Hearth Record

Concerned Care Home Health, Inc.

A home health agency in Covington, Louisiana 70433

125 North Theard Street, Suite C, Covington, Louisiana 70433. (985) 892-3947.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 27, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 27, 2024: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) as evidenced by failing to ensure the agency successfully completed and transmitted OASIS data within 30 days of completion of the assessment of the beneficiary. Findings: Findings: Review of CMS’s (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Standard Regulation Text titled “CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Section 484.45(a)” revealed: A home health agency must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. Review of the agency’s Oasis Detail Error Report dated 04/01/2024 to 06/18/2024 revealed 20 Oasis assessments with error code -3330 were submitted more than 30 days after the date of completion on the record, which was late. On 06/27/2024 at 3:00 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S7OM. S7OM confirmed she was responsible for all OASIS submissions. She verified the aforementioned Oasis records reviewed were submitted more than 30 days after the completion date on the record and were late. On 06/27/2024 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. S1DCS confirmed S7OM was responsible for the submission of all Oasis data. S1DCS further confirmed she did not review the validation reports for accuracy, including if any submissions were late, or > 30 days of the completion date. SIDCS reviewed the validation reports dated 04/01/2024- 06/18/2024 and confirmed the OASIS assessments on these dates with error code -3330 were submitted more than 30 days after the completion date on record and were late.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 864 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the HHA failed to ensure staff followed accepted standards of infection control practices for 3 (Patients #1, #6, #7) of 7 (Patients #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) patients observed during home visits. The agency staff failed to: 1. Ensure staff properly disinfected reusable equipment used during home visits with Patients #1, #6, #7; and 2. Practice proper bag barrier technique while providing care to Patients #6 and #7. Findings: Review of the undated Agency’s Competency Training titled “Bag Technique” included the following, in part: Purpose: to decrease spread of infection from patient to patient. Expectations: All supplies that have touched a patient/unclean surface will be considered dirty until they have been cleaned with an antimicrobial wipe. (ex. B.P. cuff, thermometer, etc). All employees will equip themselves with a disposable waterproof barrier to protect bags. Visit Process: Place bag on waterproof barrier in home. Remove B.P. cuff, thermometer and other supplies needed for visit from bag and place on clean barrier. Take patient vitals and proceed with assessment. Clean all supplies (B.P. cuff, stethoscope, thermometer, etc.) with antimicrobial wipe and place back into clean portion of bag. 1. Patient #1 Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had a SOC (Start of Care) date of 06/08/2024. A review of the 485/PoC (Plan of Care) for the certification period of 06/08/2024 – 08/06/2024 revealed Orders and Treatments, which included the following: SN (Skilled Nurse) 1day1, then 1w9. On 06/25/2024 at 9:05 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted in the home of Patient #1 with S2LPN present. S2LPN was observed taking the patient’s blood pressure, temperature, and pulse oximetry reading. After completing the vital sign assessment, S2LPN returned her reusable blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, thermometer, and pulse oximeter to her bag without properly disinfecting her equipment. S2LPN verified she did not have any antimicrobial wipes on hand and did not clean her reusable equipment before returning them to her bag. Patient #6 Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had a SOC (Start of Care) date of 12/16/2023. A review of the 485/PoC for the certification period of 06/13/2024- 08/11/2024 revealed Orders and Treatments, which included the following: SN 1w1, 3w8. On 06/26/2024 at 8:52 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted in the home of Patient #6 with S3RN present. S3RN was observed taking the patient’s blood pressure, temperature and performing a pulse oximetry reading. After completing the vital sign assessment, S3RN returned her reusable blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, thermometer and pulse oximeter to her bag/box without properly disinfecting her equipment. S3RN verified she did not have any antimicrobial wipes on hand and did not clean her reusable equipment before returning them to her bag/box. Patient #7 Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had a SOC date of 02/23/2024. A review of the 485/PoC for the certification period of 06/22/2024- 08/20/2024 revealed original Orders and Treatments which included the following: SN 2w2, 3w3. On 06/26/2024 at 9:25 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted in the home of Patient #7 with S3RN present. S3RN was observed taking the patient’s blood pressure, temperature, and pulse oximetry reading. After completing the vital sign assessment, S3RN