Hearth Record

Alexian Brothers Behavioral Hlth Hosp

A psychiatric hospital in Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60169

1650 Moon Lake Blvd, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60169. (847) 882-1600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 7, 2023: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34411 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the Hospital failed to comply with the Condition of Participation 42 CFR 482.13 Patient Rights. Findings include: 1. The Hospital failed to ensure that a court-ordered petition for medication was initiated and filed timely, when emergency medications were administered for greater than 72 hours. See deficiency at A-117 (A).”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Notice Of Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 1,265 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: NOTICE OF RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13(a)(1) A hospital must inform each patient, or when appropriate, the patient’s representative (as allowed under State law), of the patient’s rights, in advance of furnishing or discontinuing patient care whenever possible. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34411 A. Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 1 of 2 (Pt #1), clinical records reviewed for patients requiring court orders for treatment, the Hospital failed to ensure that a “court-ordered petition for medication” was initiated and filed timely when emergency medications were administered for greater than 72 hours. Findings include: 1. The Hospital’s policy titled, “Administration of Psychotropic Medication” (dated 8/1/2017), was reviewed, and required, “ ...Emergency Treatment may not be administered for more than 72 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, unless a petition for Psychotropic Medication or ECT [electroconvulsive therapy] is filed with the circuit court and the Emergency Treatment continues to be necessary. Once the petition is filed with the court, treatment may continue pursuant to these requirements until the final outcome of the hearing on the petition.” 2. The clinical record for Pt #1 was reviewed on 12/4/2023. Pt #1 was involuntarily admitted to 2 South (Acute Adult Behavioral Health Unit) on 9/9/2023. Pt #1 was administratively discharged on 9/26/2023, for legal proceedings. - Pt #1’s Behavioral Health History and Physical (dated 9/10/2023), documented by the Psychiatrist (MD #1), included, “ ...Patient was initially assessed at [local Hospital’s emergency department] ...was brought to the hospital after running around neighborhood naked stating that [Pt #1] was ‘running to a better place’ ...According to the family, the patient is not compliant with medications. [Pt #1] was deemed appropriate for inpatient hospitalization due to the severity of [Pt #1] psychotic symptoms and unpredictable erratic behavior... [Pt #1] has been petitioned before and received long-acting injectable medications ...” - 9/11/2023: “ ...Patient lacks insight into [Pt #1’s] psychiatric condition. [Pt #1] has no intention of being on medications and says that [Pt #1] does not need any medications at all ...Patient may need to be petitioned since [Pt #1] is a danger towards [self] and others prior to admission and this is due to the acuity of [Pt #1] psychiatric symptoms ... [Pt #1] has been petitioned in the past as well ...” - 9/14/2023: “ ...Patient is refusing medications. Due to the patient’s severity of psychotic symptoms and behavior when [Pt #1] is not stable in the outpatient setting and [Pt #1] inability to take care of [Pt #1] basic needs, patient requires medications. Petition will be filed ...” - 9/18/2023: “ ...Over the weekend [Pt #1] had to receive multiple imminent danger antipsychotics [medications] as well as Benadryl. 2 days ago [Pt #1] received medications for imminent danger twice in a span of 6 hrs ...Patient will be petitioned ...” - 9/22/2023: “ ... [Pt #1] is one-to-one [sitter] due to [Pt #1] unpredictable behavior ...The last time [Pt #1] received mandated medications was yesterday morning/afternoon ...Patient will be petitioned. Patient has received multiple imminent danger medications ...” - 9/25/2023: “ ...Patient lacks insight. Patient needs treatment with medications and ECT [electroconvulsive therapy]. Patient will be petitioned ...” - Pt #1’s medication orders included the following IM (intramuscular) psychotropic medications: Lorazepam (Ativan/anti-anxiety) 1 mg every 6 hours, PRN, indication: imminent danger; Chlorpromazine (Thorazine/antipsychotic) 50 mg; Olanzapine (Zyprexa/antipsychotic) 10mg; Ziprasidone (Geodon/antipsychotic) 20 mg; and Haloperidol (Haldol/antipsychotic) 5 mg (to be given if patient refuses Haldol PO), One-Time, indication: imminent danger. - Pt #1’s MAR (Medication Administration Record), included the following emergency IM medications: -Chlorpromazine (Thorazine) was given on 9/15 (twice), 9/17, 9/18, 9/20, and 9/21/2023. -Lorazepam (Ativan) was given on 9/22 and 9/25/2023. -Olanzapine (Zyprexa) was given on 9/17, 9/19, and 9/21/2023. -Ziprasidone (Geodon) was given on 9/22 and 9/25/2023. Pt #1 was admitted on 9/9/2023 and was refusing medications/treatment since admission. Pt #1 initially received an emergency IM injection on 9/15/2023, due to aggressive and threatening behavior. MD #1’s notes from 9/15/2023 - 9/25/2023 included documentation indicating that a petition would be filed. Pt #1’s clinical record included a petition for Psychotropic Medication. However, the petition was not filed until 9/26/2023 (11 days after initial dose was administered), which was greater than 72 hours. 3. On 12/5/2023 at 1:05 PM, an interview was conducted with a Psychiatrist (MD #1/Pt #1’s Psychiatrist). MD #1 stated that Pt #1 was admitted due to an acute psychiatric episode where the patient was threatening and damaging property. MD #1 stated that Pt #1 was not in a mental state to consent to medication and required psychotropic medication to treat his symptoms. MD #1 stated that since Pt #1 was refusing oral medications, then the nurses should only administer IM medications for acute or catatonic episodes. MD #1 stated that a petition to obtain a court order for medication administration and for ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) was initiated on 9/26/2023. 4. On 12/5/2023 at 12:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Case Management (E #5). E #5 stated that we (case management team, State’s Attorney, Psychiatrist, and Guardianship), went to court to force medications for Pt #1 since the patient was refusing oral medications. E #5 stated that prior to filing a petition for the medication court order, the nurses cannot give IM medications (other than emergency). E #5 stated that a petition for psychotropic medication was not filed until 9/26/2023, as the team was trying to decide what the next steps would be for Pt #1’s treatment plan. E #5 stated that if an emergency medication, is given for more than 72 hours, then there needs to be a medication petition filed. B. Based on document and interview, it was determined that 1 of 2 (Pt #1), clinical records reviewed for chemical restraints, the Hospital failed to ensure that a Notice of Restriction of Rights form for restraints was completed, when an emergency medication was administered, as required. Findings include: 1. The Hospital’s policy titled, “Administration of Psychotropic Medication” (dated 8/1/2017), was reviewed, and required, “ ...Required Procedures: Emergency Treatment: A Notice Regarding Restricted Rights of Individuals must be completed and provided to the patient and the Guardian, if any ...A copy shall be placed in the patient’s medical record ...” 2. The clinical record for Pt #1 was reviewed on 12/4/2023. Pt #1 was involuntarily admitted to 2 South (Acute Adult Behavioral Health Unit) on 9/9/2023. Pt #1 was administratively discharged on 9/26/2023. 3. Pt #1’s medication orders included the following IM (intramuscular) psychotropic medications: Lorazepam (Ativan/anti-anxiety) 1 mg every 6 hours, PRN, imminent danger; Chlorpromazine (Thorazine/antipsychotic) 50 mg; Olanzapine (Zyprexa/antipsychotic) 10mg; Ziprasidone (Geodon/antipsychotic) 20 mg; and Haloperidol (Haldol/antipsychotic) 5 mg (to be given if patient refuses Haldol PO), One-Time, indication: imminent danger. Pt #1’s MAR (Medication Administration Record), included the following emergency IM medications: -Chlorpromazine (Thorazine) was given on 9/15 (twice), 9/17, 9/18, 9/20, and 9/21/2023. -Lorazepam (Ativan) was given on 9/22 and 9/25/2023. -Olanzapine (Zyprexa) was given on 9/17, 9/19, and 9/21/2023. -Ziprasidone (Geodon) was given on 9/22 and 9/25/2023. Pt #1’s clinical record included the Restriction of Rights form for 2 times that the emergency medications were administered (Zyprexa on 9/19 and Thorazine on 9/21/2023). However, the clinical record lacked the required form for the 11 other times that the emergency IM medications were administered. 4. On 12/6/2023 at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (E #1). E #1 stated that if a medication is given IM as an imminent danger/emergency medication, then there should be a “Restriction of Rights” form completed with each instance.”

