Hearth Record

Back to Diapers

Huggies diapers

141 reports to CPSC, the latest made Sep 20, 2026. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 31, 2026.

  • 141reports to CPSC
  • Sep 20, 2026the latest report was made
  • Sep 3, 2011the earliest
  • 139with the company’s comments
Brand
Huggies
Maker
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
DiapersCPSC’s product type: Diapers (code 1512), in Baby: Nursery Equipment & Supplies
Other ways the reports write the brand (18)

“Huggies little movers”, “Huggies diapers”, “Huggies little snugglers”, “Huggies Little Movers”, “Huggies Plus”, “Huggies Pull Ups”, “Huggies Snug & Dry Over 27lb.”, “Huggies Snug & Dry Size 5”, “Huggies Snug N Dry”, “Huggies little snuggleers New look size 3, 120ct”, “Huggies little snugglers/mivers”, “Huggies plus little snugglers”, “Huggies pull ups”, “Huggies snug and dry”, “Huggies snug and dry surefit size 4”, “Huggies snug and fur”, “Huggies.” and “Hugies”

By month

32 reports from October 2025 to September 2026; the most in January 2026, 7. 109 earlier reports, since September 2011, are in the table.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
September 20263
August 20263
July 20264
June 20262
May 20262
April 20264
January 20267
December 20251
November 20254
October 20252
September 20256
August 20254
July 202523
June 202543
June 20241
November 20231
October 20231
June 20231
January 20232
November 20211
October 20213
August 20201
October 20181
November 20171
May 20171
January 20161
August 20151
July 20151
June 20142
February 20141
January 20141
December 20131
November 20135
February 20132
November 20121
September 20121
February 20121
September 20111

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Emergency room 7 CPSC: Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
  • Seen by a doctor or nurse 38 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  • First aid 38 CPSC: Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  • Hurt, no treatment 18 CPSC: Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  • Hurt, care not known 21 CPSC: Injury, Level of care not known
  • No one hurt 17 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
  • No incident, no one hurt 2 CPSC: No Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 31, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Hurt, care not known

    Made Jun 25, 2025, sent to the company Jun 26, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 18, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies diapers size 2

    Huggies diapers changed the liners to blue liners and is giving my 5 month old a rash that looks like a burn.

    Bought from
    Walmart, Colorado
    Bought
    Jun 1, 2025, about then
    Where
    Aurora, Colorado: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known
  2. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Jun 25, 2025, sent to the company Jun 27, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 14, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies Little Movers, size 4, purchased from Sams Club locations in Maryland and Missouri

    We purchased two boxes of Huggies Little Movers in June 2025. The lining in these diapers was blue, a change from the previous white. Since using them, my 22-month-old son has developed severe rashes under his entire diaper area.

    Model
    Little Movers
    Bought from
    Sam’s Club
    Bought
    Jun 2, 2025, about then
    Where
    Annapolis, Maryland: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  3. First aid

    Made Jun 24, 2025, sent to the company Jun 26, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 18, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies little movers size 3 diapers. Ever since the change to their manufacturer.

    My son was using huggies diapers for almost a whole year when the liner was white. Since the liner changed to blue my son has suffered chemical burns on his groin/crotch/genitals. It took almost a month for it to fully go away. Once we realized it was the diapers about a week in we switched to [REDACTED] and have no issues thus far.

    Bought from
    Walmart
    Bought
    May 1, 2025, about then
    Where
    Reno, Nevada: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  4. No incident, no one hurt

    Made Jun 23, 2025, sent to the company Jul 7, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 28, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies Overnight Diapers size 6, Huggies Overnight Diapers size 7, Huggies Little Movers Diapers size 6

    Huggies Little Movers and Huggies Overnight diapers had a recent change in their manufacturing/products. The inside of the diapers now have a blue liner around of the outside and back of the diaper (like around the legs and the part of the diaper that sits on the lower back). This liner used to be white. For both styles of diapers and in multiple sizes these diapers with the blue style liner break open, causing gel beads to get everywhere. The products have been used following manufacturing guidelines. Daytime diapers we change frequently and the overnight diapers are advertised as lasting up to 12 hours. If our son sleeps through the night we do not wake him up to change a diaper that is wet with urine. The absorbent gel beads clump together but are easily broken apart which leads to thousands of tiny beads everywhere. These gel beads have made it out of the broken diaper and out of my sons clothes. This is a huge risk as they could very easily be ingested.

