Hearth Record

Heartland Hospice Fond Du Lac

A hospice in Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin 54937

N6650 Rolling Meadows Dr Suite 1, Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin 54937. (920) 926-1144.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 11 hospices serving ZIP code 54937 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 10, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 10, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patients #2,#3,#4,#6,#7,#8,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 2: The medication profile contained polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 3: Upon observation during the home visit the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained magnesium oxide and an albuterol inhaler that both discontinued 10/2/24. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 9/10/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Upon observation during home visit, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained amlodipine that was discontinued by hospice 10/4/24, and did not contain hyoscyamine and lorazepam that was on the hospice profile. Patient 6: The medication profile contained duplicative clonazepam listing for once daily at 2pm dated 5/24/24 and for twice daily at 2pm and bedtime dated 10/8/24. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medication profile contained a lidocaine topical patch with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contained atropine with no defined frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medication profile contained nystatin topical powder and lidocaine patch with no areas defined for administration. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 1: There was no evidence per agency policy of weekly assessments and measurements of wounds to left thigh and mid chest from 9/5/24 to 9/20/24 and 9/20/24 to 10/2/24.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #3,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issues with difficulty swallowing and coughing after eating. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying the patient is a high risk for falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #2,#4,#7,#8,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained an order for polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 9/10/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for a lidocaine topical patch with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained an order for atropine with no defined frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for lidocaine patches with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #6,#8,#10,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a nebulizer. There was no evidence of an order for the nebulizer included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the walker included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for the wheelchair included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker and wheelchair. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation of wounds activated 7/22/24 and 9/5/24. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to skin impairment updated in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #15,#16,#17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15: The bereavement care plan contained tasks of sending 6 and 9 month newsletters and support group invitations. There was no evidence the 6 and 9 month tasks were completed. Patients 16,17: The bereavement care plans contained tasks of a 6 month phone call, and 3 and 6 month newsletters and support group invitations. There was no evidence the 3 and 6 month tasks were completed.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to patient needs. Patient 3: The aide care plan did not include instructions for level of transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency had a volunteer utilization rate of 3% for 2023.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 16 (Personnel #5,#10) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 5,10: There was no evidence of an initial skills competency assessment.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Medical director contract (42 CFR 418.102(a))

    “Upon contract review, 1 of 5 (Hospice Physician contract) did not have evidence of a contract to fulfill the role of alternate medical director. The contract was for Hospice Physician and did not outline responsibilities to assume obligations of the medical director as needed.”

    Rule L0666. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #3,#7,#10,#14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 3,10,14: The medical record contained an election form identifying the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items was requested upon admission. There was no evidence the information was provided as requested. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained an election form identifying the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items was requested upon admission 4/29/24. There was no evidence the information was provided as requested.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient 4: There was no evidence of attending physician signature on the initial CTI prior to billing. The CTI on file was signed by a NP instead of the attending physician elected by the patient upon admission. Corrected on site with signature obtained. Agency notified compliance to address billing.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 19: There was no evidence of an order to discharge the patient for extended prognosis. Corrected on site with late data entry.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #13) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel 13: There was no evidence of a criminal background check completed.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. In the absence of state requirements, criminal background checks are obtained within three months of the date of employment for all states that the individual has lived or worked in the past 3 years. Personnel 5: There was no evidence of a background check completed.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 10, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 5, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 6% at home, 75% in assisted living, 19% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death97.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Cynthia Fisher (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Tracy Lynn Rosinski (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.47% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54937, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.