Hearth Record

Children’s Nebraska

A children’s hospital in Omaha, Nebraska 68114

8200 Dodge St, Omaha, Nebraska 68114. (402) 955-5400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 5, 2026: a complaint inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 5 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 5, 2026: complaint inspection5 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48575 Based on policy and procedure review, emergency room log review, patient interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 policies were followed for 1 (Patient 1) out of 20 emergency department (ED) sampled patients who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of chest pain. This failed practice has the potential to cause a delay in care and treatment to any patient who presents to the facility ED with an EMC. The facility ED sees an average of 3,592 patients per month for the past 6 months. See citations A2405, A2406, A2407 and A2409 that also resulted in A2400 to be not met.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Emergency Room Log

    The inspectors’ words, 541 words

    “EMERGENCY ROOM LOG CFR(s): 489.20(r)(3) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b) (including both the transferring and receiving hospitals), to maintain a central log on each individual who comes to the emergency department, as defined in §489.24(b), seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged. §489.24 The provisions of this regulation apply to all hospitals that participate in Medicare and provide emergency services. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48575 Based on policy and procedure review, dedicated emergency department (DED)-A central log review, patient interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Patient 1) of 20 sampled emergency department (ED) patients were placed on the central ED log and whether treatment was refused or stabilized and transferred on 12/2/2025. This failed practice has the potential to cause a delay in emergent care and treatment to any patient who presents to the facility ED with an emergency medical condition (EMC). The facility ED sees an average of 3,592 patients per month for the past 6 months. See citations A2400, A2406, A2407 and A2409 that also resulted in A2405 to be not met. Findings Include: A. Review of facility policy, Unidentified Patients Policy, last approved 2/21/2023 revealed in the event a patient arrives at the ED and is unable to be identified will be registered by first name as letter of the alphabet, and last name gender. Once identified the patient will continue to have the same patient identification number and changed to the legal name. Review of facility policy, Medical Retention and Destruction Schedule Policy, last approved 5/14/2025 revealed the ED log retention period is 22 years. B. Review of the facility dedicated emergency department (DED-A) central log from December 2, 2025, revealed Patient 1 was not entered on the ED log. A dedicated ED is defined as providing emergency care to the public. C. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 1:53PM, Patient 1 revealed they drove to a hospital they thought was DED-B, saw the red sign and pulled in. Patient 1 stated, “I walked in, said I was having bad chest pain and not feeling well at the ED front desk.” The person sitting at the desk asked Patient 1 if they knew they were at DED-A, and Patient 1 replied no. The person at the desk asked Patient 1 if they meant to go to DED-B, and Patient 1 replied yes. The person at the desk told Patient 1 it’s across the street. Patient 1 left the DED-A and checked into DED-B on 12/2/2025 around 9:30AM. Patient 1 revealed the person at the DED-A front desk did not ask their name. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 10:15AM, Staff B revealed an adult who presents to the DED-A is registered on the board (ED log). Staff B revealed if the patient doesn’t give a name they’re registered as a doe. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 11:06AM, Registered Nurse (RN)-A revealed they were the quick view nurse (QVN) assigned in the triage role on 12/2/2025 from 7:00AM until 11:00AM. RN-A revealed around 3 adults per week present to the DED-A.”

    Rule A2405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Medical Screening Exam

