Hearth Record

University of Louisville Dialysis Center, LLC

A dialysis facility in Louisville, Kentucky 40202

614 East Chestnut Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202. (502) 589-5997.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 8, 2023: a complaint and standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 8, 2023: complaint and standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Ic - Hbv - Isolation Of Machines/Equipment/Supplies

    The inspectors’ words, 425 words

    “IC-HBV-ISOLATION-MACHINES/EQUIP/SUPPLIES CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Isolation of HBV+ Patients To isolate HBsAg positive patients, ... dedicate machines, equipment, instruments, supplies, and medications that will not be used by HBV susceptible patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to dedicate and label all equipment and supplies used to care for dialysis patients positive for bloodborne pathogens in one (1) of 1 isolation rooms. Failure to dedicate and label equipment and supplies used when treating dialysis patients requiring bloodborne pathogen isolation had the potential to provide a mode for cross-contamination and the potential spread of bloodborne pathogens and negatively impact the well-being of the seventy-one (71) patients receiving dialysis treatments at this facility. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled “G43 Hepatitis B: Control & Management,” revised on 07/21/2022, revealed, “31. The Hepatitis B isolation room or area must have a sink with water for handwashing and must have a dedicated dialysis machine, equipment, instruments, supplies and medications that will not be used by Hepatitis B susceptible patients. Disposable supplies/equipment, such as disposable thermometers, should be used whenever possible. A separate restroom for patients with Hepatitis B may be present if required by current state and/or local regulations.” Further review of the policy revealed, “34. All supplies, including durable ones, will be clearly labeled as “isolation”, [sic] for use in the Hepatitis B isolation room or area only, and will not be removed for use in other areas without disinfection per the applicable procedure.” An observation of the isolation room and interview with the Interim Clinic Manager on 12/04/2023 at 12:10 PM revealed the following unlabeled and undedicated items: two (2) boxes of gloves, one (1) waste basket, 1 dialysis chair, and 1 oxygen tank and carrier. The Interim Clinic Manager confirmed the items in the isolation room were unlabeled and undedicated. The Interim Clinic Manager stated all items should be labeled and dedicated for use only in the isolation room so as not to allow removal from the isolation room and prevent the spread of bloodborne pathogens. During an interview on 12/08/2023 at 12:10 PM, the Clinical Regulatory Manager stated, “any items in the isolation room” need to be marked and “nothing should be in there that isn’t marked.” The Clinical Regulatory Manager stated the process when establishing an isolation room is to “label anything and everything that moves.” She stated the unit staff are trained and educated to “label everything” and “not to take anything from that room.””

    Rule V0130. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Mr - Protect Patient Records From Loss/Keep Confidential

    The inspectors’ words, 383 words

    “MR-PROTECT PT RECORDS FM LOSS/CONFIDENTIAL CFR(s): 494.170(a) The dialysis facility must- (1)Safeguard patient records against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use; and (2) Keep confidential all information contained in the patient’s record, except when release is authorized pursuant to one of the following: (i) The transfer of the patient to another facility. (ii) Certain exceptions provided for in the law. (iii) Provisions allowed under third party payment contracts. (iv) Approval by the patient. (v) Inspection by authorized agents of the Secretary, as required for the administration of the dialysis program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to protect patient records from unauthorized access in one (1) of 1 unrestricted storage areas. Failure to restrict access and protect patient records had the potential for unauthorized access and use of protected health information (PHI) of the 71 patients receiving dialysis treatments at this facility. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled “G32 Medical Records,” revised on 03/24/2023, revealed, “Purpose: To ensure that [facility name] medical records: provide accurate, complete and consistent patient care data, facilitate patient care, are readily available and systematically organized to facilitate compilation and retrieval of information, are maintained according to the most stringent guidelines [facility name] Policy (sic), HIPAA [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act] requirements and/or federal/state regulations, and serve as a legal and financial record.” Observation on 12/04/2023 at 9:45 AM of a storage area located in an unlocked room with the Interim Clinic Manager and Clinical Regulatory Manager revealed thirty-four (34) cardboard boxes. Five (5) of the 34 boxes were labeled “Patient.” The Clinical Regulatory Manager opened one of the boxes labeled “Patient” and stated the box contained “patient information.” The Interim Clinical Manager stated that the janitorial staff arrived at the unit “after hours and after we’ve left.” The Interim Clinical Manager stated the medical records should have restricted access due to containing PHI; she was unaware records were stored in this area. Both the Interim Clinic Manager and the Clinical Regulatory Manager observed the door leading from the hallway into the storage area and confirmed the door had no locking mechanism and allowed unrestricted access by the janitorial staff into the area where the patients’ records were stored.”

    Rule V0727. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 8, 2023Complaint and standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 16, 1999.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: American Renal Associates.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 31 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the American Renal Associates chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Jefferson County, 24 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 4 of 5, 11 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.