returned her reusable blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, thermometer, and pulse oximeter to her bag/box without properly disinfecting her equipment. S3RN confirmed she had not properly disinfected her equipment using antimicrobial wipes before returning them to her bag/box and should have. On 06/27/2024 at 2:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. S1DCS confirmed all staff should clean reusable equipment with antimicrobial wipes before returning them to their bag. 2. Patient #6 Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had a SOC date of 12/16/2023. A review of the 485/PoC for the certification period of 06/13/2024- 08/11/2024 revealed Orders and Treatments, which included the following: SN 1w1, 3w8. On 06/26/2024 at 8:52 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted in the home of Patient #6 with S3RN present. S3RN was observed placing her equipment box on the patient’s dining table without a barrier between the box and table. S3RN verified she did not use a barrier between her box and patient’s table and should have. Patient #7 Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had a SOC date of 02/23/2024. A review of the 485/PoC for the certification period of 06/22/2024- 08/20/2024 revealed original Orders and Treatments which included the following: SN 2w2, 3w3. On 06/26/2024 at 9:25 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted in the home of Patient #7 with S3RN present. S3RN was observed placing her equipment box on the patient’s side table without a barrier between the box and table. S3RN verified she did not use a barrier between her box and patient’s table and should have. On 06/27/2024 at 2:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. S1DCS confirmed all staff should use a waterproof barrier to place their bag/box on during patient visits.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,188 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the agency failed to ensure the medication profile accurately reflected all medications patients were using, and/or did not reflect medications the patients were no longer using, for 4 (Patient #1, #2, #6 and #7) of 7 (Patients #1- #7) sampled patients reviewed who received home visits. Findings: Patient #1 Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had a SOC (Start of Care) date of 06/08/2024. The patient’s current diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of the 485/PoC (Plan of Care) for the certification period of 06/08/2024-08/06/2024 revealed Orders and Treatments, which included the following: SN 1day1, then 1w9. A current medication profile list was provided by the agency on 06/25/2024. On 06/25/2024 at 9:05 a.m., a visit and interview were conducted at Patient #1’s home with S2LPN present. Patient #1 stated his daughter setup his medications. His daughter was unavailable and not present during the home visit. The current medication profile list provided by the agency for Patient #1 was reviewed with S2LPN and revealed the following discrepancies: 1. Zyrtec 10mg one tablet by mouth daily. This medication was listed as a current medication on the patient’s medication list provided by the agency. There were no Zyrtec tablets available in the home. 2. Bupropion HCL ER (XL) 300mg one tablet by mouth daily. This medication was listed as a current medication on the patient’s medication list provided by the agency. There were no Bupropion tablets available in the home. A review of SN visit documentation revealed SN visits were conducted with Patient #1 on the following dates during the current Certification Period of 06/08/2024 to present: 06/15/2024 and 06/21/2024. S2LPN verified Patient #1’s medication list had not been updated to reflect the current medications he was taking and should have. Patient #2 Review of the clinical record revealed a start of care date of 04/17/2024. A review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care/485 for the Certification Period of 06/16/2024- 08/14/2024 revealed a primary diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1-4 and orders, which included SN 1w8 effective week of 08/01/2021. A current medication profile list was provided by the agency on 06/25/2024. On 06/25/2024 at 10:05 a.m., a visit and interview were conducted at Patient #2’s home with S2LPN present. The current medication profile list provided by the agency for Patient #2 was reviewed with the Assisted Living facility (ALF) nurse and S2LPN and revealed the following discrepancies: 1. A bottle of Zinpep DR 20,000 units 1 capsule by mouth three times daily, with a prescription fill date of 06/13/2024 was provided by the ALF nurse. This medication was not listed as a current medication on Patient #2’s medication profile list. A review of SN visit documentation revealed SN visits were conducted with Patient #2 on the following dates during the current Certification Period of 06/16/2024 to present: 06/18/2024 and 06/25/2024. The ALF nurse verified she administered Patient #2’s medications daily and stated Patient #1’s new Zinpep DR medication was started on 06/13/2024. S2LPN verified Patient #2’s medication list had not been updated to reflect the current medications she was taking and should have been. Patient #6 Review of the clinical record revealed a start of care date of 12/16/2023. A review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care/485 for the