    UPC
    036000549201
    Bought from
    Target
    Bought
    May 17, 2025
    Where
    Watertown, Minnesota: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    No Incident, No Injury
  5. First aid

    Made Jun 23, 2025, sent to the company Jun 26, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 18, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies size 3 diapers

    Eczema-like rash, chemical rash/burn

    Bought from
    Walmart
    Bought
    Jun 2, 2025, about then
    Where
    Greenbrier, Arkansas: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  6. Hurt, care not known

    Made Jun 15, 2025, sent to the company Jun 17, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 10, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies size 8 diapers the new ones with blue lines on the sides

    My son who is 2 years old developed a chemical burn and rash from the new blue lined Huggies diapers size 8. He wore the diaper for 2 hours and when we changed him he screamed in pain. We see 2 large areas on his butt and thighs ( where the blue lines of the diaper lined in his body) that are raw and dark red. It is still healing and its almost been a week. My son was in extreme discomfort for a couple to a few days,

    Where
    United States: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known
  7. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Jun 10, 2025, sent to the company Jun 12, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 7, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies little mover diapers size 5 has the lion king printed in the diaper

    My son started to have a bad rash since I started putting the Huggies little movers diapers and he was in pain every time I touched the parts where he had very red to put cream on.

    UPC
    036000535938
    Bought from
    Target, Georgia
    Bought
    May 24, 2025
    Where
    Kingston, Georgia: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  8. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Jun 10, 2025, sent to the company Jun 13, 2025, published by CPSC Jun 30, 2025

    The product, in the report: Huggies little movers diapers. [REDACTED] design on the front and back. Ruffles on the side. Size 6 diapers.

    I recently bought a pack of Huggies because my usual diapers werent available. I saw that the Huggies were slightly cheaper than the other brands. Ive used this brand before when my child was a newborn and I didnt have any problems. That being said, my daughter was wearing Huggies from Monday afternoon until Friday evening. Thursday morning, I saw she had developed a mild diaper rash. Only slightly pink. Friday evening after a bath, this mild rash had developed into what looked like a chemical burn! There were open lesions on her vagina and towards her anus. I had to throw the entire pack away.

    Model
    Little Movers
    Bought from
    Walmart, South Carolina
    Bought
    Jun 2, 2025
    Where
    North Charleston, South Carolina: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  9. First aid

    Made Jun 8, 2024, sent to the company Jun 12, 2024, published by CPSC Jul 5, 2024

    The product, in the report: They were the Huggies snug and dry size 3

    I in used 1 diaper out of a brand new package of the Huggies snug and dry my baby instantly got a rash that turned into welps then to blisters and I took the diaper off as soon as I saw the rash and put [REDACTED] on her. She was in screaming pain and her whole private area looked horrible. I have pictures of the wounds without the private parts in it if I could send them but after not putting those diapers back on her the blisters have seemed to go down a lot and we havent tried anything else new recently so that was the only thing it could have been. As a mother I am VERY concerned and UPSET that this has happened to my baby especially because shes in pain now.

    Where
    Kansas city mo, Missouri: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies snug and dry, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  10. First aid

    Made Nov 27, 2023, sent to the company Dec 1, 2023, published by CPSC Dec 15, 2023

    The product, in the report: Huggies Snug and Dry, size 3 31count baby diapers [REDACTED] Baby

    Huggies Snug and Dry size 3 31ct diapers. My 6 month old broke out in what appears to be chemical burns on her diaper area only after wearing Huggies. Switching back to [REDACTED] the rash immediately started to recede and decrease in severity. Product was used as recommended, rash started to appear after 3 diaper changes within 4hours. So well within the normal use.

    Model
    Snug and Dry
    UPC
    036000514711
    Bought from
    Foodland
    Bought
    Nov 25, 2023
    Where
    Pahoa, Hawaii: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  11. No one hurt

    Made Oct 13, 2023, sent to the company Oct 27, 2023, published by CPSC Nov 13, 2023

    The product, in the report: Baby diaper

    Baby diaper contain some hard fragments that can causes sever rash in babies

    Model
    Stage 4
    Bought from
    Costco, Maryland
    Bought
    Sep 20, 2023, about then
    Where
    Sparrows Point, Maryland: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Unknown
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  12. No one hurt

    Made Jun 15, 2023, sent to the company Jun 20, 2023, published by CPSC Jul 12, 2023

    The product, in the report: Huggies Pull-ups Training pants 4T-5T

    Purchased a box of Huggies Pull-ups from Costco. Upon opening the box, I was gagged by the overwhelming chemical smell in the box and also while opening the individual bags. The Pull-ups themselves also have a strong chemical smell. I will NOT be using these on my child, and am very disturbed that companies are allowed to use such offensive chemicals for Baby products!

    I have not breathed normally since opening this box, and can taste it in my mouth still.

