Hearth Record

Medical City Dallas Hospital

An acute care hospital in Dallas, Texas 75230

7777 Forest Lane, Dallas, Texas 75230. (972) 566-6222.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 9, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 21, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Emergency Services Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 719 words

    “EMERGENCY SERVICES POLICIES CFR(s): 482.55(a)(3) [If emergency services are provided at the hospital --] (3) The policies and procedures governing medical care provided in the emergency service or department are established by and are a continuing responsibility of the medical staff. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51905 Based on observation, record review, and interviews, Facility A failed to establish policies and procedures governing medical care provided in the emergency service or department for sexual assault survivors as specified under Texas Health and Safety Code (HSC) Chapter 323 Emergency Services for Survivors of Sexual Assault . . Findings: Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 323, Subchapter A. Emergency Services for Survivors of Sexual Assault Sec. 323.002. PLAN FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES. (a) Each health care facility that has an emergency department shall comply with Sections 323.004 and 323.0044. At the request of the department, a health care facility that has an emergency department shall submit to the department for approval a plan for providing the services required by Section 323.004 to sexual assault survivors who arrive for treatment at the emergency department of the health care facility. . Sec. 323.004. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES. (a) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (a-2), after a sexual assault survivor arrives at a health care facility following a sexual assault, the facility shall provide care to the survivor in accordance with Subsection (b). . (b) A health care facility providing care to a sexual assault survivor shall provide the survivor with: . (1) subject to Subsection (b-1), a forensic medical examination in accordance with Subchapter B, Chapter 420, Government Code, and Subchapter G, Chapter 56A, Code of Criminal Procedure; (2) a private area, if available, to wait or speak with the appropriate medical, legal, or sexual assault crisis center staff or volunteer until a physician, nurse, or physician assistant is able to treat the survivor; (3) access to a sexual assault program advocate, if available, as provided by Subchapter H, Chapter 56A, Code of Criminal Procedure; (4) the information form required by Section 323.005; (5) a private treatment room, if available; (6) if indicated by the history of contact, access to appropriate prophylaxis for exposure to sexually transmitted infections; (7) the name and telephone number of the nearest sexual assault crisis center; and (8) If the health care facility has shower facilities, access to a shower at no cost to the survivor after the examination described by Subdivision (1). . Record Review: . Facility B Does Not Have a Sexual Assault Policy: On 01/20/2026, during the emergency department tour, Facility B was asked to provide a Sexual Assault policy. Facility B failed to establish policies and procedures governing the medical care provided in the emergency department for sexual assault survivors. . Facility B failed to establish a sexual assault policy that addresses the following: . - The examination of a sexual assault survivor by a Safe-Ready or Non-Safe-Ready facility, how the exam would be presented to the patient, who would be responsible for presenting to the patient, or how the selected option of the patient would be documented in the patient’s chart. - The patients’ privacy to wait or speak with the appropriate medical, legal, or sexual assault crisis center staff or volunteer until a physician, nurse, or physician assistant to treat the survivor. - The option to contact a sexual assault program advocate nor describe the role of a sexual assault program advocate. - The requirement to provide sexual assault survivors with the required information form, who would be responsible for ensuring the most current information form, who would be responsible for providing the information form to the patient, or how the receipt of the information form would be documented in the patient’s chart. - The requirement to provide patients with the name and telephone number of the nearest sexual assault crisis center, who would be responsible for providing the contact information, or how the provision of information would be documented in the patient’s chart. - Access to a shower at no cost after the examination. . Interviews: On 01/20/2026 at 5:57 P.M., the Vice President of Quality, Staff B, stated, “We [Facility B] do not have a sexual assault policy; however, we do have abuse reporting policies that refer to victims of sexual assault. I have attached them.””

    Rule A1104. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Apr 16, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Medical Record Services

    The inspectors’ words, 237 words

    “MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES CFR(s): 482.24 The hospital must have a medical record service that has administrative responsibility for medical records. A medical record must be maintained for every individual evaluated or treated in the hospital. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 45847 . Based on record review and interview the facility failed to abide by the provider’s agreement that required a hospital to comply with 42 CFR §482.24 and ensure medical records were accurately and promptly completed when the facility failed to provide a discharge summary that included radiological findings of an identified suspicion for a nondisplaced fracture to his clavicle or further provisions for follow-up care. The facility failed to provide instructions, and provisions for follow up care, disposition of care and provisions for follow-up care for 1 of 20 patients whose records was reviewed (Patient #1). . Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to include a discharge summary with the complete outcome of hospitalization, disposition of care, and provisions for follow-up care for 1 of 20 patients whose records were reviewed (Patient #1) reviewed with a complaint regarding the discharge summary findings, instructions, and provisions for follow up care; and in accordance with the facility’s By Laws. Specifically, Patient #1’s discharge summary did not include the radiology findings for an identified suspicion for a nondisplaced fracture to his clavicle or further provisions for follow-up care. . Cross reference A0468. .”

