Hearth Record

Home Health Ctr of Thibodaux

A home health agency in Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301

804 Bayou Lane, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301. (985) 447-8442.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 4, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 4, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 926 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the agency failed to: 1. Ensure the skilled nurse assessed daily weights per the patient’s plan of care (Patient #7); 2. Ensure the skilled nurse provided care and services per the frequency and specifications of the plan of care (Patient #9); and, 3. Ensure the skilled nurse obtained vital signs during the skilled nurse visit per the plan of care (Patient #13). This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Patient #7, Patient #9, Patient #13) of 17 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #11, Patient #12, Patient #13, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16, Patient #17) sampled patients reviewed for care and services per the plan of care. Findings: Patient #7 Review of Patient #7’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 11/24/2024 through 01/22/2025 revealed Patient #7 had a diagnosis of, in part, Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure (condition in which the patient’s heart does not pump effectively). Further review revealed, in part, Patient #7 was to receive skilled nurse services twice a week for eight weeks and the skilled nurse was to notify the physician of a weight gain of 2-3 pounds in one day or 5 pounds in a week and was symptomatic. Review further revealed if Patient #7 was unable to weigh, notify the physician of other symptoms of fluid retention. Review of Patient #7’s record revealed the following, in part: 11/29/2024 Patient #7 was able to ambulate with a walker, and the skilled nurse documented Patient #7 was able to ambulate, and the skilled nurse documented Patient #7 was not weighed daily; 12/11/2024 Patient #7 was able to ambulate with a walker, and the skilled nurse documented Patient #7 was not weighed today; 12/13/2024 Patient #7 was not weighed daily; 12/18/2024 Patient #7 was not weighed daily; 12/20/2024 no documentation of Patient #7’s weight; 12/25/2024 Patient #7 ambulated on the skilled nurse’s arrival, and no documentation of Patient #7’s weight; 01/01/2025 Patient #7 was not weighed daily; and, 01/08/2025 Patient #7 able to ambulate, and the skilled nurse documented Patient #7 was not weighed today. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 1:52PM, S1Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON) indicated per Patient #7’s plan of care, daily weights should be obtained daily unless unable to stand. The skilled nurse should review the daily weights and notify the physician per the plan of care for weight gains. S1Administrator/DON further indicated if Patient #7 had not weighed himself, the skilled nurse should have weighed Patient #7 or documented if Patient #7 was refused to get weighed. Patient #9 Review of Patient #9’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/31/2024 through 02/28/2025 revealed, in part, Patient #9 was to receive skilled nursing services twice a week for three weeks. Review of Patient #9’s record revealed the week of 01/05/2025 through 01/11/2025 Patient #9 had a completed skilled nurse visit on 01/08/2025; however, the skilled nurse visit on 01/09/2025 was a non-billable visit because the skilled nurse only provided care to read a skin test for tuberculosis, and did not perform a skilled nursing visit per the plan of care. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #9 had a complete skilled nurse visit per the plan of care for the week of 01/05/2025 through 01/11/2025. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 4:02PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the agency did not have any documented evidence Patient #9 received a second complete skilled nurse visit the week of 01/05/2025 through 01/11/2025. Patient #13 Review of Patient #13’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 11/01/2023 through 12/30/2023 revealed, in part, the skilled nurse was to obtain and notify the physician of vital signs outside of the following parameters: systolic blood pressure (top number of a blood pressure) of greater than 150 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or less than 90 mmHg and symptomatic; diastolic blood pressure (bottom number of a blood pressure) of greater than 90 mmHg or less than 40 mmHg and symptomatic; heart rate of greater than 100 beats per minute or less than 50 beats per minute; and temperature of greater than 101 degree Fahrenheit. Review of Patient #13’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #13’s blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature had been obtained and documented on Patient #13’s skilled nurse visit dated 11/14/2023. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 3:55PM, S2Registered Nurse (RN)/Patient Care Coordinator (PCC) indicated she had performed the visit on 11/14/2023 and did not have any documentation of Patient #13’s blood pressure, heart rate, nor temperature documented as required by the plan of care. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 3:56PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the above vital signs should have been obtained and documented on the 11/14/2023 visit and were not.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 430 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure patient medications were reconciled for 2 (Patient #7, Patient #12) of 7 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #12) sampled patients reviewed for medication reconciliation. Findings: Patient #7 Review of Patient #7’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 11/24/2024 through 01/22/2025 revealed Patient #7 was to receive skilled nursing services twice a week for eight weeks. Review of Patient #7’s Medication Profile dated 01/28/2025 revealed, in part, an order for Tramadol (medication used to treat pain) 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet every six hours as needed for pain. Observation on 01/29/2025 at 10:06AM revealed Patient #7’s Tramadol 50mg one tablet twice a day as needed for pain with a prescription fill date of 12/23/2024. In an interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:06AM, Patient #7 confirmed the prescription label was the current order for Tramadol twice a day, which was different from Patient #7’s medication profile. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 1:52PM, S1Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the nursing staff should have identified the change in order for Patient #7’s Tramadol order and reconciled the medication list. Patient #12 Review of Patient #12’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/31/2024 through 02/28/2025 revealed Patient #12 was to receive skilled nursing services twice a week for three weeks, then once a week for six weeks. Review of Patient #12’s Physician Progress Note dated 01/09/2025 revealed Patient #12’s medication list included, in part, Ropinirole (generic name for Requip) (medication used to treat parkinson’s disease) 0.25 mg administer one tablet at bedtime. Review of Patient #12’s Medication Profile dated 01/28/2025 revealed no documented evidence Requip was documented as a current medication. Observation on 01/29/2025 at 11:50AM revealed Patient #12 had Requip 0.25 mg one tablet by mouth every night with a prescription date fill date of 01/16/2025. In an interview on 01/29/2025 at 11:50AM, Patient #12’s caregiver confirmed Patient #12 was currently receiving Requip and had been on the Requip for quite some time. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 2:04PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the agency did not capture the Requip on Patient #12’s medication profile and should have.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • In Accordance With Current Clinical Practice

