Vision Montessori
A child day center in Ashburn, Virginia 20147
21740 Beaumeade Circle, Suite 100-A, Ashburn, Virginia 20147. (703) 724-1500.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 29 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jul 282026 the latest visit on record
- 89 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
15 inspections on record, the latest on Jul 28, 2026.
29 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
29 deficiencies in 7 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
May 12, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Individuals from independent contactors who do not meet staff qualifications shall, when in presence of children, be within sight and sound supervision of a staff member.
“The primary classroom had 28 children alone with an independent contractor doing a group activity, while the two teachers were two doors down, interacting with 2 children.”
-
3 year olds up to school-age - ratio 1:10 (staff : children)
“Observed 28 children and 1 contract staff in the primary classroom, while the 2 teachers and were two doors down interacting with two children that just arrived to school.”
Feb 24, 2026: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method.
“Room 2 had disinfectant spray and air freshener on a low shelf, and unlocked.”
-
Electrical outlets shall have protective covers.
“1. Room 2 did not have a protective cover on a wall outlet at the far end of the room. 2. The hall bathroom used by children did not have covers on the two outlets near the sink.”
Aug 5, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
The license and any other documents required shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.
“The inspection findings from the most recent inspection, dated 03/11/2025, were not posted in a conspicuous place on the premises.”
Mar 11, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“Providers must obtain the results of a central registry search for board officers/agents. Board Officer #3, did not have documentation of central registry search results during the inspection.”
-
Documentation of additional immunizations is required once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Child #5, 15 months old, last documented immunization was over 8 months ago.”
-
The center is required to obtain documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Staff #2 is currently working and has a TB screening that was dated 19 months after their first day of employment.”
-
Repeat Violation
“A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening. Staff #9 updated screening was due 3 days ago.”
-
The center shall ensure that areas and equipment of the center, inside are maintained in an operable condition.
“A black chair in a classroom used by children has a cushion that is ripped and torn in several places.”
Sep 25, 2024: inspection10 deficiencies
-
The center is required to have employees undergo a background check every five years.
“The most recent central registry check for staff #5 was overdue by a five years and four months.”
-
The center is required to obtain a completed sworn statement prior to the employee’s first day of employment.
“Staff #7, who is currently working, did not have a sworn statement and has been employed for eight months. Staff #9, who is currently working, has a completed sworn statement that was not dated and has been employed for seven months.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“For staff hired before July 1, 2024, providers must obtain the results of a central registry search for an employee, within 30 days of service. Staff #7 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for eight months. Staff #9 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for seven months. Staff #11 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for thirteen months. Staff #12 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for eighteen months”
-
The center shall obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“Child #4, who had been attending for twenty months, did not have documentation of an immunization record on file.”
-
Physical examinations completed by a physician shall be obtained prior to the first day of attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“There was no physical examination in the record of child #4, who had been enrolled for twenty months.”
-
The center shall have at least one staff member on duty who has obtained within the last three years instruction in performing the daily health observation of children.
“There was no staff member on duty at the time of the inspection with current DHO training.”
-
The center shall provide to the licensing representative an annual fire inspection report from the appropriate fire official having jurisdiction.
“The fire inspection was expired by 91 days.”
-
The center shall obtain annual approval from the health department for meeting requirements for water supply and sewage disposal system.
“The environmental sanitation inspection was expired by 13 days.”
-
Repeat violation
“Areas inside of the center were not maintained in a safe condition. There were areas of chipped paint in four classrooms.”
-
Each grouping of children shall have at least one staff regularly present who meets lead teacher qualifications.
“Staff #7, who did not meet lead teacher qualifications, was alone with a group of preschool children during a time of the inspection. The administration stated staff #7’s qualifications have been submitted and they’re waiting for staff #7’s montessori certification.”
Jul 11, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure care, protection, and guidance while supervising children.
