Hearth Record

St Camillus Hospice

A hospice in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226

10101 W Wisconsin Ave, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226. (414) 258-2418.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

20 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 53226 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 14, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

20 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 11, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission20 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to include all services needed in the plan of care for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions as evidenced in HOSRRHV#3: No volunteer interventions or frequency was in care plan. HOSRRNHV#9: Patient had massage and music therapy with no orders. HOSRRNHV#8: Patient had massage therapy with no orders, this was observed and validated by Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization failed to evaluate contracts annually as evidenced the organization did not eval pharmacy or DME program, this was validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The governing body/leadership did not ensure that the following Conditions of Participation were met as determined through observations, documentation and staff interviews 418.100,: 418.56 and 418.58”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to assess and reassess the patients pain as per pain assessment policy as evidenced in HOSRRHV#2: No pain assessment completed during nursing visits, notes states staff used observation scale but unable to find it in documentation, this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 15 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to assess the patient’s need for physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual care, as evidenced in HOSRRHV#1: HOSRRHV#4: HOSRRNV#1, HOSRRNHV#2, HOSRRNHV#3, HOSRRNHV#4, HOSRRNHV#5, HOSRRNHV#6, HOSRRNHV#7, HOSRRNHV#8, HOSRRNHV#9 and HOSRRNHV# 10 the need for volunteer services not assessed. HOSRRHV#2: Prior to visit the ALF staff informed hospice RN that patient had irritation/rash to groins bilaterally and she was concerned that it may open, RN did not assess skin during nursing visit. HOSRRBR#3, no initial bereavement assessment completed this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b ))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide a written plan of care based on the patient’s goals and time frames as most of the time frames were end of cert as evidenced by in HOSRRHV#1: Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of falls prevention, home safety measures: target date end of cert, this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to establish measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care as evidenced in HOSRRHV#1: patient/caregiver will have no s/s complications related to impaired physical mobility for stage of disease process. HOSRRHV#2: Chaplain: Patient/family achieves feelings of spiritual comfort. HOSRRHV#3: peripheral edema will be reduced within limitations of disease process. HOSRRNHV#1: Patient symptoms will be consistent with stage of disease process and problems managed as well as disease will allow, HOSRRNHV#3:Patient will maintain optimum level of functioning appropriate for stage of disease process. HOSRRNHV#4: Patient/caregiver will express satisfactory in control on symptoms. HOSRRNHV#7: Patient will be free of preventable complications. HOSRRNHV#9: Maintains skin integrity,this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to clarify medications and treatment necessary to meet the patient’s needs as identified in HOSRRHV#1 and HOSRRHV#3: HOSRRNHV#1, HOSRRNHV#2, HOSRRNHV#3, HOSRRNHV#4, HOSRRNHV# 5, HOSRRNHV#6, HOSRRNHV#7, HOSRRNHV#8, HOSRRNHV#9: Oxygen was ordered 2-5 litres via nasal cannula as needed for dyspnea, no indication when to choose which litre dose. HOSRRHV#2 and HOSRRHV#3: No indication: scopolamine 1mg/72hrs transdermal patch, extended release: apply 1-3 patches transdermally every 72 hours as needed for secretions. HOSRRHV#2: patient is a diabetic and there was no diabetic care in the plan of care. HOSRRHV#4: No bleeding precautions or diabetic care plan since initial plan of care and no order for hibiclens wash to left axilla 3 times a week for recurrent suppuration hidradenitis since SOC and this has been discontinued HOSRRNHV#2: Patient has a stage 1 decubitus ulcer @ SOC and no care plan about thi HOSRRNHV#7: . Patient is on a fentanyl patch and no pain care plan for high risk medication s, this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to revise plans and goals for care, treatment, or services based on the patient’s needs as evidenced by all target dates were end of cert HOSRRHV#2: Continuation of same goals and target dates unchanged into next cert period,e.g SN goal: patient will remain comfortable and symptom will be managed and dates were for last benefit period. HOSRRHV#3: Target date remained unchanged since last cert period for Chaplain: caregiver will consult with staff as needed for support. HOSRRHV#4: MSW: patient will be able to indicate preferred coping strategies that add to quality of life since SOC. HOSNHV#1: Patient symptoms will be consistent with stage of disease process and problems managed as well as disease will allow. HOSRRNHV#2:Patient and family have spiritual needs will be met and target date unchanged since SOC. HOSRRNHV#4: Patient/caregiver will express satisfactory in control on symptoms. HOSRRNHV#5: All goals have end of cert period: Patient will demonstrate decreased s/s of constipation. HOSRRNHV#6:goal still present