    Bought from
    Costco
    Where
    Texas: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 41, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  13. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Jan 29, 2023, sent to the company Feb 2, 2023, published by CPSC Feb 16, 2023

    The product, in the report: Huggies Snug and Dry white package with [REDACTED] baby size 3

    My baby has severe chemical burns from Huggies snug and dry diapers

    Model
    Kimberly-Clark Global Sales LLC.
    UPC
    0 36000 51471 1
    Bought from
    Walmart
    Bought
    Aug 12, 2021, about then
    Where
    Stratford, Oklahoma: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  14. First aid

    Made Jan 1, 2023, sent to the company Jan 5, 2023, published by CPSC Jan 20, 2023

    The product, in the report: Huggies little movers. Purchased at sams club in Madison Mississippi. Used one diaper and had to discontinue use due to chemical type burns on my daughters behind. I will include censored photos of the burns as this is a very delicate matter and I’m not just going to send my daughters privates in an email.

    I purchased a box of Huggies “little movers” and after one use they caused chemical burns to my daughters behind. I have emailed Huggies with no reply or concern from them.

    Model
    Huggies Little Movers
    UPC
    036000534382
    Bought from
    Sams Club, Mississippi
    Bought
    Nov 17, 2022
    Where
    Brandon, Mississippi: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  15. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Nov 9, 2021, sent to the company Nov 23, 2021, published by CPSC Dec 8, 2021

    The product, in the report: Huggies Snug & Dry diapers

    9/25/2021: The consumer said her soon to be 12 month old, grandson, developed a skin a rash, which resembled 3rd degree burns. This particular diaper has a blue liner inside of them. The consumer keeps her grandson five (5) days during the week and he wore this brand at her home. But when he was not staying with her, he wore Huggies Movers brand and did not experience the skin irritation. It was his groin and butt areas and everywhere that the diaper came into contact, which were affected.

    The daughter-in-law took the child to his pediatrician. The child was treated and prescribed an ointment to apply to the affected area.

    It took approximately 5 weeks for the child to get better and he is just starting to show signs of healing.

    10/2021: The consumer contacted the manufacturer and suggested that they remove it from the market. Their rep. took her information and offered to send her a gift card. Nothing else was offered to the consumer

    The worst part of the incident, was that they could not identify what was causing the issue, for two weeks.

    The consumer said that her children found that there were lawsuit on-line against this company in California for this exact problem.

    Model
    Box information: 5153400
    Serial number
    36000515343 Disney Baby
    Bought from
    Walmart, West Virginia
    Bought
    Jul 15, 2021, about then
    Where
    Hinton, West Virginia: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Other Relative
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies Snug & Dry Over 27lb., made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  16. No one hurt

    Made Oct 26, 2021, sent to the company Oct 28, 2021, published by CPSC Nov 19, 2021

    The product, in the report: Huggies snug and dry and Huggies little movers+plus diaper with Mickey Mouse print size 5

    I used Huggies snug and dry [REDACTED] and little movers plus for 5 days and within the first day my son who rarely gets diaper rash developed a diaper rash that was severely painful to the touch. His typical diaper rash cream was not working against it. I also noticed his penis tip was peeled and red. I continued applying cream and That did not solve the problem and it got worse. After having the rash for 5 days I decided to switch diaper brands. I switched to the [REDACTED] with no ointment at all. Immediately during his next diaper change I saw an improvement. This was with no ointment cream or anything. Something is in the Huggies diapers that irritates babies bottoms. I’ve heard thousands of other parents talk about their experiences as well. I never had an issue until this last pack.

    Bought from
    Walmart
    Bought
    Oct 17, 2021, about then
    Where
    Green Bay, Wisconsin: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand HUGGIES, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  17. Hurt, care not known

    Made Oct 19, 2021, sent to the company Nov 9, 2021, published by CPSC Nov 24, 2021

    The product, in the report: Diapers

    Caller stated that the diaper caused blisters on her 16 weeks old son’s buttocks. She stated that she noticed that after she had changed the child’s diaper she noticed red blisters but today she noticed that it gotten worse. Caller stated that she has been using the diapers for a month now but this was the first time this occurred.

    The manufacturer was contacted and they apologized and suggested that she could take her child to see a physician.

    Caller feels that this diaper is unsafe and should be reported.

    Model
    lot#bi016812s / 7877688
    Bought from
    Target, Florida
    Where
    Merritt, Florida: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known
  18. First aid

    Made Oct 3, 2021, sent to the company Oct 6, 2021, published by CPSC Oct 21, 2021

    The product, in the report: Huggies Little Snugglers Red Box Size 2

    I was using Huggies Little Snugglers diaper and When i took the diaper off my baby there was a big red burn in the shape of the diaper on my baby’s private area. She was screaming in pain.

    UPC
    54021
    Serial number
    3600054021
    Bought from
    Walmart, New York
    Bought
    Sep 22, 2021
    Where
    Morristown, New York: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  19. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Aug 13, 2020, sent to the company Sep 8, 2020, published by CPSC Sep 22, 2020

    The product, in the report: Huggies snug n dry

    These diapers still cause chemical burns. This is a recurring issie and I’d like to know why. Many parents have been reporting this issue since at least 2013. These need to be recalled.