The inspectors’ words, 139 words
“Evidence: 1. On Thursday, July 11, 2024, at approximately 11:14 am, Child #1 (2 years old) was found sitting alone and unsupervised on the floor in Classroom #9. 2. Staff #2 stated they completed a head count in the hallway to ensure all seven students were present before entering the classroom at approximately 11:05 am. However, they failed to perform a second head count once inside, resulting in their unawareness of Child #1. 3. At approximately 11:12 am, Staff #2 noticed that Child #1 was not in the room and called another staff member to help in locating Child #1. 4. Staff #2 stated that they suspected Child #1 slipped out of line and walked to Classroom #9 while they were waiting in the hallway. 5. Child #1 was alone and unsupervised in Classroom #9 for approximately nine minutes.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 167 words
“Based on observation and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that all children under 10 years of age were always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. 1. On Thursday, July 11, 2024, at approximately 11:14 am, Child #1 (2 years old) was found sitting alone and unsupervised on the floor in Classroom #9. 2. Staff #2 stated they completed a head count in the hallway to ensure all seven students were present before entering the classroom at approximately 11:05 am. However, they failed to perform a second head count once inside, resulting in their unawareness of Child #1. 3. At approximately 11:12 am, Staff #2 noticed that Child #1 was not in the room and called another staff member to help in locating Child #1. 4. Staff #2 stated that they suspected Child #1 slipped out of line and walked to Classroom #9 while they were waiting in the hallway. 5. Child #1 was alone and unsupervised in Classroom #9 for approximately nine minutes.”
Jan 9, 2024: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and staff interview, the center failed to post the license and any other documents required by the Superintendent in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.
“Evidence: 1. The findings of the most recent inspection of the facility was not posted in an conpicous place. 2. The findings of the most recent inspection of the facility is located in the director’s office.”
-
Based on record review, 2 of 4 staff files indicated that the facility did not obtain the results of a central registry check by the end of the 30th day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. There was no documentation of central registry results for Staff #3 (DOH: 8/15/2023). 2. There was no documentation of central registry results for Staff #4 (DOH: 2/27/2023).”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure children under 10 years of age were within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
The inspectors’ words, 129 words
“Evidence: 1. During the facility’s inspection, on Tuesday, January 9, 2024, the Inspector observed Child #10 (two years and six months old) walking out of a hallway bathroom alone. 2. Child #10 stood in the hallway with their pants down until Staff #5 who was in the PK- Kindergarten classroom noticed them. 3. The Inspector asked Staff #5 if they knew who the teacher of Child #10 was and where they could find them. Staff #5 mentioned that Staff #6 was the child’s teacher and that they should be in the bathroom. When the inspector checked the bathroom, there was no teacher present. 4. Staff #6 stepped out of their classroom to assist Child #10, escorting the child back into the bathroom to potty and back to their classroom.”
-
Based on record review and observation, the center failed to ensure that the ratio for balanced-mixed-age groupings of children was not being followed at all times.
The inspectors’ words, 183 words
“Evidence: 1. The Inspector arrived at the facility for an inspection on Tuesday, January 9, 2024, at approximately 10:30 am. 2. Staff #5 left the PK-Kindergarten classroom to open the locked door for the Inspector and another student who was waiting in the entryway to enter the facility. 3. There were 20 students (ages 4 to 6 years old) checked in on the Pk-Kindergarten classroom attendance sheet when Staff #5 left to open the door for the Inspector and the student, the Inspector counted 20 students in the classroom, and Staff #3 confirmed there were 20 students present. 4. At approximately 10:35 am, Staff #5 was observed leaving the PK-Kindergarten classroom again to open the locked door for another student being dropped off in the entryway. 5. From approximately 10:30 and 10:35 am, Staff #5 left the classroom twice to unlock the entryway for the Inspector and the two students who were being dropped off, leaving Staff #3 alone with 20 students. 6. As a result of this action, the classroom was out of ratio and exceeded the 1:14 mixed-age group classroom ratio.”
-
Based on a review of medications, one medication does not have an authorization available for review.
“Evidence: Child #9 is missing an medication authorization for medication they have at the center.”
-
Based on a review of medications, one medication at the center does not have a prescription label attached.
“Evidence: Child #8 has an epi-pen at the center that does not have a prescription label attached.”
-
Based on a review of medications, when an authorization for medication expires, the parent was not notified to pick up the medication or renew the authorization.
“Evidence: 1. Medication present at the center had expired authorizations. 2. Medications were not picked up and the authorizations were not renewed. 3. Child #9’s authorization expired 4/8/2023.”
Aug 21, 2023: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and interviews, areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, were not maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: The ground covering underneath the resilient surfacing was exposed and lifted, causing a tripping hazard on the playground.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure the maximum group size limitations were followed when children were in care.
