Hearth Record

Angels Care Home Health of Iowa

A home health agency in Des Moines, Iowa 50310

3125 Douglas Avenue Suite 205, Des Moines, Iowa 50310. (515) 252-2847.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 20, 2026: a complaint inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 17, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 679 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a home observation visit, patient interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure accurate completion of all components comprising the Plan of Care, including all medical supplies/equipment used by the patient for 3 of 5 sampled patients (Patients #1, #2 and #5). Failure to maintain complete and accurate Plans of Care placed patients at risk to not receive services, supplies, medications and/or treatments according to assessed needs. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Plan of Care, revised in February 2022, the plan of care is based upon relevant assessment findings. The content of the patient’s plan of care includes, but is not limited to: diagnoses, medications, medical supplies/equipment, safety measures and functional limitations. 1.Patient #1 had a start of care date of 11/16/23. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 11/5/25 to 1/3/26, identified the patient had diagnosis of sepsis and included physician orders for medical supplies/equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies/equipment used by the patient: cane, rails/grab bars, shower/tub equipment, walker, wheelchair and nursing supplies. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 12/3/25, completed by Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), identified the patient was using a heating pad and got burned. c. During a home observation visit on 12/15/25 at 12:05 PM with Staff C, RN, the patient stated he/she plans to continue to use the heating device (rice bag) as needed for pain relief; however, will not heat it up as long in the microwave. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including the heating device (rice bag). 2. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 10/17/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 10/17/25 to 12/15/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral region and included physician orders for medical supplies/equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies/equipment used by the patient: commode, lift, wheelchair, incontinence supplies, wound care supplies and nursing supplies. b. The physical therapist visit note, dated 10/17/25, completed by Staff I, Physical Therapist, identified the patient uses a handheld shower head. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including a handheld shower head. 3. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 10/29/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 10/29/25 to 12/27/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of age related osteoporosis and included physician orders for medical supplies/equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies/equipment used by the patient: walker. b. The skilled nurse start of care comprehensive assessment visit, dated 10/29/25, completed by Staff D, RN, identified the patient utilized a lifeline and also identified the patient had incontinence. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 12/3/25, completed by Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), identified the patient checks his/her blood sugars. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including lifeline, incontinence supplies and diabetic supplies. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Regional Clinical Director.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Required Items In Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 466 words

    “Required items in clinical record CFR(s): 484.110(a)(1) The patient’s current comprehensive assessment, including all of the assessments from the most recent home health admission, clinical notes, plans of care, and physician or allowed practitioner orders; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to provide complete wound assessments on a weekly basis per agency policy for 2 of 3 sampled patients with wounds (Patient #2 and #3). Failure to accurately and thoroughly complete wound assessments put patients at an increased risk of unidentified condition changes. Findings include: According to the agency’s clinical procedure for wound care and assessment, wound assessments and measurements are to be documented weekly. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 10:03 AM, Staff A, Administrator stated wounds are measured weekly and documented in the patient’s electronic medical record. Wound measurements include length, width and depth in centimeters. 1.Patient #2 had a start of care date of 10/17/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 10/17/25 to 12/15/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of pressure ulcers of sacral region (fives wounds) and included physician orders for skilled nursing services two times a week for one week and then three times a week for three weeks. b. The skilled nurse visit notes, dated 10/22/25 and 10/24/25, completed by Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN), failed to include documentation of an assessment including measurements for the following wounds: 1) Stage II pressure ulcer to right superior sacral 2) Stage II pressure ulcer to medial right upper buttock 3) Stage II pressure ulcer to distal right lower buttock 4) Stage II pressure ulcer to left superior sacral 5) Stage II pressure ulcer to distal left lower buttock The agency nurse failed to obtain complete wound assessments and measurements per agency policy. 2. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 11/25/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 11/25/25 to 1/23/26, identified the patient had a diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system and included physician orders for skilled nursing services to perform and teach wound care. b. The skilled nurse start of care visit note, completed by Staff B, Director of Nursing, included documentation of an assessment including measurements of the wound to the medial sternal, inferior surgical incision that had a small opening. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 12/8/25, completed by Staff G, RN, failed to include documentation of an assessment including measurements of the wound to the medial sternal, inferior surgical incision that had a small opening. The agency nurse failed to obtain a complete wound assessment and measurements per agency policy. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Regional Clinical Director.”

    Rule G1012. Element-level. From a complaint.