    Rule A0117. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 259 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34411 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 5 behavioral health units, the Hospital failed to ensure patient safety, by not completing the environmental safety rounds sheets, as required. Findings include: 1. The Hospital’s “Environmental Rounds Checklist: [Hospital] Procedure, Reminders: What to look for during an environmental rounds checklist” (dated 2022) was reviewed and required, “Environmental Rounds Procedures/Reminder...Completed Daily: AM shift, PM shift. To ensure Patient and Staff safety.” 2. On 12/4/2023 at 10:15 AM, an observational tour of the 2 South/Adult Acute care unit was conducted. During the tour, environmental (safety) rounding sheets were reviewed from 10/2023-11/30/2023. The rounding sheets include checks for environmental safety risks, such as plastic bags, garbage bin, shower wall, patient room, laundry rooms, and quiet rooms. The sheets require twice a day documentation (AM and PM). The sheets lacked the twice/day documentation on the following dates: - (6 days): 10/3/2023, 10/8/2023, 10/12/2023, 10/14/2023, 10/16/2023, and 11/27/2023, lacked documentation of PM shift completion. - (2 days): 10/17/2023, 10/19/2023, lacked documentation of AM shift completion. 3. On 12/6/2023 at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (E #1). E #1 stated that the environmental rounds are to ensure patient safety, including ligature risks and anything that can cause harm. E #1 stated that the rounding sheets are required to be completed daily, AM and PM shift.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 5 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 15, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 3, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 15, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 7, 2023Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Jun 28, 1990.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - church.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Church.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Alexian Brothers Health System and Ascension Health run it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Clayton Ciha (corporate officer); Deborah Mau (corporate officer); Deborah Mau (managing employee (on the payroll)); Legary N Vaselopulos (corporate director, 0%); Legary N Vaselopulos (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Polly Davenport (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Feb 19, 1998.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Alexian Brothers Health SystemRuns it (operational or managerial control)Aug 3, 2010
Ascension HealthRuns it (operational or managerial control)Apr 1, 2022

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 56 hospitals CMS lists in Cook County, 40 have an overall star rating from CMS: 5 rated 5 of 5, 8 rated 4 of 5, 10 rated 3 of 5, 9 rated 2 of 5, 8 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.