Global Dialysis Plus Inc.
A dialysis facility in Stafford, Texas 77477
12823 Capricorn Drive, Stafford, Texas 77477. (281) 980-0446.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 1of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 2 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Dec 2, 2024: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 2, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Compliance With Fed/State/Local Laws
The inspectors’ words, 429 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL LAWS CFR(s): 494.20 The facility and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to licensure and any other relevant health and safety requirements. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, interview and record review: the facility failed to ensure patient’s nephrologist round and assess patient’s every two weeks in 3 of 6 sampled patients: Patient #s 1, 2 and 3 Findings: Patient #1 On 12/02/2024 at 7:53 AM, Patient #1 was observed on machine #A2 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 450 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 600 mL/min via a left lower arm vascular access. Vital signs were: Review of the patient’s clinical record (demographic record) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 01/19/2015 with diagnosis of end stage renal disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus on insulin, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed a face-to-face physician progress note dated 09/30/2024, 10/28/2024 and 11/25/2024. There was no documented face-to-face physician progress note every two weeks as required by the state regulations. Patient #2 On 12/02/2024 at 11:01 AM, Patient #2 was observed on machine #C2 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min via a right upper arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record (demographic record) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 06/22/2015 with diagnosis of end stage renal disease, hypertension, amputation, and diabetes mellitus on insulin, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed a face-to-face physician progress note dated 09/30/2024, 10/28/2024 and 11/25/2024. There was no documented face-to-face physician progress note every two weeks as required by the state regulations. Patient #3 On 12/02/2024 at 11:20 AM, Patient #3 was observed on machine #A2 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 500 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record (demographic record) revealed the patient was admitted to the facility on 06/17/2021 with diagnosis of end stage renal disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus on insulin, on in-center hemodialysis three times weekly. Review of the patient’s clinical record revealed a face-to-face physician progress note dated 09/30/2024, 10/28/2024 and 11/25/2024. There was no documented face-to-face physician progress note every two weeks as required by the state regulations. Interview on 12/02/2024 with Facility Administrator (E) at 3:28 PM confirmed the above findings.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 1,285 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48020 Based on observation, record review and interview: the facility’s registered nurses failed to conduct assessments when patients experienced a change in condition during hemodialysis treatment in 3 of 6 sampled patients: Patient #s 1, 2 and 3 Findings: Review of the facility’s current policy and procedure on Patient Assessment Protocols for Hemodialysis Therapy directs staff as follows: “POLICY: A comprehensive nursing assessment will be completed prior to initiation of each hemodialysis treatment and a follow-up assessment will be performed at the end of each hemodialysis treatment. PROCEDURE “PRE-DIALYSIS” 1. Obtain pre-dialysis weight (kg). 2. Obtain vital signs: blood pressure, pulse, and temperature. 3. Physical assessment should be done including: a. Lungs sounds b. Heart tones c. Edema, fluid status d. Skin color and warmth e. Level of consciousness f. Observation of the vascular access ... 5. Notify physician of any untoward findings.” Review of the facility’s Hemodialysis Standing Orders directs staff as follows: “Intradialytic Events Hypotension NS 0.9% 250cc IV, repeat as needed up to 1,000cc Trendelenburg position, Turn UF OFF. Notify MD” Patient #1 On 12/02/2024 at 7:53 AM, Patient #1 was observed on machine #A2 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 450 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 600 mL/min via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record on 12/02/2024 revealed the following: Treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024: Review of treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed the following documentation: 06:00 AM: documented blood pressure of 178/83 mmHg and pulse rate of 66 beats per minute - Treatment initiated 06:30 AM - 09:30 AM the patient had no reportable vital signs or complaints 10:00 AM: documented blood pressure of 111/65 mmHg and pulse rate of 66 beats per minute 10:19 AM: documented blood pressure of 89/51 mmHg and pulse rate of 71 beats per minute - Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) documented, “pt’s bp low, uf off until bp stable, will monitor pt close. RN notified.” 