Hearth Record

Unity Hospice

A hospice in De Pere, Wisconsin 54115

2366 Oak Ridge Circle, De Pere, Wisconsin 54115. (920) 338-1111.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 54115 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 19, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 4, 2026: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Hospices that provide inpatient care directly (42 CFR 418.110)

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Based on observation, staff interview and review of maintenance records on February 4, 2026, Unity Hospice, DePere, WI failed to meet the following fire protection and building safety standards for safety to patients. Findings include K 0293 Exit Signage - Maintenance and TestingK 0341 Fire Alarm System InstallationK 0345 Fire Alarm System - Maintenance and TestingK 0363 Corridor Doors42CFR 418.110(d) Standard: Fire Protection42CFR 418.110(e) Standard: Building Safety As a result of the above deficiency, 42 CFR Subpart 418.110 Condition of Participation: Hospices that provide inpatient care directly was NOT MET. See K-tags for details of the specific findings.”

    Rule L0820. Condition-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to include required contact information in the emergency preparedness plan per 42 CFR section 418.113(c)(2). This deficient practice could affect all patients, as well as undetermined number of staff and visitors. Findings include:On 02/04/2026 at 11:39 am, record review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP) revealed that the contact information for the Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff was not included in the EPP or communication plan. When asked if this contact information was available, Staff E reviewed electronic documents from her computer but was unable to locate and retrieve this information.This finding was confirmed at the time of discovery by concurrent interview with Staff D and Staff E.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Exit Signage (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the facility did not document the monthly inspections of the exit lights in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 101 (2012 edition), sections 19.2.9.1 and 7.10.9.1. This deficient practice could affect all patients, as well as an undetermined number of staff and visitors. Findings include:On 02/04/2026 at 9:56 am, record review revealed monthly visual inspections for the operation and illumination of the exit lights were not documented for the past (12) months. When asked if the exit lights were visually inspected and documented each month, Staff D replied, “I check exit lights when I check extinguishers and detectors, but it is not documented.”This finding was confirmed at the time of discovery by a concurrent interview with Staff D.”

    Rule K0293. Standard-level.

  • Fire Alarm System - Installation (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to install supervised smoke detection in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 101 (2012 edition), sections 19.3.4, 19.3.4.2.1, and 9.6 and NFPA 72 (2010 edition), sections 17.7.3, 17.7.4, and 17.7.4.1. This deficient practice could affect 6 of 12 patients, as well as an undetermined number of staff and visitors. Findings include:On 02/04/2026 at 12:47 pm, observation in the Fireplace Room B138 revealed that (2) ceiling mounted smoke detectors were located within 28-inches of the air flow of 6-inch by 24-inch air supply diffusers. One detector was located on the south side of the room, and the other was on the north side of the room. The facility had no documentation to confirm that the detector was installed per manufacturer’s recommendations.This finding was confirmed at the time of discovery by a concurrent interview with Staff D.”

    Rule K0341. Standard-level.

  • Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the facility did not perform the semi-annual testing and inspections of the fire alarm system accordance with the requirements of NFPA 101 (2012 edition), sections 19.3.4, 9.6.1.3, and 9.6.1.5; NFPA 72 (2010 edition), sections 14.3.1, 14.4.2.2, 14.4.5, 14.6, and 14.6.2.4. This deficient practice could affect all patients, as well as an undetermined number of staff and visitors. Findings include:On 02/04/2026 at 9:27 am, record review of fire alarm inspection and testing revealed no documentation that the semi-annual visual inspections of initiating devices (duct detectors, electro-magnetic door hold-opens, pull stations, heat detectors, smoke detectors) or testing of the fire system batteries was performed in the past 12 months. When asked if the semi-annual inspection had been performed, Staff D replied “I do a visual inspection for any damage of devices, but I don’t document it. I do not do any battery testing.”This finding was confirmed at the time of discovery by a concurrent interview with Staff D.”

    Rule K0345. Standard-level.