    The inspectors’ words, 414 words

    “In accordance with current clinical practice CFR(s): 484.105(f)(2) All HHA services must be provided in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines and accepted professional standards of practice. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure weekly wound measurements were obtained for 2 (Patient #7 and Patient #16) of 7 (Patient #7, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #13, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16) sampled patients reviewed for weekly wound care measurements. Findings: Review of the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society’s Guidelines revealed the assessment and documentation of wound status included comprehensive clinical data demonstrating evidence of progress in healing or failure to heal. Comprehensive wound assessment included: dimensions and depth, presence, location and depth of any sinus tracts or undermining areas, status and characteristics of the wound bed, volume, color, and odor of exudates, and evidence of infection in surrounding tissues. Further review revealed when recorded over time, this information can be used to track the progress of wound healing. Patient #7 Review of Patient #7’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 11/24/2024 through 01/22/2025 revealed Patient #7 was to receive skilled nursing services for, in part, wound care to the right heel stage III pressure ulcer (wound caused by pressure which extends through the subcutaneous [fat] tissue). Review of Patient #7’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #7’s right heel wound was measured the week of 12/22/2024 through 12/28/2024. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 1:52PM, S1Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the agency did not have evidence of Patient #7’s wound had been measured the week of 12/22/2024 through 12/28/2024. S1Administrator/DON further indicated the nurses should measure wounds weekly. Patient #16 Review of Patient #16’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 08/03/2024 through 10/01/2024 revealed Patient #16 was to receive skilled nursing services for, in part, wound care to the right buttock stage II pressure ulcer (wound caused by pressure which extends through the first level of skin). Review of Patient #16’s record revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #16’s right buttock wound was measured the weeks of 09/01/2024 through 09/07/2024, and 09/15/2024 through 09/21/2024. In an interview on 02/03/2025 at 4:00PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the agency did not have wound care measurements for the above mentioned weeks. S1Administrator/DON further indicated all wounds should be measured weekly.”

    Rule G0984. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 4, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 21, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Gregory Stock (corporate officer, 50%); Gregory Stock (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Bonnie Loker (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); David W Elias (corporate director); Raja S Talluri (corporate director); Jacob Giardina (corporate director); Jacob Giardina (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Obie C Hill (corporate director); Harold M Block (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (286 surveys completed): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.07% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.28% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.88% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70301, where this agency’s office is, 15 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.