Luther Manor Hospice
A hospice in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53225
4545 N 92nd St, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53225. (414) 847-3041.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 53225 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on May 3, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 19, 2024: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
-
Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)
The inspectors’ words, 389 words
“Based on record review and interview, this agency failed to ensure there is a comprehensive Emergency Preparedness Program, in 1 of 1 Emergency Programs reviewed. Findings include: On 03/19/2024 Administrator A presented a binder titled “Emergency Preparedness” not dated, revealed in part, the agency is an integrated healthcare system of Luther Manor. This was confirmed in interview with Hospice Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM, “;All the patients are within the campus and we do not have a Hospice specific plan.” Interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM. Administrator A was asked if this Hospice had an emergency preparedness plan Administrator A stated, “There is no hospice Emergency Preparedness program, there is a plan going forward.” The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the Hospice Agencys ability to effectively develop or implement an emergency preparedness policy and procedures utilizing an all-hazards risk assessment, emergency preparedness communication plan, emergency preparedness training and testing program, and updated every 2 years. On 03/19/2024 Administrator A presented a binder titled “Emergency Preparedness” not dated, which revealed the agency was part of an integrated healthcare system. This was confirmed in an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM, “;All the patients are within the campus and we do not have a Hospice specific plan; We are part of the nursing home plans.” The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the Hospice Agencys ability to effectively develop or implement a hospice emergency preparedness policy and procedures utilizing an all-hazards risk assessment, emergency preparedness communication plan, emergency preparedness training and testing program, and updated every 2 years. This agency failed to establish an Emergency Preparedness program that is reviewed and updated every two years. See tag E-0004. This agency failed to document a risk assessment using all hazards approach. See tag E-006 This agency failed to ensure the communication plan is reviewed every two years. See tag E-0029. This agency failed to coordinate the development of a hospice specific Emergency plan within the Integrated Healthcare system. See tag E-0042. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the clinic’s inability to effectively develop or implement an emergency preparedness policy and procedures utilizing an all-hazards risk assessment, emergency preparedness communication plan, hospice specific plan within the Integrated Healthcare system, that is reviewed and updated every 2 years.”
-
Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))
The inspectors’ words, 112 words
“Based on interview and record review this agency failed to document an Emergency Plan risk assessment that is reviewed and updated every two years in 1 of 1 Emergency Preparedness Programs reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the binder titled “Emergency Preparedness” not dated, which revealed the agency was part of an integrated healthcare system, failed to contain the required documents supporting the hospice agency’s participation, development, and review of the plan every two years. This was confirmed in an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM, “;All the patients are within the campus and we do not have a Hospice specific plan; We are part of the nursing home plans.””
-
Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Based on interview and record review this agency failed to document an Emergency Plan risk assessment using an all-hazards approach, and is reviewed and updated every two years in 1 of 1 Emergency Preparedness Programs reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the binder titled “Emergency Preparedness” not dated, which revealed the agency was part of an integrated healthcare system, failed to contain a risk assessment, using an all hazards approach. This was confirmed in an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM, “;All the hospice patients are within the campus and we do not have a Hospice specific plan; The emergency plan was developed by the nursing home.””
-
Development of Communication Plan (42 CFR 418.113(c))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Based on record review and interview this agency failed to ensure there is a written communication plan in 1 of 1 Emergency Preparedness programs reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the binder titled “Emergency Preparedness” not dated, which revealed the agency was part of an integrated healthcare system, failed to contain a collaborative communication plan that included contact information of hospice staff and emergency official contacts. This was confirmed in an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM, “;All the hospice patients are within the campus and we do not have a Hospice specific plan; The emergency plan was developed by the nursing home.””
