Hearth Record

Methodist Hospitals Inc.

An acute care hospital in Gary, Indiana 46402

600 Grant St, Gary, Indiana 46402. (219) 886-4000.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 11, 2026: a complaint inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 3 of them at condition level, the most serious.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 22, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 44532 Based on document review and interview, nursing staff failed to ensure all high fall precautions were in place at all times and failed to document fall precautions accurately for 1 of 10 patient Medical Records reviewed (P1) . The cumulative effects of these systemic problems resulted in the facility’s inability to provide nursing care in a safe manner.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 489 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44532 Based on document review and interview, nursing staff failed to ensure all high fall precautions were in place at all times and failed to document fall precautions accurately for 1 of 10 patient Medical Records reviewed (P1) . Findings Include: 1. The policy titled “Risk for Fall and/or Entrapment Guidelines”, last revised: 05/2025, PolicyStat ID: 17699367 indicated the under I. policy: Indication of Risk guidelines are provided to identify patients at risk for falling and/or entrapment and to implement strategies for fall and/or entrapment prevention. All patients need to be assessed using the Morse Fall Risk Scale at the time of admission, daily and when patients condition changes. III. Procedure: Once the patient is identified as being medium or high risk for fall per Morse Fall Risk Scale, additional interventions specific to the needs of the patient can be initiated to improve patient safety. These may include but not limited to if possible place patient close to nurses station, check patient every 1-2 hours and assess for reorienting patient, toileting needs . food/fluid needs, check tubing, close curtain at night, implement bed/chair alarm, implement bed/chair alarm for patients with medium or high fall risk. 2. Review of P1’s medical record (MR) indicated the following: a. Morse fall risk assessment on 04/29/2025 at 2300 hours indicated a total score of 80 points (High fall is 45 points or above). b. Fall risk interventions dated 05/05/2025 at 1900 in place pre fall for P1 included, nonskid footwear, bedside commode in place, require moderate assist when out of bed, 2 side rails up on bed, bed alarm on, bed wheels locked, and room door open. c. Review of Nurse progress note dated 05/05/2025 at 1935 hours N2 (Registered Nurse) indicated that P1 was found on the floor. Post fall wound documentation dated 05/05/2025 at 1935 hours indicated P1 had a laceration above the left eyebrow. d. Review of the computed tomography (CT) of the head without intravenous therapy (IV) dated 05/05/2025 at 2027 hours indicated a large left frontal and forehead soft tissue hematoma, moderate chronic small vessel ischemic disease evidenced by periventricular white matter hypodensities. and mild diffuse volume loss with associated ventricular and sulcal prominence. 3. Review of Post Fall Huddle Review Form dated 05/05/2025 at 1935 hours indicated that P1 had a fall with a head laceration to the left forehead. Huddle report indicated the fall was preventable due to F1 failed to put the bed alarm on while he/she was in bed. 4. In interview on 07/07/2025 at approximately 1530 hours with staff member A3 (Director of Acute Care) indicated that P1 did not have his/her bed alarm on at the time of P1 fall and that MR indicated at 1900 hours F1 staff had documented bed alarm on.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Nov 12, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 14445 Based on document review and interview, nursing services failed to follow facility Fall guidelines for fall risk patients in the utilization of patient bed siderails; and failed to accurately document in MR event related to a patient’s fall for 1 of 10 patient MR’s (Medical Records) reviewed (Patient # 4). The cumulative effects of these systemic problems resulted in the facility’s inability to ensure that quality Nursing Services were provided.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 535 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 14445 Based on document review and interview, nursing services failed to follow facility Fall guidelines for fall risk patients in the utilization of patient bed siderails; and failed to accurately document in MR event related to a patient’s fall for 1 of 10 patient MR’s (Medical Records) reviewed (Patient # 4). Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled: “Risk for Fall and/or Entrapment Guidelines”, Policy Stat ID 12014203, indicated on page 2, under PROCEDURE, Action, the following can assist in providing a safe environment for patients; 8th point; ... in locked position, 11th point: Utilize two side rails as applicable for positioning and bed controls, and on page 4, under Fall Actions, if fall should occur, the nurse must take the following actions, 7th point; Document objective findings related to patient fall. Last revised 4/2022. 2. Review of Patient # 4 MR, indicated, the following: (a). Nursing flowsheets on admission reflected the following: Morse fall risk - (scores included, but not limited to): on admission = 80 (high risk). (b). Plan of care on admission reflected patient safety; falls. Fall preventions (included: call light, bed low position, side rails up x [times] 2, staff rounding, non-skid socks, alarms {bed & chair}, fall risk band). (c). Nurse note on 10/8/2024 at 2:45 am, by N # 20 (RN {Registered Nurse} - 5W-2 - IMCU {Intermediate Care Unit} - staff), reflected nurse was called to patient room where patient was found on the floor nearby bed and commode. Patient was placed on commode and instructed to call for assistance with call light in reach prior to incident. Patient has small laceration to right eyebrow. Patient was assisted back to bed by staff. (d). MR documentation for fall by nursing staff is not consistent with incident/event report findings. 