Blue Stream Hospice and Palliative Care Inc.
A hospice in Houston, Texas 77054
2646 South Loop West Suite 635, Houston, Texas 77054. (713) 667-7202.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 39 hospices serving ZIP code 77054 had 5.5.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 25, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Feb 15, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
-
Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)
The inspectors’ words, 308 words
“It is required that a clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The clinical record must contain correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The clinical record may be maintained electronically. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by a review of clinical records and interviews which revealed the hospice: Failed to ensure the clinical record contained initial and updated plans of care {HSIM. 3. I/L672}; Failed to ensure that the clinical records included physician orders {HSIM. 3. I/L678; Failed to ensure the clinical patient record, its content, and the information it contains is safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use and that the hospice complies with state and federal law and regulation addressing privacy, including the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) {HSIM. 5. I/L680}; Failed to ensure patient clinical records must be retained for 6 years after the death or discharge of the patient unless State law stipulates a longer period of time {HSIM.1. D/L681}; Failed to ensure the clinical record, whether hard copy or in electronic form, must be made readily available on request by an appropriate authority {HSIM.6. I/L685}; and Failed to ensure patient has a right to have a confidential clinical record. Access to or release of patient information and clinical records is permitted in accordance with 45 CFR parts 160 and 164 {HPFC. 2. D/L516}. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the condition of participation CFR 418.104: Clinical Records. The deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients cared for by the agency.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 332 words
“It is required that the written Patient Bill of Rights includes the right to have a confidential record per state and federal law and regulation. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 5 of 11 (45%) clinical records reviewed that were discharged from the hospice agency revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patient’s clinical record remained confidential per state and federal law and regulation. Document 1: Policy “Patient Rights and Responsibilities” reviewed/revised 12/30/2023 stated in part “A patient has a right to confidential treatment of the patient’s personal and medical records.” Clinical Record 9: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 3/10/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review Clinical Record 10: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/6/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 11: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/8/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 12 The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/12/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 13: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/26/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. The Administrator confirmed the findings and disclosed in interview on 2/14/2024 that she does not know where the clinical records are located and believes that the previous administrator is in possession of the clinical records. She verbalized that she has tried to reach out to the previous administrator and has not received return communication.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 298 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including intervention to manage pain and symptoms. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and personnel record review. 1 of 8 (12%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patient’s individualized written plan of care reflected the patient and family goals and included interventions to manage pain. Document 1: Policy “Plan of Care” reviewed/revised 12/30/2023 stated in part “The written plan of care, with a focus on palliative care, will include the following: 1. Problems identified. 2. Patient and family goals. 3. Interventions to manage pain and symptoms.” Clinical Record 1/Home Visit 1: The registered nurse (RN) initial nursing assessment dated 2/5/2024 identified pain as an unmanaged problem. The initial plan of care dated 2/5/2024 did not include the identified problem of pain, patient and family goals for pain management, and interventions to manage pain. During the home visit with the RN (Personnel Record 7), the patient disclosed that pain had been an issue before coming to her present location and that she had reported the pain in her shoulder and rib area to the admission nurse. Home Visit 1: During home visit 1 on 2/14/2024, the patient (clinical record 1) disclosed that pain had been an issue before coming to Texas and that she reported her pain at admission to the admission nurse. She reported that the pain was in her shoulder and rib area. The Administrator confirmed findings in a joint record review and interview on 2/15/2024, that the plan of care created 2/5/2024 did not include goals and interventions for the pain as identified in the initial nursing assessment on 2/5/2024.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 250 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including intervention to manage pain and symptoms. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and personnel record review. In 1 of 8 (12%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patient’s individualized written plan of care reflected the patient and family goals and included interventions to manage pain. Document 1: Policy “Plan of Care” reviewed/revised 12/30/2023 stated in part “The written plan of care, with a focus on palliative care, will include the following: 1. Problems identified. 2. Patient and family goals. 3. Interventions to manage pain and symptoms.” Clinical Record 1/Home Visit 1: The registered nurse (RN) initial nursing assessment dated 2/5/2024 identified pain as an unmanaged problem. The initial plan of care dated 2/5/2024 did not include the identified problem of pain, patient and family goals for pain management, and interventions to manage pain. During the home visit with the RN (Personnel Record 7), the patient disclosed that pain had been an issue before coming to her present location and that she had reported the pain in her shoulder and rib area to the admission nurse. During the joint record review and interview with the Administrator on 2/15/2024, the Administrator confirmed the findings that the plan of care did not include goals and interventions for the pain as identified in the initial nursing assessment.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 191 words
“It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 1 of 8 (12%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the clinical record included physician orders for service provided. Document 1: Policy “Clinical Record” reviewed/revised 12/30/23 stated in part “The clinical record will include: physician orders.” Clinical Record 2: The clinical record included documentation of completed nursing visits 11/14/2023, 11/15/2023, 11/29/2023, 12/8/2023, 12/21/2023, 12/29/2023, 1/2/2024, 1/9/2024, 1/20/2024, and 1/25/2024; and completed social worker visits 11/17/2023, 12/15/2023 and 1/8/2024. The clinical record did not contain evidence that physician orders were obtained for nursing and social work services provided. The administrator confirmed findings in joint record review and interview on 2/15/2024, that the clinical record did not contain physician orders for the nursing and social work services provided.”