  • Corridor - Doors (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure corridor doors would resist the passage of smoke in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012 edition) sections 19.3.6.3.1, 19.3.6.3.5, 19.3.2.4 and 8.7; NFPA 99 (2012 edition), sections 11.3.1, 5.1.3.3.2. This deficient practice could affect 0 of 12 patients, as well as an undetermined number of staff and visitors. Findings include:On 02/04/2026 at 12:30 pm, observation in the basement of the 45-minute rated fire door between the Oxygen Central Supply room and the emergency egress corridor revealed that when the door was opened and released to close, the door would not fully close and latch for (3) of (3) attempts. The basement is only accessed by an exterior door at grade, and no patients have access to the basement.This finding was confirmed at the time of discovery by a concurrent interview with Staff D.”

    Rule K0363. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 251 words

    “Based on observation, record review and interview, the agency nurse failed to follow standards of practice for disposal of patient medication in 1 of 1 inpatient observations (Patient #6) in a total of 6 observations of patient care.Findings include: Record review of agency policy titled “Medications-Management” dated 12/2022 revealed “Procedures: 15. Medications that are no longer needed are disposed of in accordance with accepted standards of practice.”During an observation and interview with RN B on 02/04/2026 at 9:15 AM, RN B went into the locked pharmacy room and retrieved the medication bottle Atorvastatin for Patient #6 from a locked medication cart. RN B removed the label from the medication bottle and threw the label into a black medication disposal bin located behind RN B on the other side of the pharmacy room. RN B then threw the medication bottle, which was 1/4 full of white pills, into a trash bin to the right of the medication cart. RN B stated that when a patient medication is discontinued, B will throw the label into the designated medication bin and throw the medication bottle away.During an interview with Team Leader C on 02/04/2026 at 9:50 AM, Team Leader C stated, “There is a designated medication disposal box located in the pharmacy area. Controlled substances go into a Drug Buster and anything else goes into the designated medication disposal bin. Except if empty, it goes into the garbage.” Team Leader C stated RN B should have put the medication bottle in the designated bin.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

All 6 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 19, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 19, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 4, 2026Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Feb 4, 2026Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited
Dec 10, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 15, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 21, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 39% at home, 40% in assisted living, 17% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 1% in an inpatient hospice, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death96.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • St Vincent Hospital-Hospital Sisters-Third Order of St Francis owns 45% directly since Oct 1, 1992; Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc. owns 45% directly since Oct 1, 1992; St Mary’s Hospital Medical Center of Green Bay Inc-Hospital Sisters owns 10% directly since Oct 1, 1992.
  • St Vincent Hospital-Hospital Sisters-Third Order of St Francis and Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc. and St Mary’s Hospital Medical Center of Green Bay Inc-Hospital Sisters run it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Patricia L Allen (corporate director); Melody Wohlfeil (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Ken Nelson (corporate director); Amy A James (managing employee (on the payroll)); Alisa A Gerke (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kathy Kerscher (corporate director); Tracey Tegtman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jessica A Grimm (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
St Vincent Hospital-Hospital Sisters-Third Order of St FrancisOwns 5% or more directly45%Oct 1, 1992
St Vincent Hospital-Hospital Sisters-Third Order of St FrancisLimited partner45%Oct 1, 1992
St Vincent Hospital-Hospital Sisters-Third Order of St FrancisRuns it (operational or managerial control)45%Oct 1, 1992
Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc.Owns 5% or more directly45%Oct 1, 1992
Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc.Limited partner45%Oct 1, 1992
Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)45%Oct 1, 1992
St Mary’s Hospital Medical Center of Green Bay Inc-Hospital SistersOwns 5% or more directly10%Oct 1, 1992
St Mary’s Hospital Medical Center of Green Bay Inc-Hospital SistersLimited partner10%Oct 1, 1992
St Mary’s Hospital Medical Center of Green Bay Inc-Hospital SistersRuns it (operational or managerial control)10%Oct 1, 1992

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.25% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54115, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.