Dec 12, 2024: complaint inspection5 deficiencies
  • Comprehensive Assessment Of Patients

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Comprehensive Assessment of Patients CFR(s): 484.55 Condition of participation: Comprehensive assessment of patients. Each patient must receive, and an HHA must provide, a patient-specific, comprehensive assessment. For Medicare beneficiaries, the HHA must verify the patient’s eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit including homebound status, both at the time of the initial assessment visit and at the time of the comprehensive assessment. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on provider and agency staff interviews, clinical record review and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure comprehensive assessments included the patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status. The cumulative effects of these systemic practices resulted in placing patients at risk of not receiving safe, individualized and consistent care designed to meet each patients health needs.”

    Rule G0510. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review and agency staff interview, the agency: 1) failed to include all required components of the Plan of Care (G574); and 2) failed to provide medications, treatments and services only as ordered by a physician (G580). The cumulative systemic practices resulted in the failure to ensure the organizational framework of the agency promoted and supported the coordination of safe and effective delivery of care to the agency’s 144 patients.”

    Rule G0570. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Health, Psychosocial, Functional, Cognition

    The inspectors’ words, 2,168 words

    “Health, psychosocial, functional, cognition CFR(s): 484.55(c)(1) Standard: Content of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive assessment must accurately reflect the patient’s status, and must include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The patient’s current health, psychosocial, functional, and cognitive status; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency staff interview, clinical record review, and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure accurate and thorough completion of all pertinent components of each comprehensive assessment for 4 of 5 sampled patients with wounds (Patients #1, #2, #4 and #5). Failure to accurately and thoroughly complete comprehensive assessments to address individualized pertinent areas of health to obtain baseline findings placed patients at an increased risk of unidentified condition changes. 2. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 10/26/24 and received skilled nurse services 2 times a week. a. The POC, dated 10/26/24 to 12/24/24, included orders for the skilled nurse to instruct care to incision site located on the right lower abdomen. b. The comprehensive skilled nurse visit at start of care, dated 10/26/24, included measurement of a surgical wound on the right lower abdomen of 3.5 (cm) length by 0.1 cm width by 0 cm depth. c. The skilled nurse notes, dated 10/28/24 and 10/31/24, Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) revealed the patient had a surgical wound to the right lower abdomen. The notes failed to include wound measurements. d. The skilled nurse notes, dated 11/2/24, Staff J, RN revealed the patient had a surgical wound to the right lower abdomen. The notes failed to include wound measurements. The agency nurse failed to include weekly measurement of the patient’s surgical wound. 3. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 10/24/24 and received skilled nurse services 3 times a week. a. The POC, dated 10/24/24 to 12/22/24, included orders for the skilled nurse to perform/teach wound care to the pressure ulcer to the coccyx, left heel, right 2nd toenail and left pinky (5th) toenail. b. The comprehensive skilled nurse visit at start of care, dated 10/24/24, Staff A, Administrator, included the following measurements: 1) left heel, unstaged ulcer, 1 cm length by 1 cm width by 0.2 cm depth. 2) right lower buttock stage 2 (partial thickness skin loss with a red or pink wound bed, or an open or closed blister) pressure ulcer 1.5 cm length by 1.5 cm width by 0.2 cm depth. 3) left 5th toe diabetic ulcer, 0.7 length by 0.7 cm width by 0.3 cm depth. 4) right 2nd toe diabetic ulcer, 2 cm length by 2 cm width by 0.3 cm depth. c. The skilled nurse note, dated 10/28/24, Staff H, RN revealed the patient had wounds to the left heel, right lower buttock, left 5th toe and right 2nd toe. The note failed to include wound measurements and identified measurements not due. d. The skilled nurse notes, dated 10/30/24 and 11/1/24, Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed the patient had a surgical wound to the left heel, right lower buttock, left 5th toe and right 2nd toe. The note failed to include wound measurements and identified measurements not due. The agency nurse failed to include weekly measurement of the patient’s wounds. 4. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 11/23/24 and received skilled nurse services 3 times a week. a. The POC, dated 11/23/24 to 1/21/25, included orders for the skilled nurse to perform/teach wound care to the stage 3 (full thickness skin loss with visible subcutaneous fat, but no exposed bone, tendon or muscle) pressure ulcer to the sacrum. b. The comprehensive skilled nurse visit at start of care, dated 10/24/24, Staff H, RN, included measurements for the stage 3 coccyx (sacrum) pressure ulcer 1 cm length by 1 cm width by 0.5 cm depth. c. The skilled nurse note, dated 11/25/24, Staff D, RN revealed the patient had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx. The note failed to include wound assessment or measurements and identified staff awaiting orders. d. The skilled nurse notes, dated 11/27/24 and 11/29/24, Staff F, RN revealed the patient had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx. The note failed to include wound measurements and identified measurements not due. The agency nurse failed to include weekly measurements of the patient’s wounds. The above findings reviewed with the Administrator. The agency policy titled Patient Assessment and Reassessment, dated 4/2023, patients who are accepted for skilled service by the agency will receive a comprehensive assessment that will identify the medical, nursing, rehab and social needs of the patient. Relevant assessment findings will be communicated to the physician to aide in the development of the plan of care. Additional assessments or reassessments will be conducted as frequently as the patient condition warrants. During an interview on 12/11/24 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator reported the agency did not have a policy specific for wound care assessments and measurements, but that the staff follow physician orders, or in the absence of a physician order, staff would follow best practice with wound assessments and wound documentation. The Administrator could not specify what best practice expectations would include at the time of the interview. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 10:40 AM, Primary Care Physician reported Patient #4, had been hospitalized prior to the admission of home care with a serious wound infection in his coccyx needing Intravenous (IV) antibiotics. The primary physician reported her professional opinion was the patient needed a much higher level of care in a facility that could provide 24 hour care. The wife refused this and the patient was discharged to home following the hospital stay on 9/13/24 with home health care. The primary physician reported that the clinic did receive a call from the home care agency nurse caring for this patient on 10/7/24, with an update the patient had developed three new wounds, and had received orders from the wound clinic on how to treat these wounds. The physician did indicate she signed an order for wound treatments the agency indicated the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), had faxed to the agency. The physician indicated the specifics of the wounds were not given to her and that she had not been aware prior to the nurses call that the mobile wound clinic had been in the home assessing patients wounds on a weekly basis. She indicated the clinic had not received any specific documentation from the mobile wound clinic practitioner or the agency and that she could not attest to the exact condition of the patient, as there was not a way to transport the patient to the clinic for assessment. The primary physician did report she had given the agency an order for a foley catheter on 10/21/24 in an attempt to keep the patient dry and facilitate wound healing in his coccyx. During an interview on 12/10/24, at 10:25 AM, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) reported completing the initial comprehensive assessment on 9/14/24 for Patient #4 admission to home care. Staff F reported the wound to the patients coccyx was large and significant and that a considerable amount of time was spent providing education to the spouse on the importance of keeping the patient as dry as possible and turning with repositioning every two hours. Staff F reported the only wound noted and observed was the pressure ulcer on patients coccyx and completed a wound assessment including measurements in her documentation of that coccyx wound. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 11:46 AM, Staff D, RN, reported the Patient #4 was a complicated case and acknowledged role as patients primary nurse. Staff D reported patient had a severe pressure ulcer on his coccyx that was being assessed, measured and treated, 3 times per week by agency nurses following admission. Staff D reported mobile wound care became involved at the end of September and the ARNP with the mobile wound care service began to make a weekly visit on Mondays to the patient’s home for evaluation of the wound and provide orders for treatment of the wound. Staff D reported three new wounds developed 10/7/24 on patients lower left leg, on the end of the stump on the right leg, and on the scrotum. Staff D confirmed she reported those new wounds to the primary caregiver. Staff D reported had also requested a foley catheter 10/21/24 to assist with wound healing because the patient’s spouse had difficulty keeping the patient turned and changed on a consistent schedule. During an interview on 12/12/24 at 3:35 PM, ARNP from the mobile wound care service reported she first assessed Patient #4’s wounds on 9/30/24. The ARNP reported the coccyx wound was quite serious and with all of Patient #4 comorbidities, felt the patient was on a definite downward trajectory. The ARNP reported her documentation of Patient #4’s onset date for all wounds of 6/1/24 was based off of the spouse knowledge of the wound origins. 1.Patient #4 had a start of care date of 9/14/24 and a discharge date of 10/25/24. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 9/14/24 to 11/12/24, included physicians orders for skilled nursing services 3 times per week to assess all body systems, to identify changes requiring medical attention, to intervene to prevent complications, and wound care orders for the stage 4 (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) pressure ulcer to the coccyx. b. The initial comprehensive assessment, dated 9/14/24, completed by Staff F, RN, identified the stage 4 pressure ulcer on the coccyx with wound description and measurements of 9 centimeters length by 11 centimeters width by 2.5 centimeters depth (CM). No additional wounds were identified or assessed. c. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 9/18/24 and 9/20/24, Staff E, RN, included assessment of the pressure ulcer on the coccyx. No additional wounds were identified or assessed. d. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 9/23/24, 9/25/24 and 9/27/24, Staff D, RN, included assessment of the pressure ulcer on the coccyx. No additional wounds were identified or assessed. e. The initial wound evaluation, dated 9/30/24, by the ARNP with the mobile wound clinic, identified the following wounds: assessment and measurements for the stage 4 ulcer on the coccyx and further divided into measurements of the left section measuring 4.1 CM length by 4.5 CM width by 2.3 CM depth, with additional undermining of 2.4 CM, the right side measuring 4.9 CM length by 5.5 CM width by 3.7 CM depth with additional undermining of 3.8 CM. An unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel was identified and measured 4.5 CM length by 5.5 CM width and no measurable depth as the wound was covered with eschar (necrotic dead tissue usually black or brown) and 2 stage 2 (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed) ulcers to the scrotum, one on the front measuring 1 CM length by 1.5 CM width by 0.1 CM depth, and the second one on the back measuring 2.1 CM width by 1.9 CM length by 0.1 CM depth. f. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 10/2/24, Staff D, RN, included assessment of only the stage 4 pressure ulcer on the coccyx. The skilled nursing visit note failed to identify or assess the pressure areas on the left heel and the scrotum. g. The skilled nurses visit note, dated 10/9/24, Staff D, RN, included assessment and measurements for the stage 4 pressure ulcer on the coccyx, 1 of the 2 pressure ulcers on the scrotum, and documentation onset of new wounds to the mid area of the left leg and the bottom of the right leg stump where an amputation had previously been done. The skilled nursing note failed to identify or assess the second pressure ulcer to the scrotum and the unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel. h. The skilled nurses note, dated 10/11/24, Staff E, RN, included assessment and measurements for the stage 4 pressure ulcer on the coccyx, 1 of the 2 pressure ulcers on the scrotum, wound to the mid area of the left leg and the bottom of the right leg stump. The skilled nursing note failed to identify or assess the second pressure ulcer to the scrotum and the unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel. i. The Skilled nurses notes, dated 10/16/24, 10/18/24, and 10/25, Staff D, RN, included assessment for the stage 4 pressure ulcer on the coccyx, 1 of the 2 pressure ulcers on the scrotum, the wound to the mid area of the left leg and the bottom of the right leg stump. The skilled nursing note failed to identify or assess the second pressure ulcer to the scrotum and the unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel. j. The hospital discharge records, dated 9/12/24, noted the left heel to have dry gangrene and brown/purple color changes at the time of discharge. The agency failed to identify and assess pressure ulcers to the scrotum and the right heel.”

