Mercy Home Health Services
A home health agency in Mandeville, Louisiana 70471
1011 North Causeway Blvd, Suite 19, Mandeville, Louisiana 70471. (985) 674-1699.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 20, 2026: a recertification inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 20, 2026: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
-
Ep Training Program
The inspectors’ words, 1,115 words
“EP Training Program CFR(s): 484.102(d)(1) §403.748(d)(1), §416.54(d)(1), §418.113(d)(1), §441.184(d)(1), §460.84(d)(1), §482.15(d)(1), §483.73(d)(1), §483.475(d)(1), §484.102(d)(1), §485.68(d)(1), §485.542(d)(1), §485.625(d)(1), §485.727(d)(1), §485.920(d)(1), §486.360(d)(1), §491.12(d)(1). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospitals at §482.15, ICF/IIDs at §483.475, HHAs at §484.102, REHs at §485.542, “Organizations” under §485.727, OPOs at §486.360, RHC/FQHCs at §491.12:] (1) Training program. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the [facility] must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For Hospices at §418.113(d):] (1) Training. The hospice must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (iii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iv) Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others. (v) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (vi) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the hospice must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For PRTFs at §441.184(d):] (1) Training program. The PRTF must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) After initial training, provide emergency preparedness training every 2 years. (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (iv) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the PRTF must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (1) The PACE organization must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing on-site services under arrangement, contractors, participants, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures, including informing participants of what to do, where to go, and whom to contact in case of an emergency. (iv) Maintain documentation of all training. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the PACE must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (1) Training Program. The LTC facility must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected role. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually. (iii) Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. *[For CORFs at §485.68(d):](1) Training. The CORF must do all of the following: (i) Provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of the training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. All new personnel must be oriented and assigned specific responsibilities regarding the CORF’s emergency plan within 2 weeks of their first workday. The training program must include instruction in the location and use of alarm systems and signals and firefighting equipment. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the CORF must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For CAHs at §485.625(d):] (1) Training program. The CAH must do all of the following: (i) Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures, including prompt reporting and extinguishing of fires, protection, and where necessary, evacuation of patients, personnel, and guests, fire prevention, and cooperation with firefighting and disaster authorities, to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. (ii) Provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. (iii) Maintain documentation of the training. (iv) Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. (v) If the emergency preparedness policies and procedures are significantly updated, the CAH must conduct training on the updated policies and procedures. *[For CMHCs at §485.920(d):] (1) Training. The CMHC must provide initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under arrangement, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles, and maintain documentation of the training. The CMHC must demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. Thereafter, the CMHC must provide emergency preparedness training at least every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure direct care staff were trained on their emergency preparedness (EP) plan upon hire, and at least every 2 years thereafter for 4 (S6HHA, S7HHA, S8HHA, and S15RN) of 14 personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of the agency’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) dated 04/08/2025 revealed in part: V. Training A. All new staff will be trained on the EOP in orientation. D. Emergency Preparedness training will be conducted annually. Review of S6HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/26/2024. Further review revealed there was no documented evidence EP training was completed upon hire on or after 02/26/2024 or 2025. Review of S7HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/17/2021. Further review revealed there was no documented evidence EP training was completed in 2024 or 2025. Review of S8HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/19/2026. Further review revealed there was no documented evidence EP training was completed upon hire on or after 02/19/2026. Review of S15RN’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 01/20/2025. Further review revealed there was no documented evidence EP training was completed upon hire on or after 01/20/2025. On 04/20/2026 at 12:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2HR. S2HR confirmed there was no documentation available indicating S8HHA had completed EP training upon hire, and there was no documentation EP training had been completed for all other direct care staff mentioned above in 2024 or 2025. On 04/20/2026 at 1:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM stated EP training should be completed upon hire and annually. S1ADM confirmed there was no documentation of EP training available for the direct care staff mentioned above for 2024 or 2025.”
