Childrens Lounge
A child day center in Roanoke, Virginia 24014
1342 Riverland Road, SE, Roanoke, Virginia 24014. (540) 892-3693.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 11 deficiencies in the last three years
- Oct 52026 the latest visit on record
- 45 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
26 inspections on record, the latest on Oct 5, 2026.
11 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Apr 30, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
At least 6 inches of resilient surfacing shall be under equipment with moving parts or climbing structures to create a fall free zone.
“Repeat Violation: The depth of the resilient surfacing measured less than one inch.”
Nov 13, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
At least 6 inches of resilient surfacing (mulch) for playground equipment shall be under equipment with moving parts or climbing apparatus to create a fall zone free of hazardous obstacles.
“The resilient surfacing (mulch) underneath and surrounding the outdoor playground equipment measured less than 1 inch.”
Apr 23, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
The physical examination shall be within the time period prescribed: within 12 months prior to attendance for children two years of age through five years of age.
“The physical examination for Child 3, 4 years old, was completed 18 months prior to attendance.”
-
Any child for whom emergency medications have been prescribed shall always be in the care of a staff member who meets the requirements of medication administration training.
“On 04/23/2025 for over 3 hours, Child 1, who has been prescribed emergency medication, was not in the care of a staff member that meets the requirements of medication administration training.”
Apr 23, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Each center shall maintain and keep at the center a separate record for each child enrolled that contains all of the required information. The records for Child 1 and Child 2, enrolled over two weeks, were each missing several of the required components.”
Apr 30, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interviews with staff, the center failed to obtain a copy of a child abuse and neglect search from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 2 contained documentation that Staff 2 has resided outside of the state of Virginia within the preceding five years. There was not an out of state child abuse and neglect registry check from all of the states in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years available for review during the inspection for Staff 2. The hire date for Staff 2 was 07/22/2023. Staff 1 confirmed this information was not available for review.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“Evidence: Staff 4 was the only staff supervising the 9 children in the large classroom; the children were determined to be 3-5 years of age. Approximately 4 times, Staff 4 was observed leaving the room, closing the ?half door?, and assisting children at the water fountain while the reminder of the children were in the classroom. The remaining children were not within actual sight and sound supervision of a staff member. During one occurrence, the inspector had to inform Staff 4 that several children were fighting.”
Nov 28, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water or disposable wipes before and after eating meals or snacks.
“Evidence: Children, ages 2 years- 4 years, were observed participating in self-directed activities and immediately going to tables to eat breakfast. The children did not wash hands with soap and running water or disposable wipes before eating.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that children three years of age or younger may not be offered foods that are considered to be potential choking hazards.
“Evidence: Children, ages 2 years- 4 years, were observed were observed during breakfast. The children were served fruit cocktail that contained whole grapes; whole grapes are considered to be potential choking hazards.”
-
THIRD REPEAT VIOLATION Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each enrolled child contains all of the elements as required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 209 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the following information: work phone number for each parent (an employer was listed but the record did not contain a work phone number) and name address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (the addresses for both designated people were incomplete). 2. The record for Child 2 did not contain the following information: name and phone number of child’s physician, allergies and intolerance to medication or any other substances and action to take in an emergency situation, chronic physical problems and pertinent development information and any special accommodation needed, previous child day care and schools attended by the child, and name of any additional programs or schools that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level. 3. The record for Child 5 did not contain the following information: name address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (the addresses for both designated people were incomplete), written parent agreements between the parent and the center and name of any additional programs or schools that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level.”
