Hearth Record

Loyola University Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Maywood, Illinois 60153

2160 S 1st Avenue, Maywood, Illinois 60153. (708) 216-9000.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 31, 2025: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 18, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Respiratory Care Services

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “RESPIRATORY CARE SERVICES CFR(s): 482.57 The hospital must meet the needs of the patients in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The following requirements apply if the hospital provides respiratory care services. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 39802 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the hospital failed to comply with the Condition of Participation 42 CFR 482.57, Respiratory Services. Findings include: 1. The Hospital failed to ensure that there was adequate respiratory therapy staffing and that staff had the required qualifications, to meet the respiratory care needs of the patient populations served. A-1154 An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/18/2025 at 42 CFR 482.57, Respiratory Service, due to the Hospital’s failure to ensure that adequate respiratory care staff were available and qualified to provide respiratory services and treatments to its high volume of patients. The IJ was announced on 06/18/2025 at 4:15 PM during a meeting with the President, the Chief Medical Officer, the Chief Nursing Officer, the Vice President (VP) of Finance, three Chief Quality Improvement Specialists, and the Regional VP of Clinical Excellence, and was not removed by the survey exit date of 06/18/2025. The Hospital’s failure has the potential to pose an immediate threat to the health and safety of all patients in need of respiratory services.”

    Rule A1151. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Adequate Respiratory Care Staffing

