Hearth Record

Amedisys Home Health

A home health agency in Houma, Louisiana 70360

1403 St Charles Street , Suite 101, Houma, Louisiana 70360. (985) 872-1955.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 28, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 28, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,057 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure: 1. The skilled nurse monitored patient weights and/or abdominal circumferences for weight gain (Patient #1, Patient #10); and, 2. The skilled nurse monitored patient capillary blood glucose readings (Patient #9, Patient #10). This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Patient #1, Patient #9, Patient #10) of 13 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #11, Patient #12, Patient #13) sampled patients reviewed for care and services provided per the plan of care. Findings: 1. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/08/2025 through 03/08/2025 revealed, in part, Patient #1 was to receive skilled nursing services twice a week for nine weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was to observe Patient #1’s ability to monitor and report daily weights. The skilled nurse was to record Patient #1’s reported weight, or weigh patient as needed. The skilled nurse was to report a weight gain of greater than 2 pounds in a day or greater than 5 pounds in a week. Further review revealed the skilled nurse may measure abdominal girth if unable to weigh. Review of Patient #1’s Skilled Nurse Visit Note Report for the following dates revealed no documented evidence of a weight being obtained or abdominal circumference being obtained and recorded, and/or that the nurse reviewed Patient #1’s weights, in part: 01/15/2025, 01/17/2025, 01/24/2025, 01/29/2025, 02/05/2025, 02/07/2025, and 02/12/2025. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #1’s weights and/or abdominal circumference was obtained and/or monitored as per the plan of care for the above mentioned dates. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:16PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the skilled nurses were not monitoring Patient #1’s weight during every visit, due to Patient #1’s right leg amputation which made it difficult for Patient #1 to stand for a weight. S1Administrator/DON confirmed the skilled nurses did not take an abdominal circumference in the place of Patient #1’s weight on the above mentioned dates as required. Patient #10 Review of Patient #10’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/08/2024 through 03/07/2024 revealed, in part, the skilled nurse was to provide care and services once a week for nine weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was to observe Patient #1’s ability to monitor and report daily weights. The skilled nurse was to record Patient #1’s reported weight, or weigh Patient #10 as needed. The skilled nurse was to report a weight gain of greater than 2 pounds in a day or greater than 5 pounds in a week. Further review revealed the skilled nurse may measure abdominal girth if unable to weigh Review of Patient #10’s Skilled Nurse Visit Note Report for the following dates revealed no documented evidence of a weight being obtained or abdominal circumference being obtained and recorded, and/or that the nurse reviewed Patient #10’s weights, in part: 01/18/2024, 01/23/2024, 02/01/2024, 02/08/2024, 02/15/2024, 02/22/2024, 03/01/2024, and 03/05/2024. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #10’s weights and/or abdominal circumference was obtained and/or monitored as per the plan of care for the above mentioned dates. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:35PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the skilled nurses were not monitoring Patient #10’s weight during every visit. S1Administrator/DON confirmed the skilled nurses did not obtain an abdominal circumference in the place of Patient #10’s weight on the above mentioned dates as required. 2. Patient #9 Review of Patient #9’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/17/2025 through 03/17/2025 revealed, in part, the skilled nurse was to monitor Patient #9’s blood sugar (capillary blood glucose) log for blood sugar readings that were being checked by Patient #9 two times a day. Review of Patient #9’s Skilled Nurse Visit Note Report dated 01/17/2025 revealed no documented evidence of Patient #9’s capillary blood glucose (blood sugar) readings were obtained and/or no documented evidence the skilled nurse reviewed Patient #9’s capillary blood glucose readings. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #9’s capillary blood glucose was obtained and/or monitored as per the plan of care for the above mentioned dates. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:10PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the skilled nurse did not document Patient #9’s capillary blood glucose on 01/17/2025, nor did the skilled nurse document she reviewed Patient #9’s capillary blood glucose readings as required. Patient #10 Review of Patient #10’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/08/2024 through 03/07/2024 revealed, in part, the skilled nurse was to provide care and services once a week for nine weeks. Further review revealed the skilled nurse was assess and teach patient/caregiver ability to perform and record blood glucose testing as ordered and to report abnormal findings. The nurse was to notify the physician if a blood glucose reading was greater than 300 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dl) or less than 70 mg/dl. Review of Patient #10’s Skilled Nurse Visit Note Report dated 01/08/2024, 01/18/2024, 01/23/2024, 02/01/2024, 02/08/2024, 02/15/2024, 02/22/2024, 03/01/2024, and 03/05/2024 revealed no documented evidence Patient #10’s capillary blood glucose (blood sugar) reading were obtained and/or documentation that skilled nurse had reviewed Patient #10’s capillary blood glucose readings. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #10’s capillary blood glucose readings were obtained and/or monitored as per the plan of care for the above mentioned dates. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:35PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the skilled nurse did not document capillary blood glucose readings, and/or document reviewing blood glucose readings as required.