    The inspectors’ words, 1,166 words

    “MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM CFR(s): 489.24(a) & 489.24(c) (a) Applicability of provisions of this section. (1) In the case of a hospital that has an emergency department, if an individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits and regardless of ability to pay) “comes to the emergency department”, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, the hospital must- (i) Provide an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition exists. The examination must be conducted by an individual(s) who is determined qualified by hospital bylaws or rules and regulations and who meets the requirements of §482.55 of this chapter concerning emergency services personnel and direction; and (ii) If an emergency medical condition is determined to exist, provide any necessary stabilizing treatment, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section, or an appropriate transfer as defined in paragraph (e) of this section. If the hospital admits the individual as an inpatient for further treatment, the hospital’s obligation under this section ends, as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (2)(i) When a waiver has been issued in accordance with section 1135 of the Act that includes a waiver under section 1135(b)(3) of the Act, sanctions under this section for an inappropriate transfer or for the direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location do not apply to a hospital with a dedicated emergency department if the following conditions are met: (A) The transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period. (B) The direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location is pursuant to an appropriate State emergency preparedness plan or, in the case of a public health emergency that involves a pandemic infectious disease, pursuant to a State pandemic preparedness plan. (C) The hospital does not discriminate on the basis of an individual’s source of payment or ability to pay. (D) The hospital is located in an emergency area during an emergency period, as those terms are defined in section 1135(g)(1) of the Act. (E) There has been a determination that a waiver of sanctions is necessary. (ii) A waiver of these sanctions is limited to a 72-hour period beginning upon the implementation of a hospital disaster protocol, except that, if a public health emergency involves a pandemic infectious disease (such as pandemic influenza), the waiver will continue in effect until the termination of the applicable declaration of a public health emergency, as provided under section 1135(e)(1)(B) of the Act. (c) Use of dedicated emergency department for nonemergency services. If an individual comes to a hospital’s dedicated emergency department and a request is made on his or her behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, but the nature of the request makes it clear that the medical condition is not of an emergency nature, the hospital is required only to perform such screening as would be appropriate for any individual presenting in that manner, to determine that the individual does not have an emergency medical condition. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48575 Based on policy and procedure review, dedicated emergency department B (DED-B) medical record review, patient interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Patient 1) of 20 sampled emergency department (ED) patients were provided a medical screening exam (MSE) to rule out an emergency medical condition (EMC) for a patient who presented to the dedicated ED (DED-A) with a chief complaint of chest pain. This failed practice has the potential to cause a delay in emergent care and treatment to any patient who presents to the facility ED with an EMC. The facility ED sees an average of 3,592 patients per month, and 40 transfers per month for the past 6 months. See citations A2400, A2405, A2407 and A2409 that also resulted in A2406 to be not met. Findings Include: A. Review of facility policy, Medical Screening Exam, last approved 1/20/2025 revealed an MSE will be performed on any individual who presents to the ED or another area of the hospital and either requests emergency treatment or is in apparent need of emergency treatment. In the event the patient needs transferred from the ED to another facility, refer to the Transfer and Transport of Patient policy. Review of facility policy, Transfer or Transport of Patients, last approved 1/13/2026 revealed an EMC is defined as a medical condition with acute symptoms without immediate medical attention could result in placing the health of the individual in serious jeopardy. A dedicated ED is defined as providing emergency care to the public. Stabilized is defined as no deterioration of the medical condition is likely during transfer of the patient or the physician has determined the EMC has been resolved. Transfer is defined as relocation of an individual outside the hospital’s facility. B. Review of Patient 1’s medical record from DED-B revealed, P1 presented to DED-B on 12/2/2025 at 9:34AM with a chief complaint of chest pain that started 30 minutes prior while exercising at the gym. P1 was provided an MSE that revealed an EMC of an inferior STEMI (a serious, time-sensitive heart attack caused by a total blockage in the artery that supplies blood to the bottom portion of the heart) which required emergent heart catheterization (the doctor guides a thin tube through a blood vessel from the groin, neck or arm to the heart) with two stents (a mesh tube placed inside a narrowed or weakened artery to hold it open and improve blood flow) placed. P1 was admitted and remained inpatient until discharged on 12/4/2025 at 10:30AM. C. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 10:15AM, Staff B revealed an adult who presents to the DED-A is registered on the board (ED log). Staff B revealed if the patient doesn’t give a name they’re registered as a doe. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 11:06AM, Registered Nurse (RN)-A revealed they were the quick view nurse (QVN) assigned in the triage role on 12/2/2025 from 7:00AM until 11:00AM. RN-A revealed around 3 adults per week present to the DED-A. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 1:53PM, Patient 1 revealed they drove to a hospital they thought was DED-B, saw the red sign and pulled in. Patient 1 stated, “I walked in, said I was having bad chest pain and not feeling well at the ED front desk.” The person sitting at the desk asked Patient 1 if they knew they were at DED-A, and Patient 1 replied no. The person at the desk asked Patient 1 if they meant to go to DED-B, and Patient 1 replied yes. The person at the desk told Patient 1 it’s across the street. Patient 1 left the DED-A and checked in to DED-B on 12/2/2025. Patient 1 revealed the person at the DED-A front desk did not ask their name.”

