Hearth Record

Ochsner Home Health of Raceland

A home health agency in Raceland, Louisiana 70394

4560 Highway 1, Suite 4, Raceland, Louisiana 70394. (985) 664-4066.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 16, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 16, 2024: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 882 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. A patient’s pulse oxygen saturation level (a measurement of the amount of oxygen circulating in a patient’s blood) was obtained per the plan of care (Patient #17); 2. A patient’s capillary blood glucose (blood sugar) level was obtained per the plan of care (Patient #17); and, 3. A patient’s weight or ankle circumference was obtained per the plan of care (Patient #7, Patient #16). This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Patient #7, Patient #16, and Patient #17) of 17 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #11, Patient #12, Patient #13, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16, and Patient #17) sampled patients reviewed for care and services provided per their plan of care. Findings: 1. Patient #17 Review of Patient #17’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/19/2023 through 02/16/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #17 was to receive skilled nursing services once a week for eight weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was to obtain a pulse oxygen saturation level for Patient #17 every visit. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, a pulse oxygen saturation level was obtained during the skilled nurse visits for Patient #17 conducted on 12/28/2023, 01/05/2024, 01/12/2024, 01/18/2024, 01/25/2024, and 02/01/2024. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:48 p.m., S2Patient Care Manager (PCM) indicated the agency had no documented evidence Patient #17’s pulse oximetry was completed as ordered for the above mentioned dates per the plan of care. 2. Patient #17 Review of Patient #17’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/19/2023 through 02/16/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #17 was to receive skilled nursing services once a week for eight weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was to instruct Patient #17 on diabetes, and assess Patient #17 for diabetic complications, and notify the physician of a fasting blood sugar of less than 60 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL) or greater than 350 mg/dL, or a random blood sugar of less than 60 mg/dL or greater than 350 mg/dL. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #17’s capillary blood glucose was monitored on 12/28/2023, 01/12/2024, and 01/18/2024. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:48 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency had no documented evidence Patient #17’s capillary blood glucose was monitored by the skilled nurse per the plan of care. 3. Patient #7 Review of Patient #7’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 09/12/2024 through 11/10/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #7 was to receive skilled nursing services once a week for nine weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was to obtain Patient #7’s weight every visit and notify the physician of a weight gain or loss of three pounds within one day or five pounds within one week. Further review also revealed the skilled nurse was to obtain Patient #7’s ankle circumference every visit and notify the physician of an increase of 2 centimeters (cm) within one day. Review of Patient #7’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #7’s weight was obtained on 09/24/2024, 10/01/2024, and 10/08/2024. Further review revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #7’s ankle circumference was obtained during the skilled nursing visits on 09/17/2024, 09/24/2024, 10/01/2024, and 10/08/2024. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:31 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency had no documented evidence that the skilled nurses had obtained Patient #7’s weights and/or ankle circumference measurements for the above mentioned dates per the plan of care. Patient #16 Review of Patient #16’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 04/11/2024 through 06/09/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #16 was to receive skilled nursing services once a week for one week, then twice a week for eight weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was to obtain Patient #16’s ankle circumference measurements every visit and notify the physician of an increase of 1 cm within one day. Review of Patient #16’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #16’s ankle circumference measurements were obtained during the skilled nursing visits on 04/12/2024, 04/15/2024, 04/22/2024, 04/26/2024, and 04/29/2024. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:45 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency had no further evidence to present that Patient #7 and Patient #16’s weight and/or ankle circumference measurements were obtained as ordered for the above mentioned dates per their plan of care.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 413 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to maintain surveillance of infections for 4 (Patient #8, Patient #10, Patient #15, and Patient #16) of 8 (Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #15, Patient #16, and Patient #17)) sampled patients identified as having infections in a total sample of 17. Findings: Findings: Patient #8 Review of Patient #8’s Client Medication Record revealed, in part, Patient #8 received Valacyclovir (medication used to treat infections) 1 gram tablet by mouth two times per day with a start date of 08/09/2024 and end date 08/18/2024. Patient #10 Review of Patient #10’s Client Medication Record revealed, in part, Patient #10 received Penicillin V Potassium (medication used to treat infections) 500 milligrams (mg) tablet by mouth every six hours with a start date of 06/05/2024 and end date 06/24/2024. Patient #15 Review of Patient #15’s Client Medication Record revealed, in part, Patient #15 received Levofloxacin (medication used to treat infections) 750 mg one tablet by mouth daily with a start date of 05/08/2024. Further review revealed patient #15 also received Rifampin (medication used to treat infections) two 300 mg capsules by mouth daily with a start date of 06/11/2024. Patient #16 Review of Patient #16’s Client Medication Record revealed, in part, Patient #16 received Vancomycin (medication used to treat infections) Topical 1gram and Meropenem (medication used to treat infections) Topical one gram apply both medications to wounds once daily with a start date of 04/11/2024. Review of the agency’s Infection Control Logs for the year of 2024 revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, the above mentioned medications used to treat Patient #8, Patient #10, Patient #15, and Patient #16’s infections were included in the agency’s surveillance of infections. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:22 p.m., S1Administrator/Executive Director acknowledged these antibiotic and/or antiviral medications for Patient #8, Patient #10, Patient #15, and Patient #16 were not included in the agency’s surveillance of infections.”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level.