    Model
    Snug n dry
    Bought from
    Walmart
    Bought
    Aug 6, 2020
    Where
    Unspecified: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  20. Hurt, care not known

    Made Oct 10, 2018, sent to the company Jan 29, 2019, published by CPSC Feb 12, 2019

    The product, in the report: Huggies Pull-ups Training Pants

    Every time my child uses Huggies brand pull-ups she gets a bad rash on her butt. It is very , bumpy and itchy/painful. We switched to [REDACTED] and the rash went away. We tried Huggies again and the rash returned.

    Model
    Pull-ups Training Pants
    Where
    Stillwater, Minnesota: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Age 3, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known
  21. Hurt, care not known

    Made Nov 22, 2017, sent to the company Apr 11, 2018, published by CPSC Apr 25, 2018

    The product, in the report: Package of 88 Size 3 diapers

    This caller is reporting size 3 box of 88 diapers purchased from retailer in [REDACTED] around Sunday, November 19, 2017. Lot# on inside package of 22 diapers PA727406B 0316, on the box the UPC# 03600040812 6 _ PA727406X 03:22 __ Department# HLSG53-88 Caller’s daughter opened the box and got one of the diapers out to put it on her 5 month old baby, then opened the diaper, but when she ran her hand down the side it scratched her right thumb. She put these diapers to the side and used old ones that she had used previously. When the daughter returned home from work the following day she and the caller (her mother) went through the diapers purchased around November 19th and found six more diapers with the sharp objects in them. This is six out of twenty two. They are using the diapers that do not have the sharp objects in them after checking each diaper very carefully. She is asking that these diapers be inspected to identify the sharp objects before a baby is injured by them. The caller contacted Huggies November 21, 2017 but was advised only to send the diapers to them and they would refund her money. She said that this is unacceptable and is reporting this as a potentially severe laceration hazard for babies whose caregivers may not notice the sharpness.

    Model
    PA727406B 0316 on separately packaged, on the box _ PA72740
    UPC
    03600040812 6
    Bought from
    Target, Maryland
    Bought
    Nov 19, 2017
    Where
    Silver Spring, Maryland: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known
  22. First aid

    Made May 11, 2017, sent to the company May 19, 2017, published by CPSC Jun 12, 2017

    The product, in the report: Buggies Pull Ups, size 2-3T, Lion Guard designs

    I purchased a package of Huggies Pull-Ups in size 2-3T for my two year old son to aid in potty training him. May 10th was the first time we used the product. He used two diapers and wound up with huge blisters in his diaper area. We immediately discontinued using the Huggies Pull-Ups and started treating his injuries.

    Bought from
    Walmart, Massachusetts
    Bought
    May 4, 2017, about then
    Where
    Unspecified: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies Pull Ups, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  23. Emergency room

    Made Jan 5, 2016, sent to the company Jan 13, 2016, published by CPSC Feb 9, 2016

    The product, in the report: Huggies Slip on Diapers 20 count Sz 5

    My daughter developed a severe staph infection after using Huggies Slip-on diapers. She ended up in the hospital to have a large abscess drained and was placed on IV antibiotics. The problem specifically started with the diapers. This was our first time using Huggies on her. After wearing 2 of the diapers she broke out in weird little pimples, not like a normal diaper rash. Some went away others begin to swell, so she was placed on an antibiotic cream. After it didn’t clear, we suspected the diapers. But by this time, (less than 2 days latr), we were in the ER with a high fever and 2 absesses. Even the ER doctor suggsted it was caused by diapers and asked if we had used this brand. She had seen several cases like my daughters in recent months, all had been using Huggies of some sort. There is no history of her having staph, anyone in my family having it, or even of her having diaper rashes. She has had maybe 2 rashes that were light in the past with other diaper brands.

    UPC
    3600025810
    Bought from
    Krogers, Ohio
    Bought
    Dec 30, 2015
    Where
    Portsmouth, Ohio: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
  24. Hurt, care not known

    Made Aug 19, 2015, sent to the company Aug 27, 2015, published by CPSC Sep 18, 2015

    The product, in the report: Huggies Diapers Snug and Dry size 5

    I wanted to start off by saying that I have used Huggies diapers for my 2 year old son for over 1.5 years and have been pleased with the quality of the diapers up until last night. It was very disturbing and saddening to find maggot-like bugs in the diapers. I have used up almost the entire box before my husband found these bugs. Some were still alive! And I have taken pictures of them as proof as well as bagged one of them up. After finding these bugs in the diapers, we went online to research. Apparently this has happened before to other families which is absolutely unacceptable! I am not sure what processes they have in place to ensure this wouldn’t happen, but it’s clearly not working. I purchased these boxes from either Target or Walmart. I do not believe that these stores are the issue. I believe the issue stems from the manufacturing plant as other people have had the same issues that lives across the world. What is more heartbreaking is that my son has complained of his private area hurting/itching for weeks and every time I checked, my thought was to look for a rash. Never in a million years did I think he had maggot-like bugs biting him! I need answers.

