Ms. Robbin Reid
A family day home in Suffolk, Virginia 23434
125 Squire Reach, Suffolk, Virginia 23434. (757) 537-8132.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 12 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 262026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
13 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 26, 2026.
12 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 5 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 26, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Children’s records must contain required information. The records for Child #2 and Child #3 did not have a physical examination and is overdue by eight months. The record for Child #4 did not have first date of attendance and insurance plan information.”
Mar 25, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Children’s records are required to contain insurance plan/number and signed acknowledgement from parent for receipt of required information. The records for Child #1, #3 and #4 did not have parent’s signed acknowledgement of whether provider has liability insurance coverage. The record for Child #3 did not have insurance plan information.”
Feb 11, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-1
“The center is required to obtain a completed sworn statement for any adult household member. There was no sworn statement for household member #4 who is currently residing in the home was overdue by just under 4 months.”
-
22.1-289.036-B-2
“Providers must obtain a completed national criminal background check for each adult household member. Household member #4, did not have a completed national criminal background check which was overdue by just under 4 months,”
-
22.1-289.057-A
“The program is required to submit to VDH and implement a plan to test potable water for lead. The program did not have evidence of a testing plan submitted to VDH and/or the program did not have evidence of the implementation of the required testing plan.”
-
8VAC20-800-170-A
“Providers must obtain a current tuberculosis screening for each adult household member and from a caregiver at the time of hire and prior to coming into contact with children. There was no tuberculosis screening for Caregiver 3, who has been caring for children for over two months. There was no tuberculosis screening for household member # 4 who turned 18 years old over 4 months ago.”
-
8VAC20-800-180-A
“A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening. An updated TB screening for Caregiver #1 was not completed and was overdue by more than 2 months.”
Aug 2, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-100-A
“Based on a review of records, the licensee did not always obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Evidence: Five children’s records were reviewed. The record for child #1, whose date of enrollment was8/22/2020, did not contain the results of a physical examination. The provider was unable to provide the documentation during the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-800-240-A
“Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure that all areas and furnishings of the family day home, inside and outside are maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition. Evidence: A ladder holder was installed on the privacy fence which enclosed the outdoor play space used by children in care. Two of the 4 metal hooks used to support the ladder had an exposed metal edge where the rubber fitting was missing. A child could sustain an injury if they scraped against them or fell onto them.”
Apr 9, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-A
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that all employees undergo the required background checks before beginning to serve as a volunteer and every five years thereafter. Evidence: Four caregiver / Assistant. / Household Member records were reviewed. The record for caregiver #3 contained the most recent results of a Criminal History Record check which were dated 1/25/2019, more than 5 years ago. The record for caregiver #3 contained the most recent results of a Search of the Central Registry check which were dated 2/12/2019, more than 5 years ago. The licensee confirmed that this was an oversight and that a new request for an updated Criminal History Record Check and an updated Central Registry search had not been completed.”
-
8VAC20-790-180-A
The inspectors’ words, 125 words
“***REPEAT VIOLATION*** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not obtain for each caregiver a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form, in accordance with the requirements in 8VAC20-800-170, every two years from the date of the first screening or more frequently as recommended by a physician or the local health department. Evidence: Four caregiver/ Assistant / Household Member records were reviewed. The record for caregiver #3, who was working with children during the inspection, contained the most recent result of a Tuberculosis screening which was dated 2/5/2019 and was read more than 2 years ago. The licensee confirmed with caregiver #3, who had just returned to work from an extended leave, that she did had not obtained a more recent screening.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not ensure that when meals or snacks are provided by the family day home, they follow the most recent, age appropriate nutritional requirements of a recognized authority such as the Child and Adult Care Food Program of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
“Evidence: The children were observed eating a snack which consisted of a cereal bar and water. When asked if the children had been served any additional food components, it was confirmed that they there had been a change in the menu and the children had not had any additional food or drink for their snack. Snacks must include a minimum of 2 separate food components and water is not considered a food component.”
Jul 27, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not obtain a current Criminal History Record Check within 5 years of the most recently obtained criminal record check. Evidence: Three provider / Assistant / Household member records were reviewed. The record for provider #1 contained the last results of a criminal history record search which was dated 6/18/2018. These results were more than 5 years ago and required updating before 6/18/2023. The provider confirmed that an updated criminal record check had not been completed.”
