Everbrook Academy
A child day center in Bristow, Virginia 20136
11675 Chapel Springs Road, Bristow, Virginia 20136. (571) 428-5059.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 19 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 262026 the latest visit on record
- 136 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
16 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 26, 2026.
19 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
17 deficiencies in 7 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Apr 10, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Repeat Violation: Play equipment used by children shall not have protrusions.
“The basketball hoop’s pole had a protruding bolt more than 2 threads. The protrusion was at the children’s eye level. which is an impalement hazard.”
Oct 7, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-1
“Provide a sworn statement or affirmation disclosing whether their has ever been a conviction of or is the subject of pending charges for any offense within or outside the Commonwealth and whether he has been the subject of a founded complaint of child abuse or neglect within or outside the Commonwealth. The sworn disclosure statement form used for staff A was dated in 2014 and not the current 2024 form. The up to date form was overdue by 6 months.”
-
Areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a safe condition.
“There were protruding bolts more than 2 threads on the gates and fence throughout the playground. Protruding bolts present impalement and cut hazards.”
-
Repeat Violation: The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions documented in the allergy plan required in 8VAC20-780-60 A 8.
“Child A has a peanut allergy per their physical however this allergy was not documented on the allergy/sensitivity/dietary restriction list. This was overdue by 2 months”
-
Play equipment used by children shall not have protrusions.
“The basketball hoop had protruding bolts more than 2 threads on the shaft.”
-
A written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“There was no allergy care plan on file for child A’s peanut allergy. This was overdue by 2 months.”
Aug 25, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
The following action or threat thereof is forbidden: rough handling of a child.
“On 8/19/25 at approximately 3:55pm, Staff #1 roughly handled Child A. Observed evidence revealed that Child A was skipping past Staff #1 who was sitting in a chair. Staff #1 grabbed the upper arm of Child A and pulled the child over.”
Aug 12, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Within six months before being promoted or beginning work or one month after being promoted or beginning work, a minimum of 24 hours of training shall be received related to the care of children, including but not limited to health and safety, child abuse and neglect, child development and playground safety for staff functioning as a lead teacher.
“Staff A was hired as a lead teacher however the staff did not have the 24 hours of lead teacher training hours. This training was overdue by 17 months.”
-
In order to promote the child’s physical, intellectual, emotional, and social well-being and growth, staff shall interact with the child and one another to provide needed help, comfort, support .
“Child A, two years of age, fell after loosing their balance when the staff took an object from the child. The child fell to the floor and appeared upset and the staff provided no help or comfort to the child after the fall.”
Mar 4, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Each report shall include the date that the immunizations were received and shall be signed by a physician, his designee, or an official of a local health department.
“The immunization records for child A, B and C did not include a physician/ designees signature.”
-
The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions. This list shall be dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.
“1. The allergy/sensitivity/dietary restriction list in the Jr-K and Pre-K classrooms were dated 1/17/25 and not the most recent listed of 2/3/25. 2. Child C has 2 allergies that were not on the 2/3/25 allergy list.”
Aug 13, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-770-60-C-2
“The licensed program is required to have a central registry finding within 30 days of employment. There was no central registry finding on file for Staff #1, who has been employed for over 2 months.”
Mar 14, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-A
“Based on interview and a review of staff files, it was determined that a repeat background check was not obtained every five years from the original background check. Evidence: Staff B’s Sworn Disclosure Statement was dated 1/11/19.”
-
22.1-289.035-B-2
“Based on interview and a review of staff files, it was determined that fingerprint background checks for staff were not obtained prior to employment. Evidence: Staff A’s Fingerprint background check was dated 9/5/23, Staff A was employed on 8/28/23. Staff C’s Fingerprint background check was dated 11/3/23. Staff C was employed on 10/23/23.”
-
Based on observation, it was determined that the center was not maintained in a clean and safe condition. Evidence: 1. The Licensing Inspector (LI) observed the phone cords to the wall-mounted phones hanging in reach of the children in the toddler, two year old, early preschool, pre-k # 1 and pre-k #2 classrooms. The cords are a strangulation hazard.