-
Based on record review and interviews with staff, the center failed to ensure that staff records contain all of the elements as required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 271 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff 1 did not contain the following: name address and telephone number of person to be notified in an emergency and information about any health problems that my interfere with fulfilling the job responsibilities. Staff 1 confirmed this information was not available at the center, as required by the standard. 2. The record for Staff 2 did not contain the following: name address and telephone number of person to be notified in an emergency and information about any health problems that my interfere with fulfilling the job responsibilities. Staff 1 confirmed this information was not available at the center, as required by the standard. 3. The record for Staff 3 did not contain the following: name address and telephone number of person to be notified in an emergency and information about any health problems that my interfere with fulfilling the job responsibilities. Staff 1 confirmed this information was not available at the center, as required by the standard. 4. The record for Staff 4 did not contain the following: name address and telephone number of person to be notified in an emergency and information about any health problems that my interfere with fulfilling the job responsibilities. Staff 1 confirmed this information was not available at the center, as required by the standard. 5. The record for Staff 5 did not contain the following: name address and telephone number of person to be notified in an emergency and information about any health problems that my interfere with fulfilling the job responsibilities. Staff 1 confirmed this information was not available at the center, as required by the standard.”
Oct 17, 2023: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and record review, the center failed to ensure during stated hours of operation, there shall always be on premises and on field trip when one or more children are present one staff member who meets the qualification of a program leader or program director and an immediately available staff member, or volunteer or other employee who is at least 16 years of age, with direct means for communication between the two of them.
“Evidence: 1. Upon the inspector’s arrival to the center on 10/17/2023 at approximately 7:25 am, Staff 1 was the only staff member present and there were 7 children in care, ages 18 months ? 4 years old. Staff 1 confirmed the first child in care arrived at approximately 7:00 am on 10/17/2023. 2. There were a total 11 children in care ages 18 months ? 4 years old, when Staff 2 and 3 arrived at approximately 7:55 am.”
-
Based on observation and record review, the center failed to ensure that the required staff to child ratio shall be maintained for 16 months up to 24 months.
“Evidence: There were 11 children observed with 1 staff member. The youngest child was 18 months old. The required staff ratio for this group of children was 1:5. Three staff would be required.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that there shall be at least two people who are currently certified in CPR and First Aid on the premises during the center’s hours of operation, on fieldtrips and wherever children are in care.
“Evidence: Staff 1 was the only staff on premises with a current certification in CPR and First Aid from approximately 7:00 am until approximately 7:55 am on 10/17/2023.”
-
REPEAT VIOLATION Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each enrolled child contains all of the elements as required by the standards.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the following information: first and last day of attendance. 2. The record for Child 2 did not contain the following information: first day of attendance. 3. The record for Child 3 did not contain the following information: first day of attendance.”
Jun 20, 2023: inspection5 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-770-60-B
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that an employee must not be employed until the agency has the person’s completed sworn statement or affirmation. Evidence: The record for Staff 3 contained a documented hire date of 12/30/2022. The sworn statement was dated 01/05/2023.”
-
Based on record review and interview with staff, the center failed to obtain the finding from the search of the central registry within 30 days of employment.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 3 contained a documented hire date of 12/30/2022. The search of the central registry was dated 03/22/2023. The search of the central registry was not obtained within 30 days of employment.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation that each child has received the immunization required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“Evidence: The record for Child 2 indicated the first date of attendance as 02/28/2022. The immunization record was obtained 05/25/2022.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 03/16/2023. The tuberculosis screening in the record was dated 04/21/2023.”
-
REPEAT VIOLATION Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each enrolled child contains all of the elements as required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the following information: phone number of child’s physician, and name address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (the addresses for both designated people were incomplete). 2. The record for Child 2 did not contain the following information: name, home address, and home phone number of each parent (no home address for one parent was available), and name address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (the addresses for both designated people were incomplete).”
Apr 12, 2023: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-500-A
“Repeat Violation Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that staff shall wash their hands with soap and water before and after a diaper change. Evidence: Staff 1 was observed changing a child’s diaper. Staff 1 did not wash their hands after completing the diaper change.”
-
8VAC20-780-80-A
“Based on observation and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that for each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs. Evidence: As of approximately 8:00 am on 04/12/2023, the daily attendance for the only group of children in care had not been taken. There was a total of 7 children in care. The daily attendance record did not document the arrival of each child as it occurred.”
