Acara Hospice
A hospice in College Station, Texas 77845
601 Graham Rd, College Station, Texas 77845. (979) 661-7272.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 5of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 77845 had 3.5.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 14, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 14, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #5: The record indicated the start of care was on 04/26/24. There was no evidence of the psychosocial comprehensive assessment completed within 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care; psychosocial assessment was completed on 5/2/24.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #2: The record indicated the patients start of care was on 06/29/24. There was no evidence of the psychosocial comprehensive assessment at the time of the survey.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 375 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1, #3, #5, #6, #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: The medication administration record indicated Morphine 10mg/0.5ml (0.25-1.0 ml) Q1hour prn Pain/SOB. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing. COS. In addition: Lorazepam was listed on the medication administration record, it was indicated as 0.5mg 1-4 tabs po Q2hours prn anxiety/dyspnea. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing and or no max dose was listed. i.e. 12mg/24 hours. COS. Patient #3: The medication administration record indicated Morphine 10mg/0.5ml (0.25-1.0 ml) Q1hour prn Pain/SOB. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing. COS. In addition: Lorazepam was listed on the medication administration record, it was indicated as 0.5mg 1-4 tabs po Q4hours prn anxiety/dyspnea. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing and or no max dose was listed. i.e. 12mg/24 hours. COS. Patient #5: The medication administration record indicated Oxygen 1-10 lpm continuously; There was no evidence of the route of administration and or no parameters for this liter flow titration. In addition: The MAR indicated Senna S 1 - 4 tabs po as needed for constipation. There was no evidence of parameters for the Senna S dosing. COS. Patient #6: The medication administration record indicated Acetaminophen 650mg Suppository PR Q6hours prn, Tylenol ES 500mg 1-2 tab po Q6hours prn pain/temp, and Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs twice a day for pain. There were duplicated orders of each medication and no evidence of a maximum dose to not exceed 4000 mg daily. COS. Patient #7: The medication administration record indicated Oxygen 1-5 lpm. There was no evidence of a route for administration and or parameters. COS. In addition, Acetaminophen was ordered 650mg PR Q4hours prn fever/temp & pain, along with an order for Acetaminophen 500mg po Q8hours for pain, there was no maximum dose to not exceed 4000 mg daily. COS.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 149 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #2, #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #2: The record indicated the patients start of care was on 06/29/24. There was no evidence of a bereavement risk assessment at the time of the survey. Patient #5: The record indicated the patients start of care was on 04/26/24. There was no evidence of a bereavement risk assessment being completed within 5 calendar days from the election date of hospice care; it was completed on 5/2/24.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 102 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 record reviewed (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #10: The record indicated the patients was placed in respite care. There was no evidence of problems/goals/interventions being specified in the plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 329 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1, #3, #5, #6, #7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The MD order indicated Morphine 10mg/0.5ml (0.25-1.0 ml) Q1hour prn Pain/SOB. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing. COS. In addition: Lorazepam was ordered as 0.5mg 1-4 tabs po Q2hours prn anxiety/dyspnea. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing and or no max dose was listed. i.e. 12mg/24 hours. COS. Patient #3: The MD order indicated Morphine 10mg/0.5ml (0.25-1.0 ml) Q1hour prn Pain/SOB. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing. COS. In addition: Lorazepam was ordered as 0.5mg 1-4 tabs po Q4hours prn anxiety/dyspnea. There was no evidence of parameters for this dosing and or no max dose was listed. i.e. 12mg/24 hours. COS. Patient #5: The MD order indicated Oxygen 1-10 lpm continuously; There was no evidence of the route of administration and or no parameters for this liter flow titration. In addition: The MD order for Senna S was written for 1 - 4 tabs po as needed for constipation. There was no evidence of parameters for the Senna S dosing. COS. Patient #6: The MD order was written for Acetaminophen 650mg Suppository PR Q6hours prn, Tylenol ES 500mg 1-2 tab po Q6hours prn pain/temp, and Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs twice a day for pain. There were duplicated orders for each of the three orders and no evidence a maximum dose to not exceed 4000 mg daily. COS. Patient #7: The MD order indicated Oxygen 1-5 lpm. There was no evidence of a route for administration and or parameters. COS. In addition, Acetaminophen was ordered 650mg PR Q4hours prn fever/temp & pain, along with an order for Acetaminophen 500mg po Q8hours for pain, there was no maximum dose to not exceed 4000 mg daily. COS.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #8: The record indicated an MD order on 1/18/24 for macrodantin 50 mg one tab po QDay. There was no evidence of progress towards outcome/goals in the plan of care. COS.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 146 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1: The aide was using a Hoyer lift, this was not on the aide plan of care. COS.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 163 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 19 record reviewed (Patient #1, #3) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1: The hospice aide care plan indicated for the patient to receive oral care and nail care. There was no evidence this was completed by the aide on 8/9/24. The aide did not report these task as not being completed to the RN. Patient #3: The hospice aide care plan indicted for the aide to chart the last BM, change the linens, complete a bed bath, nail and foot care and to shampoo on bath days. There was no evidence of these assigned task being completed on visit date 8/6/24 and no notification to the RN that these were not completed.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 Records Reviewed (Patient #16) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient #16: The record indicated the patient was discharged due to entering a non contracted facility. There was no evidence of a discharge order prior to the patient being discharged. COS.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #15) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #15: The record indicated the patient revoked hospice services on 06/12/24. There was no evidence of a discharge summary with all required elements having been sent to the attending physician.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #16: The record indicated a discharge but a discharge summary was generated with only a few check boxes. There was no evidence of a discharge summary to include all the requirements having been sent to the attending physician.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 12 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 29, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 46% at home, 37% in assisted living, 13% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 9.6% |
| Visits near death | 98.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Amber Macias (corporate director, 100%); Amber Macias (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Don R Bosse (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Stacey Rowse (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Stacey Rowse (corporate officer, 50%); Stacey Rowse (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Dana Rowse (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Dana Rowse (corporate officer, 50%); Dana Rowse (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 95% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 96.96% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77845, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 12.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Vitalcaring Group | 1 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas | 1 |
| Allumine Hospice | 9 |
| Acara Hospice This hospice | 12 |
| Remarkable Hospice | 2 |
| Enhabit Hospice | 1 |
| Luminos Hospice | Not given |
| Hospice Brazos Valley Inc. | 0 |
| Bluebonnet Health Services | 0 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 5 |
| Three Oaks Hospice | 6 |
| Remarkable Hospice | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.