Kid-Konnection Child Development Center
A child day center in Danville, Virginia 24541
2825 Stony Mill School Road, Danville, Virginia 24541. (434) 685-7663.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 14 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jul 292026 the latest visit on record
- 86 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
23 inspections on record, the latest on Jul 29, 2026.
14 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
14 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jul 29, 2026: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Complaint related
“When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care and protection. On 10/29/2025, Staff 5 did not ensure the care and protection of the children in their care when an adult medication tablet fell out of their pocket onto the floor of Classroom 1. Child 3 (age 2 years) picked up the tablet off of the floor and began to play with it. Staff 2 saw the child playing with the tablet and took it from them.”
-
Complaint related
“Physical punishment, or threats thereof, is a forbidden action. On 07/14/2025, Staff 2 threatened to cut off Child 1?s (age 4 years) fingers with scissors because the child was coloring on other children.”
-
Complaint related
“Medication, including staff’s personal medication, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. On 10/29/2025, Staff 5 placed personal medication into their pocket while working in a classroom with children.”
Dec 10, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Children under 10 years of age shall always be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
The inspectors’ words, 169 words
“The infant class was observed during the designated rest time. The door to the classroom was closed, the lights were off, and the windows were covered with blankets to darken the room. The 2 staff were unable to maintain sight supervision of the 5 infants (ages 3 months-) in care in these conditions. The toddler class was observed during the designated rest time. The door to the classroom was closed, the light was off and there are no windows in the classroom, creating an environment of complete darkness. Staff 2 was unable to maintain sight supervision of the 4 children in the room in these conditions. At approximately 12:25 pm, Staff 4 was observed brining the leftover lunch upstairs to the kitchen from the downstairs Pre-K classroom. It was determined that Staff 4 was the only staff member supervising the Pre-K class that day. During the time that Staff 4 was upstairs, the 10 children in the pre-k classroom were not within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.”
-
Repeat violation
“For each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs. There were 10 children observed in attendance in the Pre-K room, but the attendance record indicated that there were 11 children in care.”
Jun 5, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that where playground equipment is provided, resilient surfacing shall comply with minimum safety standards and shall be under equipment with moving parts or climbing apparatus to create a fall zone free of hazardous obstacles.
“Evidence: The resilient surfacing at the base of the small red slide and the small orange slide on the playground did not meet the required depth; the dirt under the pea gravel was visible at the base of both of the slides.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water after toileting and that staff shall wash their hands before and after a diaper change.
“Evidence: Staff 6 was observed changing 2 children’s diapers; Staff 6 did not wash their hands before or after changing the children’s diapers. The children did not wash their hands after the diaper change.”
-
2nd REPEAT VIOLATION Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that tables shall be sanitized before and after each use for feeding.
“Evidence: Staff 6 was observed cleaning the table with a soap and water solution after breakfast. Staff 6 did not sanitize the tables. The tables were not sanitized after being used for feeding.”
-
Based on document review and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that for each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Evidence: 1. There were 6 children observed in the Infant Class; there were 8 children marked present on the attendance record. The attendance record did not document the departure of each child as it occurred. 2. There were 2 children observed in the Toddler Class; there was not an attendance record for the group.”
Jun 5, 2024: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Complaint related
“Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. Evidence: The record for Staff 5 did not contain the results of a tuberculosis screening. Staff 1 verified that Staff 5 worked at the center on 05813/2024.”
-
Complaint related
“Based on staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that timeout is not used with infant or toddlers. Evidence: Staff 1 stated that they placed Child 1 (21 months old) in a crib for a two minute timeout because they hit another child.”
-
COMPLAINT RELATED Based on staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that actions towards children that are forbidden by the standards (confining children in a space that they cannot freely exit themselves; using equipment for the intended purpose) are not used.
“Evidence: Staff 1 stated that they placed Child 1 (21 months old) in a crib for a two minute timeout. The crib was not used for its intended purpose when the child was place in it for time out. Child 1 could not freely exit the crib themselves.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that staff records contain all of the elements as required by the standards.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 5 did not contain the following information: documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment (there was only one reference in the record during the 06/05/2024 inspection), Staff 1 verified that Staff 5 worked at the center on 05/13/2024; and date of separation from employment (Staff 5 is no longer employed at the center).”
Jan 30, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that cribs shall be identified for use by a specific child.
“Evidence: 1. Child 1 was observed sleeping in a crib that was identified for the use by Child 2. 2. Child 3 was observed sleeping in a crib that was identified for the use by Child 4. 3. Child 5 was observed sleeping in a crib that was identified for the use by Child 6.”
Nov 3, 2023: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that every applicant for licensure as a child day center shall undergo a background check in accordance with the Code of Virginia prior to issuance of a license and every five years thereafter.
“Evidence: The most recent criminal record check for Applicant 1 was dated 03/28/2018; there was not a follow-up criminal record check obtained by 03/28/2023.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances, such as cleaning materials, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1. There was a container of disinfecting wipes on the table in the 2?s Classroom. The cleaning materials were not locked and were accessible to children. 2. The cabinet under the sink in the bathroom of the 2?s classroom, containing various cleaning products, was unlocked. The cleaning materials were not locked and were accessible to children. Children were observed in the bathroom during the inspection.”
