Hearth Record

Fmc - East Louisville

A dialysis facility in Louisville, Kentucky 40291

6455 Bardstown Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40291. (502) 239-8221.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 12, 2025: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 12, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 685 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, manufacturers’ instructions for use (IFU) review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU by not maintaining the arterial drip chamber fluid levels at approximately 90% full and the venous drip chamber fluid levels at approximately 70% full during 4 of 4 observations. Failure to follow the manufacturers’ IFU had the potential to result in equipment malfunction and/or failure and negatively impact the safety and wellbeing of the 65 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. The findings include: Review of facility procedure titled, “Priming an Optiflux Single Use E-beam Dialyzer,” published 05/05/2025, indicated, “8. Fill the Pre-pump arterial chamber: Vent the chamber by loosening the cap and opening the clamp on the level adjust line. Fill chamber 85% - 95% full and tighten cap.” Further review indicated, “12. Fill the venous chamber: Vent the chamber by loosening the cap and opening the clamp on the level adjust line. Fill chamber 65% - 75% full.” An undated manufacturer’s IFU titled, “CombiSet True Flow Series Hemodialysis Blood Tubing Set with Priming Set and Transducer Protectors” indicated that during treatment, “c. Maintain fluid level in arterial chamber at approximately 90% full and venous chambers at approximately 70% full. Levels may rise or drop during the treatment due to changes in pressure or flow rate. Readjust levels as needed. Air Leaks will also cause the chamber levels to fluctuate.” An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 09/29/2025 at 9:58 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were less than (<) 90% full in Stations 1, 2, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were greater than (>) 70% full in Stations 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 10/01/2025 at 9:22 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 90% full in Stations 1, 2, 5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 20, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 70% full in Stations 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 20. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 10/01/2025 at 9:50 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 90% full in Stations 1, 2, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 20, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 70% full in Stations 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 20. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 12/12/2025 at 7:50 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 90% full in Stations 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 16, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 70% full in Stations 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 20. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 7:50 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated the chamber fluid levels were not maintained per the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 8:12 AM, RN #2 stated she was trained to maintain the drip chambers at “half full or 80% [full]” and “to the line [on the chambers].” During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 8:28 AM, the Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician stated, “We were taught to save some [space] for the air” in the venous chamber and “at least halfway full” in the arterial chamber. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 8:44 AM, the Interim Clinical Manager stated staff were expected to follow the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU for the chamber fluid levels. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 11:08 AM, the Medical Director stated the staff were expected to follow the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU for the chamber fluid levels.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 732 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor patients’ vital signs and/or machine parameters according to the expectations in their policy for 6 (Patients #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) of 7 sampled patients. Failure to monitor patients’ vital signs and/or machine parameters during dialysis treatments according to the facility’s policy provided an opportunity for changes to the patients’ vital signs, blood flow rate, dialysate flow rate, arterial and/or venous pressures to be unrecognized and unaddressed and negatively impact the care provided to the 65 in-center patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” published 05/01/2023, revealed the section titled, “During Treatment,” included, “- Obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations. - Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 minutes or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations.” 1. Review of Patient #2’s treatment sheet dated 09/09/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 65 minutes, from 10:03 AM until 11:08 AM and for 64 minutes, from 11:38 AM until 12:42 PM. Review of Patient #2’s treatment sheet dated 09/13/2025 revealed vital signs were not documented for 60 minutes, from 10:00 AM until 11:00 AM, and machine parameters were not documented for 54 minutes, from 10:08 AM until 11:02 AM. Review of Patient #2’s treatment sheet dated 09/27/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 47 minutes, from 10:03 AM until 10:50 AM 2. Review of Patient #3’s treatment sheet dated 09/12/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 47 minutes, from 9:03 AM until 9:50 AM, vital signs were not documented for 61 minutes, from 9:03 AM until 10:04 AM, and machine parameters were not documented for 59 minutes, from 10:04 AM until 11:03 AM. Review of Patient #3’s treatment sheet dated 09/19/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 89 minutes, from 9:32 AM until 11:01 AM. 3. Review of Patient #4’s treatment sheet dated 09/10/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 190 minutes, from 11:25 AM when the treatment was started until 2:33 PM, and vital signs were not documented for 48 minutes, from 1:00 PM until 1:48 PM. Review of Patient #4’s treatment sheet dated 09/15/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 59 minutes, from 2:04 PM until 3:03 PM, and machine parameters were not documented for 72 minutes, from 3:03 PM until the treatment was terminated at 4:15 PM. Review of Patient #4’s treatment sheet dated 09/24/2025 revealed vital signs and machine parameters were not documented for 51 minutes, from 11:42 AM until 12:33 PM. 4. Review of Patient #5’s treatment sheet dated 09/09/2025 revealed vital signs and machine parameters were not documented for 88 minutes, from 1:05 PM until 2:33 PM. 5. Review of Patient #6’s treatment sheet dated 09/10/2025 revealed vital signs and machine parameters were not documented for 80 minutes, from 11:18 AM until 12:38 PM. Patient #6’s treatment sheet dated 09/26/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 47 minutes, from 1:32 PM until 2:19 PM. 6. Review of Patient #7’s treatment sheet dated 09/19/2025 revealed machine parameters were not documented for 54 minutes, from 9:02 AM until 9:56 AM, and the vital signs were not documented for 55 minutes, from 9:02 AM until the treatment was terminated at 9:57 AM. During an interview on 10/01/2025 at 2:40 PM, the Acting Clinic Manager stated vital signs and machine parameters should be documented every 30 to 45 minutes. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 8:12 AM, Registered Nurse #2 stated she was trained to document vital signs and machine parameters every 30 minutes. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 8:28 AM, the Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician stated that they check the vital signs and machine parameters every 30 minutes. During an interview on 12/12/2025 at 11:08 AM, the Medical Director stated staff were trained and expected to monitor and document vital signs and machine parameters every 30 minutes per the facility’s policy.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 12, 2025Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 15, 1994.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (33 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 66% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Jefferson County, 24 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 4 of 5, 11 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.