    Bought from
    Walmart
    Bought
    Jul 20, 2015, about then
    Where
    Charlotte, North Carolina: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known
  25. First aid

    Made Jul 14, 2015, sent to the company Jul 22, 2015, published by CPSC Aug 5, 2015

    The product, in the report: Huggies little movers size 4

    I bought the huggies little movers diapers for the the first time and after using half a pack about 35, I notice bruising on my baby’s waist where the front blue grip strip stays on the baby. One side of her waist at a time got bruised. I took pictures and stopped us in the diapers.

    UPC
    036000407402
    Bought from
    target
    Bought
    Jul 1, 2015
    Where
    North Richland Hills, Texas: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  26. First aid

    Made Jun 25, 2014, sent to the company Jul 2, 2014, published by CPSC Jul 17, 2014

    The product, in the report: Diapers

    I was using [REDACTED] as soon as my daughter hit size 2 she got the mosy terrible rash I have ever seen! (I’ve worked at 2 daycare centers so I know what normal rashes are) this was horrible Her skin was blistered and red. It took me a while to realize it was the diapers. After switching diapers Ive had no problem. Until recently Im now trying to potty train I put her in huggies pull ups and the same rash came back. Its frustrating because Im potty training the longest she’s left in a diaper is when she’s sleeping otherwise Im constantly having Het sit on her potty and changing her

    Bought from
    Walmart, Minnesota
    Bought
    Jun 10, 2014
    Where
    Deerwood, Minnesota: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies pull ups, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  27. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Jun 23, 2014, sent to the company Jul 1, 2014, published by CPSC Jul 16, 2014

    The product, in the report: Huggies pull ups, size 4

    Hi, our son, [REDACTED], is 2.5y old. we just started using pull ups, but had to stop them almost immediately. He developed a severe rash (we have lots of pictures). first it started around the inner part of the upper legs, then it spread out down to his toes and some on his arms/hands. we went to doctors care the first night, they had no idea what to do with him. the following morning we went to his pediatrician, he was shocked with the severity of the rash. The doctor advised us to start soothing baths with and stop all other baby products. the soothing baths and soothing lotion/cream did help him with itch and the blisters started to dry out after the 4-th day. now, its been 2 weeks and all blisters are gone and his legs and arms are covered in spots of new skin. we wanted to try one more time with the pull ups, it took maybe 20 minutes and he developed redness and his skin around the inner part part the legs started to bump up and started to itch and cry. we immediately shower him and used the soothing lotion. this did help a bit, but it took very long time to calm him down. he did fall asleep after a good hour of crying and scratching his sides and he did hurt him self because of the severe rash/itch. we went back to using [REDACTED]. so far, we have no problem with using them.

    Model
    pull ups, boys
    Bought from
    sams club, South Carolina
    Bought
    May 13, 2014, about then
    Where
    MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  28. No one hurt

    Made Feb 24, 2014, sent to the company Mar 4, 2014, published by CPSC Mar 26, 2014

    The product, in the report: huggies size 1 diapers white with purple and blue

    I was changing my 7 weeks old baby’s diaper when I noticed something tiny and dark in the diaper around the waist band. it was a sharp metal shard. I looked at the other diapers and found that they also had small metal shards .

    Bought from
    gift
    Where
    lyman, Maine: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  29. Emergency room

    Made Jan 17, 2014, sent to the company Feb 12, 2014, published by CPSC Feb 28, 2014

    The product, in the report: disposable diapers size 4

    (01/14/2014) The consumer stated that her child had a little rash. She slept in her Huggies diaper all night. The next morning the consumer discovered that her bottom was beet read. She cleaned her bottom and put ointment and diaper rash cream on it. She put another Huggies diapers on her.

    The babysitter called her later on in the day and advised her that the rash looked worse. The baby sitter stated that it looked like a burn. The consumer went to the baby sitter’s home and got her daughter. She took her to St. Joseph’s Hospital in Berea, Ky.

    The consumer was advised that the child had second degree burns on her bottom. She was given a compound mixture of burn ointment to put on her child. The medical personnel advised her that it was burn and not a diaper rash.

