Davita Katy Dialysis Grand Parkway
A dialysis facility in Katy, Texas 77494
403 W Grand Pkwy S, Ste T, Katy, Texas 77494. (281) 392-6063.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 20 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 28, 2024: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 28, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Compliance With Fed/State/Local Laws
The inspectors’ words, 482 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL LAWS CFR(s): 494.20 The facility and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to licensure and any other relevant health and safety requirements. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30124 The facility failed to ensure that oxygen tanks were stored and identified according to Federal and State laws that regulated medical gases. 1. Six oxygen tank cylinders observed on the treatment floor were not properly identified as full or empty. 2. Five oxygen tanks were observed to be opened for use with regulators attached to the oxygen cylinders. 3. One oxygen tanks observed on the treatment floor with seal intact and not identified as full or empty. The facility failed to safely store oxygen in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 99, Standard for Health Care Facilities. Record Reviewed: Review of “National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 99, Standard for Health Care Facilities”(2005 edition): showed oxygen cylinders must be secured in racks or by chains, identified as full or empty and stored separately. NFPA 99 requires empty cylinders to be stored separately from full cylinders. This means partially full cylinders must be stored with the empty cylinders or stored separately from full or empty cylinders. “ A cylinder is considered “full” provided it still has its seal from the supplier. Once the seal has been removed, the cylinder is no longer considered full and cannot be stored with full cylinders. “ NFPA 99 requires empty cylinders to be stored separately from full cylinders. This means partially full cylinders must be stored with the empty cylinders or stored separately from full or empty cylinders. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Incenter hemodialysis (ICHD), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD), Home Hemodialysis (HHD), DaVita Skilled Nursing Facility Dialysis (DSD) Clinic Administration Vol * DaVita Inc.”, Policy: 8-04-01; revision April 2018. Policy: 10. The dialysis facility will store supplies in a manner that is consistent with fire safety and other appropriate regulations. Supplies will not obstruct any fire exits or hallways. Refer to: Monthly OSHA and Safety Checklist for further guidance or as required by local jurisdiction requirements. Supplies are stored as to minimize deterioration, contamination or breakage. Finings: Observation of the patient care area on 03/28/2024 at 12:40 PM along with the facility administrator, staff ID # A, six oxygen tanks observed in the patient treatment area were found. Five oxygen tanks were observed to have been opened for use with regulators attached to the cylinders and were not labeled as full or empty, and oxygen cylinders observed with the seal intact and not labeled as full or empty. Interview with staff # A on 03/028/2024 at 12:50 PM confirmed the oxygen tanks were not able to be identified if they were full or empty and oxygen cylinders were not stored and separated to identify full or empty oxygen cylinders.”
-
Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments
The inspectors’ words, 364 words
“PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30124 Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to monitor patients’ vascular accesses to ensure patient safety, citing 2 of 10 stations (stations #12, 13)), during patients’ dialysis treatment were not visible to staff. Allowing patients to cover access sites and line connections with blankets provides an opportunity for accidental needle dislodgement or disconnection to go undetected. This practice placed patients of the facility at risk for potential needle dislodgement and/or disconnection which could result in exsanguination and harm. Policy Reviewed of the facility’s current policy Title: Pre-Intra-post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing assessment; Policy: 1-01-08; Revision date October 2023. Purpose: To obtain and document baseline and ongoing information about the patient before, during and after the dialysis treatment through data collection and nursing assessment. This information will be used in planning and documenting the patient’s dialysis treatment, monitoring during treatment and for reviewing the patient’s response to the treatment and status prior to discharge. Intradialytic Date Collection/Assessment: 9. C. The vascular access site, blood line connections and the patient’s face should be visible throughout the dialysis treatment. Findings included: During a tour of the facility on 3/28/2024 at 12:20 PM along with staff #A the surveyor observed: Patient ID #7 at station #12 was observed to be receiving his dialysis treatment with a blood flow of 450 ml/minute through a left upper arm vascular access. Patient #7 had his vascular access covered with blankets and not visible during their dialysis treatment. Patient ID # 9 at station # 13 was observed to be receiving his dialysis treatment with a blood flow of 350 ml/minute through a left upper arm vascular access. Patient # 8 had his vascular access covered with a blanket and not visible during the dialysis treatment. This finding was confirmed in an interview with the staff member #A on 03/28/2024 at 13:00 PM. Staff was seen immediately uncovering the patient’s access and reminding the patients to keep their access uncovered.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 3, 1997.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 20 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 32 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Fort Bend County, 29 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5, 13 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 9 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.