-
Integrated EP Program (42 CFR 418.113(e))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Based on record review and interview the agency failed to demonstrate how it was actively involved in the development and maintenance of the unified and integrated emergency preparedness (EP) program, in 1 of 1 EP program reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the binder titled “Emergency Preparedness” not dated, which revealed the agency was part of an integrated healthcare system, did not show evidence of the hospice agency’s unique circumstances, patient population and services offered in the event of an emergency. This was confirmed in an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 10:59 AM, “;All the hospice patients are within the campus and we do not have a Hospice specific plan; The emergency plan was developed by the nursing home.””
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 197 words
“Based on record review and interview, administration failed to employ a MSW (Masters in Social Work) supervisor to oversee, advise, and consult with staff social worker I in meeting the hospice needs of patients and families, in 1 of 1 Hospice program reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the agency’s position description titled “Hospice Social Worker,” dated 11/14/2023, revealed in part “Requirements: Wisconsin Social Work Certification and License, including a Master’s degree in social work or human services related field.” Record review of personnel record for Social Worker I, date of hire 04/11/2022, revealed a completed certification in social work and trained under the supervision of a Master’s prepared social worker. Review of additional documentation revealed, Social Worker I has actively participated in all Core activities, expected essential job functions and ongoing orientations. There was no evidence SW (Social Worker I) held a Master’s degree in social work or related field. During an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 11:15 AM, when asked when the previous qualified social worker left, Administrator A replied, “early 2023.” Administrator A stated, “I wasn’t aware Social Worker I did not meet the qualifications and required credentialing for a hospice social worker.””
-
Infection control (42 CFR 418.110(j))
The inspectors’ words, 1,024 words
“Based on record review, observation and interview, the agency staff failed to clean and disinfect reusable medical equipment after each patient use per agency policy in 2 of 3 home visits observed (Patient #1 and Patient #2). Findings Include: Date of Discovery: Patient #2 - 03/18/2024 Patient #1- 03/19/2024 Date of Violation: Patient #2 - 03/18/2024 Patient #1- 03/19/2024 Facility policy entitled, “Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment” (revised 10/23) revealed in part: “3. Staff shall follow established infection control principles for cleaning and disinfecting reusable, non-critical equipment. General guidelines include: b. Each user is responsible for routine cleaning and disinfection of multi-resident items after each use, particularly before use for another resident.” During an observation on a home visit for Patient #2 on 03/18/2024 at 11:30 AM with RN C, RN C did not clean and disinfect the following reusable equipment after using them on Patient #2 and prior to placing them back inside the medical supply bag: stethoscope, pulse oximeter, temporal thermometer, and blood pressure cuff. During an interview with RN C, when asked when C would clean and disinfect her reusable equipment, RN C stated, “I clean all my equipment at the end of the day. Unless they are noticeably soiled, I would then clean that right away.” When asked how RN C would clean and disinfect the equipment RN C stated that she would use a bleach wipe and wipe all of the equipment down using agency provided supplies. During an observation on a home visit for Patient #1 on 03/19/2024 at 10:53 AM with RN F, RN F did not clean and disinfect the following reusable equipment after using the equipment on Patient #1 and prior to placing them back inside the medical supply bag: stethoscope, pulse oximeter, temporal thermometer, and blood pressure cuff. During an interview with RN F, when asked about the cleaning and disinfecting of the reusable equipment, RN F stated, “I go downstairs to the office and wipe off all of my equipment after my visit with wipes.” RN F stated that after the reusable medical equipment is used the equipment is placed back into the cloth medical supply bag and taken downstairs to the hospice office and wiped down with bleach wipes before putting the equipment back into the cloth medical supply bag without the medical supply bag being cleaned or disinfected. RN F confirmed there was a potential for cross-contamination within the medical supply bag when the reusable equipment is not cleaned and disinfected immediately after each use and placed back into the same cloth medical supply bag. During an interview with Administrator A on 03/18/2024 at 2:45 PM, Administrator A was asked what the expectations were for cleaning and disinfecting reusable equipment. Administrator A stated “I would expect that our policy would be