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Evidence: 1. On Monday, August 21, 2023, at approximately 12:41 pm, a total of 21 children (17 months to three years of age) were being supervised by 4 staff members in the Toddler classroom during nap time. 2. Several teachers stated that the toddler’s classroom had 25 students and 5 teachers on Monday, August 21, 2023, before half-day dismissal at 12:30 pm. 3. The toddler’s classroom has 25 children (17 months to three years of age) documented on the August 2023 attendance sheet. 4. The maximum group size for children 16 to 24 months of age is 15 children.”
-
Based on interviews, the center failed to ensure that when time out is used as a behavior guidance technique that it is used sparingly and shall not exceed one minute for each year of the child’s age.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #1 reported that on June 13, 2023, they took recess away from Child #26 (4-years-old) for 10 minutes. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that Child #26 was given 10 minutes of time out (thinking time) from playing on the playground as a form of behavior guidance due to the child’s behavior. 3. Child #26 is four years old, and time out should have been limited to four minutes.”
-
Based on observation and interview, for each group of children, the center failed to maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Evidence: 1. On Monday, August 21, 2023, the arrivals and departures of each child in care were not documented on the attendance sheet for the toddler classroom at the time of the inspection. 2. The daily attendance record maintained at the center consists of a check mark, which indicates when the child arrives but not when the child departs from the center. 3. Staff #1 confirmed that they only document arrivals.”
Aug 10, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on review of attendance records and inteview, the center exceeded the 1:5 staff-to-children ratio requirement for the 18 months-3-year-old mixed-aged classroom.
“Evidence: 1. In the toddler classroom, there were 2 children in care who were 18 months old and the other 24 children were over the age of 18 months old. 2. Since the children aged 18 months were in care the ratio required is 1 staff to 5 children. 3. There was 4 staff with 26 children during the inspection. 4. The ratio of the youngest age must be followed in a mixed-age grouping such as this.”
-
Based on medication review and interview, medication was not labeled with the child’s name, the name of the medication, the dosage amount, and the time or times to be given.
“Evidence: Child #2 has emergency medication that is missing a prescription medication label that includes the child’s name, the name of the medication, the dosage amount, and the time or times to be given.”
-
Based on observation and interview, food brought from home was not dated.
“Evidence: 1. In the Pre-K/Kindergarten Classroom, 10 out of 10 lunch boxes were not dated. 2. In the Pre-Primary Classroom, 7 out of 7 lunch boxes were not dated.”
Mar 7, 2023: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, it was determined that not all background checks were repeated every five years.
“Evidence: The most recent criminal history background check on file for Staff #6 is dated 2/9/2018.”
-
Based on record review, a subsequent TB screening was not completed.
“Evidence: Staff #6’s last documented TB screening was on 4/11/2011.”
-
Based on observation, areas and equipment of the center, inside were not maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: 1. There were three large areas of peeling paint on the left side of the wall near the entrance door and two large areas on the right side of the room near the cabinet, in the nap room. 2. There was a large area of peeling paint on the left side of the wall between the bathroom door and the exit door, as well as another area across from the cubbies, in the lunch room.”
-
Based on observation and interview, hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1. In the PR-K/kindergarten classroom, swiffer wet mopping pads were on top of a set of cubbies next to the classroom door. 2. In the Toddler classroom, two bleach spray bottles were on top of a 3 drawer compartment next to the diaper changing table. 3. In the Pre-Primary classroom, a container of air freshener was on top of a set of cubbies near the classroom door.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not develop a written policy that describes how the center will ensure that each group of children receives care by consistent staff or team of staff members.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of a written policy that describes how the center will ensure that each group of children receives care by consistent staff.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not develop written procedures for injury prevention.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of written procedures for injury prevention.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not develop written procedures for the prevention of shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma, including coping with crying babies, safe sleeping practices, and sudden infant death syndrome awareness.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of written procedures for the prevention of shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma, including coping with crying babies, safe sleeping practices, and sudden infant death syndrome awareness”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not maintain, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions.
“Evidence: The center allergy list did not include child #4 and child #5, who have food allergies.”
-
Based on a review of medications, nonprescription medication was not in the original container.