    Bought from
    Kroger, Kentucky
    Bought
    Nov 9, 2013, about then
    Where
    Richmond, Louisiana: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies Snug N Dry, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
  30. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Dec 14, 2013, sent to the company Dec 23, 2013, published by CPSC Jan 8, 2014

    The product, in the report: Huggies little movers disposable diapers size 6

    My 19 month old used [REDACTED] brand and we suddenly switched to Huggies little movers. The next day I noticed he kept scratching his inner thighs and legs. The next night at bed time he had red burn type marks on his inner thighs both sides and his stomach n back.

    Bought from
    Independent grocery
    Bought
    Nov 18, 2013
    Where
    Yellowknife, Canada: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  31. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Nov 12, 2013, sent to the company Nov 19, 2013, published by CPSC Dec 11, 2013

    The product, in the report: huggies snug and dry

    Huggies Snug and Dry

    We switched to them the other day and my boys butt went cherry red by the next diaper change. I thought it was a regular diaper rash but saw a post on facebook about it possibly being a chemical burn. I also googled it and saw a lot more parents are reporting the same thing. So I told the wife to give him a bath and switch to a different type of diaper. Within 2hrs my wife said his butt was already getting better by noon. By the time I got home from work, 4pm, the redness was all gone. I think if I kept on assuming it was a diaper rash I think it would have gotten ugly. People say it’s the chemical in the gel lining they use in that particular diaper. Might be something you want to look into. If you want samples I can send you what I have left of it.

    Bought from
    amazon
    Bought
    Sep 4, 2013
    Where
    Garden Grove, California: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  32. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Nov 12, 2013, sent to the company Jan 16, 2014, published by CPSC Feb 3, 2014

    The product, in the report: disposal diapers

    (11/10/2013) The consumer noticed a red looking rash and blisters around the diaper area of her son’s leg. The consumer stated that her son had never had a diaper rash. The consumer used a diaper cream to get rid of the rash. The rash did not go away. The consumer stated that she used about nine of the disposal diapers. The consumer stated that she saw an article on line in reference to the burns. When she changed to a different brand, the rash went away and the burns did not get any bigger. The consumer stated that she has a doctor’s appointment for 11/12.

    (11/12/2013) The consumer contacted the manufacturer. She spoke to [REDACTED]. The consumer was advised that the company was aware of the problem. The consumer was offered a gift card to replace the diapers with another brand. The consumer accepted the offer.

    Model
    Lot #DI322615X00140719
    Bought from
    Sam’s Club, West Virginia
    Bought
    Nov 9, 2013, about then
    Where
    Athens, Ohio: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies Snug & Dry Size 5, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  33. Emergency room

    Made Nov 8, 2013, sent to the company Dec 2, 2013, published by CPSC Dec 16, 2013

    The product, in the report: infant diaper, size 5

    The responded is filing the report on behalf of the consumers.

    A 21 month old infant, male wore the diaper for approximately 2 hours. The consumer changed the diaper, because the baby was crying. The father found that some of the stitching had torn away from the diaper and some of the gel had leaked from inside of the diaper onto his son’s leg. The father discovered that the infant had a reddish rash on the back of his leg. The father used a wet wipe on the affected areas and some of the skin came off of the baby. This happened at approximately 4:00pm.

    The wife arrived home around 6:30pm and they took the baby to the Emergency Room, [REDACTED] Hospital, [REDACTED]. The baby was seen by a physician and it was determined that the baby sustained 2nd degree chemical burns to his leg. The baby was treated and released the same day. An ointment was applied to the wounds and “strep throat” was ruled out as a cause, while at the hospital.

    (11/4/2013) The consumers took their baby to The Pro Health Pediatric and [REDACTED]., where he was seen by [REDACTED], Physician Assistant. The respondent is unsure of what treatment may have been provided by this doctor.

    (11/7/2013) The consumers took the baby to a “burn specialist”, Dr. [REDACTED]. The respondent is unsure of what treatment may have been provided by this doctor.

    (date unknown) The mother sent the manufacturer and email through their website and she received a call back on 11/4/2013.

    (11/4/2013) [REDACTED], Mfr’s rep., Tel: [REDACTED], called the consumer and said that she would provide them with a postage paid overnight envelope and asked that the consumer send 1 of diapers from that package back to them. She also discussed possible payment for the consumer’s medical bills. The consumers “did not” send any of the diapers back to the mfr.

    The consumer also placed information about her incident on the Internet and the respondent indicated that it went viral.

    It is unknown how many diapers were in the package. It is unknown if this manufacturer’s brand of diapers is typically used by the consumers or if they have ever experienced any similar problems in the past.

    The respondent saw some pictures of the babies burns and based on pictures, there were several burns (2 burns ¾” in dia and 2 were ¼” dia). There was also an approx. 4” dia. burn to the upper right leg and an approx. 6” L x 3” W burn to the lower right leg.