-
Based on observation and record review, the center failed to maintain the required staff-to-child ratio whenever children are in care.
“Evidence: There were 11 children and 2 staff members observed in the 2?s Classroom. Child 5 was determined to be 18 months old. The required staff-to-child ratio for children 16 months- 24 months is 1:5. Three staff would be required for this group of children.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that the diapering surface shall be cleaned with soap and at least room temperature water and sanitized after each use.
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Evidence: Two diaper changes were observed during the inspection. Staff 4 was observed using a disinfecting wipe on the diaper changing surface after each diaper change. The standards state that to sanitize a surface, an item is sprayed or dipped into the disinfectant solution and allowed to air dry on the surface for a minimum of two minutes or according to the disinfectant solution instructions. Disinfecting wipes do not meet the definition of sanitizing. The diaper changing surface was not cleaned with soap and water and was not properly sanitized after each use.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that tables shall be sanitized before and after each use for feeding. Evidence: Staff 4 was observed using a disinfecting wipe on the tables after breakfast. The standards state that to sanitize a surface, an item is sprayed or dipped into the disinfectant solution and allowed to air dry on the surface for a minimum of two minutes or according to the disinfectant solution instructions. Disinfecting wipes do not meet the definition of sanitizing. The tables were not properly sanitized after the use of each feeding.”
Jun 6, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that cleaning materials and insecticides/pesticides shall be stored in areas physically separate from each other.
“Evidence: There were two bottles of Raid on the same shelf as the cleaning materials in the supply closet.”
-
Based on document review and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that nonprescription medication shall be administered by a staff member who has satisfactorily completed a medication administration training course.
“Evidence: The medication administration log contained documentation that Medication 4 was administered by Staff 8 on 05/26/2023. Staff 7 verified that Staff 8 has not satisfactorily completed a medication administration training course.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that tables shall be sanitized before and after each use for feeding.
“Evidence: Staff 4 was observed spraying the sanitizing solution on the table and immediately wiping the solution off before lunch. The manufacturer’s instructions for the product states that to sanitize, the solution should be allowed to air dry for 10 minutes before wiping the product off. The tables had not been properly sanitized before the use for feeding.”
Nov 7, 2022: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain a copy of a criminal history record check and a copy of a child abuse and neglect search from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 5 contained documentation that Staff 5 has resided outside of the state of Virginia within the preceding five years. The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire of 08/30/2021. There was not a copy of a child abuse and neglect search from all of the states in which the individual had resided in the preceding five years available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on record review and interviews with staff, the center failed to ensure that any child for whom emergency medications have been prescribed shall always be in the care of a staff member who has satisfactorily completed the medication administration training program.
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Evidence: 1. Staff 6 and Staff 7 are the only two staff members that have a current training in medication administration. 2. Staff 7 verified that both Staff 6 and Staff 7 leave the center to take children to school and to pick children up from school each day. 3. Staff 7 stated that there is no one on-site that has medication administration training for approximately 5 minutes-15 minutes each day when Staff 6 and Staff 7 leave the center to take children to school and to pick children up from school. 4. There are two children enrolled in the program that have prescription emergency medications on-site.”
-
Based on document and record review, the center failed to ensure that medication is administered by a staff member who has satisfactorily completed the medication administration training program.
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Evidence: 1. Review of the Medication Administration Log for Medication 1 contained documentation that Staff 3 administered Medication 1 on the following dates/times: 09/20/2022 at 9:00 am; 09/21/2022 at 8:00 am; 09/21/2022 at 12:00 pm; 09/21/2022 at 5:00 pm; and 09/22/2022 at 12:00 pm. Staff 3 has not satisfactorily completed the medication administration training program. 2. Review of the Medication Administration Log for Medication 1 contained documentation that Staff 8 administered Medication 1 at 1:00 pm on 09/2022. Staff 8 has not satisfactorily completed the medication administration training program. 3. Staff 7 verified that Staff 3 and Staff 8 do not have training in medication administration.”
All 23 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 28, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 20, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 20, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 6, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 6, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 10, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 10, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 3, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 3, 2023 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jun 6, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 6, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 7, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 7, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| May 26, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 26, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 3, 2021 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 3, 2021 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Dec 1, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 86 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 3 complaint inspections on record.
- 1 complaint allegation published with Virginia’s findings, 1 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | Complaint | Allegation: Physical Abuse/Neglect. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 13 child care providers in Pittsylvania County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 14.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Kid-Konnection Child Development Center This child care provider | 14 |
| Pittsylvania County Community Action-Bethel Baptist Church | 7 |
| Pittsylvania County Community Action - Shiloh | 5 |
| Faith Christian Academy | 1 |
| Little Blessings Child Care, Inc. | 23 |
| Altavista Area YMCA - Gretna | 8 |
| Heritage Academy | 6 |
| Children First Learning Center LLC | 8 |
| The Learning Tree Daycare LLC | 43 |
| Homestead Christian Church | 5 |
| Gwendolyn Averett | 2 |
| Eva Johnson | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.