Harbor Hospice of Livingston LP
A hospice in Livingston, Texas 77351
317 West Church St Ste 112, Livingston, Texas 77351. (936) 327-8010.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 37 hospices serving ZIP code 77351 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 29, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 29, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 159 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the plan of care was revised when the patient’s condition changed. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRHV#1, it was noted that the patient experienced a fall with injury during week #4, a fall with injury during week #6, and a fall without injury during week #7, during the 1st benefit period of hospice services. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#6, it was noted that during week 10 of the 1st benefit period, the patient experienced a fall with bruising at chin, and bilateral upper/lower extremities. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety and strategies to prevent injury. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 139 words
“Observed in Competency Session. During the competency session, it was noted that 2 of 2 Human Resource files for Hospice Aides did not document initial competency assessments as required. For example, a review of the competency assessments for Hospice Aide #1, and Hospice Aide #2 revealed the following tasks were documented as being assessed through a verbal examination: 1) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff; 2) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations; 3) Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; 4) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; 5) and Normal range of motion and positioning. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 153 words
“Observed in Competency Session. A review of 2 of 2 Human Resource files for Hospice Aides, revealed that competency assessment was not completed as required before the hospice aides provided patient care. For example, Since the initial competency assessment for Hospice Aide #1, and Hospice Aide #2 were completed using a verbal exam. The requirements for the following tasks to be observed with a patient or a pseudo patient were not implemented: 1) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff; 2) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations; 3) Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; 4) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; 5) and Normal range of motion and positioning. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 155 words
“Observed in Competency Session. A review of 2 of 2 Human Resource files for Hospice Aides, revealed that the organization’s policy to perform competency assessments annually was not implemented. For example, a review of the annual competency for Hospice Aide #1, and Hospice Aide #2 revealed that the following tasks were assessed through verbal examination. The requirements for the following tasks to be observed with a patient or a pseudo patient were not implemented: 1) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff; 2) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations; 3) Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; 4) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; 5) and Normal range of motion and positioning. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 individual tracers, for patients receiving Hospice Aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure Hospice Aide supervision was effective. For example, during the review of the medical record for RRHV#1, and RRHV#2, it was noted that a Hospice Aide supervision visit was not documented by the Registered Nurse every 14 days during the first benefit period. Example #2: During the review of the medical record for RRHV#3, it was noted that a Hospice Aide supervision visit was not documented by the Registered Nurse every 14 days during the 3rd benefit period. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Volunteer Program review the organization did not document effective recruitment for volunteers used in direct patient care services. Recruitment efforts resulted in one (1) administrative volunteer for 2024, and one (1) administrative volunteer for 2025. Efforts to recruit volunteers for direct patient care roles was not documented. This observation was reviewed with Volunteer Coordinator, and the Administrator.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Volunteer Program review the organization did not document effective efforts to achieve cost savings through the use of Volunteers. For example, volunteers did not provide at least 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. During the year of 2024, the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2025, the volunteer program achieved less than 3% cost savings through the use of volunteers. This observation was reviewed with the Volunteer Coordinator and the Administrator.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed for patients discharged or transferred from the organization, it was noted that the organization did not ensure information was provided to the receiving organization as required. For example, a review of the medical record for RRDC#1, revealed that the receiving organization was not provided with a copy of the hospice discharge summary and requested documents from the medical record. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharge records reviewed, it was noted that a discharge/transfer summary that included all required information was not completed. For example, a review of the medical records for RRDC#1, revealed no evidence that a discharge summary including the following information was documented: 1) A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, 2) The patient’s current plan of care, and 3) The patient’s latest physician orders. This observation was reviewed with Administrator.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 9 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 21, 2013.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 4% in assisted living, 33% in a nursing facility, 2% in an inpatient hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.2% |
| Visits near death | 92.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Feb 1, 2012.
- 6 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Bryan Gaspard (corporate officer, 0%); Bryan Gaspard (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Qamar U Arfeen (corporate officer, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arfeen Properties, L.P. | Owns 5% or more directly | 99% | Feb 1, 2012 |
| Hhcs Managers LLC | General partner | 1% | Feb 1, 2012 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 86.33% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 55% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 37 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77351, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 9.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| 1st Quality Hospice LLC | Not given |
| Harbor Hospice of Livingston LP This hospice | 9 |
| Gentiva | 5 |
| Hospice in the Pines | 18 |
| Gentiva | 27 |
| Hospice Compassus Houston | 1 |
| Reliant at Home | 8 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas | 2 |
| Altus Hospice | 10 |
| Oasis Hospice | Not given |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Lufkin LLC | 2 |
| Alamo Hospice of Conroe | 13 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.