  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 918 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure a patient’s wounds were assessed and measured upon identification of the wound, and weekly for 5 (Patient #7, Patient #11, Patient #15, Patient #16, and Patient #17) of 7 (Patient #7, Patient #9, Patient #11, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16, and Patient #17) sampled patients reviewed for provision of services. Findings: Review of the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society’s Guidelines revealed, in part, assessment and documentation of a wound’s status, which included comprehensive clinical data to demonstrate evidence of progress in healing or failure to heal. Further review revealed comprehensive wound assessment included the measurement of: dimensions and depth; presence, location and depth of any sinus tracts or undermining areas; status and characteristics of the wound bed; volume, color, and odor of exudates; and, evidence of infection in surrounding tissues. Further review revealed when the above mentioned data was recorded over time, this information could be used to track the progress of wound healing. Patient #7 Review Patient #7’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 09/12/2024 to 11/10/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #7 was to receive skilled nursing services once a week for nine weeks and the nurse was to perform wound care for Patient #7’s skin tears. Review of Patient #7’s Nurse Visit Note Report dated 10/12/2024 revealed, in part, an anterior proximal right pretibial (right front of lower leg) skin tear was identified, and no measurements of the wound was obtained. Further review revealed an anterior left proximal pretibial skin tear was identified, and no measurements were obtained. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:31 p.m., S2Patient Care Manager (PCM) indicated there was no wound care measurements obtained on the above mentioned wounds on 10/12/2024, and the nurse should have measured the wounds upon identification. Patient #11 Review of Patient #11’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 08/10/2024 to 10/08/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #11 was to receive skilled nursing services three times a week with wound care to be performed by the nurse to the wound to Patient #11’s anus. Review of Patient #11’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency did not present any documented evidence, wound care measurements had been obtained on Patient #11’s anus wound the week of 08/25/2024 thru 08/31/2024. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:35 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency had no documented evidence the skilled nurse obtained Patient #11’s wound measurements as required for the week of 08/25/2024 thru 08/31/2024 for Patient #11’s anus wound. Patient #15 Review of Patient #15’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 11/09/2023 thru 01/07/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #15 was to receive skilled nursing services twice a week for eight weeks which included wound care . Review of Patient #15’s Nurse Visit Note Report dated 12/21/2023 revealed Patient #15 had a newly identified Stage II (open wound of the skin) pressure ulcer to the upper right buttock. Review of Patient #15’s Nurse Visit Note Report dated 12/26/2023 and 12/28/2023 revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence Patient #15’s upper right buttock wound was measured and assessed the week of 12/24/2023 thru 12/30/2023. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:40 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency had no documented evidence Patient #15’s upper right buttock wound had been assessed and measured the week of 12/24/2023 thru 12/30/2023. Patient #16 Review of Patient #16’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 04/11/2024 thru 06/09/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #16 was to receive skilled nursing services once a week for one week, then twice a week for eight weeks. Further review revealed, in part, Patient #16 was also to receive wound care services. Review of Patient #16’s Wound Visit Note Report dated 04/22/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #16 was identified as having a new right heel wound with bloody drainage. Further review revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, wound care measurements and/or assessment was completed for Patient #16’s new right heel wound. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:45 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency had no documented evidence a wound care assessment and/or wound measurements were completed on Patient #16’s new right heel wound on 04/22/2024. S2PCM further indicated an assessment with wound measurements should be completed for all newly identified wounds. Patient #17 Review of Patient #17’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/19/2023 to 02/16/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #17 was to received skilled nursing services once a week for eight weeks. Further review revealed, in part, the skilled nurse was to provide wound care. Review of Patient #17’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency was unable to present any documented evidence, wound measurements and/or assessment was completed on Patient #17’s left lower buttock wound the weeks of 01/07/2024 thru 01/13/2024, and 01/28/2024 thru 02/03/2024. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:48 p.m., S2PCM indicated the agency did not have any documented evidence Patient #17’s left lower buttock wound was assessed which included wound measurements weekly as required.”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level.

