The Springs, A Montessori School
A child day center in Springfield, Virginia 22153
7719 Fullerton Road, Suite D, Springfield, Virginia 22153. (703) 455-1000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 19 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jun 82026 the latest visit on record
- 200 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
20 inspections on record, the latest on Jun 8, 2026.
19 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jan 21, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
When centers choose to provide meals or snacks, the following shall apply: A menu listing foods to be served for meals and snacks during the current one-week period shall: a. Be dated; b. Be posted in a location conspicuous to parents or given to parents; c. List any substituted food; and d. Be kept on file for one week at the center
“The center does not have a menu for the week of January 19 2026 through January 23 2026 showing what morning and afternoon snacks will be served during the current 1 week period. The center staff complete snack menus in the classroom once snack has been served.”
Dec 9, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
Authorize the child day center to obtain a copy of the results of a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years within 30 days of a hiring.
“The center did not ensure that child abuse and neglect registry searches were complete for Staff #3 and Staff # 6. Staff #3 and Staff #6 records did not have documentation of completed searches and are approximately 3 years out of compliance.”
Dec 12, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Prior to employment, staff must have a completed Fingerprint Criminal Record check.
“Staff #1 criminal record check was passed due 50 days from the employees start date.”
-
Children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“2 children were not visible to staff for approximately 5 minutes. The 2 children were doing work in the hallway, while the classroom staff were observed cleaning up for the next activity.”
-
The center shall keep documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment or volunteering.
“Staff #1 record has 1 of 2 references documented and the center is 6 months passed compliance.”
May 20, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review, the center did not ensure that documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening was completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment. Evidence: Staff #3?s (date of employment: 05/13/2024) TB screening was dated 11/08/2023.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on observation, hazardous substances were not kept in a locked place. Evidence: Clorox wipes, bleach sanitizer spray, multi-surface cleaner, disinfectant spray, three air fresheners, and glass cleaner were in an unlocked cabinet in Classroom 5, accessible to children.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on observation, medication was not kept in a locked place. Evidence: Two inhalers were in an unlocked cabinet in Classroom 5.”
-
Based on record review, the center did not have a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1 (start date: 06/12/2023), Child #2 (start date: 06/13/2022) and Child #4?s (start date: 06/18/2020) records indicate food allergies. 2. The center did not have a written care plan for Child #1, Child #2 and Child #4.”
Nov 27, 2023: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that they received results of fingerprinting for 3 out of 10 employees prior to employment. Evidence: 1. Staff 2?s (start date: 07/09/2023) fingerprinting results were dated 07/19/2023. 2. Staff #9?s (start date: 05/30/2023) fingerprinting results were dated 05/31/2023. 3. Staff #10?s (start date: 08/14/2023) fingerprinting results were dated 08/17/2023.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening was submitted at the of employment and completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment for 2 out of 10 staff. Evidence: 1. Staff #4?s (start date:08/14/2023) TB screening was completed on 04/20/2023. 2. Staff #10?s (08/14/2023) TB screening was completed on 08/24/2023.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the center failed to provide annual approval from the health department meeting requirements for water supply and sewage disposal system.
“Evidence: 1. The center did not have documentation that an environmental sanitation inspection was completed. 2. Staff #11 confirmed that an environmental sanitation inspection had not been completed.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: Two bottles of multi-purpose cleaner with bleach, one disinfectant spray, one jug of sunscreen, and two room air fresheners (label states to keep out of reach of children) were found in an unlocked cabinet under the sink in Classroom 5.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that when hazardous substances were not kept in the original container, the substitute containers clearly indicate their contents.
“Evidence: 1. There were two spray bottles found in a cabinet in Classroom 7. 2. Staff #9 confirmed that one bottle contained sanitizer and one contained disinfectant. 3. Each bottle had a colored label that should match a color-coded chart identifying the contents. Staff #9 confirmed that the contents in the bottles did not match the chart.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to develop a written policy and procedure that describes how the center will ensure that each group of children receives care by consistent staff or team of staff members.
“Evidence: At the time of inspection, the center did not have a written policy and procedure that describes how the center will ensure that each group of children receives care by consistent staff.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that medication was kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: An inhaler was located in a bag that was hanging on a hook, unlocked, in Classroom 7.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that over-the-counter skin products were not kept beyond the expiration date.
“Evidence: A healing ointment found in Classroom 7 expired in August 2023.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that when food is brought from home, the food container is clearly dated and labeled in a way that identifies the owner. Evidence: 3 out of 3 infant bottles belonging to Child #5 were not dated or labeled with the child’s name.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain all information for 6 out of 10 staff records.