-
Encoding And Transmitting Oasis
The inspectors’ words, 392 words
“Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) within 30 days of completion date of the assessment. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy titled “Encoding and Reporting OASIS Data” revealed, in part: Policy: The agency will electronically report all OASIS data collected in accordance with federal regulations. Special Instructions: 1. Agency will encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 30 days of completing the assessment of the client. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 01/05/2026 revealed 1 out of 1 record submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 12/05/2025. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 01/06/2026 revealed 1 out of 41 records submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 12/05/2025. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 01/21/2026 revealed 1 of 1 record submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 12/21/2025. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 01/24/2026 revealed 1 of 1 record submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 12/06/2025. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 02/14/2026 revealed 1 of 1 record submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 01/13/2026. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 03/04/2026 revealed 1 of 8 records submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 01/31/2026. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report dated 03/31/2026 revealed 1 of 8 records submitted was greater than 30 days after the completion date of 02/28/2026. On 04/20/2026 at 12:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM stated she submitted all OASIS data for the agency. S1ADM confirmed all OASIS should be submitted within 30 days of the completion date and the above-mentioned assessments were late.”
-
A Review Of All Current Medications
The inspectors’ words, 1,476 words
“A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the agency failed to maintain an accurate medication profile for 2 (#2 and #5) of 7 sampled patients reviewed who received home visits. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 228 patients, according to the agency’s current active census reported on 04/13/2026. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy titled “Medication Reconciliation” revealed, in part: Policy Agency will reconcile all medications taken by the client prior to admission to home care with those ordered at the time of admission, before and after inpatient facility stays, at 60-day reassessment visits, and at the time of discharge. Special Instructions 1. At the time of admission to the home care agency, the admitting professional will document a complete list of medications taken by the client prior to admission. This will include all over the counter (OTC), prescribed, and as needed (PRN) medications. Patient #2 Review of Patient #2’s Resumption of Care (ROC) orders dated 04/09/2026, for Certification Period 02/27/2026 through 04/27/2026, revealed a Skilled Nursing frequency of two visits every week for one week and one time every week for two weeks effective 04/09/2026; Physical Therapy 2 visits every week for 3 weeks effective 04/14/2026, and Occupational Therapy one visit per week for three weeks effective 04/09/2026. Review of Patient #2’s medication profile provided by the agency on 04/14/2026 revealed the following, in part: Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg 1 tablet twice daily Combigan Ophthalmic 0.2-0.5% 1 ml both eyes daily Denosumab Subcutaneous 60 mg/ml 1-daily On 04/15/2026 at 3:00 p.m., a home visit observation was conducted with Patient #2, her spouse, sitter, and S14COTA present. Review of the medications on Patient #2’s current medication profile list provided by the agency was reviewed with Patient #2’s sitter, who stated she was familiar with all of Patient #2’s medications. Further review revealed the following discrepancies: 1. Metoprolol Succinate 50 mg 1 tablet once daily- this medication was observed in home, sitter verified Patient #2 was currently taking the medication, but medication was not on the agency med profile. 2. Polyethylene Glycol 17 gms by mouth daily- sitter verified Patient #2 was currently taking this medication, but medication was not on the agency med profile. 3. Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg 1 spray each nostril once daily as needed- sitter verified Patient #2 was currently taking this medication, but medication was not on the agency med profile. 4. Spironolactone 25 mg 1 tablet once daily- sitter verified Patient #2 was currently taking this medication, but medication was not on the agency med profile. 5. Combigan Ophthalmic 0.2-0.5% 1 ml twice daily both eyes-sitter verified Patient #2 was currently taking this medication twice daily, but the agency med profile had patient taking this once daily. 