Mar 23, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-170-A
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not obtain from each caregiver at the time of hire and each adult household member prior to coming into contact with children a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health or a form consistent with it documenting the absence of tuberculosis in a communicable form. Evidence: Three caregiver records were reviewed. The record for caregiver #3, who began employment on 3/17/2023, did not contain results of a Tuberculosis Screening. The licensee confirmed that she had not received this documentation from caregiver #3 who was working with the children during the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-800-180-A
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not obtain for each caregiver a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form, in accordance with the requirements in 8VAC20-800-170, every two years from the date of the first screening or more frequently as recommended by a physician or the local health department. Evidence: Three caregiver records were reviewed. The record for caregiver #2, who was working with children during the inspection, contained the most recent results of a Tuberculosis screening which was dated in 2019 and was more than 2 years ago. The licensee confirmed with caregiver #2 that she did had not obtained a more recent screening.”
Aug 31, 2022: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not ensure that every applicant for licensure as a family day home who is or will be involved in the day-to-day operations of the family day home, or who is or will be alone with, in control of, or supervising one or more of the children shall undergo a background check in accordance with subsection B prior to issuance of a license as a child day center, family day home, or family day system, registration as a family day home, or approval as a family day home by a family day system and every five years thereafter.
“Evidence: Two provider records were reviewed. The record for the licensee contained the most recent results of a search of the central registry which were dated 8/25/2016 and should have been conducted again by 8/25/2021. The Licensee confirmed that this documentation was not available during the inspection.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not ensure that any person living in the licensed family day home provider obtains a Child protective services central registry check within 30 days of a 14-year-old beginning to reside in the home or a person in the home becoming 14 years old.
“Evidence: Three provider / household member records were reviewed. The record for household member #3, who is 15 years old, did not contain the results of a Search of the Central Registry. When asked, the licensee stated that she believed it had been conducted, but that she was unable to locate the documented results.”
-
8VAC20-800-140-B-1
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Based on a review of records, the licensee did not maintain documentation in the records for caregivers of high school program completion or the equivalent or evidence of having met the requirements for admission to an accredited college or university. Evidence: The records for caregiver #1 and caregiver #2 did not contain documentation of high school program completion or the equivalent or evidence of having met the requirements for admission to an accredited college or university. The licensee confirmed that his documentation was not located in the records she maintained for herself and the assistant caregiver and that she was unable to locate this documentation.”
-
8VAC20-800-180-A
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Based on a review of records, the licensee did not obtain for each caregiver and adult household member a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form, in accordance with the requirements in 8VAC20-800-170, every two years from the date of the first screening or more frequently as recommended by a physician or the local health department. Evidence: Two caregiver records were reviewed. The Tuberculosis screening for caregiver #1 was dated 6/14/2018 - more than two years ago. The Tuberculosis screening for caregiver #2 was dated 2/5/2019 - more than two years ago. The provider was unable to demonstrate that a more recent screening had been conducted.”
-
8VAC20-800-210-A
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that caregivers obtain a minimum of sixteen clock hours of training annually in areas relevant to their job responsibilities. Evidence: Two caregiver records were reviewed. The record for caregiver #1 did not contain any documentation of training in the past year. The record for caregiver #2 contained 3 hours of training last year. The Licensee confirmed that training is tracked from April through March each year and that neither caregivers obtained a minimum of 16 hours of training last year.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
The inspectors’ words, 100 words
“Based on a review of records, the licensee did not ensure that each enrolled child’s record contained all of the required information. Evidence: Three children’s records were reviewed. The record for child #2 did not contain the name address and phone number for two individuals designated as emergency contacts if the parents can not be reached in an emergency. The records for child #1 and child #3 did not contain complete information for the parents’ work location and phone number. The licensee confirmed that this information had not been completed on the children’s enrollment paperwork and was not available elsewhere.”
-
8VAC20-800-900-A
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure that foods that are considered a choking hazard are not fed to children under four years of age unless the the food is prepared before being served in a manner that will reduce the risk of choking. Evidence: The inspector observed children eating whole grapes during lunch time. Five of the 7 children observed eating the uncut grapes were three years old, while the remaining 2 children were 5 years old. The licensee confirmed the children’s ages and said that she thought the choking hazards pertained to children under 3 years of age.”