    The inspectors’ words, 1,561 words

    “ADEQUATE RESPIRATORY CARE STAFFING CFR(s): 482.57(a)(2) There must be adequate numbers of respiratory therapists, respiratory therapy technicians, and other personnel who meet the qualifications specified by the medical staff, consistent with State law. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39802 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the Hospital failed to ensure that there was adequate respiratory therapy staffing and that staff had the required qualifications, to meet the respiratory care needs of the patient populations served. Findings include: 1. The Hospital’s Scope of Services titled, “Leadership Plan for Care, Treatment, and Services”, (dated 8/2023), was reviewed, and included, “Description of the Organization: As part of [Hospital] ...with 547 beds ...[Hospital] offers quaternary and tertiary care [highest level] ...Clinical services include: ...respiratory care services ...Respiratory Care Practitioners (RCPs), under the direction of a physician, evaluate, treat and care for patients with breathing disorders ...With an average of 40 ventilated patients a day across ten intensive care units, our Respiratory Care Practitioners accompany physician led teams on round evaluating the patients ...Staff is based on the volume of ordered therapy and the level of acuity for each shift. This service or unit is open/available around the clock, 7 days/week ...Our standard of practice is based on the AARC (American Association of Respiratory Care) standards” 2. The Pediatric, Neonatal, and Adult Point Tally Sheet (revised 5/2025), was reviewed. The point tally sheet uses a staffing metric, based on the AARC (American Association of Respiratory Care) guidelines. The sheet included a column that listed various respiratory procedures/duties that has pre-determined points next to the procedure. The total points are tallied (per respiratory therapist). After the points are tallied, the total number points should be divided by 90 (indicating the “90-point system”). Per interview on 6/16/2025 at 11:50 AM, with the Respiratory Manager (E #1), the goal regarding staffing for the respiratory therapists, is to keep the assignment load less than 90 points. 3. The Respiratory Care Practice II Job Description (dated 8/11/2011), was reviewed and included, “Under the general supervision of the Clinical Resource Manager of Respiratory Care provides intensive and general respiratory care services to neonatal, pediatric, adolescent, adult, and geriatric patients upon receiving written prescriptions from a physician and/or per approved medical center protocol ...” 4. The Neo-Peds Respiratory Care Practice III Job Description (dated 2/19/2014), was reviewed and included, “ ...Coordinates daily staffing assignments to distribute the workload according to the point system to and Department guidelines. Adjust assignments throughout shift to ensure appropriate staffing. Calculates points for the oncoming shift and adjusts staffing as necessary to ensure efficient utilization staff ...Required ...NRP (Neo Resuscitation Program) and PALS [pediatric resuscitation] ...” 5. The “Interim Guidelines for High-Risk Delivery & NICU Transports” (dated 11/22/2021), was reviewed on 6/17/2025, and required, “There will be 24/7 Respiratory (RT) coverage in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Assignments will be made with designated High-Risk Delivery (HRD) RT to cover NICU and will be identified to NICU Charge Registered Nurse (RN) .... High Risk Deliveries: The High-Risk Delivery Team (HRD) will be called to attend deliveries for any known or anticipated maternal or fetal complications ...” 6. On 6/16/2025, the RT daily staffing sheets/assignments from 5/1/2025-6/16/2025 were reviewed. The assignment sheets included RTs with workloads greater than the recommended “90-points” guidelines on the night shift (11 PM-7 AM) on the following dates: - 6/8, 6/12, 6/13/2025: 5 Respiratory Therapists (instead of the required 9). - 5/2, 5/19, 5/21, 5/25, 5/27, 6/9/2025: 6 Respiratory Therapists (instead of the required 9). - 5/12, 5/15, 5/17-5/18, 5/24-5/30, 6/2-6/3, 6/5- 6/6/2025: 7 Respiratory Therapists (instead of the required 9). - 5/5, 5/7, 5/9-5/10, 5/13, 5/16, 6/4, 6/7, 6/10/2025: 8 Respiratory Therapists (instead of the required 9). In addition, the RT staffing assignment sheets included RTs (adult-trained) who were floated to the NICU on 5/30, 6/3, 6/7, 6/8 and 6/13/2025. RT (adult-trained) staff were floated to the PICU on 5/4, 5/19, 5/23-5/27, 5/30, 6/1-6/2, 6/6-6/10, 6/12-6/13/2025. 7. On 6/17/2025, the personnel files of 12 RTs including the adult-trained RTs that floated to the NICU or PICU, were reviewed. The files lacked the required NRP or PALS certification for the adult-trained RTs who were floated/assigned to either NICU or PICU. 8. On 6/17/2025, the NICU staffing sheets from 5/1/2025-6/16/2025, were reviewed. The daily assignment sheets listed the assigned RT for the NICU. On 6/8/2025, the night shift’s assignment sheet included a note, “No RT for HRD [high risk delivery] or transport”. In addition, the NICU staffing assignments included some RT staff (adult-only trained) who were floated/assigned to the NICU. 9. Incident Reports from 03/01/2025-06/16/2025 were reviewed and included multiple incidents of delayed or missed care due to lack of respiratory staffing. 10. The clinical records of seven additional patients (Pts. #9, 10, and 16-20) selected from incident reports were reviewed for respiratory care and imaging and the following concerns were identified: - Pt. #9 with missed or delayed respiratory nebulizer and airway clearance therapies between 04/24/2025 to 05/12/2025. - Pt. #10 unable to receive MRI scan ordered on 05/02/2025 due to no respiratory staff available to accompany vented patient for imaging procedure. - Pt. #16 with missed or delayed respiratory nebulizer and airway clearance therapies between 05/24/2025 to 06/16/2025 - Pt. #17 with greater than 24 hour delay in completing MRI scan ordered on 06/05/2025., due to lack of respiratory staff available to accompany vented patient. - Pt. #18 with missed nebulizer treatments overnight due to no respiratory staff available on 06/09/2025. 11. On 6/17/2025 at 2:00 pm, the clinical record of a patient (Pt #8) in the 4 Tower Ortho Med/Surg unit (Nebulizer Pilot Unit) was reviewed. Pt #8 was ordered albuterol-ipratropium (respiratory treatment medication) scheduled 4 times a day. The Medication Administration Record from 6/13/2025-6/16/2025 was reviewed for administration of the respiratory medication. On 6/16/2025 at 1:00 PM, the scheduled medication was documented as “missed” and was not given. The assigned nurse (E #6) acknowledged the missed dose and stated that E #6 did not have time to administer Pt #8’s medication since nurses now have the added responsibility of administering nebulizer treatments. 12. On 6/16/2025 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with the Respiratory Manager (E #1). E #1 stated that hospital does not use an external agency at this time, due to a financial decision/financial deficit. E #1 stated that there is not a particular staffing policy for the respiratory department. E #1 stated that, however, the department uses the AARC guideline’s “90-point system”. This guideline sets metrics on the time allocated for various respiratory treatments. E #1 stated that the points are tallied for each treatment and each assigned RT. E #1 stated that for example, each treatment averages around 15 minutes, which would equal to 5 points. E #1 stated that the purpose of the guideline, is to schedule the RTs so that their assignment load does not exceed the “90 points”. E #1 stated that the safest minimum staffing of RTs on the night shift, would be 5-6 at a minimum, but the goal is around 9 RTs. E #1 stated that when there is a critical shortage, then the RTs have to prioritize patient care: asthmatics, patients on ventilators, and Neo/Peds. E #1 stated that there are multiple open positions in the respiratory department. E #1 stated that as an attempt to offset the shortage, the department uses an internal staffing agency. 13. On 6/16/2025 at 10:45 AM, during tour, an interview was conducted with the assigned NICU RT (E #4). E #4 stated that there should always be one RT assigned to the NICU. E #4 stated that RTs assigned to the NICU should have NRP certification (neonatal resuscitation program card). E #4 stated that there has been ongoing staffing shortage with the RTs. E #4 stated that there are times when an adult-trained RT has to be pulled to the NICU to cover. E #4 stated that the shortage is primarily on the night shift (11 PM-7AM). 14. On 6/16/2025 at 11:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the Respiratory Department Educator (E #3). E #3 stated that there are staffing concerns in the RT department, especially on the night shift. 15. On 6/17/2025 at 12:20 PM, a phone interview was conducted with the Respiratory Medical Director (MD #1). MD #1 stated that the respiratory therapists who work in the NICU are required to have the NEO/PEDS certification. MD #1 stated that a Neo/Peds RT should be assigned to the NICU at all times. MD #1 stated that MD #1 along with leadership are aware of a shortage with the RT’s. MD #1 stated that if there is a severe staffing shortage, then calls would be made to see if there is anyone on-call that would come in or if staff would stay over their shift. MD #1 stated that as of late, there has been a more acute change in the staffing shortage and we have responded more acutely. 16. An interview was conducted with Respiratory Therapist (E#8) on 06/16/2025 at approximately 11:55 AM. E#8 stated that if a patient is on a ventilator they must be accompanied by a RT if going to imaging. E#8 stated that respiratory treatments should be administered as ordered. E#8 stated that the expectation is to administer medications within a half an hour before or after the scheduled time.”

