Unitypoint at Home
A home health agency in Urbandale, Iowa 50322
11333 Aurora Avenue, Urbandale, Iowa 50322. (515) 557-3100.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 10, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 25, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 299 words
“All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and agency staff interview, the agency failed to update the Plan of Care with all new physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled patients with interim orders. (Patient #2). Failure to update the Plan of Care increased the potential for medication errors in administration or inaccurate provision of care. Findings include: Patient #2 had a start of care date of 7/30/23 and a discharge date of 6/19/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Plan of Care, dated 7/30/23 to 9/27/23, included an order for staff to not measure depth of wounds. b. Plans of Care, dated 9/28/23 to 11/26/23, 11/27/23 to 1/25/24, 1/26/24 to 3/25/24, 3/26/24 to 5/24/24 and 5/25/24 to 7/23/24, lacked an order for staff to not measure depth of wounds. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 10:35 AM, Staff C, Clinical Supervisor reported wound depths were not measured per a recommendation from Wound Clinic provider, this is not a physician order and would not be identified in the clinical record. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 1:44 PM, Staff B, Clinical Manager reported initial Plan of Care, dated 7/30/23 to 9/27/23, included an order for staff to not measure depth of wounds. This order fell off the recertification Plan of Care, dated 9/28/23 to 11/26/23, and all following plans of care for the episode. The agency did not document all verbal orders on a working care plan as required by regulation. The surveyor reviewed the above stated findings with Staff A, Administrator, and Staff B, Clinical Manager. The agency provided no additional information prior to the end of the survey.”
-
Revised Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 789 words
“Revised plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(c)(2) A revised plan of care must reflect current information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment, and contain information concerning the patient’s progress toward the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and patient in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review and agency staff interview, the agency failed to include current information regarding wounds from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment concerning the patient’s progress toward the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the agency and patient in the revised plan of care for 1 of 3 sampled patients with wounds (Patients #2 and #5). Failure to include current assessment information pertaining to patient’s progress toward identified outcomes/goals placed patients at risk of receiving inadequate or inappropriate care. Findings include: According to the agency process manual, titled Wound Collaborative Management, dated 3/27/23, identified skin alterations requiring monitoring and management are photographed and measured a minimum of weekly with skilled assessments, significant changes in condition and at OASIS time points. The wound assessment will need to contain measurements, including length, width, and depth. Wound measurement of length, width and depth will be completed weekly. Open areas with skin loss have depth. Wound with superficial loss of epithelial layer; the depth measurement should be documented as “0.1 cm” (centimeter). Fluid filled blisters or other raised lesions require documentation of length and width and enter “0” for depth. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 10:35 AM, Staff A, Administrator reported the agency staff are unable to enter a “0” for depth measurement in the current electronic medical record, staff are expected to leave this area blank for wounds with no depth or wounds that are unable to be measured. 1. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 7/30/23 and a discharge date of 6/19/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 5/15/24 and 6/12/24, included documentation patient instructed in wound care and verbalized understanding of strategies to prevent infection, but lacked documentation of wound measurements. b. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 5/17/24, included documentation wound care performed per orders, but lacked documentation of wound measurements. Clinical record lacked wound measurements for the weeks starting 5/12/24 and 6/9/24. c. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 5/8/24 and 5/29/24, included documentation wound care completed as ordered for scrotal incision, perianal wound and abdominal wound; abdominal wound measured 6 cm by 2 cm but lacked a wound depth; and scrotal incision and perianal wound lacked measurements. d. Recertification comprehensive assessment visit note, dated 5/22/24, included documentation wound care completed, abdominal wound measured 4 cm by 1.8 cm but lacked a wound depth; and scrotal incision and perianal wound lacked measurements. Clinical record lacked complete wound measurements for the weeks starting 5/5/24, 5/19/24 and 5/26/24. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 1:44 PM, Staff A, Administrator and Staff B, Clinical Manager, reported home health staff are able to view wound measurements taken at the wound clinic in the electronic medical record, they do not document these measurements in the home health clinical record. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 3:48 PM, Wound Clinic provider reported 2 of the wounds were fistulas and were ordered to not measure a wound depth, the abdominal wound would be able to have a depth measured. 2. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 6/3/24 and a discharge date of 7/19/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment visit note, dated 6/3/24, included documentation wound care completed to left foot, but lacked documentation of wound measurements. b. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 6/10/24, 6/14/24 and 6/28/24, included documentation left foot incision dressing changed, but lacked documentation of wound measurements. c. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 6/12/24 and 6/24/24, included documentation left foot incision wound cares done per orders, but lacked documentation of wound measurements. Clinical record lacked wound measurements for the weeks starting 6/3/24, 6/10/24 and 6/23/24. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 2:32 PM, Staff B, Clinical Manager reported she reviewed the clinical record and confirmed no wound measurements were completed at the start of care on 6/3/24. d. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 6/17/24, included documentation of new wound to right foot toe, measured 2.5 cm by 3 cm but lacked depth measurement. e. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 6/19/24 and 6/21/24, included documentation wound cares done per orders, but lacked documentation of left foot or right foot toe wounds measurements. Clinical record lacked complete wound measurements for the week starting 6/16/24. The surveyor reviewed the above stated findings with Staff A, Administrator, and Staff B, Clinical Manager. The agency provided no additional information prior to the end of the survey.”
All 5 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 29, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 25, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| May 16, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 10, 1984.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this agency.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (572 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 92.18% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 5.78% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.26% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 50322, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Unitypoint at Home This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Centerwell Home Health | 5 |
| Family First Homecare of Iowa | Not given |
| Wesley Life Home Health | 3.5 |
| Mercyone Des Moines Home Care | 4 |
| Iowa Home Care, L L C | 3 |
| Optimae Home Health Services, Central Iowa | 2 |
| Aveanna Healthcare | Not given |
| Freedom Home Health Care | Not given |
| Everystep | 2.5 |
| Good Samaritan Society-Home Care | 5 |
| Aveanna Healthcare | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.