6. Denosumab Subcutaneous 60 mg/ml daily- sitter verified Patient #2 was not currently taking this medication, but medication was on the agency med profile. On 04/15/2026 03:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with Patient #2’s Sitter, who stated Patient #2’s daughter managed all the patient’s medications and pre-filled her pill boxes weekly. Sitter stated Patient #2’s Metoprolol medication and dose had changed during her recent hospitalization. The Sitter confirmed Patient #2 was now taking Metoprolol Succinate 50 mg daily, Polyethylene Glycol 17 gms daily, Fluticasone nasal spray one spray each nostril daily as needed, and Spironolactone 25 mg daily. Sitter confirmed Patient #2’s Combigan eye drop was changed to twice daily prior to hospital discharge on 04/08/2026, and she was no longer taking the Denosumab injections. On 04/15/2026 at 3:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S14COTA. S14COTA stated she asked Patient #2 if medication changes had occurred during their visits, and any medication changes were reported to the nurse. S14COTA stated she had not reviewed or reconciled any of Patient #2’s medication since hospital ROC on 04/09/2026. S14COTA stated all medications used by the patient should be accurately reflected on the agency medication profile. On 04/16/2026 at 2:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16RN. S16RN stated he was assigned to Patient #2. S16RN confirmed there was no medication reconciliation completed during Patient #2’s SN visits completed on 04/09/2026 or 04/10/2026. S16RN stated a Discharge Medication list was not provided with Patient #2’s ROC orders prior to visits on 04/09/2026 or on 04/10/2026. S16RN confirmed Patient #2’s med profile did not accurately reflect all current medications taken or not taken. On 04/16/2026 at 12:51 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. Patient #2’s med profile provided from the agency was compared to the hospital discharge medication list dated 04/08/2026 available in Patient #2’s home. S1ADM confirmed Patient #2’s medication profile from the agency did not accurately reflect all medications Patient #2 was currently taking or no longer taking. Patient #5 Review of Patient #5’s Start of Care (SOC) orders dated 03/30/2026 for Certification Period 03/31/2026 through 05/29/2026, revealed a Skilled Nursing frequency of two visits every week for two weeks and one time every week for seven weeks effective 03/31/2026; Physical Therapy one visit every week for one week, then two visits every week for two weeks, then one visit per week for one week effective 03/31/2026, and Occupational Therapy one visit per week for one week, then two visits per week for two weeks effective 03/31/2026. Review of Patient #5’s medication profile provided by the agency on 04/14/2026 revealed the following, in part: Amiodarone HCL 200 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day Furosemide (Lasix) 20 mg 1 tablet daily as needed for shortness of breath (SOB) On 04/15/2026 at 1:00 p.m., a home visit observation was conducted with Patient #5 and S12PTA present. Review of the medications on Patient #5’s current medication profile list provided by the agency was reviewed with Patient #5, who stated she managed all of her own medications. Further review revealed the following discrepancies: 1. Amiodarone HCL 200 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day; Patient #5 stated she was currently taking 200 mg once daily as of 03/31/2026. 2. Furosemide (Lasix) 20 mg 1 tablet daily as needed for shortness of breath; Patient #5 stated she was taking 20 mg daily as of 03/31/2026. 3. Aldactone 25 mg take 0.5 tablets (12.5 mg) once daily was observed in the home, taken currently by Patient #5 as of 03/31/2026, but medication was not on the agency med profile. 4. Fluticasone-Salmeterol (Advair) 250-50 mcg inhaler- Patient #5 stated she was currently taking this medication twice daily as of 03/31/2026, but medication was not listed on the agency med profile. 5. Tylenol 325 mg take 650 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain; Patient #5 stated she was currently taking this medication as needed as of 03/31/2026, but medication was not listed on the agency med profile. 6. Ezetimibe 10 mg daily; Patient #5 stated she was taking this medication daily as of 03/31/2026, but this medication not listed on the agency med profile. 7. Cyclobenzaprine 10 mg three times daily as needed; Patient #5 stated she was currently taking this medication three times daily as needed as of 03/31/2026, but this medication was not listed on the agency med profile. 8. Sacubitril-Valsartan 24-26 mg two times daily; Patient #5 stated she was currently taking this medication two times daily, but this medication was not listed on the agency med profile. On 04/15/2026 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12PTA. S12PTA confirmed the medication profile in Patient #5’s home did not accurately reflect all medications Patient #5 was currently taking. On 04/17/2026 at 3:25 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with S15RN. S15RN stated she had completed the SOC for Patient #5 on 03/31/2026. S15RN stated Patient #5 managed all of her own medications. Patient #5’s discharge med list dated 03/30/2026 was reviewed. S15RN stated she was unaware of the discharge med list provided to the agency on 03/30/2026, and she had not reconciled Patient #5’s medications according to the hospital discharge list and should have. S15RN confirmed the agency medication profile should have accurately reflected Patient #5’s current medications. On 04/17/2026 at 9:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. The above medication profile discrepancies were discussed. S1ADM stated she expected all nurses to check patient’s medication bottles and compare their home medications against the discharge medication list provided by the referring provider. S1ADM confirmed the information on Patient #5’s referral was incorrect and did not include all of Patient #5’s discharge medication orders. S1ADM confirmed Patient #5’s medication profile from the agency did not accurately reflect all medications Patient #5 was currently taking.”
