New Bridge Baptist Church
A religious exempt child day center in Sandston, Virginia 23150
5701 Elko Road, Sandston, Virginia 23150. (804) 737-7665.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 15 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 62026 the latest visit on record
- 350 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 6, 2026.
15 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
15 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jun 29, 2026: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Each person in a supervisory position has been certified by a practicing physician or physician assistant to be free from any disability which would prevent him from caring for children under his supervision.
“Staff #1, employed for three years, had a completed staff health form that expired two years ago.”
-
Subsequent TB screenings are required at least every two years from the date of the initial screening.
“Staff #1, employed for three years, had a TB screening that expired one year ago.”
Feb 26, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection7 deficiencies
-
The center shall establish and implement procedures for a daily simple health screening and exclusion of sick children by a person trained to perform such screenings.
“There were no staff at the center that were formally trained in daily health screenings at the time of inspection.”
-
The center is required to have employees undergo a background check every five years.
“The most recent sworn statement for staff #5 was overdue by three years at the time of inspection.”
-
The vendor shall provide the department representative an annual fire inspection report from the appropriate fire official having jurisdiction.
“The most recent fire inspection report was overdue by three weeks.”
-
Areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition.
“In classroom #1, peeling paint was observed on the wall where children were present.”
-
Shelter-in-place procedures shall be practiced twice a year.
“The center stated the shelter-in-place drills were conducted but not documented for 2025.”
-
Lockdown procedures shall be practiced at least annually.
“The center stated the lockdown drill was conducted but not documented for 2025.”
-
Prepared infant formula shall be refrigerated, dated, and labeled with the child’s name if more than one infant is in care.
“In classroom #7, bottles were observed without dates for infants in the room.”
Mar 17, 2025: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Staff shall be evaluated by a health professional and be issued a statement that the individual is determined to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB). Documentation of the screening shall be submitted at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Staff #2 had a tuberculosis screening dated two weeks after date of employment.”
-
Children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water after toileting and any contact with blood, feces, or urine.
“A staff person in classroom 6 was changing a child’s diaper and did not wash the child’s hands with soap and water afterwards.”
-
When a child is placed in an infant seat, high chair, or feeding table, the protective belt shall be fastened securely.
“In classroom 6, four children were sitting in bucket seats at a feeding table without the protective belt fastened. In classroom 6, one child was seated in a high chair without a protective belt fastened securely. The high chair was manufactured with seatbelts, however no protective belt was used during observation.”
May 1, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interviews, the vendor did not ensure two staff who work directly with children had current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children care.
“Evidence: 1. The CPR certification in the record of Staff #2, employed on 05/16/23, expired on 01/10/2024. 2. The record of Staff #5, employed on 10/23/23, did not contain documentation that the staff has current certification in CPR. All staff who work directly with children shall have current certification in CPR within 90 days of the date of employment. 3. During interview, management confirmed Staff #2 and Staff #5 did not have current certification in CPR as required.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interviews, the vendor did not ensure two staff who work directly with children had current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children care.
“Evidence: 1. The first aid certification in the record of Staff #2, employed on 05/16/23, expired on 01/10/2024. 2. The record of Staff #5, employed on 10/23/23, did not contain documentation that the staff has current certification in first aid. All staff who work directly with children shall have current certification in first aid within 90 days of the date of employment. 3. During interview, management confirmed Staff #2 and Staff #5 did not have current certification in first aid as required.”
-
Based on a review of documentation and interviews, the vendor did not ensure evacuation procedures shall be practiced at least monthly.
“Evidence: The center’s emergency response drill log was reviewed. The most recent evacuation drill was documented on 03/13/24. During interview, a member of management confirmed the evacuation procedures were not practiced in the month of April 2024.”
Apr 5, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of six staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure four staff had the satisfactory results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check prior to employment.
The inspectors’ words, 104 words
“Evidence: 1) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #1, employed on 08/29/22, was dated 09/13/22. 2) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #2, employed on 01/24/23, was dated 02/24/23. 3) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #5, employed on 09/09/22, was dated 09/21/22. 4) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #6, employed on 02/21/23, was dated 03/07/23. 5) During interview, a member of management confirmed the fingerprint results for Staff #1, Staff #2, Staff #5, and Staff #6 were not received prior to employment.”
-
Based on a review of six staff records and interview, the vendor did not obtain the results of a sex offender registry check and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which one staff member had resided in the preceding five years within the required timeframe.
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #4, employed on 11/28/22, indicated the staff had resided in another state outside of Virginia within the last five years. The record did not contain a sex offender registry check or a search of the child abuse and neglect registry from that state. The out-of-state sex offender registry check is required to be obtained prior to employment and the out-of-state search for founded complaints of child abuse or neglect is required to be requested within the first 30 days of employment. 2) During interview, a member of management confirmed the required out-of-state checks were not obtained for Staff #4 within the required timeframe.”
