Hearth Record

Hope Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Medford, Wisconsin 54451

537 W Broadway Ave, Medford, Wisconsin 54451. (715) 748-3434.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 54451 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 4, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Infection control (42 CFR 418.60)

    “Based on record review and interview the Hospice agency failed to maintain and document an effective infection control program that protects patients, families, visitors, and hospice personnel by preventing and controlling infections and communicable diseases in 1 of 1 Infection Control Programs reviewed. Findings include: The agency staff failed to properly disinfect reusable equipment. See Tag L579 The agency failed to include the Infection Control program as an integral part of QAPI program and document methods to survey, identify and screen employees for clinically apparent communicable diseases. See Tag L580.”

    Rule L0577. Condition-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Based on record review and interview the agency failed to document a risk assessment based on all-hazards approach in 1 of 1 Emergency Preparedness programs reviewed. Findings include: Review of agency policy/procedure titled “Emergency / Disaster Management, Policy Number: AD.E10” last reviewed on 01/30/2024 revealed no documentation of a completed facility or community based all-hazards risk assessment. During an interview with Director A on 12/04/2024 at 9:30 AM, Director A stated, “We don’t have that” and was unaware that they (Agency) needed a risk assessment. Director A stated that the agency works with the community to determine risks and participates in community exercises. Director A was unable to provide documentation of a community based risk assessment.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “Based on observation, record review, and interview agency staff failed to properly disinfect reusable equipment prior to returning it to the nursing bag in 1 of 1 RN (Registered Nurse) observation visit out of a total of 3 observation visits (RN B). Findings include: Review of policy “;Infection Control-Bag Technique” policy number: PC.I10, last revised 12/2020 revealed in part, “;5. All items that might be used with other patients (for example, stethoscopes) are cleaned with the appropriate disinfectant after each use and before being returned to the bag. 7. Disinfect reusable items before returning them to the bag: c. Allow items to dry before putting back in the bag.” Review of disinfectant wipes label for use revealed “;1. Wipe surface with enough wipes for treated surface to remain visibly wet for 4 minutes. 2. Let the surface dry.” An observation visit was performed with RN B at the residence of Patient #2 on 12/3/2024 at 1:15 p.m. At the conclusion of the visit, RN B used a disinfectant wipe to wipe down equipment that was used during the visit. RN B placed the equipment directly into a plastic bag and returned it to the nursing bag, without allowing the items to remain wet for 4 minutes. During an interview on 12/4/2024 at 12:30 p.m. with Director A, Director A was asked what the expectation is for staff disinfecting equipment. Director A stated that staff should follow the instructions on the label.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “Based on record review and interview the Hospice agency failed follow agency policies and procedures and to maintain and document an effective infection control program that protects patients, families, visitors, and hospice personnel by preventing and controlling infections and communicable diseases in 1 of 1 Infection Control Programs reviewed. Findings include: Review of agency policy and procedure tilted, “Infection Control - Program Policy Number: PC.I40” Last reviewed on 12/2020 revealed, “Procedures: 2. As an integral component of the hospice’s quality assessment and performance improvement program (QAPI), infection control data is collected and analyzed to determine trends and areas in need of improvement to minimize the risk of infections. Data collected may include, but not limited to; a. identification of targeted infections; b. identification of unusual/undesirable trends and factors contributing to those trends; c. monitoring staff compliance with infection control policies and procedures; and d. reportable employee or patient illnesses and infections. 3. A summary of all infection control activities performed as well as results of aggregated surveillance data analysis is provided by the QAPI committee and included in reports to the hospice’s leaders.” Review of the agency’s Infection Control program revealed no documentation of identifying infectious and communicable disease or any surveillance data that was reviewed or monitored. Review of the agency’s QAPI program revealed no documentation of an integrated infection control program. No infection control data was found. During an interview with Director A on 12/04/2024 at 9:40 AM, Director A stated the agency does not track specific patient / employee infection control data. She stated that she does monitor the CDC website for disease trends. When asked if the agency had a policy related to screening employees for communicable disease, Director A stated, “We don’t have a policy related to employees and communicable diseases.””

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 238 words

    “Based on record review and interview, agency staff failed to ensure that the hospice plan of care identified which provider was responsible for performing their respective functions in 7 of 7 patients residing in an SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) or an ALF (Assisted Living Facility) out of a total of 13 records reviewed (Patients #1, #2, #3, #5, #9, #10, and #13). Findings include: Review of policy “;Plan of Care (POC)” policy number PC.P40, last revised 12/2020 revealed in part, “;6. For hospice patients who reside in a skilled nursing facility, community based residential setting, or other contracted residential facility (referred to as facility): c. The hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identifies which provider (hospice, facility staff) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care.” Review of Patients #1, #2, #3, #5, #9, #10, and #13 medical records revealed that these patients resided in a SNF or ALF. Review of the Plans of Care for these patients revealed no identification of which provider was responsible for performing their respective functions. During an interview conducted on 12/4/2024 at 1:00 p.m. with Director A, Director A was asked what the expectation is for plans of care of patients who reside in a facility. Director A stated that the plan of care should identify who is responsible for doing what.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 15, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Dec 4, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 29, 1988.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 49% at home, 23% in assisted living, 28% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death99.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 14 owners or officers are people: Delvin Smith (corporate director); Randi Werner (corporate director); Rebecca Brost (corporate director); Karen Chaplinski (corporate director); Rick Flora (corporate director); Patricia Waldhart (corporate officer, 0%); Patricia Waldhart (corporate director); Nicole C Syryczuk (corporate officer); Nicole C Syryczuk (managing employee (on the payroll)); Nicole C Syryczuk (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Ronald J Cooper (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ruthann Koch (corporate director); Melissa Ann Zuleger (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jasmin Skerven (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 95% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 89.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 88.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54451, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 54451
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Hope Hospice and Palliative Care This hospice5
Compassus Central Wisconsin2
Interim Hospice and Palliative Care8
St Croix Hospice Eau Claire10
Heartland Hospice Central Wisconsin7
St Croix Hospice Wausau1
Aspirus at Home3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.