    Rule A0431. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Content Of Record: Discharge Summary

    The inspectors’ words, 1,289 words

    “CONTENT OF RECORD: DISCHARGE SUMMARY CFR(s): 482.24(c)(4)(vii) [All records must document the following, as appropriate:] Discharge summary with outcome of hospitalization, disposition of care and provisions for follow-up care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45847 . Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to include a discharge summary with the complete outcome of hospitalization, disposition of care, and provisions for follow-up care for 1 of 20 patients whose records were reviewed (Patient #1) reviewed with a complaint regarding the discharge summary findings, instructions, and provisions for follow up care; and in accordance with the facility’s By Laws. Specifically, Patient #1’s discharge summary did not include the radiology findings for an identified suspicion for a nondisplaced fracture to his clavicle or further provisions for follow-up care. . Findings: Complaint Review: Review of the Complaint intake summary dated 02/22/2025 indicated that on 02/05/2025 Patient #1 was in the Emergency Department (ED) bathroom, after checking in when he felt faint, lightheaded, and grabbed the emergency cord by the toilet. Patient #1 then reportedly lost consciousness and woke up on a table with an oxygen mask on, surrounded by people. Patient #1 had a sharp pain in his left shoulder and asked the facility staff what happened to him. The next day, Patient #1 reported to the Director of the ED what happened in the ED bathroom. Patient #1 then had an x-ray done for his shoulder where he alleged the provider told him his x-ray results, when asked were “nothing, probably arthritis.” Patient #1 did not believe him because he had a sharp burning pain in his shoulder and his T-shirt had a hole in it where the pain was coming from. Patient #1 reported that he went to his primary care physician (PCP) on 02/10/2025 and asked his doctor to review the x-ray. Patient #1’s PCP called Patient #1 on 02/17/2025 and told him he had a fracture on his clavicle. Patient #1 felt the hospital did not take appropriate actions. Patient #1 was provided with a discharge report that stated the reason for his visit was a GI Bleed and Syncope. There were not any medications prescribed or no further instructions. Patient continues to have pain in his shoulder and just recently completed a CT scan on 02/28/2025. . Medical Records were reviewed for Patient #1 and included: 02/05/2025: 7:33 PM Additional Text by Staff #7 (the admitting ED physician): “ ...Patient with reassuring labs and imaging and vitals. However, he had a syncopal event. During his ED course, feel he warrants admission for trending of H&H (hemoglobin and hematocrit), GI consultation, and continued monitoring. Discussed the case with GI (gastroenterology) and hospitalist who accept consult/admission and agrees with plan ...” . 02/06/2025: 10:16 AM - X-ray, 2 view, of the left shoulder ordered by Staff #13. . 11:20 AM - Left shoulder - 2 view x-ray: “IMPRESSION: 1. Cortical irregularity in the distal clavicle suspicious for a nondisplaced fracture. 2. Mild soft tissue swelling/thickening along the superior AC joint capsule. 3. Hydroxyapatite deposition/calcifying tendinopathy in the posterior rotator cuff.” “FINDINGS: Left glenohumeral joint grossly aligned. No acute fracture at the glenohumeral joint. There is cortical irregularity in the distal clavicle suspicious for a nondisplaced fracture. Left AC joint remains aligned/intact. There is mild soft tissue swelling/thickening along superior AC joint capsule. Hydroxyapatite deposition/calcifying tendinopathy in the posterior rotator cuff along the posterior humeral head margin.” . The following discharge notes for Patient #1 were reviewed: 02/07/2025: 1:56 PM - Discharge Notes by Staff #13: “Discharge diagnosis: 1.Lower GI bleed possibly secondary to diverticular bleed 2. Acute blood loss anemia secondary #1 3.Diabetes mellitus type 2 4.History of abdominal aneurysm 3.1 cm” . “Hospital course: 69-year-old gentleman with past medical history of diet-controlled diabetes mellitus type 2, hyperlipidemia, general anxiety disorder admitted with lower GI bleed.” . “GI: Admitted with lower GI bleed possibly secondary to diverticular bleed which was self-limiting. GI was on consult no plans for scopes and patient recently had one in October 2023. No further bleeding during this hospital course hemoglobin hematocrit remained stable. Patient tolerating a soft diet has been has been cleared for discharge by GI. Patient to follow-up with GI as an outpatient” . “Heme: Acute blood loss anemia secondary #1 -Globin has remained stable was 9.5 upon discharge 3. Diabetes mellitus type 2 -Diet control 4. History of abdominal aneurysm 3.1 cm -Monitor as an outpatient Discharge Time spent 38 minutes.” . Discharge instructions included: Follow up with PCP and GI in 2-3 weeks. . There was no evidence in Patient #1’s record of a physician’s interpretation of any of the imaging of the left shoulder or reporting the results/findings to Patient #1 found within any of the attending physician’s notes. There were no instructions to follow-up with any outside practitioner related to the radiological findings. . Rules and Regulations Review: The facility’s “Medical Staff Rules and Regulations”, last reviewed and implemented on 11/13/2023, contained 17 pages that were reviewed. The “Medical Staff Rules and Regulations” stated on page 6 of 17: “ ...B. MEDICAL RECORDS: The attending practitioner shall be responsible for the preparation of a complete and legible medical record lor each patient. Its contents shall be pertinent and current. This record shall include identification data, complaint, personal history, including social history, medications, allergies and family history, history of present illness, physical examination, special reports such as consultations, clinical laboratory and radiology services, and others, provisional diagnosis, medical or surgical treatment, operative report, pathological findings, progress notes, final diagnosis, condition on discharge, summary or discharge notes, clinical resume, and autopsy report when performed ...” . And on page 8 of 17: “ ...15. A discharge clinical summary shall be written or dictated on all medical records of patients hospitalized over forty-eight (48) hours. The discharge summary shall include: the reason for hospitalization, significant findings, procedures performed and treatment rendered, patient’s condition at discharge, and instruction to the patient and family, if any. A final progress note may be substituted only for those patients with problems and interventions of a minor nature and expected results as defined by the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff and normal obstetrical deliveries and normal newborns. For these patients, the final note must include at least: condition of the patient at discharge, discharge instructions, instructions for follow up care. In all instances, the content of the medical record shall be sufficient to justify the diagnosis and warrant the treatment and end result. All summaries shall be authenticated by the responsible practitioner ...” . Interviews: On 05/05/2025 at 4:01 PM Staff #1, the Vice President of Quality, was interviewed. Staff #1 was asked for a hospital (not ED) policy for documenting discussions on test result by the facility physicians. Staff #1 indicated that the facility did not have a policy for documenting discussions of test results. Staff #1 indicated that anything regarding physician documentation would be in our bylaws or rules and regs. . Staff #1 was asked if the facility had a hospital (not ED) discharge policy, and to provide a copy if so. Staff #1 indicated that the facility did not have an overall inpatient discharge policy and the Medical Staff Bylaws contained, “The content of the discharge summary shall contain the reason for Hospitalization, significant findings, instructions to the patient and family, as appropriate, be sufficient to justify the diagnosis and treatment, include follow-up instructions and shall state the condition of the patient, outcome of the hospitalization, disposition of care, final diagnosis, complications and procedures performed at the time of discharge...” The facility’s “Medical Staff Bylaws”, last reviewed and implemented on 11/14/2022, contained 55 pages that were reviewed. No section regarding the “discharge summary” could be located. .”

