Hearth Record

Ipr Healthcare System Inc.

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77054

8830 Interchange Drive, Houston, Texas 77054. (713) 592-6776.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 39 hospices serving ZIP code 77054 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 19, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 7, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission15 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Upon review of all tracer activities, it was noted that there was a pattern of staff failing to follow established organization policy and the governing body/leadership did not ensure that the Conditions of Participation for 418.100, and 418.56, were met per policy as determined through observations, documentation, and staff interviews.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of HosRRNHV#5 the patient was diabetic with orders for Insulin and two oral hypoglycemics, yet there was no documentation of an endocrine system review on admission or elsewhere in the record. In HosRRNHV#10 the initial nursing assessment documentation noted there was a wound, however there was no wound assessment noted in the documentation. These observations were reviewed with the ADON.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to update the comprehensive assessment. On review of HosRRHV#2 the IDG meeting failed to update the comprehensive assessment. In the documentation for the most recent IDG meeting there was no mention that the patient had a foley catheter added since last IDG meeting. The IDG documentation stated no lines, tubes, or devices in place yet a foley catheter had been placed since the last IDG. In review of HosRRNHV#6 the patient had a change in level of care as they went respite, yet the changes were not discussed in the update to the comprehensive assessment during the IDG meeting. These observations were reviewed with the DON and ADON.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 325 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In HosRRHV#1 the documentation and conversation with the patient’s husband noted that anxiety/agitation was an ongoing issue for the patient. There was documentation of the use of ABH cream and increase in the Haldol dosage yet no care plan related to the anxiety/agitation open to guide the care. In HosRRHV#2 the documentation noted the patient had a seizure that required a PRN visit and use of Lorazepam yet there were no seizure precautions noted on the plan of care nor was seizure risk addressed on the care plan. In HosRRHV#3 there was documentation of swelling in the patient’s neck prompting a PRN visit and ongoing monitoring yet there was no care plan opened to address the issue. In HosRRNHV#5 the patient was diabetic with insulin and multiple oral hypoglycemics, yet the issue was not addressed in the care plan. In HosRRNHV#6 the patient had a change in level of care to respite and back for caregiver relief, but the changes were not reflected in the plan of care. Further, the documentation noted poor appetite with increased protein needs but no care plan to guide the care. In HosRRNHV#7 the documentation noted issues with anxiety utilizing ABH cream and Haldol, and issues with pain requiring Fentanyl but no care plans to address the issues. The patient had multiple UTI’s with antibiotic orders yet the care plan for urinary was not updated to reflect the changes. In HosRRNHV#8 the patient had an ear infection and increased agitation requiring changes in Seroquel dosage, yet the issues were not reflected in the care plans. In HosRRNHV#10 the patient’s terminal diagnosis was End Stage Heart Disease yet there was no cardiovascular care plan to guide the care. These observations were reviewed with the ADON.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of HosRRHV#3 the patient’s wife noted they were using Thickener to honey consistency related to swallowing difficulties yet there were no orders for the thickener noted on the plan of care. There were two orders for Carafate, one liquid and one tablets yet there were no specific instructions to guide the user when to use each one. In HosRRHV#1 there were range orders for Morphine Concentrate and Lorazepam yet no specific instructions to guide the user in when to use what dosage. Such as Morphine Concentrate 100mg/5ml give 0.25ml - 1ml Q1H as needed for pain and shortness of breath, and Lorazepam 0.5 mg give 1-2 tabs as needed for anxiety/shortness of breath. Range orders for Morphine and/or Lorazepam could be seen in all records reviewed as the orders were part of the comfort kit orders. In HosRRNHV#5 the documentation noted skin tears with treatment provided yet no wound care orders noted on the plan of care. In HosRRNHV#9 there were multiple orders for PRN anxiety medication two for Lorazepam and one for Alprazolam yet no specific instructions to guide the user as to which one to choose for what situations. These observations were reviewed with the ADON.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure plan of care revisions were based on information from updates to the patient’s comprehensive assessment and address the patient’s progress toward goals and outcomes. On review of HosRRNHV#4 there were goals that had not been updated based on the comprehensive assessment. The goals had target dates that were past without update, such as: Patient will report a decrease in pain score from 5/10 to 1/10 on a numerical rating scale by (date in Feb). Examples of goals without update past the achieve by/target dates that were: In HosRRNHV#6 Patient will rate the pain scale lower than the initial rate at a level that is acceptable to them or 0/10 by (date in April). In HosRRNHV#7 an example was Patient will achieve a normal elimination pattern free from frequency and urgency by ( date in June of 2025). In HosRRNHV#8 an example was Patient will report averaging 7-9 hours of restful sleep per night by (date January). Further examples could be seen in HosRRHV#3, and HosRRNHV#9. These observations were reviewed with the ADON.