since SOC: SLP Patient will demonstrate ability to perform swallow strengthening strategies with 70% accuracy given cues as needed and patient is no longer being seen by SLP. HOSRRNHV#7: Patient will be free of preventable complications by end of cert. HOSRRNHV#8: Patient will be pain free or have acceptable FLACC score with current pain management regime target date unchanged since last cert period. HOSRRNHV#9:Maintains skin integrity remained to the same target, this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide the patient with care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care as evidenced that the HHA did not follow the ordered frequency of visits in HOSRRHV#1: the HHA as there was a missed visit for one week and no notification to RN or physician,. HOSRRHV#2: HHA missed visits on 3 different weeks without notification to RN or physician. HOSRRHV#3:HHA missing visit for 3 weeks without any notification to RN or physician .HOSRRHV#4; There was RN + HHA missed visits for 5/14/25 and 5/28/25 and no notification or documentation to physician. HOSRRNHV#1: HHA did not see patient for 3 weeks, missing visits. HOSRRNHV#8: HHA missed 1 week of visits without notifying RN or MD, this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Observed in Data Session. The quality assessment and performance improvement program failed to demonstrate improvement in the indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services, this was validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, The hospice failed to develop a bereavement plan of care that specifies the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery as evidenced in HOSRRBR#1, HOSRRBR#2 and HOSRRBR#3, this was observed and validated by Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(5))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, The organization failed to assess and document staff competency once every three years as evidenced in HR#1: HHA competency was not done for the last 3 years, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0619. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide an accurate written patient care instructions for the hospice aide as evidenced by in HOSRRHV#2: HHA care plan had assist with meal planning and also meal preparation, RN should HOSRRHV#4: HOSRRNHV#2, HOSRRNHV#3, HOSRRNHV#4 & HOSRRNHV#9: patient is on anticoagulant therapy and no special bleeding precautions identified in care plan. this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner in the plan of care as per policy Hospice Aide- Care Plan as evidenced in HOSRRHV#1:the patient declined shower since SOC during HHA visit and no communication to RN. HOSRRHV#2: HHA did not provide shower or bath and did not document reason , this was observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, A registered nurse failed to make an annual on-site visit to the location where the patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while the aide is providing care as evidenced in HR #1, there is no record for on-site observation and assessment, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, The organization failed to define the competencies it requires of its staff who provide patient care, treatment, or services as evidenced by there is no competency defined for Hospice Medical Director, this was validated by the Administrator Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, The organization failed to complete staff competency initially as part of orientation as evidenced by in HR# 5 emergency preparedness not completed on initial orientation, this was validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(6))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Leaders failed to monitor contracted services by communicating the expectations in writing to the provider of the contracted services as evidenced by the DME and therapy contract did not include criminal background checks on employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. There was no key performance indicators identified in pharmacy contract, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0716. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to identify the care and services that are needed and identify which provider is responsible for performing the functions that have been agreed upon and include in the plan of care as evidenced in HOSRRHV#4: Patient is being seen by SNF wound care RN and there is no coordination of care in the hospice plan of care, this is observed and validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide the SNF in HOSRRHV#4: hospice election form as required, this was validated by the Hospice Clinical Manager”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 14, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 11, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission20 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 21, 2010.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 29% at home, 31% in assisted living, 40% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.8%
Visits near death90.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Pedro Tramontin (corporate officer); Mario Crivello (corporate director); Leandro Blanco (corporate officer); Kevin Schwab (corporate director); Kevin Schwab (managing employee (on the payroll)); Justin J Munzel (corporate officer); Agustin Orosa (corporate officer); Shannon Angell (corporate officer); Nick Laubusch (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 83.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 53226, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 20.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.