“2. The LI observed dried food and liquid stains and rust on the outside of the kitchen refrigerator and freezer.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
The inspectors’ words, 147 words
“Repeat Violation: Based on observation, it was determined that hazardous substances were not kept locked to prevent access by children. Evidence: 1. Key’s were stored in the Laundry room and Kitchen door locks. The keys were accessible to the children. There were hazardous substances stored in the laudry and kitchen to include sanitizing tablets, stainless steel cleaner, disinfectant solutions ad multipurpose sanitizer sprays. 2. The LI observed on a shelf in an unlocked closet in the Pre-K 2 classroom adhesive remover and foam soap- both had warnings and cations on the label. 3. The LI observed on a shelf in an unlocked closet in the Pre-K 1 classroom bottles of sanitizing and disinfectant agents with cautions and warnings listed on the label. 4. The LI observed above the sink in an unlocked cabinet in the Early Preschool room a soap foam, which had warnings on the label..”
Dec 1, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-780-410-1
The inspectors’ words, 129 words
“Based on staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the following acts or threats of are forbidden: physical punishment, striking a child, roughly handling or shaking a child, restricting movement through biding or tying, forcing a child to assume an uncomfortable position, or exercise as punishment. Evidence: identified through staff interviews that around 1pm on Staff 1 observed Staff 2 pull child 1 up by their arm. Staff 1 noticed that Child 1 stopped using their arm, was favoring it, and was acting like it hurt them during the day, and reported the incident to the administration staff. Child went home, and parents noticied that the child was favoring their arm, causing them to take the child to urgent care where they were diagnosed with a dislocated elbow.”
Nov 21, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-340-A
“Based on staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the care, protection, and guidance of children while under their supervision. Evidence: Staff 1 and Staff 2 did not properly conduct name to face checks before leaving the classroom to take children outside, and left Child 1 in the classroom, unsupervised for approximately 6-15 minutes.”
-
8VAC20-780-340-F
“Based on staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that children under 10 years of age were always within actual sign and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: verified through staff interviews that Staff 1 and Staff 2 had left Child 1 unsupervised in the classroom for approximately 6-15 minutes. Child 1 was found by a third staff member who was conducting a tour of the facility, and was brought to the teachers.”
Aug 8, 2023: inspection9 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-4
The inspectors’ words, 159 words
“Based on review of four staff records, the center did not obtain the results of a criminal history record check from all states in which staff members have resided within the past five years prior to employment, or the results of a central registry check from all states in which staff members have resided within the past five years within 30 days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for Staff #1, with an employment date of 3/13/23, contained documentation that the staff had lived in Connecticut within the past five years, but there were no central registry results from Connecticut on record for the staff member. 2. The record for Staff #2, with an employment date of 5/1/23, contained documentation that the staff had lived in South Carolina within the past five years, but the criminal history check from South Carolina was dated 6/14/23, and there were no central registry results from South Carolina on record for the staff.”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Based on observation, the center did not ensure that hazardous substances, such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides, were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevented access by children. Evidence: On 8/8/23, a glass cleaning solution and an ant and roach spray, both containing the warnings ?Caution? and ?Keep out of reach of children?, were observed on a shelf in an unlocked closet in the ?Junior K/Schoolage? classroom.”
-
8VAC20-780-410-1
The inspectors’ words, 167 words
“Based on review of documentation and interviews, staff used a forbidden action, rough handling, with children in care. Evidence: 1. A document in Staff #1?s record indicated that on 3/27/23, the staff member was observed by a parent via the center cameras ?being `handsy? with a child at nap time? and ?was observed picking up the child and `slamming? the child down on the cot?. Interview revealed the child was Child F, a 23-month-old. 2. A document in Staff #1?s record indicated that on 5/31/23, two members of management observed via camera, Staff #1 ?grab a child by their wrist and lift them into the air to place them on their cot.? Interview revealed the child was Child G, a 23-month-old. 3. Interviews revealed that Toddler room staff, Staff #1 and Staff #5, were ?probably too rough? when they were putting children down for naps and on two different occasions Staff #5 caused bloody lips on two different children by putting them onto their cots too roughly.”
-
8VAC20-780-500-A
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Based on observation, the program did not ensure that staff washed their hands with soap and running water: before and after helping a child use the toilet; before and after a diaper change; and after any contact with body fluids. Evidence: On 8/8/23 in the ?Twos? classroom, Staff #6 member was observed assisting four different children in the restroom before washing their hands. Staff #6 removed one child’s diaper/pull-up, assisted them in the restroom, put on a clean diaper/pull-up and sent the child to wash their hands, then moved on to assist three other children in the same manner. Staff #6 did not wash their own hands in between children.”
