Angels Care Hospice
A hospice in San Angelo, Texas 76904
2412 College Hills Blvd, Ste 211, San Angelo, Texas 76904. (325) 627-5663.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 76904 had 2.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 20, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 20, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 263 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable Texas state law §558.283 Advance Directives: For a patient who is incompetent/incapacitated, was the written notice provided to the correct person as noted in the TX regulation? If the patient is incompetent/incapacitated, Texas order of who may sign is as follows (also in drop down): (1) the client’s legal guardian; (2) a person responsible for the health care decisions of the client; (3) the client’s spouse; (4) the client’s adult child; (5) the client’s parent; or (6) the person admitting the client. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 180 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 194 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that if a state court has not adjudged a patient incompetent, any legal representative designated by the patient in accordance with state law may exercise the patient’s rights to the extent allowed by state law. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 171 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 168 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 172 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))
The inspectors’ words, 180 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #1 LVN visit 12/04 documents a new skin issue “erythema Right inner buttocks, advised family to apply barrier cream BID , use gel cushion, and change position every 2 hours”. Discussed in IDG 12/09. No updates to plan of care to reflect this concern/ problem.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1 LVN visit 12/04 documents a new skin issue “erythema Right inner buttocks, advised family to apply barrier cream BID , use gel cushion, and change position every 2 hours”. There is no evidence of an order for barrier cream.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 186 words
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #12 resides in a “Group Home”. Documentation by the hospice MSW states, patient has no family, no MPOA, and is not verbal majority of time. MSW also notes that the hospitalization just prior to admission reported the patient only spoke one time during stay, speaking in Spanish, “feed me”. The SN comprehensive assessment notes mental status as, “Disoriented, minimally responsive, confused, abnormal cognitive function”. The Election Statement and all consents for Hospice were signed by a Nurse case manager at the group home. Further more, this patient was listed as a “Revocation”, however; no evidence of a Revocation form found in record. Also the “discharge note” states, “Revoked per MD order”. There is an order from the Hospice MD to “discharge patient”. The coordination note indicates that the MSW contacted APS “for concerns of lack of care, and Group Home making decisions without legal Guardianship”.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 201 words
“Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #13,14) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 13, 14 were Live Discharges as a result of agency issue with CMS Geographical service area. The agency gave patients/ families the choice of being re-admitted to their agency in another area or establishing care with a different hospice. The records do not reflect the information and actions as follows: “The patient record must reflect discharge planning activities, coordination with other care providers, the patient’s response and understanding to these activities, patient care instructions and a reasonable notice prior to discharge, whenever possible. The written discharge summary includes: The date and reason for discharge (these records state reason as “MOVED OUT OF SERVICE AREA” these patients did not move). Any instructions or referral information given to the patient or family (no documentation of discussion with patients or family). Discharge orders, instructions, (no d/c order or instructions found), if discharge is other than patient death, A brief description of services provided and ongoing needs that cannot be met (no documentation of this found). A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management (no documentation of this found).”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 11 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 7, 2019.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 8.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 8% |
| Visits near death | 94.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Acsk Hospice Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 26, 2021.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Michael Heath Beaty (corporate officer); Charity Cooper (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer Price (managing employee (on the payroll)); Angela W Eddins (corporate officer); Angela W Eddins (corporate director); Mark A Eddins (corporate officer); Mark A Eddins (corporate director); Peter P Chang (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Cindy M Godfrey (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acsk Hospice Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Feb 26, 2021 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76904, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 11.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Hospice of San Angelo | 5 |
| Angels Care Hospice This hospice | 11 |
| Gentiva | 1 |
| Concho Hearts Hospice, LLC | 17 |
| Hospice of East Texas | 1 |
| Hendrick Hospice Care Inc. | 9 |
| Hospice Brazos Valley Inc. | 0 |
| Angels Care Hospice | 1 |
| Solaris Hospice Inc. | 5 |
| Bsa Hospice of the Southwest | 0 |
| Excelacare Hospice | 1 |
| Hospice of Ballinger | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.