Hearth Record

Trinity Hospice

A hospice in Richmond, Virginia 23236

804 Moorefield Park Drive, Suite 305, Richmond, Virginia 23236. (804) 613-4529.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 23236 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 9, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 9, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #7,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 7,11: There is no evidence of a comprehensive spiritual assessment within 5 days of admission. Patient 7: Patient was admitted on 08/06/2024. Initial comprehensive psychosocial assessment dated 08/12/2024, outside of initial 5 days of admission.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 302 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #7,8,10,11,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 7: Patient with physician’s order for continuous oxygen at 2LPM via nasal cannula on plan of care. There is no evidence of oxygen on the medication list. The following medications are on medication list without evidence of indication for medications: Vitamin D2 50,000 international units by mouth weekly. Sertraline 100mg by mouth daily. Topiramate 100mg by mouth twice daily. Pregabalin 100mg by mouth daily. Ezetimibe 10mg by mouth daily. Patient 8: Patient with physician’s order for PRN oxygen at 2LPM via nasal cannula on plan of care. There is no evidence of oxygen on the medication list. The following medications are on medication list without evidence of indication for medications: Baclofen 10mg by mouth three times daily. Senokot 8.6mg by mouth daily. Patient 10: The following medications are on medication list without evidence of indication for medications: Levothyroxine 25mcg by mouth daily. Acetaminophen 500mg/15mL; take 30mL by mouth three times daily. Prolia 6mg/mL; inject 1mL subcutaneously every six months. Patient 11: The following medication is on medication list without evidence of indication for medication: Gabapentin 100mg by mouth three times daily. Lactulose 10Gm/15mL is on medication list with conflicting order as reads: 15mL by mouth daily every three days. There is no evidence of indication for this medication. Patient 12: The following medication is on medication list without evidence of indication for medication: Melatonin 3mg by mouth daily at bedtime.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 8: There is no evidence of comprehensive bereavement assessment within 5 days of admission.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2,3,7,11,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: Patient with active pain plan of care including problems, goals, and interventions. Patient’s documented pain goal in this plan of care is “-- /10.” There is no evidence of individualized pain goal in this plan of care. Patient 3: Patient with active pain plan of care including problems, goals, and interventions. Patient’s documented pain goal in this plan of care is “--/10.” There is no evidence of individualized pain goal in the pain plan of care. Patient with active integumentary plan of care including problems, goals, and interventions. This includes intervention: “Measures to prevent skin breakdown <SPECIFY>.” There is no evidence of individualized integumentary intervention in this plan of care. Patient 7: Patient has the following problems documented in the medical record during nursing visit dated 08/06/2024: edema, irregular heart rate, dyspnea. There is no evidence of plans of care including problems, goals, and interventions for these documented problems. Patient 11: Patient has active safety/falls plan of care including problems, goals, and interventions. One of the interventions included in this plan of care is, “Assist with transfers (specify).” There is no evidence of individualized transfer assist intervention in the safety plan of care. Patient 14: Patient’s fall risk was assessed as high during admission assessment and recertification assessment. There is no evidence of a safety/falls plan of care including problems, goals, and interventions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #3,6,11,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3:Patient has active wound plan of care with documented wound treatment on plan of care as, “wound care as prescribed <SPECIFY>.” There is no evidence of individualized prescribed wound care. Patient has active cardiac plan of care with included intervention is supplemental oxygen. This patient has no evidence of a physician’s order for oxygen. Patient 6: Patient has active cardiac plan of care with included intervention of supplemental oxygen. This patient has no evidence of a physician’s order for oxygen. Patient 11: Patient has active wound plan of care with documented wound treatment on plan of care as, “wound care as prescribed <SPECIFY>.” There is no evidence of individualized prescribed wound care. Patient 14: Patient has active cardiac plan of care with included intervention of supplemental oxygen. This patient has no evidence of a physician’s order for oxygen.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 6: 08/02/2024 physician’s order states wheelchair as tolerated with max assist for transfers. There is no evidence of wheelchair DME order in the patient’s plan of care. Patient 7: 08/06/2024 physician’s order includes hospital bed and overbed table. There is no evidence of these DME orders in the patient’s plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 3: There is documentation in the medical record that patient’s wounds were healed as of nursing assessment dated 09/30/2024. There is no evidence of updated wound plans of care, reflecting these healed wounds.