-
8VAC20-780-500-B
“Based on observation, the program did not ensure that children younger than three years were changed on a changing table or countertop designated for changing. Evidence: On 8/8/23 in the ?Twos? classroom, Staff #6 was observed changing the diapers/pull-ups of four two-year-old children while they stood in the restroom doorway.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-P
“Based on review of documentation and interviews, the center did not maintain a written record of children’s serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of occurrence. Evidence: Interviews revealed two children obtained minor injuries-bloody lips- when Staff #5 placed them roughly on their cots during nap time. One incident was reported to have occurred in approximately July 2023. The other incident was reported to have occurred several months before that. There were no injury reports documented for children in the injury log for either incident.”
-
8VAC20-780-560-J
“Based on observation, the center did not ensure that tables were sanitized before use for feeding. Evidence: On 8/8/23 at approximately 8:50am in the ?Junior K/Schoolage? classroom, the tables were not sanitized before children sat down to eat breakfast at the tables.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“REPEAT Based on review of five child records, the center did not obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: The record for Child D contained documentation that the child has a diagnosed food allergy to fish and other seafood. There was no allergy care plan on record for Child D.”
-
8VAC20-780-80-B
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“Based on review of documentation and interview, staff failed to immediately report suspected child abuse in accordance with 63.2-1509 of the Code of Virginia. Evidence: 1. A document in the record for Staff #1 stated that on 3/27/23 management received a call from a parent who said they observed via center cameras Staff #1 ?being handsy? with Child F, a 23-month-old, at naptime and ?[Staff #1] was observed picking up the child and `slamming? the child down on the cot.? Management did not report the incident to Child Protective Services as required. 2. In approximately July 2023 and on another occasion ?several months before?, Staff #5 reported that they caused two different children to have bloody lips from putting them onto their cots ?too roughly? during nap time. Staff #1 witnessed the incident in approximately July 2023 and did not report it.”
Jan 12, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-350-B-1
“Based on observation, interview, and record review, the center did not ensure that the required ratio of staff to children were met. Evidence: On 1/12/23 there were nine children observed in the Toddler classroom with two staff. The youngest child in the class was 15-months-old and required a ratio of 1 staff: 4 children.”
-
8VAC20-780-350-B-2
“Based on observation, interview, and record review, the center did not ensure that the required ratio of staff to children were met. On 1/12/23 there were 14 children observed in the Twos classroom with two staff. The youngest children in the room were 22-months-old and 23-months-old and required a ratio of 1 staff: 5 children.”
Jul 1, 2022: inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-40-L
“Based on interview, the center did not ensure that all staff who work with children were informed of children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions. Evidence: In the PreK-1 (four-year-olds) class the Licensing Inspector (LI) asked the staff if any of the children had food allergies. One staff stated that they ?were new here? and did not know. The other staff stated that Child A has an allergy to pears and dairy. The record for Child A contains documentation of allergies to sweet potato and artificial grape flavor.”
-
8VAC20-780-40-M
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Based on observation, the center did not maintain a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions. Evidence: 1. In the School Age classroom the staff reported that they did not have an allergy list. 2. In the 2?s class, the Early Preschool class (two-year-olds to three-year-olds), and the PreK-2 (four-year-olds to five-year-olds) class a written allergy list was observed that was dated November 2021. Interviews revealed that there are children enrolled who have had updates to the status of their allergies/sensitivities since November 2021 as well as new children enrolled with allergies/sensitivities. 3. In the Preschool 1 (three-year-olds to four-year-olds) class a written allergy list was observed that was dated 2019.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“Based on review of six child records, the center did not obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: The record for Child A contained documentation of diagnosed allergies to sweet potato and artificial grape flavor. The record did not contain an allergy care plan.”
All 16 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 10, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 10, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 7, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 12, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 4, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 14, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Dec 1, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 21, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 8, 2023 | Inspection | 9 violations cited |
| Jan 12, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 1, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| May 24, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 20, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Aug 18, 2028.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 136 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 4 complaint inspections on record.
- 4 complaint allegations published with Virginia’s findings, 4 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2025 | Complaint | Allegation: Structured Program. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | Complaint | Allegation: Structured Program. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Physical Abuse/Neglect. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Supervision. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 299 child care providers in Prince William County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 19.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Everbrook Academy This child care provider | 19 |
| Linton Hall School | 6 |
| Narinder Saini | 7 |
| KinderCare Learning Center at Braemar | 17 |
| KinderCare Learning Center #301808 | 8 |
| The Merit School of Braemar (#22) | 14 |
| Little Rocketeers Child Care | 6 |
| Ms. Christine Mensah | 7 |
| Ms. Fatoumata Scott | 10 |
| Bristow Montessori School | 15 |
| Kawthar Abdulla | 1 |
| Mrs. Katiuska Bonilla | 3 |
| Primrose School of Bristow | 19 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.