    Rule A2406. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Stabilizing Treatment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,031 words

    “STABILIZING TREATMENT CFR(s): 489.24(d)(1-3) (1) General. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section, if any individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits) comes to a hospital and the hospital determines that the individual has an emergency medical condition, the hospital must provide either- (i) within the capabilities of the staff and facilities available at the hospital, for further medical examination and treatment as required to stabilize the medical condition. (ii) For for transfer of the individual to another medical facility in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. (2) Exception: Application to inpatients. (i) If a hospital has screened an individual under paragraph (a) of this section and found the individual to have an emergency medical condition, and admits that individual as an inpatient in good faith in order to stabilize the emergency medical condition, the hospital has satisfied its special responsibilities under this section with respect to that individual (ii) This section is not applicable to an inpatient who was admitted for elective (nonemergency) diagnosis or treatment. (iii) A hospital is required by the conditions of participation for hospitals under Part 482 of this chapter to provide care to its inpatients in accordance with those conditions of participation. (3) Refusal to consent to treatment. A hospital meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section with respect to an individual if the hospital offers the individual the further medical examination and treatment described in that paragraph and informs the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) of the risks and benefits to the individual of the examination and treatment, but the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) does not consent to the examination or treatment. The medical record must contain a description of the examination, treatment, or both if applicable, that was refused by or on behalf of the individual. The hospital must take all reasonable steps to secure the individual’s written informed refusal (or that of the person acting on his or her behalf). The written document should indicate that the person has been informed of the risks and benefits of the examination or treatment, or both. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48575 Based on policy and procedure review, dedicated emergency department (DED)-A central log review, dedicated emergency department B (DED-B) medical record review, patient interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Patient 1) of 20 sampled emergency department (ED) patients were provided stabilizing treatment for a patient who presented to the dedicated ED (DED-A) with a chief complaint of chest pain emergency medical condition (EMC). This failed practice has the potential to cause a delay in emergent care and treatment to any patient who presents to the facility ED with an EMC. The facility ED sees an average of 3,592 patients per month, and 40 transfers per month for the past 6 months. See citations A2400, A2405, A2407 and A2409 that also resulted in A2406 to be not met. Findings Include: A. Review of facility policy, Medical Screening Exam, last approved 1/20/2025 revealed an MSE will be performed on any individual who presents to the ED or another area of the hospital and either requests emergency treatment or is in apparent need of emergency treatment. In the event the patient needs transferred from the ED to another facility, refer to the Transfer and Transport of Patient policy. Review of facility policy, Transfer or Transport of Patients, last approved 1/13/2026 revealed an EMC is defined as a medical condition with acute symptoms without immediate medical attention could result in placing the health of the individual in serious jeopardy. A dedicated ED is defined as providing emergency care to the public. Stabilized is defined as no deterioration of the medical condition is likely during transfer of the patient or the physician has determined the EMC has been resolved. Transfer is defined as relocation of an individual outside the hospital’s facility. B. Review of dedicated emergency department (DED)-A central log on 2/4/2026 lacked evidence of Patient 1 being registered, triaged or provided a medical screening exam to rule out an emergency medical condition on 12/2/2025 at approximately 9:00AM. C. Review of Patient 1’s medical record from DED-B revealed, P1 presented to DED-B on 12/2/2025 at 9:34AM with a chief complaint of chest pain that started 30 minutes prior while exercising at the gym. P1 was provided an MSE that revealed an EMC of an inferior STEMI (a serious, time-sensitive heart attack caused by a total blockage in the artery that supplies blood to the bottom portion of the heart) which required emergent heart catheterization (the doctor guides a thin tube through a blood vessel from the groin, neck or arm to the heart) with two stents (a mesh tube placed inside a narrowed or weakened artery to hold it open and improve blood flow) placed. P1 was admitted and remained inpatient until discharged on 12/4/2025 at 10:30AM. D. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 1:53PM, Patient 1 revealed they drove to a hospital they thought was DED-B, saw the red sign and pulled in. Patient 1 stated, “I walked in, said I was having bad chest pain and not feeling well at the ED front desk.” The person sitting at the desk asked Patient 1 if they knew they were at DED-A, and Patient 1 replied no. The person at the desk asked Patient 1 if they meant to go to DED-B, and Patient 1 replied yes. The person at the desk told Patient 1 it’s across the street. Patient 1 left the DED-A and checked into DED-B on 12/2/2025 around 9:30AM. Patient 1 revealed the person at the DED-A front desk did not ask their name. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 10:15AM, Staff B revealed an adult who presents to the DED-A is registered on the board (ED log). Staff B revealed if the patient doesn’t give a name they’re registered as a doe. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 11:06AM, Registered Nurse (RN)-A revealed they were the quick view nurse (QVN) assigned in the triage role on 12/2/2025 from 7:00AM until 11:00AM. RN-A revealed around 3 adults per week present to the DED-A.”