3. Review of Incident/event report for Patient # 4, dated 10/8/2024 at 2:30 am for an unwitnessed fall (patient’s room), indicated the following: (a). Patient was found on floor near commode. Patient had bruise to right eyebrow. (b). Event was reviewed by A # 4 (Unit Manager - 5W-2), with additional information. Event date: 10/8/2024 at 2:30 am, for an unwitnessed fall (patient’s room), indicated that patient was found on floor near commode - in regards to patient was assisted to BSC (bedside commode), NA (nursing assistant) remained with patient and assisted patient back to bed; bed alarm in place. NA in rush and thought that side rail of bed was latched and left room. Side rail found not to be latched. Patient was found on floor by primary RN. (c). Incident/event review is not consistent with MR documentation for fall. 4. In interview on 11/12/2024 at approximately 12:00 pm, with A # 4, confirmed the following: a. Three side rails up, for patients on fall risk; rails would be locked/latched in place. b. NA assisted patient # 4 from bedside commode back to bed; in incident investigation, NA was unsure if she/he heard click for right side rail once patient was in bed. Call light in place and bed alarm was on.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 11, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 35731 Based on document review and interview, the Registered Nurse (RN) failed to ensure a patient was moved from the Emergency Department (ED) cart to an inpatient bed once admitted in one (1) instance, failed to ensure a patient was turned every two (2) hours (Q2h) in seventy (70) instances, and failed to ensure a risk report was completed/evaluated for a patient who had developed new wounds during the patient’s length of stay. (Patient # 10) The cumulative effects of these systemic problems resulted in the facility’s inability to provide nursing care in a safe manner.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 649 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35731 Based on document review and interview, the Registered Nurse (RN) failed to ensure a patient was moved from the Emergency Department (ED) cart to an inpatient bed once admitted in one (1) instance, failed to ensure a patient was turned every two (2) hours (Q2h) in seventy (70) instances, and failed to ensure a risk report was completed/evaluated for a patient who had developed new wounds during the patient’s length of stay. (Patient # 10) . Findings include: 1. The hospital policy titled, Skin and Tissue Inspection, Assessment and Management Procedure, PolicyStat ID 12484038, indicated to turn and reposition the patient at least every two (2) hours, and complete a risk control report and forward to Risk Management when patients are admitted with pressure injuries/wounds and/or patients develop pressure injuries/wounds during their length of stay. This policy was last revised in 10/2022. 2. The facility policy titled, Event Reporting of Patient/Visitor Incidents, PolicyStat ID 11064742, indicated to maintain a safe environment issues and events representing risks to the institiution are to be reported. The reports will be reviewed each business day. This policy was last revised in 10/2020. 3. Review of patient # 10’s medical record indicated the following: a. Emergency Department (ED) note dated 11/11/2023, indicated patient arrived with right lower leg wound. b. The patient arrived at the ED on 11/11/2023 and remained on the cart until moved to the inpatient unit on 11/14/2023. Patient # 10’s MR lacked documentation related to the patient being moved from an ED cart/gurney to an inpatient bed while waiting for an inpatient room. The MR lacked documentation the patient was turned/repositioned Q2h’s on the following dates/times: 11/12/2023 at 0000, 0200, 0400, 0600, 0800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 2200; 11/13/2023 at 0000, 0200, 0400, 0600, 0800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 2200; 11/18/2023 at 0200, 0400, 0600; 11/21/2023 0800, 1000, 1200, 1400; 11/21/2023 2000, 2200; 11/22/2023 0000, 0200, 0400, 0600, 0800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 2200; 11/23/2023 0000, 0200, 0400, 0600; 11/24/2023 2000, 2200; 11/25/2023 0000, 0200, 0400, 0600; 11/27/2023 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, 2200; and 11/28/2023 0000, 0200, 0400, 0600, 0800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800. c. Wound Care note dated 11/14/2023 indicated the patient had a venous ulcer on his/her right medial lower leg, pressure ulcer left buttock, pressure ulcer sacrum, pressure ulcer left lower posterior leg calf proximal/distal, pressure ulcer right lateral lower leg calf proximal, and pressure ulcer right lower leg distal. 4. In interview on 01/10/2024 at approximately 12:30 pm with staff member S # 3 (ED RN), confirmed once we know the patient has been admitted we move them from the ED cart to a inpatient hospital bed. Everything should be documented. 5. In interview on 01/11/2024 at approximately 9:00 am with administrative staff member A # 1 (Assistant Vice President Patient Care Services), confirmed the ED did not have a policy related to boarding inpatients and/or moving the patient from the cart to an inpatient bed. 6. In interview on 01/11/2024 with administrative staff member A # 2 (Director of Critical Care), confirmed the patient should have been moved from the ED cart to an inpatient bed and turned Q2h’s while an inpatient. He/she also confirmed there should have been a risk report completed related to the patients new wounds. 7. In interview on 01/11/2024 at approximately 1:45 pm with staff member S # 4 (Wound Care Registered Nurse), confirmed he/she evaluated the patient on 11/14/2023 and the patient had eight (8) wounds and an area of hyperpigmentation. 8. In interview on 01/11/2024 at approximately 2:15 pm with administrative staff member A # 4 (Regulatory Specialist), confirmed he/she had not received/reviewed any risk reports for the patient related to wounds.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Diets