-
Based on a review of six staff records, the vendor did not ensure four staff members had documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening within the required timeframe.
The inspectors’ words, 135 words
“Evidence: 1) The TB screening in the record of Staff #1, employed on 08/29/22, was completed on 09/12/22. 2) The TB screening in the record of Staff #3, employed on 12/07/22, was completed on 02/03/23. 3) The TB screening in the record of Staff #5, employed on 09/09/22, was completed on 09/11/22. 4) The most recent TB screening in the record of Staff #6, employed on 02/21/23, was completed on 03/20/23. A previous TB screening in the record was completed on 09/04/22. Documentation of the screening shall be submitted at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. The documentation shall have been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment and be signed by a physician, physician’s designee, or an official of the local health department.”
Apr 5, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of six staff records, four staff did not obtain the required staff health report within the required timeframe.
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Evidence: 1) The staff health report in the record of Staff #2, employed on 01/24/23, was completed on 01/25/2023. 2) The staff health report in the record of Staff #3, employed on 12/07/22, was completed on 02/03/23. 3) The staff health report in the record of Staff #5, employed on 09/09/22, was completed on 09/11/22. 4) The staff health report in the record of Staff #6, employed on 02/21/23, was completed on 03/20/23. The staff health report for each staff member should have been obtained prior to the staff beginning employment.”
-
Based on a review of six staff records and interview, the center did not ensure four staff had the satisfactory results of the fingerprint based national criminal background check prior to employment.
The inspectors’ words, 104 words
“Evidence: 1) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #1, employed on 08/29/22, was dated 09/13/22. 2) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #2, employed on 01/24/23, was dated 02/24/23. 3) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #5, employed on 09/09/22, was dated 09/21/22. 4) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #6, employed on 02/21/23, was dated 03/07/23. 5) During interview, a member of management confirmed the fingerprint results for Staff #1, Staff #2, Staff #5, and Staff #6 were not received prior to employment.”
-
Based on a review of six staff records and interview, the vendor did not obtain the results of a sex offender registry check and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which one staff member had resided in the preceding five years within the required timeframe.
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #4, employed on 11/28/22, indicated the staff had resided in another state outside of Virginia within the last five years. The record did not contain a sex offender registry check or a search of the child abuse and neglect registry from that state. The out-of-state sex offender registry check is required to be obtained prior to employment and the out-of-state search for founded complaints of child abuse or neglect is required to be requested within the first 30 days of employment. 2) During interview, a member of management confirmed the required out-of-state checks were not obtained for Staff #4 within the required timeframe.”
Sep 29, 2022: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on interviews, the vendor did not ensure in order to promote the child’s physical, intellectual, emotional, and social wellbeing and growth, staff shall model desired, appropriate behavior and respect personal privacy.
The inspectors’ words, 125 words
“Evidence: 1. Staff #1 stated on July 18, 2022, Child #1 had a ?blow-out bowel movement?. Staff #1 stated ?some of the poop was inside the vagina of [Child #1]?. Staff #1 stated she called Staff #2 to the room to ask about the best way to clean the area. 2. Staff #2 stated she took a picture of the vaginal area of Child #1 in order to show the parent and to ensure Child #1 was cleaned properly. 3. The parent of Child #1 stated Staff #2 showed pictures of her child’s private area and was concerned about pictures existing of the child’s vaginal area and insisted on Staff #2 deleting the photos. 4. Staff #2 stated all pictures of Child #1 were deleted.”
All 18 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 29, 2026 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Feb 26, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 26, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Mar 17, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 17, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 1, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| May 1, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 19, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 19, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 5, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Apr 5, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Apr 5, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 18, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 18, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Religious Exempt Child Day Center: Exempt from licensure, expires Apr 28, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 350 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 3 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 232 child care providers in Henrico County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 10; this one had 15.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| New Bridge Baptist Church This child care provider | 15 |
| White Oak Early Childcare Center | 5 |
| Genesis Learning Center @ Airport | 14 |
| Little Peeples World, LLC | 17 |
| Young Men’s Christian Association of Greater Richmond -Whiteside | 15 |
| Amanda Brown | 5 |
| Right at School, LLC - Donahoe | 3 |
| Little Hearts of Sandston, Virginia, Ltd. | 2 |
| Tuckaway-Innsbrook Child Development Center | 14 |
| Bon Secours Family Center @ SMH | 4 |
| La Petite Academy - Church Road | 3 |
| KinderCare Learning Center - Parham | 31 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.