Hearth Record

Amedisys Hospice Care

A hospice in Chesapeake, Virginia 23320

814 Greenbrier Circle Ste F, Chesapeake, Virginia 23320. (757) 405-3203.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 23320 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 11, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 11, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not contain a current/comprehensive Medication Profile: Patient #11: The RN 08/13/25 SOC documentation included, “Recent laceration to right forehead, with x7 resulting stitches. Now open to the air, with the application of topical ATB by caregiver.” This topical ATB Ointment was not added to the Medication Profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had been designated to ensure the continuous ongoing assessment of the patient and family’s needs, and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family: Patient #11: The RN 08/13/25 SOC documentation included, “Recent laceration to right forehead, with x7 resulting stitches. Now open to the air, with the application of topical ATB by caregiver.” The next subsequent SN visits dated 08/14 and 08/20/25 did not document a nurses assessment of this area of concern.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #2, 7, and 9) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had developed an individualized written Plan of Care for each patient. The Plan of Care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The Plan of Care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions: Patient #2: SOC 02/20/25. The record contains a completed DPOA-Medical form. This Advance Directive information is not included on either the POC dated 08/19-10/17/25, nor the IDG POC dated 09/03/25. Patient #7: The 08/19/25 SOC CTI reflected that the patient was a DNR; with a copy of a Virginia State DNR form dated 08/19/25 within the clinical record. However, the 09/03/25 IDG POC only contained the Advance Directive of Living Will, and not the DNR status of this patient. Patient #9: The record contained both a completed Living Will and a DPOA-Medical form. However, these Advance Directive(s) information is not included on either the POC beginning 08/14/25, nor the IDG POC dated 09/02/25.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: A detailed statement of both the scope and frequency of the services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs: Patient #13: A verbal order was obtained on 08/28/25 for, “Volunteer requested. Effective 09/01/25 Volunteer 1x per month x1.” Both the 90-day 08/20/25 SOC POC, and the 09/02/25 IDG POC included the following, “Volunteer services available as needed: (delete those services not applicable). 1) Companion; 2) House chores; 3) Emotional/Spiritual support; 4) Telephone contact; 5) Music Therapy; 6) Food preparation; 7) Caregiver respite; 8) Shopping errands; 9) Oral History/Memory Project; and 10)Veteran activities. This potential scope of Volunteer services had not been individualized. Additionally, the 09/02/25 IDG POC did not include a planned/ordered Volunteer frequency.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not contain a Plan of Care which included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments: Patient #1: Both the Hospice POC dated 08/20-11/17/25, and the IDG POC dated 09/03/25, included, “Foley 16 F/10cc. SN to perform insertion.” This is an incomplete order as it does not include a date or frequency at which the ordering Physician is wanting the Foley inserted and/or re-placed.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #8) did not contain evidence that an Aide Skills Competency evaluation had been conducted per CMS guidelines: Personnel #8: DOH was 08/27/24. Multiple Aide skills/tasks were evaluated for competence on 09/06/2024 and 09/20/24. However, the following skill/tasks were not evaluated: Sponge, tub, and shower bath.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, and interview with the Administrator, there was not evidence of the use of Volunteers, providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services, in an amount that at a minimum equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid Hospice employees and contract personnel. The Volunteer Report for Calendar Year 2024 reflected a 3.2% rate.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 309 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice assumes responsibility for professional management of the resident’s hospice services in accordance with the hospice plan of care. The hospice is responsible for providing all hospice services including: • Ongoing assessment, care planning, monitoring, coordination and provision of care by the Hospice IDG • Assessment, coordination and provision of any needed general inpatient or continuous care • Consultation about the patient’s care with facility staff • Coordination by the hospice RN for the implementation of the plan of care for the patient • Provision of hospice aide services, if these services are determined necessary by the IDG to supplement the nurse aide services provided by the facility • Provision, in a timely manner, of all supplies, medications, and DME needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions • Financial management responsibility for all medical supplies, appliances, medications and biologicals related to the terminal illness and related conditions • Determination of the appropriate level of care to be given to the patient (routine homecare, inpatient, or continuous care) • Arranging any necessary transfers from the facility, in consultation with the facility personnel Patient #3: The IDG POC dated 09/03/25 included, “Oxygen 4 lpm for shortness of breath.” The SN’s SNF visit note of 09/05/25 documents that, “Patient is using 5.5 lpm of Oxygen upon SN arrival.” The subsequent 09/06, 09/07, and 09/08/25 SNV’s also document the patient actively using Oxygen at 5 lpm. There was no documentation at any four of these SN visits of care coordination with the SNF staff, to clarify the variance of the Oxygen dosage. During surveyor record review on 09/10/25, the Hospice contacted the SNF, and was told that the SNF had received a Physician order to increase Oxygen to 5-7 lpm on 09/04/2025.”

    Rule L0762. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #8) did not contain evidence of Criminal Background Checks having been obtained in accordance with Virginia State requirements as follows: A. Section 32.1-162.9:1 of the Code of Virginia requires Hospice providers, as defined in § 32.1-162.1 of the Code of Virginia, to obtain a criminal record report on applicants for compensated employment from the Virginia Department of State Police. Section 32.1-162.9:1 also requires that all applicants for compensated employment in a Hospice program provide a sworn statement regarding their criminal history. B. The criminal record report shall be obtained within 30 days of compensated employment. It is the Hospice program’s responsibility to ensure that its compensated employees have not been convicted of any of the barrier crimes listed in § 32.1-162.9:1 of the Code of Virginia. C. The Hospice program shall not accept a criminal record report dated more than 90 days prior to the date of compensated employment. D. Only the original criminal record report shall be accepted. Personnel #8: DOH was 08/27/24. The Hospice was not able to locate documented evidence of his having had a Virginia State CBC conducted.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 11, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 21, 2011.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 12% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 4% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12.8%
Visits near death96.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Compassionate Care Hospice Group Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 1, 2019.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Dharmesh K Shah (managing employee (under contract)); Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Stephanie Wilson-Adda (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stephanie Wilson-Adda (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2019
Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2019
Compassionate Care Hospice Group Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 1, 2019
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2019

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.82% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 89.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23320, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.