“Evidence: 1. At the time of inspection, there was no documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment for Staff #2 (start date: 07/09/2023), Staff #6 (start date: 08/14/2023), Staff #7 (start date: 09/26/2023) and Staff #10 (start date: 08/14/2023). 2. At the time of inspection, Staff #1 (start date: 05/30/2023) and Staff #9 (start date: 05/30/2023) only had documentation that one reference check had been completed.”
May 22, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, not all staff who work directly with children had a current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) within 90 days of the date of employment.
“Evidence: Staff #2 (date of employment: 08/15/2022) did not have documentation of a current certification in CPR on file.”
-
Based on record review, not all staff who work directly with children had a current certification in first aid within 90 days of the date of employment.
“Evidence: Staff #2 (date of employment: 08/15/2022) did not have documentation of a current certification in first aid on file.”
May 22, 2023: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, not all staff members obtained results of background checks every five years.
“Evidence: Staff #3?s (start date: 02/22/2016) fingerprinting results were dated 04/10/2018.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record check and results of the child abuse and neglect registry for a staff member, from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (start date: 08/15/2022) documented on their sworn disclosure statement (dated: 09/01/2022) that they resided out of state in the preceding five years. 2. Staff #2?s record does not contain results of an out-of-state criminal history record check. 3. Staff #2?s record does not contain results of an out-of-state search of the child abuse and neglect registry.”
-
Based on record review, an employee of the center was employed before the center had the person’s completed sworn statement.
“Evidence: Staff #2 (start date 08/15/2022) had a sworn statement that was dated 09/01/2022.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Evidence: Child #1?s (age: 13 months) most recent documentation of immunizations was dated 07/21/2022.”
-
Based on record review, not all staff members obtained and submitted the results of a follow-up tuberculosis (TB) screening at least every two years from the date of the initial screening.
“Evidence: Staff #3?s most recent results of a TB screening was dated 04/05/2021.”
-
Based on observation, hazardous substances, such as cleaning materials, were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1. In the Infant House classroom, there was a spray bottle containing a bleach/water solution on the diaper changing table. 2. Diapering was not occurring at the time.”
-
Based on observation, cosmetics, medications or other harmful agents were stored in areas that are accessible to children.
“Evidence: 1. Based on observation, harmful agents (one handheld can opener, four peelers, one cheese grater and three knives) were stored in an unlocked food prep drawer, accessible to children, in Classroom #1 (3-6 year old classroom).”
-
Based on observation, when an authorization for medication expired, medication not picked up by the parent within 14 days was not disposed of by the center.
“Evidence: 1. At the time of inspection, the center had an allergy medication and an epi-pen belonging to Child #12 on site. 2. Authorization for the two medications belonging to Child #12 was signed and dated by the child’s parent on 01/09/2023. 3. The authorization form did not have written authorization from the child’s physician.”
-
Based on observation, when food was brought from home, food containers were not clearly dated and labeled in a way that identifies the owner.
“Evidence: 1. In the Infant House classroom, there were two bottles that were not labeled with the owner’s name. 2. In the Infant House classroom, there were four bottles that were not labeled with the date.”
-
Based on record review, children’s records did not contain all information.
“Evidence: 1. Child #6?s record did not contain the child’s start date. 2. Staff #6 stated that Child #6 started at the center on 08/23/2022. 3. Child #6?s record did not contain documentation of viewing proof of the child’s identity and age.”
Sep 2, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, not each staff member submitted documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: Staff #3?s (start date: 08/15/2022) tuberculosis screening, dated 09/03/2022, was completed after the time of employment.”
Mar 22, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“Based on a review of children medication records, the center has not obtained a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy. Evidence: Child #1,#2 and #3 have medications due to food allergies, there were no written care plans from a physician for the medications on site.”
All 20 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 21, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 9, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 9, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 12, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 12, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| May 20, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 20, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Nov 27, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 27, 2023 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| May 22, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| May 22, 2023 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Sep 2, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 2, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 22, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 22, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 9, 2021 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 9, 2021 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Dec 31, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 200 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 1 complaint inspection on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 1353 child care providers in Fairfax County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 19.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| KinderCare Learning Centers #000540 | 32 |
| La Petite Academy-Springfield | 32 |
| SACC at Sangster | 0 |
| Sydenstricker United Methodist Church | 0 |
| SACC at Saratoga | 4 |
| SACC at Newington Forest | 4 |
| Felecia Hayes | 20 |
| Carla Seay | 22 |
| The Springs, A Montessori School This child care provider | 19 |
| Mila Cooper | 0 |
| Roina Mustafa | 18 |
| Laura Toledo de Mendoza | 11 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.