Hearth Record

Egan-Ochsner Home Health River Parishes

A home health agency in La Place, Louisiana 70068

1703 Chantilly Drive, Ste A, La Place, Louisiana 70068. (985) 653-8117.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 30, 2026: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 30, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure each OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) was successfully transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 30 days of completion. Findings: Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 10/21/2025 revealed 95 records were processed with 2 records receiving error message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 12/09/2025 revealed 96 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 12/16/2025 revealed 86 records were processed with 2 record receiving error message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. In an interview on 01/30/2026 at 1:24pm, S2Director of Nursing confirmed the above records were submitted late. S2Director of Nursing indicated all OASIS Assessments should be submitted within 30 days of completion and were not submitted as required.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 413 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure an accurate review of all medications that were prescribed for 1 (Patient #6) of 7 sampled patients observed for medication reconciliation during home visits. Findings: Review of Patient #6’s medication profile, presented by S2Director of Nursing (DON) as the most current copy of Patient #6’s medication, revealed Patient #6 was documented as receiving, in part, Gabapentin (medication used to help control seizures) 600 milligrams (mg), one half tablet by mouth three times a day with a start date of 12/18/2025; Gabapentin 300mg Capsule, take 1 capsule by mouth daily with a start date of 12/11/2025; Lidocaine (medication used to treat pain) Plus 5% topical patch, place one patch onto skin once daily with a start date of 12/11/2025; Lidocaine 4% topical cream, apply a thin layer to skin as needed for pain with a start date of 11/06/2025; and Nystatin (medication used to treat fungal or yeast infections) 100,000 unit/gram topical cream, apply to affected areas three time a day with a start date of 08/02/2024. Observation during a home visit on 1/28/2026 at 1:35PM, revealed, in part, the following medications were in Patient #6’s home: Gabapentin 300milligram capsule, take one capsule by mouth daily with a fill date of 12/11/2025; Lidocaine 5% topical patch, apply one patch for twelve hours then remove for twelve hours, with a fill date of 12/29/2025; Lidocaine Plus 5% topical cream, apply a thin layer to skin as needed for pain, with fill date of 01/13/2026; and Nystatin 100,000 Unit/Gram Powder, apply to affected area, with a fill date of 9/23/2025 In an interview on 1/28/2026 at 1:37PM, Patient #6 stated she was only taking Gabapentin 300milligrams once a day and further indicated that the dosage had been decreased “a while back”. In an interview on 1/28/2026 at 1:38PM, S3Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed Patient #6’s current medication list did not accurately reflect Patient #6’s physician medication orders, and should have. In an interview on 01/29/2026 at 12:27PM, S1Director of Nursing indicated the skilled nurse should have identified the above mentioned medication changes and updated them on Patient #6’s medication profile.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

Aug 19, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 371 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure a patient received skilled nursing services per the plan of care for 1 (Patient #1) of 3 (Patient #1, Patient #2, and Patient #3) sampled patients reviewed for nursing services provided. Findings: Review of Patient #1’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 06/04/2024 through 08/02/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #1 had diagnoses of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (a group of conditions caused by the mother consuming alcohol during pregnancy), lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood (condition which caused developmental delays), Congenital Tracheomalacia (condition in which the walls of patient’s windpipe collapse); and, Attention to Gastrostomy (an artificial tube to administer feedings directly into the stomach). Further review revealed Patient #1 was to receive up to 60 hours per week of private duty skilled nursing services for a 9 week period. Review revealed Patient #1’s skilled nurse was to assess all body systems every visit, obtain vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and temperature) every shift and as needed, and administer tube feedings. Review of Patient #1’s record revealed no documented evidence and the agency was unable to present any documented evidence a skilled nurse had provided care to Patient #1 from 08/01/2024 through 08/19/2024. In an interview on 08/19/2024 at 11:56am, S3EHH/ED confirmed Patient #1’s caregiver wanted skilled nursing services Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. S3EHH/ED indicated that due to staffing issues, Patient #1 did not receive skilled nursing services per Patient #1’s Plan of Care from 08/01/2024 through 08/19/2024.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Integrate All Services