    Model
    Lot #: BI321815B (was on all of the diapers)
    Bought from
    Stop and Shop, New York
    Bought
    Oct 26, 2013, about then
    Where
    Unspecified: Other
    Who was involved
    Age 1, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    No Relationship
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
  34. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Nov 8, 2013, sent to the company Nov 19, 2013, published by CPSC Dec 11, 2013

    The product, in the report: Huggies Snug and Dry Diapers

    I changed my daughter yesterday and then changed her again about 2 hours later. During the first change there was no sign of irritation. When I went to change there the 2nd time I noticed an extremely bad rash that was starting to blister. I was extremely nervous so I rushed her up to urgent care. I was inrmed by the dr that she has a chemical burn. The diapers that we just started using were the Huggies Snug and Dry and have used only a few out of the pack. We have never used these in the past and she does not have previous diaper rash irritations. She also does not have sensitive skin. The dr prescribed us 2 oitments to place on the affected area and informed me to stop using these diapers immediately. My daughter is in horrible pain and you can not even change her without her screaming from using a wipe or warm wash cloth. We have gone out and purchased the [REDACTED] oatmeal bath and the dr said that should help as well. The dr informed us to leave her diaper off as much as possible to let it get some air. I am extremely mad that we are going through this due to these diapers.

    Model
    Snug and Dry
    UPC
    03600036445
    Bought from
    Sams Club, Minnesota
    Bought
    Oct 23, 2013, about then
    Where
    Rogers, Minnesota: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Hugies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  35. Emergency room

    Made Nov 8, 2013, sent to the company Nov 19, 2013, published by CPSC Dec 4, 2013

    The product, in the report: Disposable diapers

    I have a 2 year old and a 1 year old and I had been loyal Huggies Snug and Dry uses since the day they were born until the new “surefit” came out. I bought the first box and was disappointed due to my kids peeving out of the diapers within a hr or so. Then I started to notice a rash starting to show up. I was blessed and my kids both only had very seldom diaper rashes and that was usually only when they had received some sort of antibiotic. The rash continuously got worse and worse through the continued use of the “surefit” brand. Between the two of my kids we probably visited the doctor 10 times or so for the rash/burn. We tried multiple medications. By mouth, and paste(prescription and non prescription.) nothing helped it or even slightly made the rash better. My kids would literally scream every Time they urinated. It got so bad with my 2 year old that we ended up in the er getting a urine sample because they swore that she had an urinating tract infection. never related it to the diapers until I decides to change brands because everything else I had done to help the rash didn’t work. After a week of wearing a different diapers they both were diaper rash free. I was still upset simply because I was an absolute huggies lover so I called huggies and told them what was going on. They told me they were aware that the new “surefit” leaves gel residue and yes they do state that on the box(which they made sure I knew) but no where does it say that the gel may cause some sort of reaction of rash. I basically begged them to go back to the old style and they made it perfectly clear to me that they had no intentions of going back to the old style and that the “surefit” was here to stay! I was also made out to look like a liar because they told me that they hadn’t had anyone else to complain about the new “surefit” what makes me even more furious is the fact that I was not the only one and more and more babies are being affected by these “surefit” diapers! If all of us have already complained then there is absolutely no explanation as to why Huggies doesn’t have an answer to Why these diapers are doing this!

    Where
    Mobile, Alabama: Unspecified
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies snug and dry surefit size 4, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
  36. Emergency room

    Made Feb 15, 2013, sent to the company Feb 26, 2013, published by CPSC Mar 20, 2013

    The product, in the report: Huggies Little Snugglers Diapers, Size 1, 84-count case, Lot UT233401B

    My son broke out in a horrible rash after using one Huggies Little Snugglers diaper for less than an hour. Over the next few days his condition went from bad to worse. He went from having a very red diaper rash anywhere the diaper touched that to a rash with welts, open sores, and bleeding in the areas the diaper came in contact with his skin. I rushed him to an Urgent Care after his condition worsened where he was prescribed a medication, was instructed to use two OCT medications, and eventally after 10+ days his condition finally started to clear up and the sores began to heal. As a result of using this diaper he now has numerous scars and was in visible high amount of pain in a very sensitive area for days. I contacted Huggies to tell them what happened, but they have done little about it and do not seem to care of the damnage their product has caused.

