Hearth Record

Vantage Hospice

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77057

5718 Westheimer Rd, Ste 1650, Houston, Texas 77057. (281) 579-5660.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 62 hospices serving ZIP code 77057 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 29, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 29, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “It is required that the individualized plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments, measurable goals and outcomes. In 1 of 23 clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the plan of care included all the required elements. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s election of benefit (EOB) was 03/17/2025 with a diagnosis of Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/17/2025 stated that the patient has a 16 French Foley catheter. The plan of care dated 03/17/2025-06/14/2025 did not include the interventions for the foley catheter care or measurable outcomes for the foley catheter. During a joint review of the clinical record with the Administrator (Personnel Record 7) and Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 8) on 08/28/2025, they stated they do not know why the plan of care was not updated, but they would provide additional education to all staff.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “It is required that the individualized plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments, measurable goals and outcomes. In 1 of 23 clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the plan of care included all the required elements. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s election of benefit (EOB) was 03/17/2025 with a diagnosis of Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/17/2025 stated that the patient has a 16 French Foley catheter. The plan of care dated 03/17/2025-06/14/2025 did not include the interventions for the foley catheter care or measurable outcomes for the foley catheter. During a joint review of the clinical record with the Administrator (Personnel Record 7) and Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 8) on 08/28/2025, they stated they do not know why the plan of care was not updated, but they would provide additional education to all staff.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “It is required that the individualized plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments, measurable goals and outcomes. In 1 of 23 clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the plan of care included all the required elements. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s election of benefit (EOB) was 03/17/2025 with a diagnosis of Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/17/2025 stated that the patient has a 16 French Foley catheter. The plan of care dated 03/17/2025-06/14/2025 did not include the interventions for the foley catheter care or measurable outcomes for the foley catheter. During a joint review of the clinical record with the Administrator (Personnel Record 7) and Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 8) on 08/28/2025, they stated they do not know why the plan of care was not updated, but they would provide additional education to all staff.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 215 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are supervised by a registered nurse who makes an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s need. The hospice aide does not need to be present. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 20 (5%) clinical record review of patients that elected hospice services revealed the agency did not ensure that a registered nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home to supervise the hospice aide was made no less frequently than every 14 days. CLINICAL RECORD 17: The clinical record review lacked evidence of and aide supervisory visit every 14 days in the benefit period 08/12/2025 to 10/10/2025. An aide supervisory visit was done on 08/14/2025 then 08/29/2025 (15 days). During a joint review of the clinical record with the Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 8) and the Administrator (Personnel Record 7) on 08/29/2025, they stated that the visit was changed due to the patient’s request. Also, stated that they are looking at updating the process so that this does not happen in the future.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum the initial plan of care, updated plans of care, initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, updated comprehensive assessments, and clinical notes including the care and services provided. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 23 (9%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure to update the plan of care with changes in the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient’s election of benefit (EOB) was 01/27/2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. On 08/19/2025, the nurse documented that the daughter was concerned about the patient’s possible skin cancer. On 08/27/2025, the nurse documented that the patient had undergone a skin biopsy to the scalp 3 days prior, however, the plan of care was not updated with changes. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s election of benefit (EOB) was 03/17/2025 with a diagnosis of Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/17/2025 stated that the patient has a 16 French Foley catheter. The plan of care dated 03/17/2025-06/14/2025 did not include the foley catheter. During a joint review of the clinical record with the Administrator (Personnel Record 7) and Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 8) on 08/28/2025, they stated they do not know why the plan of care was not updated, but they would provide additional education to all staff.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 220 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a member of each Interdisciplinary Group who is responsible for a patient/resident in a SNF/NF or ICF/IID. The designated IDG member provides overall coordination of care of the patient/resident, working with the facility representative staff. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 21 (5%) clinical record review of patients in a facility revealed that the agency did not ensure there was coordination of care with the facility staff. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient’s election of the hospice benefit (EOB) was dated 06/04/2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). There was no documented evidence as to the delineation of which agency (hospice or SNF) was to provide the wound care. There was a coordination of care form, however the wound care orders were not included and who was to perform the wound care was missing. During a joint review of the clinical record with the Administrator (Personnel Record 7) and Director of Nurses (Personnel Record 8) on 08/28/2025, they stated that coordination of care is not present in the clinical record. They are aware of coordination with the hospice staff. They will be providing additional education to the clinical staff on documenting coordination with the facility.”

    Rule L0778. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 29, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 19, 2011.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 44% at home, 12% in assisted living, 43% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death93.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Vch Management LLC owns 31.4% directly since Oct 1, 2011; Exceptional Management, LLC owns 12.64% directly since May 1, 2013.
  • Vch Management LLC runs it.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Scott W Breeze (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.94%); Paul Stamatis (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.94%); Juliet S Breeze (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.94%); Brenda L Wainscott (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.94%); Paul Stamatis (corporate officer); Paul Stamatis (corporate director); Paul Stamatis (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Juliet S Breeze (corporate director); Juliet S Breeze (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Aneta Nicole Knight (managing employee (on the payroll)); Theodore J Trumble (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Vch Management LLCOwns 5% or more directly31.4%Oct 1, 2011
Breeze Family Revocable TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies19.88%Dec 31, 2020
Paul and Brenda Stamatis Revocable TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies19.88%Dec 31, 2022
Exceptional Management, LLCOwns 5% or more directly12.64%May 1, 2013
Vch Management LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Oct 1, 2011

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 43.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 62 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77057, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.