    Rule A1154. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Mar 26, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 385 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(8) Unless superseded by State law that is more restrictive-- (i) Each order for restraint or seclusion used for the management of violent or self-destructive behavior that jeopardizes the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member, or others may only be renewed in accordance with the following limits for up to a total of 24 hours: (A) 4 hours for adults 18 years of age or older; (B) 2 hours for children and adolescents 9 to 17 years of age; or (C) 1-hour for children under 9 years of age; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34411 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 1 (Pt #13), clinical record reviewed for violent restraints, the Hospital failed to ensure that the restraint order for a minor was renewed every hour, in accordance with policy. Findings include: 1. The Hospital’s policy titled, “Restraint Use” (dated 9/16/2024), was reviewed and required, “...Obtaining a Restraint Order...Violent and Self-Destructive Behavior. a. Time limited order applies and may not exceed: 1 Hour-for under age 9...Continuation of a Restraint Order. Violent and Self-Destructive Behavior. When the order is about to expire, a nurse must contact the LIP [licensed independent practitioner], report the results of the most recent assessment and request that the order be renewed if appropriate...” 2. The clinical record for Pt #13 was reviewed on 3/25/2025. Pt #13 was admitted to the Pediatric Unit on 3/3/2025. Pt #13 was under the age 9. Pt #13’s physician orders were reviewed. The orders included a restraint order for violent behavior (initiated on 3/6/2025 at 9:37 AM). Subsequent orders for Pt #13’s violent restraints, included orders on 3/6/2025 at 10:45 AM, and 11:43 AM. -Pt #13’s restraint flowsheets included documentation indicating that Pt #13 was in violent restraints beginning on 3/6/2025 at 9:45 AM through 3/6/2025 at 2:30 PM. Pt #13’s last restraint order was on 3/6/2025 at 11:43 AM. There were 2 hourly restraint orders lacking for 12:43 PM and 1:43 PM. 3. On 3/25/2025 at approximately 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Registered Nurse (E #13). E #13 stated that for a child under the age of 9, the order for violent restraint needs to be renewed every hour.”