    Model
    Little Snugglers
    UPC
    036000305241
    Bought from
    Target, Illinois
    Bought
    Feb 5, 2013
    Where
    Alton, Illinois: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
  37. Hurt, no treatment

    Made Feb 9, 2013, sent to the company Feb 19, 2013, published by CPSC Mar 5, 2013

    The product, in the report: Huggies - Snug and Dry Economy Plus - Size 1

    Hi, After a long deliberation we chose to use Huggies over [REDACTED] and though most of them met our expectations we were disappointed when we found few of them had adhesive in their interiors. How we found out? That was a very sad day for us and for our baby. She had been continously crying since morning and we had no clue what was going wrong. We called up doctor, monitored her temperature, but all in vain. And accidently my wife while changing her diaper found out that the diaper baby was wearing had stuck to her tummy area below the belly button and it was pulling her skin when ever she tried to move her legs. That was a very painful day for all our family members. We thought that as an aberration, but now have found the same problem in around twenty more diapers in the ‘Huggies Snug and Dry Diapers’ 258 count box. They have an adhesive that sticks to the baby’s skin. I have provided the samples to the company for analysis and hope the company takes measures to avoid such major quality issues esp in the products meant for babies. Initially I thought of avoiding taking the issue formally, but I found a similar report filed in the past without any conclusive outcome. The report# is 20121101-A2E84-2147462308

    Model
    Lot# PA225306F
    Bought from
    Amazon
    Bought
    Oct 14, 2012
    Where
    Milpitas, California: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
  38. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Nov 1, 2012, sent to the company Nov 16, 2012, published by CPSC Dec 3, 2012

    The product, in the report: Huggies diaper size 3 for baby more than 16lbs

    I use Huggies diaper for my baby. She is five months old. My baby had regular check up in oct 3, and she is a well baby. But 4 days after her check up, when I changed her diaper I found her skin where the diaper used has much little pimples and a piece of rash, I got a clean diaper for her, then I found inside the diaper there is a big piece of glue, and the surface of the diaper is very rough. I’m thinking diaper should be clean and soft for baby skin and that glue shouldn’t happen on it. I took her to see doctor the day after and till now I still have to use the doctor’s ointment on her skin every time when I change her diaper..

    Model
    Size 3
    Serial number
    B1204809b7717306
    Where
    Homestead, Florida: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
  39. First aid

    Made Sep 24, 2012, sent to the company Oct 2, 2012, published by CPSC Oct 17, 2012

    The product, in the report: Huggies pull ups training pants

    28 month old daughter started using Night time glow in the dark pull ups. 2 nights, on the second night. After bath time. she was 2hours unable to sleep and pulling on her diaper. When I noticed it was full of urine, I removed it and found both butt cheeks very swollen and hot to the touch. I was confined to the area that was wet with urine and in contact with the diaper. Gave children [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] and over the next 2 hours allergic reaction subsided. We used a different brand for the rest of the night. She has no history of allergies, no new food was introduced, no new product was used during bath time, no product was used on buttocks after bath. Believe it to be a reaction to product in diaper. The next day she reacted on her legs only. her buttocks were fine as we had a different diaper on. Turns out we forgot to change the bed sheet and there must have been residue on the sheets. again we treated her. The next night with new bedsheets and diapers, no reactions occurred.

    Model
    Night time glow in the dark pull ups
    UPC
    36000 21353
    Serial number
    bi222218b
    Bought from
    walgreens, Florida
    Bought
    Sep 18, 2012
    Where
    palmetto bay, Florida: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  40. No one hurt

    Made Feb 22, 2012, sent to the company Mar 22, 2012, published by CPSC Apr 12, 2012

    The product, in the report: size four diapers

    The consumer noticed while removing the diapers out of their original packaging she saw a metal shard and continued on throughout the day. While applying one of the diapers the consumer noticed one metal shard on the back waist band of the diaper.

    The size of the metal shard is less an inch in width and size, similar to the middle section of a staple. She noticed one other piece of metal within the other diapers.

    She contacted the firm the week of 2/13/2012 and was advised that they would mail out a package for the diaper to be sent back and evaluated.

    The consumer did not use the diaper that had the metal shard and there were no injuries reported.

    Model
    Lot #pa10604f 6180322
    UPC
    3600055404
    Bought from
    Diapers.com
    Bought
    Nov 1, 2011, about then
    Where
    Congers, New York: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Unspecified
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury
  41. First aid

    Made Sep 3, 2011, sent to the company Dec 1, 2011, published by CPSC Dec 15, 2011

    The product, in the report: Diapers Size 4 for 22-37 lbs.

    My son came home from pre-school with blue streaks on his inner thighs and a diaper rash. I was able to use a little rubbing alcohol to remove the streaks. After his bath his legs were streak free. When I went to change his diaper before bed, I noticed the blue streaks were back. I realized that the diapers lined up with the streaks. I called Huggies the next morning and they confirmed that they had a problem with that Lot number.

    Model
    Snug and Dry
    UPC
    360055394
    Serial number
    BI 120508X00:09 303873
    Where
    Marietta, Unspecified: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 2, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Parent
    As this report names them
    Brand Huggies, made or sold by KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 31, 2026 and checked Oct 31, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Diapers

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.