Hearth Record

St Catherine Hospital Inc.

An acute care hospital in East Chicago, Indiana 46312

4321 Fir Street, East Chicago, Indiana 46312. (219) 392-7004.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 7, 2026: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 7, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,006 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26641 Based on document review and interview, nursing staff failed to complete required information on Patient’s Medicine Inventory Bag, place copy in chart, and return to patient at discharge; and failed to ensure a physician order for surgical dressing changes and/or nursing staff failed to document surgical dressing changes and wound characteristics in patient’s electronic medical record for one of ten patients (patient 3). Findings include: 1. The hospital policy titled, Storage of Home Medications, Policy/Procedure: MED 15.25, last revised March 2023, indicated on page one, section 1.0, upon admission patients will surrender all medications brought from home to nursing personnel; section 1.2, the medications will be placed in a security sealed bag...The patient or representative and the admitting nurse signs the sealed bag. The sealed bag will be returned to the patient upon discharge. On page two, section 3.5, Remove receipt from the top of the bag and make a copy. Give original portion to patient if appropriate and keep copy for chart. The copy on the chart is to indicate that the patient has home medications in storage; section 4.0, upon discharge return medication storage bag to patient after verifying serial number from storage bag with patient receipt. 2. The hospital policy titled, Discharge of Patients, Policy/Procedure: SCH.BC.9.04, last revised January 2025, indicated on page two, section 17.1, assure...any stored home medications are sent home with the patient. 3. The hospital policy titled, Dressing Changes, Surgical Dressing Guideline, Policy/Procedure: SCH.INT.8.01, last revised March 2025, indicated on page one, under General Information, section 1.0, The initial surgical dressing is changed by the physician, unless otherwise ordered by the physician; section 5.0, Documentation of the dressing change and the condition of the wound will be placed in the patient’s electronic medical record and may include the following: 5.1 Location of the wound; 5.2 Size of wound; 5.3 Appearance of wound; 5.4 Presence or absence of drainage; 5.5 Amount, color, and odor of drainage if present; 5.6 Condition of sutures/staples if present; 5.7 Condition of incision line if present; 5.8 Type, number, and adherence of drain(s) and packing if present; 5.9 Photograph of wound if indicated; 5.10 Pain at wound or incision site; 5.11 Type of dressing(s) applied. On page two, under Surgical Dressings, section 9.1.17, Document wound characteristics as listed in 5.0 of this policy in the electronic medical; section 10.0, Nursing to do initial wound assessment and dressing application per physician order on patient admission. 4. Medical record review for patient 3 on 8/7/2026 at approximately 11:45 am, indicated: a. Patient 3 was admitted at 10:44 am on 6/15/2026 for elective right knee total arthroplasty completed on this date. b. Nurse’s Note by P12 (Registered Nurse) on 6/16/2026 at 11:03 am, patient 3 had nasal diazepam in purse. Package was unopened and taken to pharmacy. c. Discharge Orders on 6/17/2026 at 3:55 pm of Diazepam 5 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray be resumed upon discharge. d. After Visit Summary (AVS) that included discharge instructions and printed on 6/17/2026 at 5:21 pm, indicated patient 3 signed and dated on 6/17/2026 receipt of the printed copy of discharge instructions that stated, “including all medications brought from home”, and that patient/significant other demonstrated/verbalized understanding of discharge instructions. e. Lacked a copy in patient’s chart of the receipt from the top of the medication storage bag for this medication patient brought from home. f. Post Op Progress Note by P17 (Physician Assistant [PA]) on 6/16/2026 at 7:49 am, indicated on exam of right knee, wound dry, continue current wound care/dressing changes [not specified]. g. Physical Therapy Note by P10 (Physical Therapist [PT]) on 6/17/2026 at 2:09 pm, indicated patient 3’s surgical wound dressing on right knee noted to be bleeding and a new dressing was placed by P10. h. Wound Care Flowsheet lacked documentation by P10 on 6/17/2026 at 2:09 pm, of surgical dressing change and assessment and wound characteristics in electronic medical record. i. Home Medications List dated 6/15/2026 at 10:18 am, indicated Diazepam 5 mg (milligrams)/0.1 ml (milliliters) nasal spray. j. Discharge Summary indicated patient was discharged home in good condition on 6/17/2026 at 6:27 pm. 5. Copy of Security Bag for Patient’s Medicine Inventory for patient 3 was reviewed on 8/7/2026 at approximately 12:25 pm, that indicated patient 3’s home medication of Diazepam 5 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray was still in this bag and originally was placed into the medication storage bag on 6/16/2026 (no time listed). The bag lacked the signature of patient 3 and/or their representative and the admitting nurse’s signature. 6. Interview on 8/7/2026 at approximately 3:01 pm with P12 (Registered Nurse), confirmed patient 3 brought their Diazepam 5 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray from home on admission and it was placed in a medication storage bag, the bag should have been signed by the patient or their representative and the admitting nurse, it was not. A copy of the receipt from the top of the bag should have been placed in the chart but wasn’t. The home medication should have been returned to the patient on discharge and even though the patient signed the AVS indicating the medication was returned, it wasn’t returned to the patient on discharge. This is known because the medication was still in the pharmacy in the medication storage bag on 8/7/2026. Do not know whether or not the patient received the original receipt from the top of the bag. 7. Interview on 8/7/2026 at approximately 4:29 pm with P10 (PT), confirmed right knee surgical dressing had bloody discharge on 6/17/2026 during PT session and P10 changed the dressing. There were no physician orders for dressing changes, only the note from P17 (PA) on 6/16/2026 at 7:49 am stating on exam wound dry, continue current wound care/dressing changes. P10 did not document on 6/17/2026 at 2:09 pm the right knee surgical dressing change and wound characteristics in patient 3’s electronic medical record.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Pharmacy Administration