    Rule G0528. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 345 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, clinical record, agency policy and patient interview, the agency failed to include all required components of the Plan of Care (POC) for 1 of 1 sampled patients with observational home visit (Patient #1). Failure to maintain complete and accurate Plans of Care with current orders placed the patients at risk to not receive services according to assessed needs and physician orders. Findings include: Patient #1 had a start of care date of 10/26/24 and received skilled nursing services. According to the agency policy, titled Plan of Care, dated February 2022, the contents of the patient’s POC may include, but are not limited to prescribed and over-the-counter medications. a. The POC, dated 10/26/24 to 12/24/24, included orders for medications the patient currently required. b. During a home observation visit on 12/10/24 at 10:30 AM with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), the patient identified he/she had the prescription medication Omeprazole 40 milligrams daily by mouth. c. During the same home visit, the patient stated the medication was prescribed prior to the start of home health services. The agency failed to include all medications on the patient’s POC.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 889 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy review, clinical record review and agency staff interview, the agency failed to provide medications, treatments or services as ordered by the physician for 3 of 5 sampled patients with wounds (Patients #2, #4 and #5). Failure to ensure staff obtain physician orders for administration of medications, treatments or services provided by agency staff placed agency patients at risk for inconsistent care/treatment and possible harm. Findings include: 2. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 10/24/24. The clinical record revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 10/24/24 to 12/22/24, included orders for the skilled nurse to perform/teach wound care to the pressure ulcer to the coccyx, left heel, right 2nd toenail and left pinky (5th) toenail as follows: 1) Pressure ulcer to coccyx, cleanse with saline, pat dry. Cover with mepilex using clean technique. Wound care to be performed 3 times a week by skilled nurse. May discontinue when wound is healed. 2) Diabetic ulcer wounds to 2nd toenail bed and toe, left pinky toenail bed and left heal, cleanse with soap and water and or irrigate with normal saline. Paint toes with betadine, cover toes with bandaids and heel with mepilex boarder using clean technique. Wound care to be performed by skilled nurse 3 times a week. May discontinue when wound is healed. b. The comprehensive skilled nurse visit note on admission, dated 10/24/24, included documentation Staff A, Administrator, completed wound care to the 2nd toenail bed and toe, left pinky toenail bed, left heel and buttock per physician’s orders. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 10/28/24, included documentation Staff H, RN, wound care to the patient’s 2nd toenail bed and toe, left pinky toenail and buttock completed per physician’s order. The wound care to the left heel not provided due to “not ordered this visit”. The skilled nurse failed to complete all wound care as ordered by the physician. 3. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 11/23/24. The clinical record revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 11/23/24 to 1/21/25, included orders for the skilled nurse to perform/teach wound care to the pressure ulcer to the sacrum as follows: irrigate with normal saline or generic wound cleanser, pack with calcium alginate AG(silver). Dressing using cotton tip applicator. Cover and secure with border silicone bordered foam dressing. Change Monday, Wednesday and Friday and as needed using clean technique. Wound care to be performed by skilled nurse. May discontinue when wound is healed. b. The comprehensive skilled nurse visit note on admission, dated 11/23/24, included documentation Staff H, RN, completed wound care to the coccyx (sacrum) per physician’s orders. c. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 11/25/24, included documentation Staff D, RN, wound care to the sacrum not provided due to “waiting on orders”. The skilled nurse failed to complete wound care as ordered by the physician. The above findings reviewed with the Administrator. The agency policy titled Plan of Care, dated 2/2022, requires the agency to develop and implement an individualized Plan of Care (POC) for each patient the agency serves. The clinical services are implemented in accordance with the POC and established by a providers written orders. The content of the POC includes clinical problems, and specific orders, including procedures, modalities, interventions and treatments for each discipline. During an interview on 12/11/24, at 10:00 AM, the Administrator acknowledged the agency received updated orders from the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), on 10/1/24 with the mobile wound care unit, and could not explain why the wound care orders were not updated to the POC until 10/7/24. 1.Patient #4 had a start of care date of 9/14/24 and a discharge date of 10/25/24. Clinical record review revealed the following. a. The POC, dated 9/14/24 to 11/12/24, included physician orders for wound care to the pressure ulcer on patient ‘s coccyx as follows: irrigation of the coccyx wound using normal saline, pack the wound with betadine (drying/antibacterial agent) soaked gauze and to cover with a foam sacral dressing to be completed daily, three times per week by the agency nurse and caregiver the other days. b. Physician orders, dated and faxed by the ARNP with mobile wound care to the agency on 9/30/24, included new wound care orders as follows: cleanse the sacral wound with wound cleanser and apply hydrofera blue foam (antibacterial dressing that absorbs drainage and controls bacteria) into the wound and cover with a sacral foam dressing. The left heel included orders to cleanse with wound cleanser, apply betadine with a swab, and apply a protective boot over the heel. Cleanse the scrotum wounds with wound cleanser and apply a thick layer of calmoseptine to both wounds. c. Skilled Nurse visit notes, dated 10/2/24 and 10/4/24, Staff D, RN included documentation of wound care completed to the coccyx as follows: irrigated with saline, packed wound with betadine soaked gauze and covered with foam dressing which was not the current physician order. The note lacked documentation of wound care completed for the scrotum, and left heel. Staff D failed to complete wound care per physicians orders. The agency failed to perform wound care as ordered by the physician.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 20, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 17, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Dec 12, 2024Complaint inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 18, 2018.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Angela W Eddins (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Mark A Eddins (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Aimee Rainbolt (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Heath Beaty (corporate officer); Angela W Eddins (corporate officer); Mark A Eddins (corporate officer); Cindy M Godfrey (managing employee (on the payroll)); Chalice Stegman (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (86 surveys completed): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate76.74% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.68% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.75% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 50310, where this agency’s office is, 14 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 17 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 50310
PlaceQuality rating
Angels Care Home Health of Iowa This home health agency3.5
Mercyone Des Moines Home Care4
Optimae Home Health Services, Central Iowa2
Everystep2.5
Home Care Services of Boone Co2.5
Unitypoint at Home3.5
Centerwell Home Health5
Iowa Home Care, L L C3
Elara Caring4.5
Wesley Life Home Health3.5
Aveanna HealthcareNot given
Freedom Home Health CareNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.