    Rule A2407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Appropriate Transfer

    The inspectors’ words, 1,223 words

    “APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48575 Based on policy and procedure review, dedicated emergency department (DED)-A central log review, dedicated emergency department B (DED-B) medical record review, patient interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Patient 1) of 20 sampled emergency department (ED) patients were provided an appropriate transfer for a patient who presented to the dedicated ED (DED-A) with a chief complaint of chest pain emergency medical condition (EMC). This failed practice has the potential to cause a delay in emergent care and treatment to any patient who presents to the facility ED with an EMC. The facility ED sees an average of 3,592 patients per month, and 40 transfers per month for the past 6 months. See citations A2400, A2405, A2406 and A2407 that also resulted in A2409 to be not met. Findings Include: A. Review of facility policy, Medical Screening Exam, last approved 1/20/2025 revealed an MSE will be performed on any individual who presents to the ED or another area of the hospital and either requests emergency treatment or is in apparent need of emergency treatment. In the event the patient needs transferred from the ED to another facility, refer to the Transfer and Transport of Patient policy. Review of facility policy, Transfer or Transport of Patients, last approved 1/13/2026 revealed an EMC is defined as a medical condition with acute symptoms without immediate medical attention could result in placing the health of the individual in serious jeopardy. A dedicated ED is defined as providing emergency care to the public. Stabilized is defined as no deterioration of the medical condition is likely during transfer of the patient or the physician has determined the EMC has been resolved. Transfer is defined as relocation of an individual outside the hospital’s facility. B. Review of dedicated emergency department (DED)-A central log on 2/4/2026 lacked evidence of Patient 1 being registered, triaged or provided a medical screening exam to rule out an emergency medical condition on 12/2/2025 at approximately 9:00AM. C. Review of Patient 1’s medical record from DED-B revealed, P1 presented to DED-B on 12/2/2025 at 9:34AM with a chief complaint of chest pain that started 30 minutes prior while exercising at the gym. P1 was provided an MSE that revealed an EMC of an inferior STEMI (a serious, time-sensitive heart attack caused by a total blockage in the artery that supplies blood to the bottom portion of the heart) which required emergent heart catheterization (the doctor guides a thin tube through a blood vessel from the groin, neck or arm to the heart) with two stents (a mesh tube placed inside a narrowed or weakened artery to hold it open and improve blood flow) placed. P1 was admitted and remained inpatient until discharged on 12/4/2025 at 10:30AM. D. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 1:53PM, Patient 1 revealed they drove to a hospital they thought was DED-B, saw the red sign and pulled in. Patient 1 stated, “I walked in, said I was having bad chest pain and not feeling well at the ED front desk.” The person sitting at the desk asked Patient 1 if they knew they were at DED-A, and Patient 1 replied no. The person at the desk asked Patient 1 if they meant to go to DED-B, and Patient 1 replied yes. The person at the desk told Patient 1 it’s across the street. Patient 1 left the DED-A and checked into DED-B on 12/2/2025 around 9:30AM. Patient 1 revealed the person at the DED-A front desk did not ask their name. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 10:15AM, Staff B revealed an adult who presents to the DED-A is registered on the board (ED log). Staff B revealed if the patient doesn’t give a name they’re registered as a doe. During an interview on 2/5/2026 at 11:06AM, Registered Nurse (RN)-A revealed they were the quick view nurse (QVN) assigned in the triage role on 12/2/2025 from 7:00AM until 11:00AM. RN-A revealed around 3 adults per week present to the DED-A.”

    Rule A2409. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 5, 2026Complaint inspection5 deficiencies cited
Mar 10, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 7, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 17, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS gives no : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified children’s hospital since Jan 1, 1984.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 27 owners or officers are people: Chanda C Chacon (corporate officer); Chanda C Chacon (corporate director); Chanda C Chacon (managing employee (on the payroll)); Chanda C Chacon (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Nicole D Birge (corporate director); Amy D Ryan (corporate officer); Amy D Ryan (corporate director); Stephen P Lindsay (corporate director); Amy L Hatcher (corporate officer); Amy L Hatcher (managing employee (on the payroll)); Amy L Hatcher (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Herbert O Davies (corporate director); Cindy M Heider (corporate director); Stacy A Scholtz (corporate officer); Stacy A Scholtz (corporate director); Farhan Khan (corporate director); Katherine L English (corporate officer); Katherine L English (managing employee (on the payroll)); Katherine L English (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Robert W Dunlay (corporate director); Samantha J Mosser (corporate officer); Samantha J Mosser (corporate director); David A Diamond (corporate director); Bryan L Wilson (corporate director); Jonathan Wegner (corporate director); Margaret M Hershiser (corporate officer); Margaret M Hershiser (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospitals CMS lists in Douglas County, 6 have an overall star rating from CMS: 5 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.