followed. We have the wipes and they should use the wipes on their reusable equipment after each patient not at the end of the day.” Administrator A confirmed RN C did not follow their “Cleaning and Resident Care Equipment” policy. During an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 3:50 PM, Administrator A confirmed RN C and RN F did not follow the general guidelines or agency policy regarding proper cleaning and disinfecting of reusable medical equipment. Findings Include: Facility policy entitled, “Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment” (revised 10/23) revealed in part: “3. Staff shall follow established infection control principles for cleaning and disinfecting reusable, non-critical equipment. General guidelines include: b. Each user is responsible for routine cleaning and disinfection of multi-resident items after each use, particularly before use for another resident.” During an observation on a home visit for Patient #2 on 03/18/2024 at 11:30 AM with RN C, RN C did not clean and disinfect the following reusable equipment after using them on Patient #2 and prior to placing them back inside the medical supply bag: stethoscope, pulse oximeter, temporal thermometer, and blood pressure cuff. During an interview with RN C, when asked when C would clean and disinfect her reusable equipment, RN C stated, “I clean all my equipment at the end of the day. Unless they are noticeably soiled, I would then clean that right away.” When asked how RN C would clean and disinfect the equipment RN C stated that she would use a bleach wipe and wipe all of the equipment down using agency provided supplies. During an observation on a home visit for Patient #1 on 03/19/2024 at 10:53 AM with RN F, RN F did not clean and disinfect the following reusable equipment after using the equipment on Patient #1 and prior to placing them back inside the medical supply bag: stethoscope, pulse oximeter, temporal thermometer, and blood pressure cuff. During an interview with RN F, when asked about the cleaning and disinfecting of the reusable equipment, RN F stated, “I go downstairs to the office and wipe off all of my equipment after my visit with wipes.” RN F stated that after the reusable medical equipment is used the equipment is placed back into the cloth medical supply bag and taken downstairs to the hospice office and wiped down with bleach wipes before putting the equipment back into the cloth medical supply bag without the medical supply bag being cleaned or disinfected. RN F confirmed there was a potential for cross-contamination within the medical supply bag when the reusable equipment is not cleaned and disinfected immediately after each use and placed back into the same cloth medical supply bag. During an interview with Administrator A on 03/18/2024 at 2:45 PM, Administrator A was asked what the expectations were for cleaning and disinfecting reusable equipment. Administrator A stated “I would expect that our policy would be followed. We have the wipes and they should use the wipes on their reusable equipment after each patient not at the end of the day.” Administrator A confirmed RN C did not follow their “Cleaning and Resident Care Equipment” policy. During an interview with Administrator A on 03/19/2024 at 3:50 PM, Administrator A confirmed, RN F did not follow the general guidelines or agency policy regarding proper cleaning and disinfecting of reusable medical equipment.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | 7 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 29, 2008.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 18.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.9% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 7% at home, 22% in assisted living, 69% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.2 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 18.8% |
| Visits near death | 95.9% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 12 owners or officers are people: Karen R Gibbs (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Arthur Keup (corporate officer, 0.01%); Elizabeth Benz (corporate director); Keith Fraleigh (corporate director); Mir Ismail Quryshi (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Kristine Iwinski (corporate director); Andrew Vedder (corporate director); Raymond Jude Zastrow (corporate director); Tim Schoewe (corporate director); Karen R Gibbs (corporate officer); Stephanie A Chedid (corporate officer); Stephanie A Chedid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 61.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 53225, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 7.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Luther Manor Hospice This hospice | 7 |
| Aurora at Home | 7 |
| St Camillus Hospice | 20 |
| Agrace Hospicecare | 15 |
| Horizon Homecare and Hospice | 2 |
| Prohealth Home Hospice | 3 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corp Midwest | 0 |
| Amedisys Hospice of Milwaukee | 4 |
| Compassus Milwaukee Metro | 1 |
| Heartland Hospice Milwaukee | 32 |
| Accent Care Hospice and Palliative Care of WI | 11 |
| Compassus Milwaukee | 8 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.