Hearth Record

Providence at Home With Compassus, Snohomish County

A hospice in Everett, Washington 98203

1615 75th St SW Ste 210, Everett, Washington 98203. (425) 261-4800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

1 deficiency cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 98203 had 2.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 26, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 26, 2024: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,192 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to follow the plan of care (POC) relative to hospice aides (HA) visit frequencies and failed to notify the patient and/or their representatives of HA missed visits for 14 of 42 patients (Patient #119, Patient #128, Patient #130, Patient #131, Patient #132, Patient #133, Patient #134, Patient #135, Patient #137, Patient #138, Patient #139, Patient #140, Patient #141, and Patient #142). Failure to follow the POC and communicate with the patient and/or their representatives of changes to the POC may potentially have a clinical impact on the patients wellbeing. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agencys policy titled, “;Plan of Care”, (Date Revision: 07/2023) showed that the POC specifies the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and family-specific needs. 2. Record review of patient records for 14 of 42 patients (Patient #119, Patient #128, Patient #130, Patient #131, Patient #132, Patient #133, Patient #134, Patient #135, Patient #137, Patient #138, Patient #139, Patient #140, Patient #141, and Patient #142) showed: a. Patient #119s election date was on 07/11/24. Hospice aide (HA) services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 12 weeks starting 07/14/24. On 07/24/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. There was no other documentation to show that the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. b. Patient #128s election date was 07/08/20. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 visits every week for 5 weeks starting 07/07/20. The records showed the following HA missed visit showed: i. On 07/30/20, a missed visit note showed visit was declined. ii. On 09/03/24, a missed visit note showed visit was declined. There was no other documentation to show who declined the missed visits and that the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. c. Patient #130s election date was 12/16/23. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 8 weeks starting 08/11/23. On 07/02/23, a missed visit note showed a missed HA visit. There was no other documentation to show that the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. d. Patient #131s election date was 08/27/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 13 weeks starting 08/27/24. On 09/06/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict, visit not made. There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. e. Patient #132s election date was 07/30/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 10 weeks starting 08/18/24. The record showed the following missed visits: i. On 08/27/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict, visit was not made. ii. On 09/03/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict. There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. f. Patient #133s election date was 07/01/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 12 weeks starting 07/02/24. On 08/02/24, a missed visit note showed regular hospice aide day off. There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. g. Patient #134s election date was 06/09/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 12 weeks starting 06/10/24. On 07/24/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. h. Patient #135s election date was 06/13/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 13 weeks starting 06/14/24. The record showed the following missed visits: i. On 07/25/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. ii. On 08/26/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. iii. On 09/06/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. iv. On 09/11/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. i. Patient #137s election date was 03/16/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 9 weeks starting 03/18/24. The record showed the following missed visits: i. On 05/05/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict. ii. On 07/03/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict. iii. On 07/24/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict. iv. On 08/28/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. j. Patient #138s election date was 04/30/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 visits every week for 7 weeks starting 05/15/24. The record showed the following missed visits: i. On 05/07/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. ii. On 05/16/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. iii. On 05/20/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. iv. On 05/23/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. v. On 05/27/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. vi. On 07/22/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. There was no other documentation to show who declined the missed visits and that the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. k. Patient #139s election date was 08/6/23. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 visits every week for 8 weeks starting 06/02/24. The record showed the following missed visits: i. On 07/05/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. ii. On 07/30/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. There was no other documentation to show who declined the missed visits and that the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. l. Patient #140s election date was 06/17/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 12 weeks starting 06/18/24. The record showed the following missed visits: i. On 07/24/24, a missed visit note showed visit discrepancy. ii. On 07/30/24, a missed visit note showed visit declined. There was no other documentation to show who declined the missed visit and that the HA missed visits were communicated to the patient and/or their representative. m. Patient #141s election date was 03/07/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 13 weeks starting 06/25/24. On 07/24/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict. There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. n. Patient #142s election date was 08/17/24. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 visit every week for 13 weeks starting 08/18/24. On 09/04/24, a missed visit note showed scheduling conflict, visit was not made. There was no other documentation to show the HA missed visit was communicated to the patient and/or their representative. 3. On 09/26/24 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agencys Hospice Director (Staff #104) regarding the HA missed visit notes. Staff #104 acknowledged the findings and was unable to provide documentation to show that the patient and/or their representative were contacted regarding their missed visits.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 26, 2024Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 10, 1987.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 80% at home, 13% in assisted living, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.2%
Visits near death88.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Cp Snohomish Co WA Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Feb 27, 2025.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: John Cullen (corporate officer); Catherine Sloan (corporate officer); Russell G Adkins (corporate officer); Terri P Warren (corporate officer); Patricia D Zimburean (managing employee (under contract)); Cheryl Cline (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Asselta (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cp WA Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 27, 2025
Cp Snohomish Co WA Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Feb 27, 2025
Providence Health & ServicesOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 27, 2025
Compassus Providence Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 27, 2025
Providence St. Joseph HealthOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 27, 2025
Providence Health & Services - WashingtonOwns 5% or more through other companies95.2%Feb 27, 2025
Compassus Parent, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies50%Mar 1, 2025
Fc Compassus LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies50%Mar 1, 2025
Compassus Holdings LPOwns 5% or more through other companies50%Mar 1, 2025
Compassus Intermediate Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies50%Mar 1, 2025
Ti V Asc Compassus Investment Aggregator LPOwns 5% or more through other companies48.75%Mar 1, 2025
Ti V Compassus Investment Aggregator, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies24.92%Mar 1, 2025
Ascension Towerbrook Healthcare Opportunties LPOwns 5% or more through other companies23.82%Mar 1, 2025
Ascension Health AllianceOwns 5% or more through other companies23.81%Mar 1, 2025
Ascension Capital LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies23.8%Mar 3, 2025
Towerbrook Investors V (Onshore) LPOwns 5% or more through other companies14.98%Mar 1, 2025
Towerbrook Investors V 892 LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.11%Mar 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.73% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 48.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 98203, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2.5; this one had 1.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.