Dec 20, 2022: inspection4 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-330-B
The inspectors’ words, 164 words
“Based on observation, measurements and interviews with staff, the center failed to ensure that where playground equipment is provided, resilient surfacing shall comply with minimum safety standards described in the American Society for Testing Materials and shall be under equipment with moving parts or climbing apparatus to create a fall zone free of hazardous obstacles. Evidence: 1. There was approximately 1 inch of resilient surfacing in the fall zone of the climbing equipment. The measurement was taken at the bottom of the slide facing the back of the building. Grass was observed in many areas in the fall zone. The inspector observed children using this equipment. Staff 6 confirmed the resilient surfacing was insufficient and has been ordered. 2. There was approximately a 2 foot 5 inch fall zone on the side closest to neighboring building of the climbing equipment. The fall zone for the climbing equipment did not comply with the minimum safety standards described in the American Society for Testing and Materials.”
-
8VAC20-780-500-A
“Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that staff shall wash their hands with soap and water before and after a diaper change. Evidence: Staff 1 was observed changing a child’s diaper. Staff 1 did not wash their hands after completing the diaper change.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
The inspectors’ words, 279 words
“Based on record review and interviews with staff, the center failed to ensure the separate record for each enrolled child shall contain all of the elements as required by the standards. Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the following information: name address and telephone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if parent cannot be reached (the address for both designated people was incomplete); and names of persons authorized to pick up the child. Staff 1 confirmed the information was not available. 2. The record for Child 2 did not contain the following information: names of persons authorized to pick up the child. Staff 1 confirmed the information was not available. 3. The record for Child 3 did not contain the following information: name address and telephone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if parent cannot be reached (the address for both designated people was incomplete); and names of persons authorized to pick up the child. Staff 1 confirmed the information was not available. 4. The record for Child 4 did not contain the following information: name address and telephone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if parent cannot be reached (the address for both designated people was incomplete); and names of persons authorized to pick up the child. Staff 1 confirmed the information was not available. 5. The record for Child 5 did not contain the following information: name address and telephone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if parent cannot be reached (the address for both designated people was incomplete). Staff 1 confirmed the information was not available.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on record review and interview with staff, the center failed to ensure that staff record contain all of the elements as required by the standards. Evidence: The record for staff 5 did not contain the following information: documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment. Staff 1 confirmed the information was not available.”
May 19, 2022: inspection17 deficiencies
-
Based on review of staff files and discussions with administration the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to employee background checks.
“Evidence: Staff file #4 did not have a completed Central Registry Clearance on file. Administration stated it had been mailed off, not within 7 days of employment, was returned for an error and as of the inspection had not been resubmitted as required. The allowed 30 days to obtain this had since expired. The staff member had been actively working with the children for more than 30 days.”
-
Based on review of children records the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required related to immunization verification.
“Evidence: Child record #2 did not have immunization documentation on file as required, the child has been in attendance.”
-
Based on review of children records the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required related to a physical.
“Evidence: Child records #1 and #2 did not have proof of physical as required. Both children have been in attendance.”
-
Based on review of staff records the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to proof of orientation.
“Evidence: Staff records #1 did not have proof of orientation as required. The staff was actively working with the children, within the facility.”
-
Based on inspection of the facility the required compliance with this standard was not met regarding locking of hazardous materials.
“Evidence: Under the diaper station, in the toddler-2year old area, there were cleaning agents that were not locked as required. Children within the area also had access.”
-
Based on inspection of the facility the required compliance with this standard was not met regarding ratios.
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Evidence: In the toddler-2 year old class there were 8 children with 1 staff at the beginning of this inspection, which began at 10:40am. Attendance records showed that at approximately 9am, with the arrival of the 6th child into the group, the group became out of ratio. Ratio remained out of compliance until another staff member arrived at approximately 11am. At approximately 11:10am this staff member went into the adjacent kitchen area, with the door closed, to finish prepping lunch for the center. Therefore, ratio was then out of compliance since the staff member was not actively able to supervise the children. This process continued until lunch was served at approximately 11:30am. Children in this class were aged 18mths-2yrs. The required ratio for this class was 1 staff to 5 children.”