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the care and services were provided in accordance with the plan of care. On review of HosRRNHV#7 the Spiritual Counselor (SC) was order a frequency of 1 x month but there were no documented visits in July, October, or November, nor any documentation as to why the visits were not made. In HosRRNHV#8 the SC was also ordered 1 x month but there were no documented visits in January, February or March. In HosRRHV#3 the SC was also ordered 1 x month yet visits were not documented monthly as early documentation noted services were declined but the frequency remained active on the plan of care. These observations were reviewed with the ADON.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement records, the organization failed to develop a bereavement plan of care that noted the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. On discussion with the bereavement coordinators and review of HosRRBR#1 and HosRRBR#2 it was noted that there was no written bereavement plan of care to indicate the services to be delivered and frequency of delivery documented on the record. This observation was reviewed with the Bereavement Coordinators, and the DON.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 9 patient records reviewed, where hospice aide services were provided, the organization failed to ensure written patient care instructions for the hospice aide were prepared by the registered nurse. On review of HosRRHV#2 the patient had a foley catheter, yet the catheter was not noted on the aide assignment nor was foley care assigned as a task for the aide. In HosRRNHV#9 there was documentation the patient had a wound with wound treatment. There was no instructions for the aide on how to handle the wound while providing care. This observation was reviewed with the DON and ADON.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to supervise the aide effectively. On review of HosRRNHV#4 the aide was seeing the patient weekly starting in February. The 1st aide supervisory was in March, after the required 14 days, on day 16. There was no further documentation of an aide supervisory visit since the March visit to date of survey. This observation was reviewed with the ADON.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for hospice aide, the organization failed to document annual on-site visits to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while preforming care. In HR#2 for the hospice aide there was only documentation of a visit in 2023 and 2026. This observation was reviewed with the HR Coordinator.”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. on review of the volunteer program it was noted the organization failed to provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care in an amount that equals 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The hospice volunteer time documented was consistently less than 5% of the total patient care hours. Volunteer time was 1.9% for 2024 and 0.9% for 2025. This observation was reviewed with the Volunteer Coordinator, DON and ADON.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain all information to reflect the patient’s care, treatment, and services. On home observation of medication reconciliation the medication profile as part of the medical record did not match the medications noted in the home. In HosRRHV#2 there was an order for oxygen yet the patient’s wife stated they did not have oxygen in the home. Mirtazapine was ordered and the patient had not been taking for a while and Dexamethasone had been stopped per the wife a week or two ago. Further, the wife noted she had been giving Ibuprofen yet Tylenol was ordered. She stated she did not have Tylenol in the home. In HosRRHV#3 the medications scopolamine, Claritin, Flonase, Ammonium Lactate lotion, Magic Mouthwash and Lorazepam were ordered in the record yet the caregiver noted the patient was not taking the medications and they were not in the home. There was Cetirizine liquid in the home the patient was using for allergy symptoms but not included in the ordered medications. These observations were reviewed with the RN and ADON.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure a copy of the discharge summary was provided to the receiving facility when the patient is transferred to another Medicare/Medicaid certified facility. On review of HosRRDC#1 the patient was transferred to the hospital seeking aggressive treatment yet there was no documentation the transfer summary was sent to the receiving facility. This observation was reviewed with the DON and ADON.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide the patient’s attending physician with a copy of the hospice discharge summary when a patient revoked or was discharged from hospice care. On review of HosRRDC#1, HosRRDC#2 there was no documentation the attending physician was provided with a copy of the discharge summary. This observation was reviewed with the DON and ADON.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 19, 2026Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
May 7, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission15 deficiencies cited
Apr 22, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 14, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 28.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day28.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.1%
Visits near death90.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 11 owners or officers are people: Pablito Caluscos (owns 5% or more directly, 70%); Oscar Buhay (owns 5% or more directly, 25.71%); Wendy Shafer (owns 5% or more directly, 4.29%); Wendy Shafer (managing employee (on the payroll), 4.29%); Pablito Caluscos (corporate officer); Pablito Caluscos (corporate director); Pablito Caluscos (managing employee (on the payroll)); Carla Denise Mayfield (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Oscar Buhay (corporate officer); Oscar Buhay (corporate director); Oscar Buhay (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 34.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 39 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77054, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.