    The inspectors’ words, 620 words

    “PHARMACY ADMINISTRATION CFR(s): 482.25(a) [§482.25 Condition of Participation: Pharmaceutical Services .....The medical staff is responsible for developing policies and procedures that minimize drug errors. This function may be delegated to the hospital’s organized pharmaceutical service.] §482.25(a) Standard: Pharmacy Management and Administration The pharmacy or drug storage area must be administered in accordance with accepted professional principles. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26641 Based on document review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to destroy a medication per policy in one instance. Findings include: 1. The hospital policy titled, Storage of Home Medications, Policy/Procedure: MED 15.25, last revised March 2023, indicated on page one, section 1.0, upon admission patients will surrender all medications brought from home to nursing personnel; section 1.2, the medications will be placed in a security sealed bag...The patient or representative and the admitting nurse signs the sealed bag. The sealed bag will be returned to the patient upon discharge; section 1.3, Any medications remaining in the pharmacy/unit for longer than 30 days following discharge will be destroyed per the Pharmacy Department standard policy and procedure; on page two, section 3.5, Remove receipt from the top of the bag and make a copy. Give original portion to patient if appropriate and keep copy for chart. The copy on the chart is to indicate that the patient has home medications in storage; section 4.0, upon discharge return medication storage bag to patient after verifying serial number from storage bag with patient receipt. 2. Medical record review for patient 3 on 8/7/2026 at approximately 11:45 am, indicated: a. Patient 3 was admitted at 10:44 am on 6/15/2026 for elective right knee total arthroplasty completed on this date. b. Home Medications List dated 6/15/2026 at 10:18 am, indicated Diazepam 5 mg (milligrams)/0.1 ml (milliliters) nasal spray. c. Nurse’s Note by P12 (Registered Nurse) on 6/16/2026 at 11:03 am, patient 3 had nasal diazepam in purse. Package was unopened and taken to pharmacy. d. Discharge Summary indicated patient was discharged home in good condition on 6/17/2026 at 6:27 pm. 3. Copy of Security Bag for Patient’s Medicine Inventory for patient 3 was reviewed on 8/7/2026 at approximately 12:25 pm, that indicated patient 3’s home medication of Diazepam 5 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray was still in this bag and originally was placed into the medication storage bag on 6/16/2026 (no time listed). 4. Interview on 8/7/2026 at approximately 12:23 pm with P4 (Associate Director of Pharmacy), confirmed patient 3 brought to the facility their home medication of Diazepam 5 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray and it was placed into a medication storage bag and sealed on 6/16/2026 (no time listed). An attempt to contact the patient via phone was done, but not documented and the patient did not answer the call. The medication should have been returned to the patient upon discharge on 6/17/2026, but it wasn’t so it should have been destroyed after 7/17/2026. This sealed medication storage bag was still in pharmacy storage on 8/7/2026. 5. Interview on 8/7/2026 at approximately 3:01 pm with P12 (Registered Nurse), confirmed patient 3 brought their Diazepam 5 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray from home on admission and it was placed in a medication storage bag, the bag should have been signed by the patient or their representative and the admitting nurse, it was not. The home medication should have been returned to the patient on discharge and even though the patient signed the AVS indicating the medication was returned, it wasn’t returned to the patient on discharge. This is known because the medication was still in the pharmacy in the medication storage bag on 8/7/2026. Do not know whether or not the patient received the original receipt from the top of the bag.”