-
Based on inspection of the facility the required compliance with this standard was not met regarding variety of daily activities.
“Evidence: The children in the preschool area and the toddler/2year old area were not engaged in a variety of activities as required. During the inspection, both classes had self-directed free play only. Children were not engaged in any teacher lead activities, or group activities.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to moving a child who cannot move/relocate on their own.
“Evidence: A child who cannot move on their own from one position/place, as stated by staff, was not moved by staff every 30 minutes as required. The child was sitting in a special chair at the start of the inspection and remained there for approximately 45 minutes. The child was asleep for approximately 20 minutes of the 45 minutes.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to labeling of cots.
“Evidence: The cots the children napped on were not labeled as required.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to handwashing.
“Evidence: The children’s hands were not washed after lunch as required. The children’s hands were not washed after diapering as required.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to running water and diaper disposal.
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Evidence: The center is using a stand-alone hand washing device that is operated by a foot pedal, and only operable with repeated foot pedal depression. However, with constant foot pedal depression the amount of water dispersed was not ?running? as required by the standard. The amount that was dispersed was only spurts of water at a time. During diapering in the preschool aged class, the teacher used her hand to open the trashcan to dispose of the soiled diaper. The teacher did not use the foot pedal on the trashcan as required.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to storage of sunscreen.
“Evidence: A basket of sunscreen was under the preschool diapering table on the bottom open shelf, accessible to the children.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to meal requirements.
“Evidence: Milk was not served with lunch as required. Children were given juice only with lunch.”
-
Based on observations and discussions with staff the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required relating to food service.
“Evidence: After the children in the toddler-2year old class had gotten up from the lunch table, staff handed the children sippy cups, the children were allowed to move around the classroom while drinking from the cups. Children are to be seated while drinking or eating.”
-
Based on review of children records the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required related to emergency contact information, parent employment information, allergies/chronic physical problems, and enrollment dates.
“Evidence: 1. Child record #1 did not have a start date, emergency contact addresses, no addressing of any allergies/chronic physical problems, no employment phone number for the mother, and did not have required information addressed for the father of the child. 2. Child record #2 did not have a second emergency contact listed.”
-
Based on review of children records the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required related to proof of birth verification.
“Evidence: Child record #2 did not have verification of review of proof of birth as required.”
-
Based on review of staff records the facility failed to maintain compliance with this standard as required related to references, proof of education, job title, and hire date.
“Evidence: Upon review of staff records the following non-compliance was noted: 1. Staff records #1-#4 did not have a hire date, references, proof of education/qualifications, or job description. 2. Staff record #5 did not have a hire date, job description, or references.”
All 26 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 30, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 13, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 13, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Dec 12, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 12, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 31, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 30, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 30, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 17, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jun 20, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 20, 2023 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Apr 12, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Dec 20, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 20, 2022 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jun 2, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 19, 2022 | Inspection | 17 violations cited |
| Mar 28, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 28, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 9, 2021 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Jun 16, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 45 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 4 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 71 child care providers in the City of Roanoke, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of VA’s Blue Ridge-Crystal Spring | 23 |
| HoneyTree Early Learning Center - Hunting Hills | 22 |
| First Evangelical Presbyterian Church | 1 |
| South Roanoke United Methodist Church | 2 |
| Childrens Lounge This child care provider | 11 |
| New Hope Christian Church | Not given |
| Shepherd’s Care Day School | 44 |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge- Fairview | 23 |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge-VA Heights | 21 |
| Grandin Court Baptist Church | 18 |
| Good Shepherd Lutheran Church | 2 |
| Covenant Presbyterian Church | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.