Certification Period of 06/13/2024 to 08/11/2024 revealed a primary diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and Stage 1-4 Chronic Kidney Disease and orders which included SN 1w1, 3w8. A current medication profile list was provided by the agency on 06/25/2024. Review of the physician’s order dated 06/21/2024 for Patient #6 signed by S3RN revealed: Problem: Rash to lower extremities New order: Apply barrier cream to skin as needed for rash or irritation. On 06/26/2024 at 8:52 a.m., a visit and interview were conducted at Patient #6’s home with S3RN and Patient #6’s sitter present. Patient #6’s spouse was not present in the home. Patient #6 stated her husband prepared all of her medications weekly. Patient #6’s sitter stated she was not familiar with the patient’s medications and did not prepare her medications. The current medication profile list provided by the agency for Patient #6 was reviewed with S3RN and revealed the following discrepancies: 1. Boudreaux’s Butt Paste a.k.a. Barrier Cream was not listed on the current medication list provided by the agency. A review of SN visit documentation revealed SN visits were conducted with Patient #6 on the following dates during the current Certification Period of 06/13/2024 to present: 06/14/2024, 06/18/2024, 06/19/2024, 06/22/2024, and 06/26/2024. S3RN verified Patient #6’s medication list had not been updated to reflect the current medications she was taking and should have been. Patient #7 Review of the clinical record revealed a start of care date of 02/23/2024. A review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care/485 for the Certification Period of 06/22/2024 to 08/20/2024 revealed a primary diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of Other Site, Stage 4 and orders which included SN 2w2, 3w3 effective 06/13/2024. A current medication profile list was provided by the agency on 06/25/2024. On 06/26/2024 at 9:25 a.m., a visit and interview were conducted at Patient #7’s home with S3RN present. Patient #7 verified he was familiar with his medications and managed them himself. Review of the medications listed on Patient #7’s current medication profile list provided by the agency revealed the following discrepancies when compared with medications in the home: 1. Ozempic 2mg/1.5ml Inject 1ml daily. The patient stated he has no longer is taking this medication due to cost and has not taken this medication in several weeks. 2. Doxcycline Hyclate 100mg tablet by mouth every 12 hours. The patient stated he no longer is taking this medication and has not taken this medication in several weeks. 3. Metoprolol 100mg one tablet twice a day. There was no medication bottle to review in the home, and the patient stated he has been taking this medication for over 3 years. A review of SN visit documentation revealed SN visits were conducted with Patient #7 on the following dates during the current Certification Period of 06/22/2024 to present: 06/26/2024. Review of prior cert period 04/23/2024-06/21/2024 revealed SN visit was last conducted on 06/21/2024 for recertification. S3RN verified Patient #7’s medication list had not been updated to reflect the current medications he was taking and should have been. On 06/27/2024 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. She was notified of the medication discrepancies found during the home visits for Patients #1, #2, #6, and #7. She verified the medication profiles were not up to date. S1DCS confirmed nurses should reconcile medications during each SN visit and update the medication profiles accordingly.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,301 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Findings: Review of the agency’s policy titled “Care Planning Process” dated November 2017 revealed the following, in part: Policy: The care planning process will be documented on the plan of care, individualized discipline specific care plans, and clinical notes. 3. Based on the assessment and conclusions, the plan of care will include: A. Patient specific interventions and education. D. Specific services and treatments to be provided. 5. Will be based on physician’s orders and will encompass the equipment, supplies, and services required to meet the patient’s needs. Review of the agency’s undated policy titled “Wound Care Protocol” revealed, in part: Wounds must match Physician’s Orders. Measurements should be done at least weekly. Prescribing physician or NP (Nurse Practitioner) must be notified of any changes in wounds. 1. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4’s Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the agency on 05/14/2024 with diagnoses, which included Infection/Inflammation Reaction Due to Internal Right Knee Prosthesis, Initial Encounter and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, and Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer Other Part Right Foot. Review of Patient #4’s Plan of Care for certification period of 05/14/2024 to 07/12/2024 revealed Physician Orders, which included the following, in part: Skilled Nurse (SN): 2w2, 1w7. SN to perform and instruct wound care on the right third toe: paint with Betadine, cover with island dressing/border daily. Caregiver may perform on alternate days of skilled nurse visit. SN to perform and instruct wound care on the right third toe: cleanse with soap and water, pat dry, and apply antifungal skin barrier ointment 2 