“Evidence: The nonprescription medication for child #5 was not in its original container.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center did not obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“Evidence: There was no documentation of a written care plan for child #5 who has a diagnosed food allergy.”
Aug 24, 2022: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside were not maintained in a safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: In the Infant classroom, 2 crib sheets were not tightly fitted around the crib mattress to ensure safe sleep practices.”
-
Based on observation, hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1. In the Primary classroom, a bottle of disinfectant spray, air freshener, and insect repellant was located on top of a cabinet, but not locked. 2. In the Pre-K classroom, air freshener and insect repellant were located on top of a cubby next to the classroom door, but not locked.”
-
Based on observation, not all of the food containers brought from home were clearly dated and labeled in a way that identifies the owner.
“Evidence: 8 of 8 food containers brought from home were missing the date.”
-
Based on observation and staff interview, infant bottles were not dated.
“Evidence: In the Infant classroom, 5 of 5 infant bottles located in the refrigerator were not dated.”
Mar 31, 2022: inspection8 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-130-E
“Based on record review, the center did not obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years. Evidence: 1) The most recent immunization record for Child #1 (dob 02/25/2021) was dated 04/28/2021 and for Child #2 (dob 02/17/2021) was dated 0/18/2021”
-
8VAC20-780-240-E
“Based on record review, one staff person did not complete orientation training in first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Evidence: 1) The record for Staff #3 (start date 05/01/2021) did not contain documentation of having completed training in first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).”
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Based on observation, the center did not ensure that hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, are kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: 1) There were two bottles of drain cleaner (Drano) in the cabinet under the sink of the Toddler classroom. The cabinet door was not locked nor had installed a locking mechanism.”
-
8VAC20-780-510-P
The inspectors’ words, 112 words
“Based on medication and documentation review, medication with expired authorization forms were not returned to parents as required. Evidence: 1) On the date of inspection, 3 different medications were kept in the center for Child #3. The authorization forms for these medication had an expiration date of 01/10/2021. Per standards, when an authorization for medication expires, the parent shall be notified that the medication needs to be picked up within 14 days or the parent must renew the authorization. Medications that are not picked up by the parent within 14 days should be disposed of by the center by either dissolving the medication down the sink or flushing it down the toilet.”
-
8VAC20-780-560-G
“Based on observation, food brought from home was not clearly dated and labeled in a way that identifies the owner. Evidence: 1) On the date of inspection, in the refrigerator in the Infant room there were two bottles with milk in them and a bottle of baby formula. These bottles had no date or name on them to identify the owner.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on record review, children’s records did not contain all required information. Evidence: 1) The records for Child #1, Child #2 and Child #3 did not contain the work phone number for each one of the parents who have custody.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Based on record review, the center did not ensure to have a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy. Evidence: 1) The records for Child #4 and Child #5 did not contain a written care plan to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. There is documentation in the records for Child #4 and Child #5 that identify food allergies and emergency medication on site for Child #4 and Child #5.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on record review, staff’s records did not contain all required information. Evidence: 1) The records for Staff #1, Staff #2 and Staff #3 did not contain name, address and telephone number of a person to be notified in an emergency.”
All 15 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 12, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 5, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 11, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Mar 11, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 25, 2024 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Jul 11, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jun 26, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 9, 2024 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Aug 21, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Aug 10, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Mar 7, 2023 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Aug 24, 2022 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Mar 31, 2022 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Apr 5, 2027.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 89 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 3 complaint inspections on record.
- 1 complaint allegation published with Virginia’s findings, 1 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2023 | Complaint | Allegation: Supervision. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 304 child care providers in Loudoun County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 29.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Vision Montessori This child care provider | 29 |
| La Petite Academy - Ashburn | 35 |
| AVSP Youth Program | 2 |
| Crossroads United Methodist Church | 5 |
| KinderCare Learning Centers at Golden Meadow | 24 |
| Ashburn Presbyterian Church | 4 |
| Little Learners Academy LLC | 8 |
| Montessori Academy at Belmont Greene | 18 |
| St. David’s Episcopal Church and School | 3 |
| KinderCare Learning Centers #301766 | 37 |
| Carolina Schwan | 10 |
| The Children’s Learning Laboratory | 10 |
| The Goddard School - Ashburn | 22 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.