-
Reviewed, Revised By Physician Every 60 Days
The inspectors’ words, 266 words
“Reviewed, revised by physician every 60 days CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The individualized plan of care must be reviewed and revised by the physician or allowed practitioner who is responsible for the home health plan of care and the HHA as frequently as the patient’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to have the Plan of Care (POC) reviewed and revised by the physician every 60 days, beginning with the SOC (Start of Care) date for 1(#6) of 17 sampled patients reviewed. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy titled, “Plan of Care” revealed in part: Policy Home care services are furnished under the supervision and direction of the client’s physician/ allowed non-physician practitioner (NPP). The Plan of Care is based on a comprehensive assessment and information provided by the client/family and health team members. The plan will be consistently reviewed to ensure the client needs are met, and will be updated as necessary, but at least every sixty (60) days. Review of Patient #6’s clinical record revealed a SOC date of 12/27/2025. Review of the POC for certification period 12/27/2025 through 02/24/2026 revealed the physician did not review and sign the POC until 03/31/2026. On 04/17/2026 at 11:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. The above POC orders for certification period 12/27/2025 through 02/24/2026 were reviewed. S1ADM confirmed Patient #6’s POC was not reviewed and signed by Patient #6’s physician within the every 60-day timeframe.”
-
Provide Services In The Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 482 words
“Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to provide skilled professional services as ordered by the physician in the Plan of Care (POC) for 1 (#2) of 7 sampled patients reviewed with home visits. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy titled, “Skilled Professional Services” revealed, in part: Special Instructions 1. Skilled professionals must assume the responsibility for, but not be restricted to the following: c. Providing services that are ordered by the physician/allowed non-physician practitioner (NPP) as indicated in the plan of care. Review of Patient #2’s clinical record revealed she began receiving services from the agency on 02/27/2026, with a primary diagnosis of Laceration without Foreign Body of Other Part of Head, Subsequent Encounter. Review of Patient #2’s POC for Certification Period 02/27/2026 through 04/27/2026 revealed in part: Physical Therapy one time a week for one week, then two times a week for three weeks, effective 03/04/2026. Review of Patient #2’s Episode Manager Visit Calendar for Physical Therapy (PT) visits made during this episode of care revealed, in part: there were two (2) ordered PT visits, per the POC the week of 03/23/2026. Further review revealed only one (1) PT visit was completed on 03/27/2026. There were no other PT visits attempted or documented as refused or missed during the week of 03/23/2026. On 04/14/2026 at 2:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S18PT. S18PT confirmed she had completed Patient #2’s PT Evaluation on 03/04/2026 and Patient #2’s physician had approved the ordered PT frequency of 1w1, 2w3, per her evaluation. S18PT stated once the PT evaluation was completed, the agency’s scheduler setup the PT visits. S18PT stated she would expect PT services to be provided per the POC orders. Patient #2’s PT schedule for the week of 03/23/2026 was reviewed. S18PT confirmed Patient #2 did not receive PT services per physician’s orders. On 04/14/2026 at 2:48 p.m., an interview was conducted with S17LPN. Patient #2’s PT evaluation dated 03/04/2026 and signed by Patient #2’s physician on 03/16/2026 was reviewed. S17LPN confirmed PT services were not provided to Patient #2, per the physician-ordered frequency the week of 03/23/2026 and should have been. On 04/14/2026 at 2:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM reviewed the above PT Episode Visit Calendar for Patient #2, the POC dated 02/27/2026, and the PT evaluation dated 03/04/2026 and signed by the physician on 03/16/2026. S1ADM confirmed there was no missed visit or refusal documentation recorded the week of 03/23/2026, and only one (1) PT visit was completed instead of two (2) PT visits, as per POC orders. S1ADM confirmed all skilled professional services should be provided per physician’s orders and Patient #2’s PT services were not.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | Recertification inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 5, 2001.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 8 owners or officers are people: Kevin Kramer (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Kevin Kramer (corporate officer, 50%); Kevin Kramer (corporate director, 50%); Kevin Kramer (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Gregory Killebrew (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Gregory Killebrew (corporate officer, 50%); Gregory Killebrew (corporate director, 50%); Gregory Killebrew (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (147 surveys completed): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 76.21% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 16.52% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.00% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 21 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70471, where this agency’s office is, 21 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Omni Home Care | 4.5 |
| Mercy Home Health Services This home health agency | 4.5 |
| Life Source Home Health | 4 |
| Southeast Louisiana Home Health, LLC | 5 |
| Concerned Care Home Health, Inc. | 2.5 |
| Stat Home Health Triton | 4.5 |
| Apex Home Health, LLC | 4 |
| Ochsner Home Health of Covington | 3.5 |
| St. Tammany Hospital Home Health | 4.5 |
| Pulse Home Health Care | 4 |
| Lcmc Health Home Care | 3.5 |
| Audubon Home Health of Hammond | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.