI Health Clinic Orthopedic Surgery- Immanuel, dated 5/23/24, received via fax to the agency on 5/30/24, included orders for wound vac changes to the left ankle. 2. The initial POC for the certification period 5/31/24 through 7/29/24, included orders for SN to provide wound vac care weekly and PRN. 3. The initial POC wound vac orders failed to include: a. The cleansing of the wound and periwound. b. The type of foam to be used on the wound. c. The type of suction for the wound vac (intermittent or continuous) d. The negative pressure measurement of the suction. E. Review of Patient 4’s clinical record revealed: 1. The After Visit Summary from CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center – Bergan Mercy, for services provided 6/7/24 through 6/13/24, included orders for SN to provide wound vac dressing change to the right foot on M,W, F (Monday, Wednesday and Friday), – 125 mmHg. 2. The initial POC for the certification period 6/14/24 through 8/12/24 included an order for SN to change wound vac M,W,F, and PRN. 3. The initial POC wound vac orders failed to include: a. The cleansing of the wound and periwound. b. The type of foam to be used on the wound. c. The type of suction for the wound vac (intermittent or continuous). d. The negative pressure measurement of the suction. F. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator and the RN Case Manager confirmed, the agency failed to follow their policy and procedures to include complete wound vac orders on the initial Plan of Care, and/or failed to verify complete wound care orders to include on the initial Plan of Care, for 3 of 5 patient records reviewed, for patients who had wound vacs (Patient 2, 3, and 4).”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 402 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Findings are: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to verify and include complete Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT or wound vac) (a type of wound therapy that uses negative pressure suction to help heal wounds) orders on the revised Plan of Care for 1 of 2 patient records reviewed for patients who had a wound vac (Patient 5). The total sample size was 6. The census was 57. A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled, Wound Care, Home Health, Hospice and Assisted Living – Enterprise, date reviewed/revised 7/30/24, revealed: 1. Wound care was to be provided according to the provider’s order and should include: a. Dressing type to be used. b. Packing type to be used. c. Cleansing solution to be used. B. Review of the agency’s Skills procedure for Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (Home Health Care) – CE/NCPD, developed in cooperation with LeadingAge, date unavailable, revealed, practitioner’s orders were to be verified to include the cleansing of the wound and the periwound (skin surrounding the wound), and the specific type of dressing. C. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record revealed: 1. The After Visit Summary from CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center – Bergan Mercy, for services provided 4/1/24 through 4/9/24, included orders: a.. Wound vac changes MWF (Monday, Wednesday, Friday), with negative pressure wound vac. b.. Place adaptic (a non-adhesive dressing) over muscle/bone of sternum and black foam over this. 2.. The revised Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 5/19/24 through 7/17/24, included orders for Skilled Nursing (SN) to change the wound vac dressing on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and PRN (as needed). 3. The POC orders failed to include: a. The cleansing of the wound and periwound. b. Place adaptic over muscle/bone of sternum and use black foam over the adaptic. c. The type of suction for the wound vac (intermittent or continuous). d. The negative pressure measurement of the suction. D. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator and RN Case Manager confirmed, the agency failed to verify complete wound vac orders and failed to include the complete wound vac orders on the revised POC for Patient 5.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level.

Jan 18, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 326 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure staff administer treatments as ordered on the plan of care for 1 of 7 clinical records reviewed (Patient 2). The census was 51. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration, Home Health-Enterprise, reviewed/revised 2/17/23, revealed drugs and treatments are to be administered by agency staff only as ordered. B. Review of Patient 2’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 12/12/23 through 2/9/24 revealed: 2. Orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) to assess wound to right shoulder. 3. Orders to apply Triad Hydrophilic Wound Dressing external paste (a topical cream used to protect skin and promote healing) to the right shoulder wound every other day. 4. A Charts/Clinical Note by the SN, dated 12/29/23, revealed the SN applied an allevyn (a foam dressing) to the bilateral hips and buttocks, applied hydrofera blue (a wound dressing used to promote healing) covered with allevyn to the right shoulder, and applied an allevyn to the scabbed area on the right foot. 5. There were no orders in the clinical record for applying allevyn to the bilateral hips and buttocks, applying hydrofera blue covered with allevyn to the right shoulder, or applying allevyn to the scabbed area of the right foot, as applied by the SN on 12/29/23. C. During staff interview on 1/18/24 at 11:45 AM, the Agency Administrator and the Clinical Manager confirmed the SN did not follow the treatment as ordered on the plan of care for Patient 2’s right shoulder wound, and did not obtain new treatment orders for Patient 2’s new areas of skin breakdown, as identified during the 12/29/23 SN visit.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes

    The inspectors’ words, 515 words

    “Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to promptly notify the physician to request a change in treatment orders, when changes in a patient’s skin integrity were identified during the assessment of 1 of 2 patients (Patient 2), who received wound care. The total sample size was 7. The census was 51. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled, Care Planning and Care Coordination, Home Health and Therapy-Enterprise, last reviewed/revised 2/21/23, revealed: 1. Collaboration and communication relevant to the patient’s care should be ongoing. 2. Significant changes in the patient’s condition are communicated in a timely manner and documented in the patient record. 3. The Plan of care should be reviewed and revised by the provider and the team as frequently as the patient’s condition requires. B. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled, Physician Orders-Home Health, reviewed/revised 12/13/21, revealed: 1. The purpose of the policy is to provide documentation of the providers approval for changes they have made. 2. The order was to be written the day the skilled professional received the order and sent to the physician for signature. C. Review of Patient 2’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 12/12/23 through 2/9/24 revealed: 2. Orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) to assess wound to right shoulder. 3. Orders to apply Triad Hydrophilic Wound Dressing external paste (a topical cream used to protect skin and promote healing) to the right shoulder wound every other day. 4. The patient was admitted with a chronic wound greater than four months which the patient covers with a bandaid at night for protection of the wound. 5. A Charts/Clinical Note by the SN, dated 12/29/23, revealed: a. The patient reported sores to bilateral hips, right shoulder, and right foot. b. The SN assessed the areas, cleansed the wounds, and applied allevyn (a foam dressing) to the bilateral hips and buttocks, applied hydrofera blue (a wound dressing used to promote healing) covered with allevyn to the right shoulder, and applied allevyn to the scabbed area on the right foot. c. There was no documentation in the clinical record to indicate the physician was notified of the new areas of skin breakdown found during the SN visit on 12/29/23, or to request a new physician order to change to the existing wound care treatments to reflect the wound care treatments provided during the SN visit on 12/29/23. D. During staff interview on 1/17/24 at 7:30 AM, the Agency Administrator confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record to indicate the physician was promptly notified of the changes to Patient 2’s skin conditions or the need to change Patient 2’s wound care treatments.”

    Rule G0590. Element-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 11, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited
Jan 18, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 9, 1992.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this agency.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (70 surveys completed): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.18% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.23% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.25% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 68137, where this agency’s office is, 19 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.