    The inspectors’ words, 432 words

    “Integrate all services CFR(s): 484.60(d)(3) Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s Support Coordinator (SC) was notified: 1. When the agency was unable to provide skilled nursing services per the plan of care (Patient #1); and 2. When the agency was unable to contact Patient #1’s caregiver to provide services to Patient #1. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Patient #1) of 3 (Patient #1, Patient #2, and Patient #3) sampled patients reviewed for coordination of care. Findings: Review of Patient #1’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 06/04/2024 through 08/02/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #1 was to receive skilled nursing services via Extended Home Health (EHH) up to 60 hours per week for one 9 week episode. Review of Patient #1’s Case Coordination Note dated 05/31/2024 revealed, in part, the agency had notified Patient #1’s caregiver there may be times when the agency was unable to provide all of Patient #1’s ordered/authorized visits/hours due to an ongoing critical nursing shortage and staffing crisis. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the agency presented no documented evidence the agency had notified Patient #1’s support coordinator of the agency’s staffing shortage and inability to provide staff for all of Patient #1’s authorized/ordered visits. Review of Patient #1’s Case Communication Note dated 07/11/2024 - 07/12/2024 revealed, in part, S5Case Coordinator made several attempts to contact Patient #1’s caregiver with messages left, but did not receive a return telephone call. Review of Patient #1’s Case Communication Note dated 08/08/2024 revealed S3Extended Home Health (EHH)/Executive Director (ED) had called and informed Patient #1’s caregiver and notified Patient #1’s caregiver the agency would continue to attempt to have prn (as needed) nurses provide services. In an interview 08/19/2024 at 10:12 a.m., Patient #1’s Support Coordinator indicated she was not notified about the staffing shortage and inability of the agency to provide staffing for Patient #1 until July 2024, when Patient #1’s caregiver had contacted her regarding not having nursing services. In an interview on 08/19/2024 at 2:48 p.m., S3EHH/ED indicated the agency did not notify Patient #1’s Support Coordinator of the upcoming staffing issues nor did they notify Patient #1’s Support Coordinator when the agency was unable to contact Patient #1’s caregiver about not being able to provide nursing services.”

    Rule G0606. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Primary Hha Is Responsible For Patient Care

    The inspectors’ words, 325 words

    “Primary HHA is responsible for patient care CFR(s): 484.105(e)(3) The primary HHA is responsible for patient care, and must conduct and provide, either directly or under arrangements, all services rendered to patients. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the agency maintained responsibility for the Extended Home Health (EHH) patients who were assigned to the home health agency. Findings: Review of S2Executive Director for Home Health’s Job Description revealed, in part, the Executive Director was to supervise and ensure high quality patient care services throughout the episode of care. In an interview on 08/14/2024 at 9:22 a.m., S2ED of Home Health indicated she was not aware of the agency providing EHH services. S2ED of Home Health then asked if the surveyor was asking for the pediatric patient’s census, and indicated the information on the pediatric patients would have to be obtained from S3Extended Home Health (EHH)/ED which was out of a sister agency. S2ED of Home Health indicated she did not have access to the EHH/pediatric patient census or medical records. In an interview on 08/19/2024 at 2:45 p.m., S1Administrator indicated the day to day operations and responsibility for the EHH/pediatric services was led by S3EHH/ED, and the agency was not handling the staff or coordination of care for EHH/pediatric patients. S1Administrator further indicated S3EHH/ED was responsible for the supervision and coordination of care of the EHH/pediatric program, and all of the agency’s EHH/pediatric patients were managed centrally by S3EHH/ED out of a sister agency’s office, which had a different provider number. In an interview on 08/19/2024 at 2:48 p.m., S3EHH/ED indicated there was no staff at the agency level responsible for the supervision of care and services of the EHH/pediatric patients. S3EHH/ED further indicated she was responsible for all day to day operations of EHH/pediatric patients for multiple agencies and the EHH program was not supervised or managed at the individual agencies.”

    Rule G0980. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 30, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited
Aug 19, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 14, 1989.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Southeast Louisiana Homecare LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2020.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jeanne Fos (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
Southeast Louisiana Homecare LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2020
Louisiana Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2020
Ochsner Clinic FoundationOwns 5% or more through other companies75%Jan 1, 2020
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies75%Jan 1, 2020

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (245 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.57% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.74% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.82% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 31 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70068, where this agency’s office is, 29 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.