    Rule A0171. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 412 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27125 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 1 patient (Pt. #2) requiring removal of an indwelling catheter, the hospital failed to ensure the nursing decatheterization (removal) protocol was followed. Findings included: 1. The hospital’s nurse driven protocol approved by the medical executive committee - “Discontinuation of indwelling Urinary Catheter per Decatheterization Protocol” was reviewed on 3/24/2025 and required, “Voids [urinate] greater then 200 ml within 6 hours or less. After each void, obtain PVR [post void residual] two times via bladder scan. If bladder scan is greater than 300 ml, proceed with straight catheterization. Repeat as needed.” 2. The daily flow sheets included that the indwelling urinary catheter was removed on 7/27/2024 at 12:00 PM. The urinary totals were as follows: - 7/27/2024 at 5:18 PM - voided 75 ml, bladder scan 290 ml - 7/27/2024 at 11:49 PM - voided 200 ml, bladder scan 285 ml - 7/28/2024 at 4:19 AM - voided 225 ml, bladder scan 186 ml - 7/28/2024 at 10:55 AM - voided 225 ml, bladder scan 550 ml - 7/28/2024 at 1:22 PM - voided 200 ml, bladder scan 433 ml - 7/28/2024 at 3:45 PM - voided 100 ml, bladder scan 630 ml - 7/28/2025 at 5:27 PM - voided 110 ml, bladder scan 572 ml - 7/28/2024 at 8:00 PM - voided 100 ml, bladder scan 643 ml - 7/28/2024 at 10:00 PM - voided 125 ml, bladder scan 686 ml - 7/29/2024 at 12:00 AM - unable to void, discomfort, straight cath 680 ml - 7/29/2024 at 8:00 AM - voided 10 ml, bladder scan 357 ml - 7/29/2024 at 3:00 PM - indwelling catheter inserted per order 3. The registered nurse (E#8), who cared for Pt. #2 during the decatheterization process, was interviewed via telephone on 3/25/2025 at 10:30 AM. E#8 did not recall Pt. #2, but stated that based on the above data Pt. #2 should have been straight cathed (temporary placement) earlier. E#8 stated, “Once the catheter is removed, we wait 6 hours and allow the patient to void. Then we perform a bladder scan. If the amount of urine scanned is greater than 300 ml we will notify the attending service. Then a straight Cath will be done and the process is started over again.””

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 31, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 18, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Mar 26, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Sep 5, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 1 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 1 worse of 8; readmission, 0 better and 4 worse of 11.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (502 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 63% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 61% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: worse than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.5%, heart failure 10.4%, pneumonia 12.6%, COPD 8.2%, stroke 10.1%, heart bypass surgery 2.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 15.6%, heart failure 21.1%, pneumonia 17.4%, COPD 20.6%, heart bypass surgery 13.3%, hip or knee replacement 5.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 275 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 3% left before being seen.
  • 60% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.98 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 2, 1969.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 92% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Loyola University Health System owns 100% directly since Jan 13, 1995.
  • 14 owners or officers are people: Elizabeth Early (corporate director); Eva Maria Wojcik (corporate director); Melissa Lukasick (corporate officer); Bertina Barnes (corporate officer); Marc H Schwartz (corporate officer); Marc H Schwartz (corporate director); Maria J Pekar (corporate officer); Joy V Cunningham (corporate director); Jill Rappis (corporate officer); Adenrele Adekunbi Kolawole (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stuart Kilpinen (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Tad Gomez (corporate officer); Tad Gomez (corporate director); Pierre Monice (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 5 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Loyola University Health SystemOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 13, 1995
Trinity Health CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2011

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 56 hospitals CMS lists in Cook County, 40 have an overall star rating from CMS: 5 rated 5 of 5, 8 rated 4 of 5, 10 rated 3 of 5, 9 rated 2 of 5, 8 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.