Hearth Record

A Caring Touch Home Health Services & Hospice Care

A hospice in Lufkin, Texas 75901

4000 South Medford Drive Suite 9w, Lufkin, Texas 75901. (936) 632-9400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 15 hospices serving ZIP code 75901 had 3.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 29, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 15, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “It is required that the hospice must conduct and documents a patient-specific comprehensive assessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services, and the patient’s need for physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual care. The assessment includes all areas of hospice care related to the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL FINDING This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by a review of clinical records, interviews, document review and interviews which revealed the hospice: Failed to ensure that the psychosocial assessment was completed as part of the initial comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care {HCPC.9. I/L523; and Failed to ensure that the comprehensive assessment included the identification of the psychosocial and emotional needs related to the patient’s terminal illness to promote the patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process {HCPC.12. I/L524}. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the condition of participation CFR 418.54: Initial and comprehensive assessment of the patient. The deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients cared for by the agency.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 798 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 12 of 14 (86%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that a psychosocial assessment was completed as part of the initial comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. Policy PE. 3 Initial Patient Assessments/Patient Admission dated 06/15/2020 stated in part “The Initial Comprehensive Health Assessment, with input from appropriate IDT members and the attending physician, will be completed within 5 calendar days. Clinical Record 1: The election of hospice care was 05/04/2022. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 05/04/2022 which stated in part “unable to reach pt nor family for completion of initial assessment”. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 2: The election of hospice care was 11/22/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 11/22/2023. The psychosocial assessment was completed on 12/10/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 4: The election of hospice care was 01/30/2024. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 01/30/2024 which stated in part “Worker unable to visit on this date”. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 5: The election of hospice care was 03/29/2023. A psychosocial assessment was completed on 11/03/20223. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 6: The election of hospice care was 01/30/2024. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 01/30/2024 which stated in part “Worker unable to visit on this date”. The psychosocial assessment was completed on 02/17/2024. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 7: The election of hospice care was 03/29/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 8: The election of hospice care was 09/30/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 09/30/2023 which stated in part “patient was still in skilled nursing home”. The psychosocial assessment was completed on 11/11/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 9: The election of hospice care was 08/07/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 10: The election of hospice care was 11/24/2021. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 11: The election of hospice care was 12/28/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 12/28/2023 which stated in part “No answer to phone call”. The psychosocial assessment was completed on 01/06/2024. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 12: The election of hospice care was 06/27/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 06/27/2023 which stated in part “No answer to phone call”. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 13: The election of hospice care was 05/26/2022. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 5/26/2022 which stated in part “No response”. The clinical record lacked evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. During joint record review and interview on 03/13/2024, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed findings that clinical record 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, and 13 did not include evidence that a psychosocial assessment was completed as part of the initial comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 797 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the patient’s terminal illness that are addressed to promote the patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 12 of 14 (86%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included the identification of the psychosocial and emotional needs related to the patient’s terminal illness to promote the patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Policy PE.3 Initial Patient Assessments/Patient Admission dated 06/15/2020 stated in part “The Comprehensive Health Assessment will identify the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process.” Clinical Record 1: The election of hospice care was 05/04/2022. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 05/04/2022 which stated in part “unable to reach pt nor family for completion of initial assessment”. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 2: The election of hospice care was 11/22/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 11/22/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 4: The election of hospice care was 01/30/2024. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 01/30/2024 which stated in part “Worker unable to visit on this date”. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 5: The election of hospice care was 03/29/2023. A psychosocial assessment was completed on 11/03/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 6: The election of hospice care was 01/30/2024. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 01/30/2024 which stated in part “Worker unable to visit on this date”. A psychosocial assessment was completed on 02/17/2024. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 7: The election of hospice care was 08/24/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 8: The election of hospice care was 09/30/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 09/30/2023 which stated in part “patient was still in skilled nursing home”. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 9: The election of hospice care was 08/07/2023. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 10: The election of hospice care was 11/24/2021. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 11: The election of hospice care was 12/28/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 12/28/2023 which stated in part “No answer to phone call”. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 12: The election of hospice care was 06/27/2023. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 06/27/2023 which stated in part “No answer to phone call”. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 13: The election of hospice care was 05/26/2022. The clinical record included documentation for a missed medical social worker visit on 05/26/2022 which stated in part “No answer to phone call”. The clinical record lacked evidence that the psychosocial and emotional needs of the patient were assessed as part of the initial comprehensive assessments. During joint record review and interview on 03/13/2024, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed findings that clinical record 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, and 13 did not include evidence that psychosocial and emotional needs were assessed by a social worker and included as part of the initial comprehensive nursing assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 571 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient and family goals and identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 7 of 14 (50%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that an individualized written plan of care reflecting patient and family goals and interventions was developed based on the problems identified in the initial and comprehensive assessments. Policy PC.6 Care Planning Process dated 06/15/2020 stated in part “The IDT must develop an individualized written plan of care for each client. The plan of care must reflect client and family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments.” Clinical Record 3: The chaplain assessment completed on 02/06/2024 stated in part “Coping issues need to be addressed in future sessions.” The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address coping issues were included in the plan of care effective 02/07/2024. Clinical Record 4: The chaplain assessment completed on 01/30/2024 identified the patient and family’s request for prayer/meditation and that continuing care was needed. The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address prayer and meditation were included in the plan of care effective 02/07/2024. Clinical Record 6: The chaplain assessment completed on 02/04/2024 identified patient and family requests for life review, prayer/meditation, religious resource material, sacred reading, scripture, and spiritual support/counsel and that continuing care was needed. The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address life review, prayer/meditation, religious resource material, sacred reading, scripture, and spiritual support/counsel were included in the plan of care effective 02/07/2024. Clinical Record 7: The chaplain assessment completed on 08/26/2023 included documentation that stated in part “The patient/family requested a bible and verbalized that she loves to read the bible.” The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address requests were included in the plan of care effective 09/06/2023. Clinical Record 9: The chaplain assessment completed on 08/07/2023 identified the patient and family’s request for prayer/meditation and that continuing care was needed. The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address prayer and meditation were included in the plan of care effective 08/23/2023. Clinical Record 11: The chaplain assessment completed on 12/28/2023 identified the patient and family’s request for prayer/meditation and that continuing care was needed. The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address prayer and meditation were included in the plan of care effective 12/28/2023 or updated plan of care effective 01/10/2024. Clinical Record 14: The Medical Social Work (MSW) assessment completed on 04/11/2022 included documentation that stated in part “SW will refer as needed for funeral planning needs. MSW plan of care will follow 1-2 routine visits every month to assess for needs and to provide emotional support and prn visits to manage urgencies.” The clinical record lacked evidence that goals and interventions to address funeral planning and emotional support were included in the plan of care effective 04/20/2022. During a joint record review and interview on 03/13/2024, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed findings that clinical record 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, and clinical record 14 did not include evidence that reflected client and family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record contains at a minimum physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that physician orders were obtained to discontinue the Medical Social Worker frequency and for the visits not completed. Policy Medical Record Content dated 06/15/2020 stated in part “Each medical record will contain the following: Physician orders that include medications, dietary information, treatment, and activity orders.” Clinical Record 5: The plan of care order effective 06/16/2023 included orders for the Medical Social Worker (MSW) to visit one time per quarter. The clinical record lacked evidence that an MSW visit was completed in July, August, or September or that a physician order was obtained for the missed visit. Clinical Record 7: The plan of care order effective 08/24/2023 included orders for the Medical Social Worker (MSW) to visit one time per quarter. The clinical record lacked evidence that an MSW visit was completed in August, September, or October or that a physician order was obtained for the missed visit. Clinical Record 9: The plan of care order effective 08/07/2023 included orders for the Medical Social Worker (MSW) to visit one time per quarter. The clinical record lacked evidence that an MSW visit was completed in August, September, or October or that a physician order was obtained for the missed visit. During a joint record review and interview on 03/13/2024, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed findings that physician orders were not obtained for the missed MSW visits for clinical record 5 and clinical record 7.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 29, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Mar 15, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 20, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 71.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.3%
Visits near death71.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Rose Virginia Debond (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Don Ayesh Sondapperumaarachchi (corporate director, 0%); Don Ayesh Sondapperumaarachchi (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Josefa S Santiago (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Dona Avishka Sondapperumaarachchi (corporate director, 0%); Dona Avishka Sondapperumaarachchi (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 87.96% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 20.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 15 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75901, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.