times a day and as needed soilage. Caregiver may perform on alternate days of skilled nurse visit. SN to perform and instruct wound care to right knee: Surgical dressing in place. Remove dressing after 7 days (05/19/2024). After removal, clean with alcohol and place silver dressing to site. Review of the Client Calendar Report for Patient #4 revealed Skilled Nurse visits were conducted on: 05/14/2024, 05/16/2024, 05/20/2024, 05/24/2024, 05/30/2024, 06/07/2024, 06/10/2024, 06/13/2024, 06/19/2024, and 06/26/2024. Review of Patient #4’s clinical nursing notes dated 05/24/2024, 05/30/2024, and 06/13/2024 revealed no wound care had been provided per Physician’s Orders and no wound measurements were performed. No documentation provided by the agency indicated the patient’s caregiver had provided the wound care on those dates. On 06/27/2024 at 3:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. She reviewed Patient #4’s Clinical Record and confirmed wound care should have been provided per physician’s orders/Plan of care and wounds measured at least weekly on the aforementioned dates and was not. 2. Patient #6 Review of Patient #6’s Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the agency on 12/16/2023 with diagnoses, which included Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Patient #6’s Plan of Care for certification period of 04/14/2024 to 06/12/2024 revealed Physician Orders, which included the following, in part: Skilled Nurse (SN) effective week of 04/15/2024 2w8, 1w1. SN to perform wound care on the left lower extremity: Cleanse with Hibiclens, wrap with unna boot and Coban, wound care to be performed 3 times a week. Caregiver may perform wound care on alternate days of skilled nurse visit. Review of the Client Calendar Report for Patient #6 revealed Skilled Nurse visits were conducted on 04/29/2024, 05/03/2024, 05/06/2024, 05/10/2024, 05/13/2024, 05/17/2024- Missed visit, 05/20/2024, 05/24/2024, 05/31/2024, 06/03/2024, 06/05/2024, 06/07/2024, and 06/10/2024. Review of Nurses notes dated 04/29/2024 by S3RN revealed, in part: Seen by [Wound Care Clinic Provider]. Will discontinue unna boots temporarily and see if blisters and redness return to bilateral lower extremities. Edema still 2+. Further record review revealed there was no written, signed Physician Orders provided by the agency for unna boot discontinuation on 04/29/2024. Review of Nurses notes dated 05/03/2024 by S3RN revealed in part: Wound assessment: left lower extremity skin lesion. Treatment: cleansed with normal saline, applied unna boot and covered with Coban. Further record review revealed no written, signed Physician Orders provided by the agency for unna boots to be resumed on 05/03/2024. Review of Nurses notes dated 05/06/2024 by S3RN revealed in part: Wound assessment: left lower extremity skin lesion. Status: Closed. Further review revealed there was no written Physician Orders provided by the agency for the discontinued wound care as of 05/06/2024. Review of Nurses notes dated 05/31/2024 by S3RN revealed in part: There are two areas of concern to patient’s left and right leg. Re-evaluate at next visit. Further record review revealed there was no communication documented in the clinical record Patient #6’s physician had been notified of the skin changes. Review of Nurses notes dated 06/03/2024 by S3RN revealed in part: Right leg has several blisters. SN cleaned with normal saline and applied barrier cream to site. Further record review revealed there were no updated wound care orders approved by Patient #6’s physician for wound care provided by S3RN to Patient #6’s right leg on 06/03/2024. Review of Patient #6’s Plan of Care for certification period of 06/13/2024 to 08/11/2024 revealed there were no Physician Orders for wound care. Review of the Client Calendar Report for Patient #6 revealed Skilled Nurse (SN) visits were conducted on: 06/14/2024, 06/18/2024, 06/19/2024, 06/22/2024, and 06/26/2024. Review of Nurses notes dated 06/19/2024 by S3RN revealed, in part: Wound assessment: Buttocks, Open, onset 06/14/2024, Rash. Treatment: Cleansed with normal saline, barrier cream applied. Further record review revealed there were no updated wound care orders approved by Patient #6’s physician for wound care provided by S3RN to Patient #6’s buttocks on 06/19/2024. Review of Nurses notes dated 06/22/2024 by S3RN revealed, in part: Wound assessment: Buttocks, Open, onset 06/14/2024, Rash, Treatment: cleansed with normal saline, barrier cream applied. Further record review revealed no updated wound care order provided by the agency to apply barrier cream to Patient #6’s buttocks or bilateral lower extremities. Review of Physician’s Orders provided by the agency on 06/26/2024, dated 06/21/2024, and written by S3RN revealed: Problem: Rash to lower extremities New Order: Apply barrier cream to skin as needed for rash or irritation 06/21/2024. Further review revealed there was no updated wound care order provided by the agency to apply barrier cream to Patient #6’s buttocks. On 06/26/2024 at 9:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3RN during a home visit with Patient #6. S3RN confirmed Patient #6’s unna boots were discontinued recently after a visit to the wound care physician’s clinic but she had not received or written Physician Order to discontinue the unna boots, and she did not clarify the orders. S3RN confirmed she had not written or requested updated wound