-
Protection of information (42 CFR 418.104(c))
The inspectors’ words, 436 words
“It is required that the clinical patient record, its content, and the information it contains is safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use and that the hospice complies with state and federal law and regulation addressing privacy, including the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH). This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 5 of 11 (45%) clinical records reviewed that were discharged from the hospice agency revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patient’s clinical record was safeguarded against loss and that the agency complied with state and federal law and regulation addressing privacy, including the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH). Document 1: Policy “IM.5 Medical Record Information Confidentiality” reviewed 12/30/2023 stated in part “Agency will ensure that all patient identifiable information in the clinical record remain confidential and will be secured and controlled whether in hard copy, electronic format or a combination of both in compliance with the Privacy Rule of the Administrative Simplification provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).” Clinical Record 9: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 3/10/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review 2/15/2024. Clinical Record 10: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/6/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 11: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/8/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 12 The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/12/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 13: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/26/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. The Administrator confirmed the findings and disclosed in interview on 2/14/2024 that she does not know where the clinical records are located and believes that the previous administrator is in possession of the clinical records. She verbalized that she has tried to reach out to the previous administrator and has not received return communication.”
-
Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))
The inspectors’ words, 379 words
“It is required that information management policies and procedures (P&P) address how the hospice documents, collects, retrieves, protects, shares, and retains information in accordance with state and federal law and regulation and that patient clinical records are retained for six (6) years after the death or discharge of the patient unless state law stipulates a longer time period. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 5 of 11 (45%) clinical records reviewed that were discharged from the hospice agency revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patient’s clinical record was retained for six years in accordance with state and federal law and regulation or ten years per agency policy. Document 1: Policy “Clinical Record” reviewed/revised 1/31/15 stated in part “The hospice will ensure patient clinical records are retained for 10 years after the death or discharge of the patient.” Clinical Record 9: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 3/10/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 10: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/6/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 11: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/8/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 12 The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/12/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 13: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/26/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. The Administrator confirmed the findings and disclosed in interview on 2/14/2024 that she does not know where the clinical records are located and believes that the previous administrator is in possession of the clinical records. She verbalized that she has tried to reach out to the previous administrator and has not received return communication.”
-
Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))
The inspectors’ words, 342 words
“It is required that the patient clinical record, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, is made readily available on request by an appropriate authority. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 5 of 11 (45%) clinical records reviewed that were discharged from the hospice agency revealed that the agency did not ensure that the clinical record was readily available for review as requested by an appropriate authority. Document 1: Policy “Clinical Record” reviewed/revised 10/13/2022 states in part “The hospice will ensure the clinical record, whether hard copy or in electronic form, will be made readily available upon request by an appropriate authority.” Clinical Record 9: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 3/10/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review Clinical Record 10: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/6/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 11: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/8/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 12 The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/12/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. Clinical Record 13: The patient’s election of hospice benefit was 4/26/2021. Date of discharge unknown. Reason for discharge unknown. Clinical record not on site at agency. Agency unable to retrieve records through date of review. The Administrator confirmed the findings and disclosed in interview on 2/14/2024 that she does not know where the clinical records are located and believes that the previous administrator is in possession of the clinical records. She verbalized that she has tried to reach out to the previous administrator and has not received return communication.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 15, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 14, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Kudy Adelakun (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Shakky Akinruli (managing employee (on the payroll)); Clyde Mcmorris (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Kudy Adelakun (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 39 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77054, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Ipr Healthcare System Inc. | 15 |
| Rth Home Care Service | 22 |
| Community First Hospice Care of Houston | 0 |
| Blue Stream Hospice and Palliative Care Inc. This hospice | 8 |
| Suncrest Hospice Care LLC | 0 |
| Life Wave Hospice Care LLC | 2 |
| Houston Hospice | 4 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas L P | 4 |
| Hospice Compassus - the Woodlands | 3 |
| Three Oaks Hospice | 11 |
| HCA Houston Hospice & Family Care | 12 |
| Vantage Hospice | 6 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.