Thousand Oaks Hospice Care Inc.
A hospice in Dallas, Texas 75226
2550 Pacific Ave Ste 700 Ofc 739, Dallas, Texas 75226. (800) 978-0402.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 11 hospices serving ZIP code 75226 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 21, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 21, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 295 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 9 (Patient # 2, 3, 9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: The medication list dated 08/13/26 recorded both Tylenol and Tramadol PRN pain with no evidence found of clarification of when to administer each medication based on pain severity or numeric rating. Further, the comprehensive assessment dated 08/13/26 detailed the use of oxygen @ 2LPM. The medication list did not record oxygen. Patient 3: The medication list recorded, “Miralax 17g powder 1 scoop oral daily PRN constipation.” There was no further evidence of clarification that the medication should be mixed with a diluent for administration. Patient 9: The medication list dated 03/09/26 recorded, “Atropine Sulfate 1% ophthalmic solution 3 drops ophthalmic every four hours as needed for excessive secretions.” There was no evidence of further clarification of the need for oral administration of this medication for the intended purpose. Also, the medication list recorded the pain medications Tramadol PRN and Tylenol with Codeine PRN, with no further clarification on when to administer each medication based on pain severity or numeric rating. In addition, oxygen 2-5 LPM was recorded, with no further directions on the method of administration (nasal cannula or facemask). The medication list effective 06/01/26 contained all of the aforementioned items with the addition of Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen PRN and Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml PRN pain with no clarification of when to administer each medication based on pain severity or numeric rating.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient # 2) did not have evidence that the plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions which including interventions to manage pain and symptoms. Patient 2: The comprehensive assessment dated 08/13/26 as well as the active medications present of the medication list detail pain as an ongoing problem for the patient. The plan of care did not contain any problems, interventions, or goals related to pain.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 270 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 9 (Patient # 2, 3, 9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The plan of care dated 08/13/26 recorded both Tylenol and Tramadol PRN Pain with no evidence found of clarification of when to administer each medication based on pain severity or numeric rating. Further, the comprehensive assessment dated 08/13/26 detailed the use of oxygen @ 2LPM. The plan of care did not record oxygen use. Patient 3: The plan of care dated 03/11/26 recorded, “Miralax 17g powder 1 scoop oral daily PRN constipation.” There was no further evidence of clarification that the medication should be mixed with a diluent for administration. Patient 9: The plan of care dated 03/09/26 recorded, “Atropine Sulfate 1% ophthalmic solution 3 drops ophthalmic every four hours as needed for excessive secretions.” There was no evidence of further clarification of the need for oral administration of this medication for the intended purpose. Also, the plan of care listed the pain medications Tramadol PRN and Tylenol with Codeine PRN, with no further clarification on when to administer each medication based on pain severity or numeric rating. In addition, oxygen 2-5 LPM was recorded, with no further directions on the method of administration (nasal cannula or facemask). The plan of care effective 06/01/26 contained all of the aforementioned items with the addition of Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen PRN and Morphine Sulfate20mg/ml PRN pain with no clarification of when to administer each medication based on pain severity or numeric rating.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 119 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient # 2, 9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: The Comprehensive assessment dated 08/13/26 documented the use of a wheelchair and shower chair with a nebulizer and oxygen concentrator needed. The plans of care dated 08/13/26 did not contain these equipment needs. Patient 9: The Comprehensive assessment dated 03/09/26 and the recertification visit dated 06/03/26 documented the use of a hospital bed, shower chair, bedside commode, oxygen concentrator and e-tank. The plans of care dated 03/09/26, 06/01/26, and 06/15/26 did not contain these equipment needs.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“Upon client record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The Initial Plan of Care developed 06/12/26 contained a visit frequency for aide visits only. The skilled nurse made a visit on 06/13/26. There was no evidence found of any supplemental physician order or plan of care update to reflect visits performed. Patient 3: The Initial Plan of Care developed 03/11/26 contained a visit frequency for SC and MSW only. The skilled nurse made visits on 03/12/26, 03/16/26, and 03/19/26. There was no evidence found of any supplemental physician order or plan of care update to reflect visits performed.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 157 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient # 1) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: The aide assignment sheet present in the EMR dated 06/12/26 did not contain information related to the patient’s need for oxygen as needed or the need for oxygen precautions.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 171 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 9 (Patient # 1, 9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1:All plans of care in the medical record listed the aide frequency as twice per week. The patient received aide services 5 days per week beginning 06/15/26 through 08/14/26. No evidence was found of a supplemental order or a plan of care update authorizing this aide frequency. Patient 9: The plan of care dated 05/18/26 recorded an aide frequency of 3 times weekly. There was only one aide visit provided the week of 06/21/26 with no evidence found of refused visits by the patient or family. There are no supplemental orders found to discontinue aide services and all updated plans of care through patient discharge contained this aide visit frequency.”
-
Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. There were no volunteer hours documented for calendar year 2025.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Upon patient client record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1, 3) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 1: The election statement dated 06/12/26 did not include the patient’s or representative’s choice of attending physician or an acknowledgment that the attending physician was his or her choice. Patient 3: The election statement dated 03/11/26 did not contain evidence the patient elected or declined to receive the “Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 10 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 29, 2023.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Ekaterina Apoyan (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Ekaterina Apoyan (corporate officer, 50%); Ekaterina Apoyan (corporate director, 50%); Onik Oganesyan (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); Onik Oganesyan (corporate officer, 49%); Onik Oganesyan (corporate director, 49%); Armen Hagopjanian (owns 5% or more directly, 1%); Kelly D Grimes (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Mary Kelian (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 11 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75226, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 10.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Thousand Oaks Hospice Care Inc. This hospice | 10 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas LP | 15 |
| VNA | 1 |
| Faith Presbyterian Hospice | 37 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 8 |
| Cornerstone Hospice Care LLC | 0 |
| Three Oaks Hospice | 3 |
| Holy Savior Hospice | 5 |
| Reliant at Home Hospice | 8 |
| Harbor Hospice of Longview LP | 13 |
| Completetx Hospice | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.