Fmc - Masonic Home Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Masonic Home, Kentucky 40041
3501 Moyers Circle, Suite 200, Masonic Home, Kentucky 40041. (502) 721-1083.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 1of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Feb 12, 2025: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 12, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 410 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 52065 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow dialysis prescriptions ordered by the medical provider for 1 (Patient #3) of 7 sampled patients. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” published 05/01/2023, indicated, “3. Machine Parameters and Extracorporeal Circuit: Check machine settings and measurements: Check prescribed blood flow is being achieved or reason is documented in medical record if unable to meet prescribed blood flow.” Review of Patient #3’s demographic information sheet indicated the facility admitted the patient on 12/13/2023. According to the demographic information sheet, the patient had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Review of Patient #3’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/27/2025 revealed a prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) of 450 milliliters per min (mL/min). The Treatment Sheet indicated Patient #3’s BFR was 350 mL/min from 12:33 PM until 3:05 PM and 400 mL/min from 3:35 PM until the treatment ended at 4:11 PM. There was no rationale documented as to why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. Review of Patient #3’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/31/2025 revealed a prescribed BFR of 450 mL/min. The Treatment Sheet indicated Patient #3’s BFR was 300 mL/min at 12:11 PM; 325 mL/min from 12:32 PM until 1:02 PM; 350 mL/min at 1:35 PM; and 400 mL/min from 2:05 PM until 2:33 PM. There was no rationale documented as to why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. Review of Patient #3’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 02/03/2025 revealed a prescribed BFR of 450 mL/min. The Treatment Sheet indicated Patient #3’s BFR was 400 mL/min from 2:30 PM until 3:09 PM and 350 mL/min at 4:22 PM. There was no rationale documented as to why the prescribed BFR was not achieved. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:40 AM, the Medical Director stated staff were expected to document a reason when the prescribed BFR was not achieved. During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 10:30 AM, the Clinic Nurse Manager stated staff were trained and expected to follow the physicians’ orders and document reasons when the prescribed BFR was not achieved. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 11:00 AM, Patient Care Technician #5 stated staff were trained and expected to write a reason for changes to the prescribed BFR.”
-
Manage Volume Status
The inspectors’ words, 930 words
“POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 52065 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor patients’ vital signs according to policy for 3 (Patients #1, #2, and #3) of 8 sampled patients. Failure to monitor patients’ vitals and machine parameters according to the facility’s policy provided an opportunity for changes to the patients’ condition during dialysis treatments to be unrecognized and unaddressed and negatively impact the care provided to the 32 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” published 05/01/2023, indicated, “During Treatment: Obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations. Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 [sic] or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations.” The policy also specified, “Follow the steps below for monitoring patient and machine parameters during treatment: Step 1: Blood Pressure - Record blood pressure. Recheck blood pressures after a drop that requires interventions such as administering normal saline. Reposition electronic cuff or use a manual cuff for aberrant blood pressure readings. Report to the nurse: - Systolic blood pressures greater than 180 mm/Hg [millimeters mercury] - Diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm/Hg - Blood Pressure less than or equal to 100 mm/Hg systolic Pulse - Record pulse. Verify pulse manually if automated readings display below 60 or greater than 100 beats per minute. Report to the nurse patients whose heart rates have dropped below 60, risen above 100 or become irregular.” 1. Review of Patient #1’s demographic information sheet indicated the facility admitted the patient on 07/12/2024. According to the demographic information sheet, the patient had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Review of Patient #1’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 02/05/2025 indicated the patient’s blood pressures were outside the parameters specified by the facility policy at the following times: - 7:26 AM: 215/114 mm/Hg - 8:04 AM: 230/122 mm/Hg - 9:10 AM: 183/94 mm/Hg There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter blood pressures were recognized or addressed. Review of Patient #1’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 02/07/2025 indicated the patient’s blood pressures were outside the parameters specified by the facility policy at the following times: - 8:04 AM: 192/107 mm/Hg - 8:37 AM: 196/98 mm/Hg - 10:30 AM: 191/96 There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter blood pressures were recognized or addressed. 2. Review of Patient #2’s demographic information sheet indicated the facility admitted the patient on 12/23/2024. According to the demographic information sheet, the patient had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Review of Patient #2’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/27/2025 indicated the patient’s pulse was outside the parameters specified by the facility’s policy at the following times: - 11:55 AM: 55 beats per minute (bpm) - 12:32 PM: 52 bpm - 1:13 PM: 55 bpm - 1:34 PM: 49 bpm - 2:06 PM: 46 bpm - 2:34 PM: 51 bpm - 3:01 PM: 53 bpm - 3:25 PM: 51 bpm There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter pulse rates were recognized or addressed. Review of Patient #2’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/29/2025 indicated the patient’s pulse was outside the parameters specified by the facility’s policy at the following times: - 12:30 PM: 52 bpm - 1:04 PM: 50 bpm - 1:33 PM: 51 bpm - 2:00 PM: 50 bpm - 2:37 PM: 52 bpm - 3:03 PM: 55 bpm There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter pulse rates were recognized or addressed. Review of Patient #2’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/31/2025 indicated the patient’s pulse was outside the parameters specified by the facility policy at the following times: - 12:37 PM: 54 bpm - 1:03 PM: 50 bpm - 1:37 PM: 52 bpm - 2:03 PM: 49 bpm - 2:34 PM: 49 bpm - 3:02 PM: 50 bpm - 3:28 PM: 51 bpm There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter pulse rates were recognized or addressed. 3. Review of Patient #3’s demographic information sheet indicated the facility admitted the patient on 12/13/2023. According to the demographic information sheet, the patient had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. Review of Patient #3’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/27/2025 indicated the patient’s pulse was outside the parameters specified by the facility’s policy at the following times: - 12:33 PM: 55 bpm - 1:02 PM: 57 bpm - 2:30 PM: 59 bpm - 2:36 PM: 59 bpm - 3:05 PM: 52 bpm - 3:35 PM: 57 bpm - 4:10 PM: 48 bpm There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter pulse rates were recognized or addressed. Review of Patient #3’s “Treatment Sheet” dated 01/29/2025 indicated the patient’s pulse was outside the parameters specified by the facility’s policy at the following times: - 12:31 PM: 55 bpm - 1:02 PM: 54 bpm - 1:33 PM: 53 bpm - 2:15 PM: 45 bpm - 2:22 PM: 33 bpm - 2:35 PM: 40 bpm - 3:05 PM: 54 bpm - 4:04 PM: 53 bpm There was no documentation to indicate the out-of-parameter pulse rates were recognized or addressed. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:40 AM, the Medical Director stated she expected staff to report out-of-parameter vital signs to the nurse and implement interventions as required and to report to the physician when needed.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2025 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 14, 2011.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, worse than expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 27 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Jefferson County, 24 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 4 of 5, 11 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.