    Rule A0468. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 11 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 9, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 20, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 23, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 21, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Sep 2, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 12, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 16, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Oct 9, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 12, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 20, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 26, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 11.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,291 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 65% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, better than the national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: better than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.9%, heart failure 10.7%, pneumonia 17.2%, COPD 11%, stroke 11.2%, heart bypass surgery 2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.1%, heart failure 21.3%, pneumonia 17.7%, COPD 21%, heart bypass surgery 10.5%, hip or knee replacement 7.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 140 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 66% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.04 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 23, 1975.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 33 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
  • 52% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Medical City Dallas Partner, LLC owns 99.99% directly since May 31, 2007; Brownsville-Valley Regional Medical Center, Inc. owns 6.04% directly since May 31, 2007; Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLC owns 0.01% directly since May 31, 2007; HCA Health Services of Texas Inc. owns an unstated share directly since May 31, 2007.
  • Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Eric D Smith (managing employee (under contract)); Chase Redden (corporate officer); Chase Redden (corporate director); Chase Redden (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jay Devenny (corporate officer); Jay Devenny (corporate director); Jay Devenny (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership, the latest on Jun 1, 1997.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
HCA Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 31, 2007
Columbia-Sdh Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 31, 2007
Columbia North Texas Healthcare System LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 31, 2007
Healthtrust Inc. - the Hospital CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 31, 2007
Medical City Dallas Partner, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99.99%May 31, 2007
Medical City Dallas Partner, LLCLimited partner99.99%May 31, 2007
HCA Squared LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies26.63%Oct 24, 2011
Hospital Corp LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies26.63%May 31, 2007
HCA Health Services of Texas Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies20.82%May 31, 2007
Healthserv Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20.82%May 31, 2007
Medical City Dallas Hospital Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies19.52%May 31, 2007
Galtex LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies19.52%May 31, 2007
Frisco Holding IIOwns 5% or more through other companies16.3%Feb 6, 2026
Hercules Holding IIOwns 5% or more through other companies14.4%May 7, 2026
Brownsville-Valley Regional Medical Center, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly6.04%May 31, 2007
Hti Hospital Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.04%May 31, 2007
Sa Medical Center Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.28%May 31, 2007
Notco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies5.01%May 31, 2007
Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLCOwns 5% or more directly0.01%May 31, 2007
HCA Health Services of Texas Inc.Owns 5% or more directlyMay 31, 2007
Columbia North Texas Subsidiary Gp LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)May 31, 2007

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospitals CMS lists in Dallas County, 18 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 6 rated 4 of 5, 7 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.