    The inspectors’ words, 221 words

    “DIETS CFR(s): 482.28(b)(2) All patient diets, including therapeutic diets, must be ordered by a practitioner responsible for the care of the patient, or by a qualified dietitian or qualified nutrition professional as authorized by the medical staff and in accordance with State law governing dietitians and nutrition professionals. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35731 Based on document review and interview the Registered Dietitian failed to ensure a nutritional supplement was ordered for one (1) of ten (10) medical records (MR’s) reviewed. (Patient # 10) Findings include: 1. The facility policy titled, Skin and Tissue Inspection, Assessment and Management Procedure, PolicyStat ID 12484038, indicated nutritional support interventions should be implemented as recommended by the dietary consult. This policy was last revised in 10/2022. 2. Review of patient # 10’s MR indicated the following: a. Medical Nutrition - Inpatient Follow-up Assessment note, dated 11/22/2023 by P # 1 (Registered Dietitian), indicated to continue current diet order per physician and initiate orders for vanilla Boost Plus one (1) times daily. Patient # 10 was considered High nutritional risk. b. The MR lacked the order to initiate vanilla Boost Plus. 3. In interview on 1/11/2024 at approximately 2:30 pm with administrative staff member A # 1 (Assistant Vice President Patient Care Services-AVP SLPCS), confirmed the MR lacked the order from the RD.”

    Rule A0630. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 16 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 11, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 9, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 11, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 28, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 20, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 13, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 22, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Nov 12, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Nov 4, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 16, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 8, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 31, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 3, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 24, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 11, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited
Dec 15, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 1 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 2 better and 1 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 3 worse of 9.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,014 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 59% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 54% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, worse than the national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.9%, heart failure 10.2%, pneumonia 14.5%, COPD 6.7%, stroke 15.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.6%, heart failure 20.7%, pneumonia 17.3%, COPD 21.4%, hip or knee replacement 5.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 158 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 51% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.07 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 39 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 1 of 5.
  • 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Laura Majoch (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Matthew Doyle (corporate officer); Robert E Johnson (corporate director); John A Lowenstine (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospitals CMS lists in Lake County, 7 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.