    Rule A0491. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Mar 5, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights: Free From Abuse/Harassment

    The inspectors’ words, 374 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT CFR(s): 482.13(c)(3) The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35731 Based on document review and interview the facility failed to ensure safety requirements were met during an altercation between a staff member and patient in one (1) instance. (Patient # 10) Findings include: 1. The hospital policy titled, Patient Rights Statement, Policy Number: BE 3, indicated on page two (2) - section - Policy Statement/Purpose - The patient had the right to - number thirteen (13) - Receive every consideration of safety in their surroundings. This policy was last revised on 05/2023. 2. Patient care security video from 02/05/2025 from approximately 11:03:40 am through 11:04:49 am was observed with A # 1 (Quality Director). The video showed patient # 10 walking in the hall with other patients and staff. Patient # 10 on three (3) different occasions went at M # 1 (Mental Health Worker III) by trying to initiate physical contact. Patient # 10 went toward M # 1 from the front at 11:03:40 am and again at 11:04:03 am. At approximately 11:04:44 am patient # 10 quickly ran up behind M # 1 who spun around and physically redirected (hands on patient’s chest) patient # 10 up against a wall. At approximately 11:04:49 am the video showed M # 1 shoving patient # 10 in the chest again to direct patient # 10 toward the entrance of the patient # 10’s room. 3. Behavioral Health Services - Mental Health Worker III - Job Description - indicated on page three (3) - main section - Job Responsibilities - number six (6) - Job Specific - number 6.9 - Regularly assesses and implements non-violent crisis intervention strategies for each patient on the psychiatric units. 4. In interview on 03/05/2025 at approximately 10:30 am with administrative staff member A # 1, confirmed the patient care security video was stored for up to forty-five (45) days. 5. In interview on 03/05/2025 at approximately 12:35 pm with patient care staff member R # 1 (Recreation Therapist), confirmed M # 1 turned around, grabbed patient # 10’s shirt, and pushed patient # 10 up against the wall.”

    Rule A0145. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Supervision Of Contract Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 531 words

    “SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35731 Based on document review and interview the registered nurse failed to ensure an event/occurrence report was completed related to an altercation between a staff member and patient in one (1) instance. (Patient # 10) Findings include: 1. The hospital policy titled, Patient Safety and Risk Management Program, Policy Number: QAI 6.25, indicated on page one (1), Guiding Principles - number 3.2 - Individuals are still held accountable for compliance with patient safety and risk management practices. On page two (2), Definitions - number 1 - Adverse event or incident: An undesired outcome or occurrence, not expected within the normal course of care or treatment, disease process, condition of the patient, or delivery of services. This policy was last revised on 07/2019. 2. Patient care security video from 02/05/2025 from approximately 11:03:40 am through 11:04:49 am was observed with A # 1 (Quality Director). The video showed patient # 10 walking in the hall with other patients and staff. Patient # 10 on three (3) different occasions went at M # 1 (Mental Health Worker III) by trying to initiate physical contact. Patient # 10 went toward M # 1 from the front at 11:03:40 am and again at 11:04:03 am. At approximately 11:04:44 am patient # 10 quickly ran up behind M # 1 who spun around and physically redirected (hands on patient’s chest) patient # 10 up against a wall. At approximately 11:04:49 am the video showed M # 1 shoving patient # 10 in the chest again to direct patient # 10 toward the entrance of the patient # 10’s room. 3. Incident Report Log was reviewed for the months of January and February 2025. The log lacked an Occurrence/Event Report related to patient # 10 and/or his/her representative for 02/05/2025. 4. In interview on 03/05/2025 at approximately 11:50 am with nursing staff member CN # 1 (Registered Nurse-RN/Charge), confirmed M # 1 told CN # 1 that patient # 10 ran up on him/her, more than once, during the hallway walking group. The patient’s nurse would be the one responsible for completing an event report related to staff to patient altercation. If M # 1 pushed patient # 10 then yes, the nurse should have completed an event report. 5. In interview on 03/05/2025 at approximately 12:35 pm with patient care staff member R # 1 (Recreation Therapist), confirmed M # 1 turned around, grabbed patient # 10’s shirt, and pushed patient # 10 up against the wall. 6. In interview on 03/05/2025 at approximately 1:45 pm with B # 1 (Behavioral Health Services-BHS/Nurse Manager), confirmed N # 2 should have completed an occurrence/event report related to M # 1 physically redirecting patient # 10 on 02/05/2025.”

    Rule A0398. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 9 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 7, 2026Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
May 19, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 24, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 26, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 16, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 5, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Jan 15, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 19, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 24, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 6; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 8.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (412 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 72% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 8.3%, pneumonia 11.8%, COPD 8.4%, stroke 7.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.2%, heart failure 21.4%, pneumonia 16%, COPD 18.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 127 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 68% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.1 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 20 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 88% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 17, 2001.
  • 18 owners or officers are people: Luis Molina (corporate director); Karen Bishop Morris (corporate director); Jeffrey D Strack (corporate director); R L Gonzalez (corporate director); Rita Jacque Gillis (corporate director); John Artis (corporate director); Victor H Prasco (corporate director); Matthew Arnold Ramos Libiran (corporate director); Daniel O’brien (corporate officer); Daniel O’brien (managing employee (on the payroll)); Maria Luz Corona (corporate director); Annemarie Kampwerth (corporate director); Wassim Shwaiki (corporate director); John Caban (corporate director); Judy Gresko (corporate director); Nectaria Bonner (corporate officer); Nectaria Bonner (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marisela Varela (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Oct 17, 2001

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospitals CMS lists in Lake County, 7 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.