Hearth Record

Bristol Hospice

A hospice in Hood River, Oregon 97031

407 Portway Avenue, Suite 201, Hood River, Oregon 97031. (541) 386-1942.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 97031 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 17, 2025: a complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 13, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 552 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 7 of 18 (39%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the patient’s election of hospice care. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/31/2024. The Registered Nurse (RN) initial assessment documented, “Patient willing to meet with Spiritual Counselor (SC).” The interdisciplinary group (IDG) notes dated 11/06/2024 (six (6) days after the election of hospice care) documented the SC “Attempted to notify family - awaiting a callback.” A clinical record review revealed no evidence the SC or Social Worker completed an initial assessment of the patient no later than 5 days after the election of hospice care. There was no evidence that the patient refused SW services. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/29/2024. The SW completed the patient’s initial assessment on 06/04/2024, six (6) days after the election of hospice care. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of the SC initial assessment being completed and no documentation that the patient/family refused or requested a delay in the SC initial assessment. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/16/2024. The SC completed the initial spiritual assessment on 07/22/2024, six (6) days after the election of hospice care. A clinical record review revealed no documentation that the patient/family refused or requested a delay in the SC initial assessment. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/02/2024. The SC and SW initial assessments were completed on 07/08/2024 (six (6) days after the election of hospice care) and 07/09/2024 (seven (7) days after the election of hospice care), respectively. A clinical record review revealed no documentation that the patient/family refused or requested a delay in the SC or SW initial assessments. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11//21/2024. The SC initial assessment was completed on 11/29/2024 (eight (8) days after the election of hospice care). There was no evidence the SW initial assessment was completed. A clinical record review revealed no documentation that the patient/family refused or requested a delay in the SC or SW initial assessments. Clinical Record 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/02/2024. There was no evidence the SW initial assessment was completed. A clinical record review revealed no documentation that the patient/family refused or requested a delay in the SW initial assessment. Clinical Record 19: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/25/2024. There was no evidence the SW initial assessment was completed. A clinical record review revealed no documentation that the patient/family refused or requested a delay in the SW initial assessment. During an interview on 12/13/2024, the Executive Director and Clinical Supervisor confirmed that the IDG did not complete an initial comprehensive assessment within five calendar days after the election of hospice care and did not document that the patient and/or family/caregiver refused or delayed the initial assessments.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 453 words

    “It is required that hospice aides must report changes in the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and/or social needs to a registered nurse as the changes relate to the plan of care and any quality assessment and improvement activities. The hospice aide must also complete appropriate records of service, including the report of changes in the patient’s needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 8 (38%) clinical records reviewed of patients receiving Hospice Aide services with changes related to the plan of care, the agency did not ensure the Hospice Aide (HHA) reported changes in the patient’s needs to the Registered Nurse (RN). Clinical Record 1: The patient elected hospice care on 10/31/2024 with the diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. The plan of care ordered HHA services two (2) times per week. The HHA care plan dated 11/03/2024 assigned the HHA the relevant task: seated shower. The aide visit note dated 12/06/2024 reported the patient refused the “seated shower.” A clinical record review revealed no evidence the HHA reported the change related to the HHA care plan with the patient refusing the “seated shower” to the RN. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected hospice care on 06/12/2024 with the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The plan of care ordered HHA services one (1) time per week. The HHA care plan dated 06/16/2024 assigned the HHA the relevant tasks: bed bath, comb or brush hair, and fingernail care every visit. The HHA visit note dated 06/18/2024 documented that the patient refused the bed bath, comb or brush hair, and fingernail care. A clinical record review revealed no evidence the HHA reported the change related to the HHA care plan with the patient refusing the bed bath, comb or brush hair, and fingernail care to the RN. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected hospice care on 12/22/2023 with the diagnosis of unspecified dementia and unspecified severity with anxiety. The plan of care ordered HHA services two (2) times per week. The HHA care plan dated 06/04/2024 assigned the HHA the relevant tasks: fingernail care, and remove soiled arm sleeves, and replace with clean every visit. The HHA visit note dated 06/13/2024 documented the patient refused the tasks of fingernail care and removing soiled arm sleeves. A clinical record review revealed no evidence the HHA reported the change related to the HHA care plan with the patient refusing the fingernail care and soiled sleeve removal and replacement to the RN. The Executive Director and Clinical Supervisor confirmed in an interview on 12/13/2024 that the aide had not reported the changes in the patient’s needs and care plan to the RN as the changes related to the aide’s care plan.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed of patients who revoked the hospice benefit or were no longer terminally ill, the agency did not ensure a copy of the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/20/2024. On 07/26/2024, the patient’s family decided to transfer the patient to the hospital to pursue aggressive treatment and revoke the hospice benefit. A clinical record review revealed no evidence the discharge summary was forwarded to the physician. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2023, revoked the hospice benefit, and was discharged as no longer terminally ill on 06/15/2024. A clinical record review revealed no evidence the discharge summary was forwarded to the physician. During an interview on 12/13/2024, the Executive Director and Clinical Supervisor confirmed that the agency did not forward a copy of the discharge summary to the patient’s attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 17, 2025Complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Dec 13, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 1, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 40% in assisted living, 5% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.1%
Visits near death94.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Bristol Hospice, L.L.C. owns 100% directly since Dec 30, 2021.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate officer, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate director, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate officer, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate director, 0%); Michael Derrick (corporate officer, 0%); Betty J Brennan (corporate director, 0%); Hyrum Kirton (corporate director, 0%); Breanna Lind (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jordan Nagle (managing employee (under contract)); David A Malm (corporate officer, 0%); David A Malm (corporate director, 0%).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bristol Hospice Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2021
Bristol Ultimate Holdco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2021
Bristol Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 30, 2021
Bristol Hospice Topco Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2021
Webster Equity Partners Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies69.8%Sep 1, 2023
Aware Super Pty, Ltd.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.28%Jan 24, 2022
Webster Equity Partners IV Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.72%Dec 30, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97031, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 97031
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Bristol Hospice This hospice3
Providence Hospice6

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.