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 413 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,7,9,10,12,13) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: Patient seen by massage therapist on dates: 07/30/2024, 08/13/2024, 09/19/2024. There is no evidence of a physician’s visit frequency order for this discipline in the plan of care. Patient 3: Patient was seen by massage therapist on 09/18/2024. There is no evidence of a physician’s visit frequency order for this discipline in the plan of care. Patient 4: Patient was seen by massage therapist on 09/18/2024. There is no evidence of a physician’s visit frequency order for this discipline in the plan of care. Patient admitted on 08/31/2024 with physician’s visit frequency order for SN of twice weekly. There is evidence of only one SN visit this week, dated 08/31/2024. Patient 7: There is an active Physician order 08/06/24 with visit frequency orders-once a month and 3 as needed. There is no evidence of any spiritual care visits made to this patient since admission. There is documentation on 08/22/2024 IDT that chaplain services have been declined. Patient 9: Physician’s order for visit frequencies as of 05/30/2024 for complementary therapies: Music therapy-4 times monthly. Massage therapy-4 times monthly. Documented music therapy visits: 08/07/2024, 08/20/2024, 08/29/2024, 09/11/2024, 09/18/2024, 09/25/2024. There is no evidence of fourth August or September music therapy visit. Documented massage therapy visits: 08/05/2024, 08/13,2024, 08/29/2024, 09/17/2024, 09/30/2024. There is no evidence of fourth August massage therapy visit. There is evidence of only two massage therapy visits in September. Physician’s order for volunteer visit frequency is twice monthly and 3 PRN. Documented volunteer visits: 07/11/2024, 09/17/2024. Documented volunteer coordinator visits: 08/14/2024, 08/30/2024. There is no evidence of second September volunteer visit. Patient 10: Physician’s order for visit frequency for massage therapy 07/15/2024 to 10/01/2024 is twice monthly. There is evidence of only one documented visit in August, dated 08/21/2024. Patient 12: Physician’s order for spiritual care visit frequency, dated 07/03/2024 is once monthly and 3 as needed. Documented September visits made 09/09/2024, and 09/23/2024. There is no evidence of documentation that either visit was PRN. Physician’s order for massage therapy visit frequency, dated 07/03/2024 is twice monthly. There is no evidence of massage therapy visits documented in patient’s medical record. Patient 13: Physician’s order for massage therapy visit frequency was discontinued on 08/14/2024. New order written 10/07/2024 for twice monthly. There is evidence of documented massage therapy visit made 09/11/2024.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #3,4) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 3: Physician’s order for hospice aide visit frequency, dated 06/17/2024 is twice weekly. On 08/13/2024 and 08/20/2024, there are documented missed visits. There were also visits made on these dates. There is no evidence of second visits made these weeks. Patient 4: Patient was admitted 08/31/2024. Physician’s order for hospice aide visit frequency written on this date for twice weekly. There is no evidence of any documented hospice aide visits made until 09/10/2024. There are two documented missed visits, dated 09/03/2024 and 09/05/2024.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #3,8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 3: There is documentation of a hospice aide supervisory visit made on 08/27/2024 and 09/12/2024, which is 16 days apart. There is no evidence of a supervisory visit made within 14 days during this period. Patient 8: There is no evidence in the patient’s medical record of a documented hospice aide supervisory visit made since 09/23/2024.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 9, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 16, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 24% at home, 45% in assisted living, 28% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4%
Visits near death82.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Mcardle Healthcare Services LLC owns 94% directly since Jan 1, 2024; Seniors Angel LLC owns 6% directly since Jan 1, 2024.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Bridget P Mcardle (owns 5% or more through other companies, 47%); William L Mcardle (owns 5% or more through other companies, 47%); Shannon Jones (owns 5% or more through other companies, 6%); Jason C Evers (managing employee (under contract)); William L Mcardle (corporate officer); Kristen Charpentier (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
William L Mcardle and Angela Pope Mcardle Family Living TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 17, 2021
Mcardle Healthcare Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly94%Jan 1, 2024
Seniors Angel LLCOwns 5% or more directly6%Jan 1, 2024

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.56% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 49.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23236, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.