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 331 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure the skilled nurse removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene after coming into contact with items in the environment and prior to performing wound care for 1 (Patient #1) of 1 (Patient #1) sampled patients observed for wound care during a home visit. Findings: Review of the agency’s Standard Precautions policy and procedure, with a reviewed date of 03/28/2024, revealed in part, staff were to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from a contaminated to a clean site during patient care, and in between patient contacts to avoid cross-contamination. Review of Patient #1’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/08/2025 through 03/08/2025 revealed, in part, Patient #1 was to receive wound care twice a week for diabetic foot ulcers on the left lateral foot and the dorsal side of the left great toe. Observation of Patient #1’s wound care on 02/26/2025 at 9:26AM, revealed S3Registered Nurse (RN) pushed her hair behind her ears then grabbed a chair leg to pull the chair forward with gloved hands. S3RN then proceeded to clean Patient #1’s left lateral foot wound without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves. After cleaning the wound, S3RN removed her gloves then performed hand hygiene. S3RN then put on a new pair of gloves, moved the chair closer by grabbing its leg, and without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene again, applied a clean dressing to Patient #1’s left foot. In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 3:16PM, S1Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the above mentioned observation. S1Administrator/DON indicated S3RN should have performed hand hygiene and changed gloves anytime she made contact with the environment and prior to performing wound care.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 579 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure all identified infections were included in the agency’s surveillance of infections for 3 (Patient #1, Patient #10, Patient #13) of 9 (Patient #1, Patient #4, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #12, Patient #13) sampled patients identified as having infections. Findings: Review of the agency’s Infection Prevention Program Overview, with a reviewed date of 04/30/2024, revealed, in part, documentation of infections on the infection report must include at minimum the date the infection was detected, the patient’s name, primary diagnosis, signs/symptoms of infection, type of infection, and in the medical record, document if the pathogen was identified and treatment. Further review revealed the agency’s infection data was collected using infection reports and trending the agency’s infection report data through the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program. Agency leadership was to identify the types of infections most common to its care, services, and population. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s Client Medication Report revealed Patient #1 received Levofloxacin (antibiotic used to treat infections) 8 percent powder apply 1 gram topically to the wound daily starting on 10/23/2024. Patient #10 Review of Patient #10’s Client Medication Report revealed, in part, Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) 500 milligrams (mg) one tablet twice a day for urinary tract infection (bladder infection) with a start date of 02/12/2024. Review of Patient #10’s Client Coordination Note Report dated 02/15/2024 revealed, in part, Patient #10 had completed the course of Cipro (antibiotic used to treat infections). Patient #13 Review of Patient #13’s Visit Note Report dated 08/14/2024 revealed, in part, an order for Doxycycline Hyclate (antibiotic used to treat infections) 100 mg one tablet by mouth twice a day. Review of Patient #13’s Wound Care Clinic Visit Note dated 08/19/2024 revealed, in part, unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel still with an odor on 08/12/2024 after Doxycycline was prescribed on 08/08/2024 due to positive wound cultures. Review of the agency’s Quality Improvement (QI) Event Report 2024 for infections revealed no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, the above mentioned patient infections were captured on the QI Event Report for infections for 2024. In an interview on 02/28/2025 at 12:33PM, S1Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the process for infection surveillance was anytime a new infection was suspected, or new antibiotics were identified in the home, the clinician was to enter an infection log into the patient’s chart. S1Adminsitrator/DON further indicated the clinician would then monitor infection symptoms. The infection log would then trigger a QI Event Report which would go to her workflow to review for trends. S1Administrator/DON further indicated the above mentioned patient infection logs were not entered; therefore, would not have been included in the tracking and trending infection control QI event statics. In an interview on 02/28/2025 at 1:08pm, S2Corporate Nurse indicated the above mentioned patients would not have been included in the agency’s tracking and trending of infections and should have been.”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,131 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure an accurate medication reconciliation was completed for 4 (Patient #1, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5) of 5 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5) sampled patient’s medications observed during medication reconciliation in the course of home visit observations. Findings: Review of the agency’s Drug Regimen Review policy and procedure, with a review date of 12/09/2024, revealed, in part, when a patient was admitted to the agency from an acute of post-acute facility, it was the responsibility of the admitting clinician to assure they review the discharge paper from the facility to assure all medications with correct dosages were captured. The clinician will also ask the patient periodically to allow them visualize all medications the patient is current taking. The visualized medications are compared to the current medication profile to ensure accuracy of the medication profile, and any discrepancies should be clarified with the patient’s physician/allowed practitioner (NP/PA). In an interview on 02/25/2025 at 9:39AM, S1Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON) indicated all clinicians were expected to do a medication reconciliation of all the patient’s medication(s) at each visit by viewing the medication bottles and reconciling the medications in the home to the patient’s Client Medication Reports. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/08/2025 through 03/08/2025 revealed Patient #1 received skilled nursing services twice a week. Review of Patient #1’s Client Medication Report, confirmed by S1Administrator/DON as the most accurate medication reconciliation, revealed, in part, Levofloxacin (antibiotic used to treat infections) 8 percent powder apply 1 gram (gm) to wound topically daily with a start date of 10/23/2024. In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 9:30AM, Patient #1 indicated he had the powder in the home but it had been discontinued from his treatment for a while now. In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 9:31AM, S3Registered Nurse (RN) indicated Patient #1 was not currently on the Levofloxacin powder; however, since it was in the home she did not remove it from the current medication list, and should have. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:16PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated after reviewing Patient #1’s record, the nurse had not discontinued the Levofloxacin powder as required. Patient #3 Review of Patient #3’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/19/2025 through 03/19/2025 revealed Patient #3 received skilled nursing services once a week and physical therapy services once a week for one week then twice a week for two weeks, then once a week for six weeks. Review of Patient #3’s record revealed Patient #3 was last seen by the registered nurse (RN) on 02/17/2025 and the physical therapist (PT) on 02/19/2025. Review of Patient #3’s Hospital Discharge Summary dated 01/18/2025 revealed Patient #3 was to start the following medications, in part, Folic Acid (medication used for vitamin supplement) 1 milligram (mg) by mouth once a day, and Thiamine (Vitamin B-1 supplement) 100mg one tablet by mouth once a day. Review of Patient #3’s Client Medication Report, confirmed by S1Administrator/DON as the most accurate medication reconciliation, revealed, in part, no documented evidence of either Folic Acid or Thiamine (Vitamin B-1) was included as a current medication Patient #3 was to receive. Observation on 02/26/2025 at 10:03AM revealed Patient #3 had a bottle of Folic Acid (nutritional supplement) 1 milligram (mg) tablets one tablet by mouth daily, and Vitamin B-1 (Thiamine) (vitamin supplement) 100mg one tablet by mouth daily with a filled date of 02/17/2025. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:13PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the agency had no documented evidence the nurse nor the PT had identified and included Folic Acid and Vitamin B-1 (Thiamine) on Patient #3’s medication report. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/10/2025 through 03/10/2025 revealed Patient #4 had a skilled nurse once a week for five weeks, and occupational therapist (OT) once a week for two weeks, twice a week for one week, then weekly for four weeks. Review of Patient #4’s Client Medication Report, confirmed by S1Administrator/DON as the most accurate medication reconciliation, revealed, in part, Cyancobalamin (Vitamin B-12, a vitamin supplement) 1,000 micrograms (mcg) one tablet by mouth daily; and Oxycodone (medication used to treat pain) 5mg one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Further review revealed no documented evidence of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (medication used to treat pain) had been identified as a current medication. Observation on 02/26/2025 at 12:35PM revealed no evidence of Oxycodone 5mg or Cyancobalamin 1,000 mcg in the home; however, a prescription for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10/325 mg one tablet by mouth four times a day as needed for pain was presented in the home with a fill date of 02/05/2025. In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 12:35PM, Patient #4 indicated she had stopped the Cyancobalamin three months ago, and was taking the pain medication that was presented to the surveyor, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10/325mg. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:14PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated the clinicians did not catch the change in medication orders and should have documented the changes. Patient #5 Review of Patient #5’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 01/16/2025 through 03/16/2025 revealed, in part, Patient #5 was to receive skilled nursing services every week for three weeks, then once every other week for six weeks. Review of Patient #5’s Client Medication Report, confirmed by S1Administrator/DON as the most accurate medication reconciliation, revealed, in part, Clopidogrel (medication used to prevent blood clots from forming) 75mg one tablet daily was listed as a current medication; however, there was no documented evidence of Brilinta (medication used to prevent blood clots from forming) had been captured as a current medication. Observation on 02/26/2025 at 1:45PM revealed a prescription for Brilinta 60mg one tablet twice a day with a prescription fill date of 01/19/2025 was present in the home; however, there was no evidence of a prescription of Clopidogrel 75mg in the home. In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 1:46PM, Patient #5’s spouse indicated Patient #5 was no longer taking Clopidogrel 75mg, because his medication changed to Brilinta 60mg. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 3:21PM, S1Administrator/DON indicated she did not have the updated hospital notes nor the physician progress notes from recent doctor visits. S1Administrator/DON indicated she could not offer an explanation for the reason as to why the the medication changes were not identified.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 28, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 24, 1985.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 31, 2009.
  • Amedisys Holding LLC runs it.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Nikki Welsh Rickerson (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Nikki Welsh Rickerson (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 20, 2015
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 31, 2009
Amedisys Holding LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Apr 4, 2012
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (142 surveys completed): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate91.94% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.02% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.02% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70360, where this agency’s office is, 10 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.