care orders for wound care provided after 04/29/2024 on the aforementioned dates to Patient #6’s lower extremities or buttocks and should have. On 06/27/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. S1DCS reviewed the Physician Orders for wound care for Patient #6. She confirmed there was no documentation available in Patient #6’s clinical record indicating the discontinuation of unna boots on 04/29/2024, resumption of unna boots on 05/03/2024, or discontinuation of unna boots on 05/06/2024. S1DCS confirmed S3RN should have notified Patient #6’s physician when skin changes were identified during her assessment 05/31/2024. S1DCS confirmed there were no approved physician orders available for wound care provided by S3RN on 06/03/2024 for application of barrier cream to Patient #6’s right lower extremity or for wound care provided by S3RN on 06/19/2024 for barrier cream application to Patient #6’s buttocks as needed for rash. S1DCS confirmed S3RN should have requested physician approval of wound care orders provided to Patient #6 prior to performing wound care on the aforementioned dates and did not.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

  • Documentation Of Inservice Training

    The inspectors’ words, 483 words

    “Documentation of inservice training CFR(s): 484.80(d)(2) The HHA must maintain documentation that demonstrates the requirements of this standard have been met. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record reviews, the agency failed to maintain documentation of annual abuse and neglect training for 11 of 11 (S1DCS, S2LPN, S3RN, S4RN, S5OT, S6PT, S8HHA, S9HHA, S10HHA, S11HHA and S12HHA) employee personnel files reviewed, in accordance with federal regulation requirements. Findings: Record review of the agency’s undated policy titled, “Assessment of Possible Abuse and Neglect” revealed, in part: Policy This policy will be reviewed annually with each employee. Each employee will sign an attestation of acknowledgement. Record Review of S1DCS’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/16/2021. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 08/11/2022. Record Review of S2LPN’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 04/17/2023. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since date of hire. Record Review of S3RN’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 11/23/2020. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 08/11/2022. Record Review of S4RN’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/09/2024. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed upon date of hire. Record Review of S5OT’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/01/2017. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 08/11/2022. Record Review of S6PT’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/10/2019. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 08/11/2022. Record Review of S8HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/16/2022. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 12/16/2022. Record Review of S9HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 10/03/2016. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 08/11/2022. Record Review of S10HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 01/17/2023. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed upon date of hire and at least annually. Record Review of S11HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/05/2022. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed upon date of hire and at least annually. Record Review of S12HHA’s personnel file revealed a hire date of 10/25/2021. There was no documented evidence of annual abuse and neglect training completed since 08/11/2022. On 06/27/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DCS. S1DCS stated she was unaware abuse and neglect training was required at least annually and was unable to provide any documented evidence of abuse and neglect training provided to any newly hired employees in the last 12 months or to any existing employees since 2022. S1DCS confirmed the aforementioned employees had not received annual abuse and neglect training and should have.”

    Rule G0778. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 27, 2024Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 5, 1972.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Jody Creighton Martin (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Jody Creighton Martin (general partner, 50%); Richard H Martin (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Richard H Martin (general partner, 50%); Jody Creighton Martin (corporate officer, 33.3%); Jody Creighton Martin (managing employee (on the payroll), 33.3%); Jody Creighton Martin (runs it (operational or managerial control), 33.3%); Richard H Martin (corporate officer, 33.3%); Richard H Martin (managing employee (on the payroll), 33.3%); Richard H Martin (runs it (operational or managerial control), 33.3%); Jody Creighton Martin (corporate director); Richard H Martin (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (91 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate85.29% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.63% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.34% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70433, where this agency’s office is, 25 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.