10:30 AM: documented blood pressure of 114/64 mmHg and pulse rate of 65 beats per minute -LVN documented, “Treatment terminated - per protocol” 10:40 a.m.: Registered Nurse (RN) documented the post treatment assessment which revealed: “The goal of 5.0 liters over 4.5 hours was met. The AVF was decannulated with minimal bleeding x 10 minutes and the patient tolerated the treatment. No additional changes in the patient’s condition was documented and or reported. The patient left ambulating and was driven home by his family member.” There was no RN notification by the LVN of turning off the patient’s ultrafiltration due to hypotension. There was no RN assessment on the patient for hypotension. The RN documented in the RN Post Assessment that the patient tolerated the treatment and no additional changes in patient’s condition was documented and or reported. Patient #2 On 12/02/2024 at 11:01 AM, Patient #2 was observed on machine #C2 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min via a right upper arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record on 12/02/2024 revealed the following: Treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024: Review of treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed the following documentation: 10:40 AM: documented blood pressure of 130/61 mmHg and pulse rate of 66 beats per minute - Treatment initiated 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM the patient had no reportable vital signs or complaints 13:00 PM: documented blood pressure of 106/54 mmHg and pulse rate of 62 beats per minute 13:30 PM: documented blood pressure of 90/46 mmHg and pulse rate of 61 beats per minute - Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) documented, “pt’s bp low, pt asymptomatic, uf off until bp stable, will monitor pt close. RN notified.” 13:45 PM: documented blood pressure of 107/60 mmHg and pulse rate of 61 beats per minute - LVN documented, “pt’s bp stable, uf on.” 14:00 PM: documented blood pressure of 114/64 mmHg and pulse rate of 64 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Treatment terminated - per protocol” 10:40 AM: Registered Nurse (RN) documented the post treatment assessment which revealed: “The goal of 1.9 liters over 4.5 hours was met. The AVF was decannulated with minimal bleeding x 10 minutes and the patient tolerated the treatment. No additional changes in the patient’s condition was documented and or reported. The patient left ambulating with one legged scooter and was driven home by his family member.” The RN Post Assessment had a documented time of 10:40 AM and the patient’s treatment did not end until 14:00 PM. There was no RN notification by the LVN of turning off the patient’s ultrafiltration due to hypotension. There was no RN assessment on the patient for hypotension. The RN documented in the RN Post Assessment that the patient tolerated the treatment and no additional changes in patient’s condition was documented and or reported. Patient #3 On 12/02/2024 at 11:20 AM, Patient #3 was observed on machine #A2 receiving hemodialysis treatment at a blood flow rate of 500 mL/min and dialysate flow rate of 800 mL/min via a left lower arm vascular access. Review of the patient’s clinical record on 12/02/2024 revealed the following: Treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024: Review of treatment sheet dated 11/29/2024 revealed the following documentation: 11:00 AM: documented blood pressure of 197/123 mmHg and pulse rate of 105 beats per minute - Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) documented, “Treatment initiated - access visible, connections intact and tape secure.” 11:05 AM: documented blood pressure of 170/112 mmHg and pulse rate of 110 beats per minute - LVN documented, “increased blood flow rate 500ml/min.” 11:30 AM: documented blood pressure of 171/101 mmHg and pulse rate of 111 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient eating lunch, Treatment tolerated, bp improving.” 12:00 PM: documented blood pressure of 187/107 mmHg and pulse rate of 111 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient eating lunch. Treatment tolerated.” 12:30 PM: documented blood pressure of 177/105 mmHg and pulse rate of 111 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient access visible [sic] - connections intact and tape secure.” 13:00 PM: documented blood pressure of 166/98 mmHg and pulse rate of 111 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient alert and denies any c/o.” 13:30 PM: documented blood pressure of 165/108 mmHg and pulse rate of 112 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient resting quietly. Eyes closed. Respirations quiet and unlabored.” 14:00 PM: documented blood pressure of 178/109 mmHg and pulse rate of 111 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient resting quietly. Eyes closed. Respirations quiet and unlabored.” 14:30 PM: documented blood pressure of 157/104 mmHg and pulse rate of 110 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Patient access visible [sic] - connections intact and tape secure.” 15:00 PM: documented blood pressure of 182/104 mmHg and pulse rate of 110 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Pt tolerates tx, no s/s distress noted. Clonidine effective.” 15:30 PM: documented blood pressure of 174/102 mmHg and pulse rate of 118 beats per minute - LVN documented, “Treatment terminated - per protocol” There was no RN notification by the LVN of the patient’s hypertension and elevated heart rate. There was no Pre or Post RN Assessment on the patient documented for the hemodialysis treatment. Interview with Director of Nursing (A) on 12/02/2024 at 4:15 PM confirmed the RN interventions were not completed for Patient #s 1 and 3 nor was the pre and post RN assessment completed for Patient #2.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 12, 2012.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 2 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 32 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Fort Bend County, 29 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5, 13 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 9 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.