  • Reviewed, Revised By Physician Every 60 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “Reviewed, revised by physician every 60 days CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The individualized plan of care must be reviewed and revised by the physician or allowed practitioner who is responsible for the home health plan of care and the HHA as frequently as the patient’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews the agency failed to ensure verbal orders were signed by the physician within 60 days for 1 (Patient #10) of 17 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #11, Patient #12, Patient #13, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16, and Patient #17) sampled patients reviewed for care and services. Findings: Review of Patient #10’s Home Health Certification and Plans of Care for the certification periods from 06/09/2023 to 11/29/2023 revealed, in part, no physician signature was documented on any orders from 06/09/2023 to 11/29/2023. Review of Patient #10’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, of having any signed physician’s orders for the time period of 06/09/2023 to 11/29/2023. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:06 p.m., S1Administrator/Executive Director acknowledged no physician’s signature was present on any of Patient #10’s physician’s orders from 06/09/2023 to 11/29/2023.”

    Rule G0588. Element-level.

  • Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes

    The inspectors’ words, 278 words

    “Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to notify the physician when a patient’s vital signs were outside of parameters for 1 (Patient #15) of 17 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #11, Patient #12, Patient #13, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16, and Patient #17) sampled patients reviewed for physician notification requirements. Findings: Review of Patient #15’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 11/09/2023 to 01/07/2024 revealed, in part, licensed professional staff were to report vital signs falling outside of the following parameter to Patient #15’s physician: a systolic blood pressure below 90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Review of Patient #15’s Nurse Visit Note Report dated 11/09/2023 revealed, in part, a systolic blood pressure of 84 mmHg. Further review revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #15’s physician had been notified of the above. In an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:40 p.m., S2Patient Care Manager (PCM) indicated the nurse should have notified the physician of Patient #15’s systolic blood pressure being below the above specified parameter. S2PCM further indicated the agency had no further evidence to present that the nurse had notified the physician that Patient #15’s systolic blood pressure was below the above mentioned parameter.”

    Rule G0590. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 16, 2024Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 14, 1984.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Southeast Louisiana Homecare LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 29, 2009.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Amy E Malbrough (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Southeast Louisiana Homecare LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 29, 2009
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 29, 2009
Louisiana Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2009
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies75%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies75%Jan 29, 2009
Ochsner Clinic FoundationOwns 5% or more through other companies25%Feb 1, 2009

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (337 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate88.07% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.94% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.96% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70394, where this agency’s office is, 10 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.