-
8VAC20-820-120-E-2
“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not visibly post the findings of the most recent inspection of the family day home. Evidence: The inspector was unable to locate the most recent inspection findings in the family ay home at the time of inspection. When asked, the licensee confirmed that the results of the last inspection were not posted and she was unable to find this documentation in her records.”
Apr 1, 2022: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not obtain a subsequent Search of the Central Registry for provider #1 within 5 years of the previous Search of the Central Registry. Evidence: Three provider / household member records were reviewed. The most recent results of the Central Registry Search available for provider #1 was dated 8/25/2016. The licensee confirmed during the inspection that she had not obtained more recent results from a Central Registry Search.”
-
8VAC20-770-40-D-5-a
The inspectors’ words, 116 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that a Search of the Central Registry is obtained within 30 days of a household member becoming 14 years old. Evidence: Three provider / household member records were reviewed. The record for household member #3 did not contain the results of a Search of the Central Registry. Household member #3 turned 14 years old more than 90 days prior to the inspection. The licensee stated that she requested a Search of the Central Registry for household member #3 but confirmed that the results had not been obtained and she had not yet made contact with the office of background checks to follow up.”
-
8VAC20-800-180-A
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not obtain for each caregiver and adult household member a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form, in accordance with the requirements in 8VAC20-800-170, every two years from the date of the first screening. Evidence: Three provider / household member records were reviewed. The record for Provider #1 contained the most recent results of a Tuberculosis (TB) Screening which was conducted more than two years ago and dated 6/14/2018. The licensee confirmed that she did not have more recent documentation of results of a TB screening for provider #1.”
-
8VAC20-800-210-A
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was not able to demonstrate that each caregiver obtains a minimum of sixteen clock hours of training annually in areas relevant to their job responsibilities. Evidence: Three provider / household member records were reviewed. The record for caregiver #1 did not contain documentation of any annual training conducted within the last 12 month period. The record for caregiver #2 contained documentation of 13 of the 16 required annual training hours for the 12 month period. The licensee confirmed that the required documentation of 16 hours of annual training had not been obtained for caregiver #1 or caregiver #2.”
-
8VAC20-800-240-A
The inspectors’ words, 111 words
“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not ensure that all areas and furnishings of the family day home, inside and outside, are maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition. Evidence: The fence surrounding the outdoor play space used by children on care had several sections in which a horizontal support board was missing and the sharp end of the nails along the length of the panel are exposed. The exposed nails would be accessible to children playing outdoors in the yard. There were no children in the yard at the time of inspection. The licensee acknowledged the exposed nails and is making arrangements to have the fence repaired.”
Dec 9, 2021: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not obtain for each caregiver and adult household member a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening, in accordance with the requirements in 22 VAC 40-111-170, every two years from the date of the first screening.
“Evidence: Two caregiver records were reviewed during the inspection. The Most recent TB screening for caregiver #1 was dated 6/14/2018. The most recent TB screening for caregiver #2 was dated 2/5/20219. The licensee confirmed that she did not have updated TB screenings for caregiver #1 or caregiver #2 and had not realized that they were expired.”
All 13 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 25, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 26, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 11, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Aug 2, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 2, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 2, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 9, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jul 27, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 23, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 31, 2022 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Apr 1, 2022 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Dec 9, 2021 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: Two Year license, expires Apr 3, 2028.
- Ages: 1 year 6 months - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 1 complaint inspection on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 53 child care providers in the City of Suffolk, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 12.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Main Street Day Care Center, Inc. | 22 |
| The YMCA of South Hampton Roads-School Age Child Care at Suffolk | 27 |
| The Children’s Center- Executive Court | 17 |
| Quality Time Child Care Center, Inc | 13 |
| Growing Up At Obici | 4 |
| Triple T Sports Center LLC | 9 |
| Apple Tree Kids-#1002 | 7 |
| The Children’s Center - Suffolk Head Start | 3 |
| Unique Little Hands Inc. | 27 |
| Mrs. Carlena Scott | 22 |
| Ms. Chrissy Cooper | 11 |
| Ms. Robbin Reid This child care provider | 12 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.